I am working on an API in .NET core 2.
Everything works great when testing on https://localhost:44333, but when trying on http://localhost:44333 it does not work anymore. It just loads, and loads, and loads.... Nothing to see in the logs or anything like that.
The thing is, I need to get it working on HTTP because I want to try it on my phone in the app. So I use iisexpress-proxy to proxy it. This works when I can access the API on HTTP, but it doesn't work with HTTPS.
So therefor I need it to work with HTTP, but I have no idea why it does not work on HTTP. All my previous projects worked fine on HTTP and for some reason this one does not. I have looked in my startup if it might be forced or something like that, but I cannot find any...
You probably need more information than this, but I don't know what you need, so If you ask in the comments I will provide some more information/logs/code you name it.
The http version will be served on a different port. You'll need to look at your project properties to see which port it's being served on.
Just as some background:
There's effectively a client-side and server-side component to SSL. The http or https is the client-side component. That means the browser or other web client will either try to negotiate a secure socket or not, respectively. The server-side component is the port binding, which will either be a secure socket or not.
The forever-loading is because your client is trying to make a non-secure request, but the server's socket is attempting to negotiate SSL. It's like one person speaking Chinese and the other speaking Spanish. They're both communicating, but nothing gets accomplished.
We will be connecting to a web service over https. This will be triggered in the background if a user performs a certain action.
The link will be between the server and the web-service though - the user will not be aware of it.
As there is no user there to see the certificate come up with an error - because this is server to server - how can we mitigate a man in the middle attack between the two servers? What would happen in the code if one were tried and the certificate failed?
We are using ASP.NET.
Its up to you - you can specify your own validation behavior via
ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback
Reference: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.servicepointmanager.servercertificatevalidationcallback(v=vs.110).aspx
Default implementation is very reasonable - throw an exception when validation fails.
If you are using a well-written HTTP client library to consume your web service, the calls will fail if the certificate validation fails. Correct http client library will do full validation including making sure that hostname it connects to matches the subject name of the certificate, that CA is correct etc. I would hope that .NET's implementation is correct in that regard, but you should definitely test and validate that default behavior is correct.
I am creating a REST API in Go, and I want to build URLs to other resources in my replies.
Based on the http.Response I can get the Host and URL.
However, how would I go about getting the transport scheme used by the server? http or https?
I attemped to check if server.TLSConfig is nil and then assuming it is using http since it says this in the documentation for http.Server:
TLSConfig *tls.Config // optional TLS config, used by ListenAndServeTLS
But it turns out this exists even when I do not run the server with ListenAndServeTLS.
Or is this way of building my URLs the wrong way of doing things? Is there some other normal way of doing this?
My preferred solution when running http and https is just to run a simple listener on :80 that redirects all traffic to https. Then any real traffic can be assumed to be https.
Alternately I believe you can access a request's URL at req.URL.Scheme to see the protocol.
Or do you mean for the entire application? If you accept configuration to switch between http and https, then can't you look at that and see which they chose? I guess I'm missing some context maybe.
It is also common practice for apps to take a baseURL via flag or config to generate external urls with.
I have a website "www.website.com".
Recently I found out that somebody has set up a reverse proxy with an almost identical url "www.website1.com" in front of my website.
I'm concerned of those users who came to my website through that reverse proxy. Their username and passwords might be logged when they login.
Is there a way for me to have my web server refuse reverse proxy?
For example, I've set up a reverse proxy using squid with the url "www.fakestackoverflow.com" in front of "www.stackoverflow.com". So whenever I type "www.fakestackoverflow.com" in my web browser address bar, I'll be redirected to "www.stackoverflow.com" by the reverse proxy. Then I notice the url in my address bar changed to "www.stackoverflow.com" indicating that I'm no longer going through the reverse proxy.
"www.stackoverflow.com" must've detected that I came to the website from another url and then redirected me to the website through the actual url.
How do I do something like that in ASP.NET web application?
Also asked on server fault.
First, use JavaScript to sniff document.location.href and match it against your domain:
var MyHostName = "www.mydomain.com";
if (0 == document.location.href.indexOf("https://"))
{
MyHostName = "https://" + MyHostName + "/";
if (0 != document.location.href.indexOf(MyHostName)) {
var new_location = document.location.href.replace(/https:\/\/[^\/]+\//, MyHostName);
if(new_location != document.location.href)
document.location.replace(new_location);
}
}
else
{
MyHostName = "http://" + MyHostName + "/";
if (0 != document.location.href.indexOf(MyHostName)) {
var new_location = document.location.href.replace(/http:\/\/[^\/]+\//, MyHostName);
if(new_location != document.location.href)
document.location.replace(new_location);
}
}
Second: write a init script to all your ASP pages to check if the remote user IP address matches the address of the reverse proxy. If it matches, redirect to a tinyurl link which redirects back to your real domain. Use tinyurl or other redirection service to counter reverse proxy's url rewriting.
Third: write a scheduled task to do a DNS lookup on the fake domain, and update a configuration file which your init script in step 2 uses. Note: Do not do a DNS lookup in your ASP because DNS lookups can stall for 5 seconds. This opens a door for DOS against your site. Also, don't block solely based on IP address because it's easy to relocate.
Edit: If you're considered of the proxy operator stealing user passwords and usernames, you should log all users who are served to the proxy's IP address, and disable their accounts. Then send email to them explaining that they have been victims of a phishing attack via a misspelled domain name, and request them to change their passwords.
After days of searching and experimenting, I think I've found an explanation to my question. In my question, I used stackoverflow.com as an example but now I'm going to use whatismyipaddress.com as my example since both exhibit the same behaviour in the sense of url rewriting plus whatismyipaddress.com is able to tell my ip address.
First, in order to reproduce the behaviour, I visited whatismyipaddress.com and got my ip address, say 111.111.111.111. Then I visited www.whatismyipaddress.com (note the additional www. as its prefix) and the url in my browser's address bar changed back to whatismyipaddress.com discarding the prefix. After reading comments from Josh Stodola, it strucked me to prove this point.
Next, I set up a reverse proxy with the url www.myreverseproxy.com and ip address 222.222.222.222 and I have it performed the two scenarios below:
I have the reverse proxy points to whatismyipaddress.com (without the prefix **www.). Then typed www.myreverseproxy.com in my browser's address bar. The reverse proxy then relayed me to whatismyipaddress.com and the url in my address bar didn't change (still showing www.myreverseproxy.com). I further confirmed this by checking the ip address on the webpage which showed 222.222.222.222 (which is the ip address of the reverse proxy). This means that I'm still viewing the webpage through the reverse proxy and not directly connected to whatismyipaddress.com.
Then I have the reverse proxy points to www.whatismyipaddress.com (with the prefix wwww. this time). I visited www.myreverseproxy.com and this time the url in my address bar changed from www.myreverseproxy.com to whatismyipaddress.com. The webpage showed my ip address as 111.111.111.111 (which is the real ip address of my pc). This means that I'm no longer viewing the webpage through the reverse proxy and redirected straight to whatismyipaddress.com.
I think this is some kind of url rewriting trick which Josh Stodola has pointed out. I think I'm gonna read more on this. As to how to protect a server from reverse proxy, the best bet is to use SSL. Encrypted information passing through a proxy will be of no use since it can't be read in plain sight thus preventing eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attack which what reverse proxy exactly is.
Safeguarding with javascript though can be seen trivial since javascript can be stripped off easily by a reverse proxy and also prevent other online services like google translate from accessing your website.
If you were to do Authentication over SSL using https://, you can bypass the proxy in most cases.
You can also look for the X-Forwarded-For header in the incoming request and match it against the suspicious proxy.
As I see it, your fundamental issue here is that whatever application layer defence measures you put in place to mitigate this attack can be worked around by the attacker, assuming this really is a malicious attack made by a competent adversary.
In my view, you should definitely be using HTTPS, which in principle would allow the user to confirm for sure whether they're talking to the right server, but this relies on the user knowing to check for this. Some browsers these days display extra information in the URL bar about which legal entity owns the SSL certificate, which would help, as it's unlikely an attacker would be able to persuade a legitimate certificate authority to issue a certificate in your name.
Some of the other comments here said that HTTPS can be intercepted by intermediate proxy servers, which is not actually true. With HTTPS, the client issues a CONNECT request to the proxy server, which tunnels all future traffic direct to the origin server, without being able to read any of it. If we assume that this proxy server is entirely bespoke and malicious, then it can terminate the SSL session and intercept the traffic, but it can only do that with its own SSL certificate, not with yours. This certificate will either be self signed (in which case clients will get lots of warning messages) or a genuine certificate issued by a certificate authority, in which case it'll have the wrong legal entity name, and you should be able to go back to the certificate authority, have the cert revoked and potentially ask the police to take action against the owner of the certificate, if you have reasonable suspicion that they are phishing.
The other thing I can think of which would mitigate this threat to some extent would be to implement one-time password functionality, either using a hardware/software token or using (my personal favorite) an SMS sent to the user's phone when they log in. This wouldn't prevent the attacker getting access to the session once, but should prevent them being able to log in in future. You could further protect the users by requiring another one time password before allowing them to see/edit particularly sensitive details.
There's very little you can do to prevent this without causing legitimate proxies (translation, google cache, etc..) from failing. If you don't care if people use such services, then simply set your web app to always redirect if the base url is not correct.
There are some steps you can take if you are aware of the proxies, and can find out their IP addresses, but that can change and you would have to stay on top of it. #jmz's answer is quite good in that regard.
I have come with an idea, and I think a solution.
First of all you do not need all page to be overwrite because this way you block other proxies, and other services (like google automatic translate).
So let say that you won to be absolute sure about the login page.
So what you do, when a user gets on login.aspx page you make a redirect with the full path of your site again to login.aspx.
if(Not all ready redirect on header / or on parametres from url)
Responce.Redirect("https://www.mysite.com/login.aspx");
This way I do not think that transparent proxy can change the get header and change it.
Also you can log any proxy, and or big requests from some ips and check it. When you found a Fishing site like the one you say you can also report it.
http://www.antiphishing.org/report_phishing.html
https://submit.symantec.com/antifraud/phish.cgi
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Maybe create a black-list of URLs and compare requests with Response.Referer if the website is on that list then kill the request or do a redirection of your own.
The black-list is obviously something you would have to manually update.
Ok i have went throu a similar situation but i managed to overcome it by using another forwarded domain that points to my original perminantly , then checking with code if the client is the reverse server or not if it it i would redirect them to my second domain which will go to the original
Check out more info from here: http://alphablog.xyz/your-website-is-being-mirrored-by-someone-else-without-your-knowledge/
The simplest way would probably be to put some Javascript code on your page that examines window.location to see if the top level domain (TLD) matches what you expect, and if not, replaces it with your correct domain (causing the browser to reload to the proper site instead).
I'm wondering if there is a way to ensure that an ASP.NET application can only be run using the HTTPS protocol
I'm fine with any code (defensive programming measure perhaps?) that can do the trick, or possibly some IIS/web server setting that can get the job done.
IIS will definitely allow you to require HTTPS. The instructions are here.
Edit: I had to go dig for it, but there's also Request.IsSecureConnection for defensive programming.
The only problem with enforcing the SSL on the IIS level is that the user receives an ugly 403.4 page error
"The page must be viewed over a secure channel"
To make the transition seamless, you could redirect the user to the secure site using the Request.IsSecureConnection if they do not generate the request over SSL.
There is a nice article that has some good information and a helper utility class on this subject over at leastprivilege.com