Create Dapper Repository Method for Complex Data - asp.net

I want to create a generic repository method for the complex data(Data Result of multiple joins in database). Following are the classes which hold the data . The data comes from SQL is the join of three tables(Tables architecture is same as of class)
public class InterfaceHeaderSetting
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string CodaDocCode { get; set; }
public string Company { get; set; }
public string Currency { get; set; }
public string DocDescription { get; set; }
public Screen Screen { get; set; }
public Interface Interface { get; set; }
}
public class Screen
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class Interface
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
I have the repository methods like
public IEnumerable<T> GetAllDynamic(string sql)
{
return Connection.Query<T>(sql, commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure).ToList();
}
public T Update(T entity, string sql, object dynamicParameters)
{
return
Connection.Query<T>(sql, dynamicParameters, commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure).SingleOrDefault();
}
I want one more repository method by which I can fill the objects like InterfaceHeaderSetting object.

I don't think you should reinvent the wheel. For this type of function i think Entity Framework is the solution.
In my projects i let entity framework handle more advanced querys that need joins and let dapper do the simple insert, update and select jobs.

Related

EF Core one-to-many relationship with multiple contexts (databases)

I have contexts with entities like this:
public class CompanyContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<StoreModel> Stores { get; set; }
// Other entities
}
public class DepartmentContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<OrderModel> Orders { get; set; }
// Other entities
}
public class StoreModel
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<OrderModel> ReceivedOrders { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<OrderModel> PreparedOrders { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<OrderModel> IssuedOrders { get; set; }
}
public class OrderModel
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Details { get; set; }
public StoreModel GettingStore { get; set; }
public StoreModel PreparingStore { get; set; }
public StoreModel IssuanceStore { get; set; }
}
For example a user makes an order in storeA, but wants to receive it in storeC, and it order will preparing in storeB. And I needs a statiscics about store received/prepared/issued orders.
When I try to create a migrations, EF throws exceptions "Unable to determine the relationship represented by navigation 'OrderModel.GettingStore' of type 'StoreModel'" and "Unable to determine the relationship represented by navigation 'StoreModel.IssuedOrders' of type 'ICollection<OrderModel>'". If I understand correctly, this happens because entities are defined in different contexts.
Now I just use next model:
public class OrderModel
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Details { get; set; }
public Guid GettingStoreId { get; set; }
public Guid PreparingStoreId { get; set; }
public Guid IssuanceStoreId { get; set; }
}
This works fine, but perhaps there are options that allow to create such a structure using navigation properties, with correct relationships between these entities from different contexts(databases).
First, the map of a different database was not placed in tables of different application formats, so think that you have a domain that should be well defined in your application, that way you would have the mapping of your application like this:
public class DomainNameContext: DbContext
{
public DomainNameContext(): base()
{
}
public DbSet<StoreModel> Stores { get; set; }
public DbSet<OrderModel> Orders { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
// config mapping methods
}
}
another thing, the relation you are using doesn't work so you can't have a repetition of Orders within the same class because this is not one -> many, this statement means that a StoreModel line can have many lines in the OrderModel this way would be like this
public class OrderModel
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Details { get; set; }
public Guid StoreModeId { get; set; } // this part will show the entity framework that this is the fk it will correlate
public StoreModel StoreModel { get; set; }
}
public class StoreModel
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<OrderModel> OrderModels { get; set; }
}
see that if you are wanting to have many StoreModel related to many OrderModel then you need to use many -> many which microsoft documentation foresees to use as well
good to map this within its context it is necessary in OnModelCreating to use its mapping like this:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
// config mapping methods
modelBuilder.Entity<StoreModel>()
.HasMany<OrderModel>(g => g.OrderModels )
.HasForeignkey<Guid>(s => s.StoreModeId )
}
you can have a look at the microsoft documentation enter link description here, enter link description here
now if you need to map between contexts you will have to use dapper to make separate queries in separate bases the entity has support for that in this link enter link description here
and then you can make the necessary inner joins so that you can use it but natively this does not exist, I advise you to rethink your database so that it can make more sense to a relational model, perhaps putting types for your StoreModel and OrderModel so you can use the way I wanted the types GettingStore, PreparingStore, IssuanceStore using an enum for this to make it explicit

ASP.NET MVC Entity Frame Work : Code First Approach

I am working ASP.NET MVC using Entity frame work code first approach. I am facing an issue ,the issue is as i have dropped two tables by using Package Manager Console.
Now i am trying to add the tables, the tables are not getting added using Package Manager Console.
Getting Error Cannot find the object "dbo.Movies" because it does not exist or you do not have permissions.
Even in Indentity.cs Model [Movies] is mentioned.
public DbSet Movies { get; set; }
Below are the Model.
public class Movie
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public DateTime ReleaseDate { get; set; }
public Genre Genres { get; set; }
public byte GenreId { get; set; }
public DateTime DateAdded { get; set; }
public int NumberOfStocks { get; set; }
}
public class Genre
{
public byte Id { get; set; }
public string Type { get; set; }
}
How to the add the new table in existing Entity frame work using Code first approach.

Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint on table may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths even after removing the affected field completely

I'm quite new to .net and entity framework (this is my first project) and I'm getting the following error when trying to update the database:
*Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_Rating_User_UserId' on table 'Rating' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
Could not create constraint or index. See previous errors.*
I tried doing what it says (at least I think so) by adding the following to my dbContext class:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelbuilder)
{
modelbuilder.Entity<Rating>().HasOne(u => u.User).WithMany().OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict);
modelbuilder.Entity<Rating>().HasOne(g => g.Game).WithMany().OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict);
}
Not sure have I formulated that method correctly but it did not help (I tried with different DeleteBehavior like SetNull and NoAction)
The thing that really got me confused is that the issue appears even after removing all fields related to other tables from Rating class or even all references between all classes.
My Rating class:
public class Rating
{
public long RatingId { get; set; }
//[Rating]
public virtual Game Game { get; set; } // issue appears even after removing this and User line
//[Rating]
public int Score { get; set; }
public string CommentTitle { get; set; }
public string CommentDescription { get; set; }
//[Rating]
public virtual User User { get; set; }// issue appears even after removing this and Game line
}
User class:
public class User
{
public long UserId { get; set; }
//[Required]
public bool IsModerator { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string Username { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string Email { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Surname { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string Password { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string Salt { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
Game class:
public class Game
{
public long GameId { get; set; }
//[Required]
public virtual User User { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string PricingType { get; set; }
public float MinDonation { get; set; }
public float MaxDonation { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string FileLocation { get; set; }
public float AverageRaiting { get; set; }
public int DownloadCount { get; set; }
}
GameImage class (probably unrelated to the issue just wanted to give a full context)
public class GameImage
{
public long GameImageId { get; set; }
//[Required]
public virtual Game Game { get; set; }
//[Required]
public string Location { get; set; }
//[Required]
public bool IsThumbnail { get; set; }
}
dbContext class:
public class dbContext : DbContext
{
public dbContext(DbContextOptions<dbContext> options) : base(options)
{
}
public DbSet<User> User { get; set; }
public DbSet<Rating> Rating { get; set; }
public DbSet<GameImage> GameImage { get; set; }
public DbSet<Game> Game { get; set; }
}
The issue only appeared after I tried to update the database. The first few migrations and updates were ok, however, then I tried adding [Required] annotation (you can see them commented in the above code) as I noticed that most of the fields were created as nullable in my database - after that the issue starting to occur even after removing the annotations.
In case that matters, I'm using Visual Studio 2019 and SQL Server Express
Does anyone have any idea what may be the cause of this?
Edit:
Image of of my database schema diagram from SSMS
As you can see in the database schema it's visible that there are indeed cycles in the database, however, I cannot get rid of them as Entity Framework's command "Update-Database" does not update the DB and just throws the error mentioned above.
Based on my test, you can try the following steps to solve the problem.
First, please change your dbcontext class into the following code.
public class dbContext : DbContext
{
public dbContext() : base("name=MyContext") { }
public DbSet<User> User { get; set; }
public DbSet<Rating> Rating { get; set; }
public DbSet<GameImage> GameImage { get; set; }
public DbSet<Game> Game { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
}
}
Second, please delete all the tables the database.
Third, please try the following command in your package console.
PM> Update-Database -Force
Finally, you can see the new tables in the databse.

Sending complex object GET vs POST

I wonder what the best way is to send a complex object when it is only for finding data purposes. I have a grid where paging, filtering , sorting etc will be done sever side. So I have to send all that data with each request.
public class DataConfiguratorDto
{
[Required]
public Paging Paging { get; set; }
public Sorting Sorting { get; set; }
public IList<Filtering> FlitersList { get; set; }
}
public enum FilterCondition
{
Equals,
Contains,
MoreThan,
LessThan,
}
public class Paging
{
public int RowNumberStart { get; set; }
[GreaterThan(nameof(RowNumberStart))]
public int RowNumberEnd { get; set; }
}
public class Filtering
{
[Required]
public string ColumnName { get; set; }
[Required]
public object FilterValue { get; set; }
[Required]
public FilterCondition FilterCondition { get; set; }
[Required]
public FilterType FilterType { get; set; }
}
public class Sorting
{
[Required]
public SortOption SortOption;
[Required]
public string ColumnName { get; set; }
}
public enum SortOption
{
Asc,
Desc
}
public enum FilterType
{
And,
Or
}
Now I could use POST but isn't it breaking it's purpose ?
What would be the best option to do this ?
You should use a post, sending the complex object in the body (as JSON for example).
per W3.org
"The GET method means retrieve whatever information (in the form of an entity) is identified by the Request-URI."
"The POST method is used to request that the origin server accept the entity enclosed in the request as a new subordinate of the resource identified by the Request-URI in the Request-Line."
See here for more info.

Using ComplexType with ToList causes InvalidOperationException

I have this model
namespace ProjectTimer.Models
{
public class TimerContext : DbContext
{
public TimerContext()
: base("DefaultConnection")
{
}
public DbSet<Project> Projects { get; set; }
public DbSet<ProjectTimeSpan> TimeSpans { get; set; }
}
public class DomainBase
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
}
public class Project : DomainBase
{
public UserProfile User { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public IList<ProjectTimeSpan> TimeSpans { get; set; }
}
[ComplexType]
public class ProjectTimeSpan
{
public DateTime TimeStart { get; set; }
public DateTime TimeEnd { get; set; }
public bool Active { get; set; }
}
}
When I try to use this action I get the exception The type 'ProjectTimer.Models.ProjectTimeSpan' has already been configured as an entity type. It cannot be reconfigured as a complex type.
public ActionResult Index()
{
using (var db = new TimerContext())
{
return View(db.Projects.ToList);
}
}
The view is using the model #model IList<ProjectTimer.Models.Project>
Can any one shine some light as to why this would be happening?
Your IList<ProjectTimeSpan> property is not supported by EF. A complex type must always be part of another entity type, you cannot use a complex type by itself. If you absolutely need to have ProjectTimeSpan as a complex type, you will need to create a dummy entity type that only contains a key and a ProjectTimeSpan, and change the type of Project.TimeSpans to a list of that new type.

Resources