I have been attempting to configure masstransit in my Web Application's UnityConfig.cs file with no success. I have attempted several methods and read many articles, but still have not gotten it to work. I looked at the example that is on the MassTransit site but can not seem to get it to work. The first issue that I am having is the I cannot figure out what assembly the "TypeFinder" class lives in, nor can I find the "FindTypesWhichImplement" method.
Is the example on the masstransit page suppose to work or is it more of "This is what it may look like" example.
The Starbucks sample (https://github.com/MassTransit/RabbitMQ-Samples/tree/master/Starbucks) has Winsor, StructureMap, and NInject but no Unity. I don't think any of the core team uses Unity.
Though I'd start with making sure you have Unity integration NuGet package included. Check your namespaces (using MassTransit;). It's all extension methods, and should be in the MassTransit namespace. We might have misplaced a type in the wrong namespace somewhere but my quick check of the source doesn't show any.
Related
I have a WebAPI .NET Framework 4.8 application which needs to make a RESTful GET request to another, third-party web service using a specific cipher. I found a code sample using the CurlThin NuGet packages in a response to this question, and then perused the little documentation on CurlThin I could find, along with taking a peek at the open source library code on GitHub. All examples and documentation talk about the need for an initial call to
CurlResources.Init();
This call only needs to be made a single time at the initialization stage to copy the appropriate DLLs to the application output folder.
I placed this call in my web app's Application_Start method, but cannot get past a NullReferenceException:
I fully expect that I am overlooking something simple that's been staring back at me for hours. Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Apologies if this sounds like a silly question. I'm not very experienced with how things are linked/bundled/assembled under the hood.
Before I begin, I'd like to say that I've tried reading documentation (such as https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/cross-platform/app-fundamentals/code-sharing) to find the answer, but was unable to.
If I have a Xamarin.Forms solution and I reference a .Net Standard project:
Question 1: Does all the code from this project get compiled and included into the app such that it may be disassembled later, or is it only code from classes that I actually make use of that gets included?
Bit more elaboration:
For example, I may have a School class that expects an IStudent (inject via DI), and a Student class that implements IStudent. Both of these exist in the .Net Standard project that I reference in the Xamarin.Forms project. However, if I only actually make use of the Student class (by registering it with type IStudent in my IoC container), will the code from School get included in the built app as well?
Question 2: If all the code from the project does get included, is there a way to forcefully specify which classes to include/exclude by way of some configuration setting, attributes, 3rd-party library, or something else?
As far as i know everything in the NETStandard project get compiled and shipped with the app.
If you want to remove unused code from compiled assemblies you have to use the linker.
To link everything, you have to select "Sdk and User Assemblies".
The linker tries to dont strip away mthods and fields you are using, but often is too aggressive (for example, methods referenced only by reflection will be stripped).
Luckily there are few methods where you can fine-tune the linker behaviour and make it work. Some link to elaborate on:
Linker in iOS and Android
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/ios/deploy-test/linker
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/android/deploy-test/linker
Official doc about the linker config:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/cross-platform/deploy-test/linker
Useful blogposts:
https://xamarinhelp.com/xamarin-linker/
https://medium.com/#harrycblum/reduce-your-xamarin-app-size-with-linking-26247edc87f6
In the developing of liferay portlet, If I use IFramePortlet(com.liferay.portlet.iframe.IFramePortlet) in portlet-class tag in portlet xml
ERROR like this -
Registering portlets for gospel-for-asia-portlet
06:08:00,712
ERROR [localhost-startStop-6][PortletBagFactory:411] java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.liferay.portlet.iframe.IFramePortlet
(sometimes NoClassDefFoundError happens)
This error occurs on registering not building. I did add External Jars with portal-impl.jar for this.
That source is presented on github. I didn't change anything.
I am struggling with this problem for couple of days. Any clues would be welcomed.
Thank you.
You must not add portal-impl.jar to your custom portlets. This is the problem: IFramePortlet is part of portal-impl.jar, so it's part of Liferay's implementation. You don't have access to this class from a plugin. If you want it, you'll have to get the sourcecode and implement it yourself.
Adding portal-impl.jar will try to initialize all kind of portal infrastructure for a second time. Plus, you'll not want to depend on such a big library just for a tiny trivial portlet implementation.
I've got two questions here. The first one is just specific and another one is more general, but is a source of the first one.
So, my specific problem: I want to use Encryption (actually, Hashing) algorithms with using System.Security.Cryptography namespace (for instance, SHA256Managed class).
I found out that (happily) Xamarin has implemented those in System.dll.
But it is not portable and obviously can not be used from Core application directly.
But I've also found another great project -- PclContrib -- which allows you to do that. But, unfortunately, they don't have the implementation for Touch and Android. (However, that still works great for Desktop (Web) and Windows Phone, plus, still can be included into Core (as it uses portable project)).
Anyway, to solve that nicely, I've decided to create some base class for the encryption methods and then override core methods which require the custom dll (for any custom system).
The way I did it (at least, trying to do) was:
Defining virtual method in Core App base class:
public virtual IEncryptionProvider CreateEncryptionProvider()
Overriding Core App class in Touch project with overriding CreateEncryptionProvider (which creates an instance of TouchEncryptionProvider class instance).
Core:
public class App : MvxApplication
Touch:
public class AppTouch : App
Launching it in Touch setup.cs:
protected override Cirrious.MvvmCross.ViewModels.IMvxApplication CreateApp (
{
return new AppTouch();
}
But, that does not work for me. On startup I've got this exception message in log:
"Exception masked KeyNotFoundException: Could not find view for Mynamespace.Etc.LoginViewModel", which works fine when I do new App() instead. I am not sure if that message shows actual problem (as before it was saying the same even that was a problem with some third-party dll, unrelated to views at all). But speaking shortly, that's just a primitive inheritance of App : MvxApplication, but placed not in Core but Touch project.
So, does it requeire some more custom initialization for such situations or do I miss something else?
And, actually, more general question is how should I build such Multiplatform approaches? Actually, now I've got similar problem with HttpUtility.UrlEncode, which I would want to use in my Core project.
What is the MvvmCross "philosophy" to handle such situations?
Thank you.
For the 'viewmodel not found' problem, this is caused because mvvmcross by default only looks for viewmodels in the Assembly containing your app.
If you want it to look in other assemblies, override ViewModelAssemblies in Setup.cs - see how this done in, for example, MvvmCross - structuring shared View Models and Views
For general multplatform approach, please read questions and answers like:
Platform-specific IoC in MVVMCross
Instantiation of ViewModels and Service classes
Please also remember you don't have to use PCLs - if you prefer to use file-linking between multiple platform-specific core projects, then you can of course use this approach.
Finally, please also try to ask one question per question - I find it makes stackoverflow work better for users and with search engines too. If you need to link questions, then you can just add a hyperlink reference - stackoverflow then marks them as related.
Can anyone help point me to some good resources for working with Unity 2.0 in an ASP.NET that doesn't talk about ASP.NET MVC?!?
We are not using MVC and I am struggling to get Unity to inject dependencies into my pages following the couple of examples I've read (which are all based on David Hayden's work so they are all presenting the same examples and code).
UPDATE
I tried to go the PageHandlerFactory route but the example (here) is incomplete and no source code is available to accompany the article.
So, I decided to try the custom HttpModule approach described here and here. Again, no source code is available beyond what is shown so it is difficult to troubleshoot issues.
The problem I have now is that all of the plumbing appears to be wiring up correctly but the Buildup method does nothing to my page. I can see all of the types are registered in the container when I set a break-point in the module code and the code is executing as expected. But a break-point in the Page_Load event handler shows that the dependencies are all null.
The property in question is public, with a setter and getter, and is marked with the Dependency attribute. I've tried with and without the attribute, with and without a mapping name, ... every combination I could think of and nothing works.
What am I missing???
It depends what you expect. Most exemples targeting MVC present custom controller factory which allows creating controllers with dependency injection. This is indeed also possible with web forms but instead of controller you must inject dependencies into pages. To do this you must replace PageHandlerFactory with custom implementation.
You can create your own implementation of PageHandlerFactory which will be able to resolve pages directly and inject dependencies defined in constructor or you can use one of these (here, here and here) which instead uses stantandard PageHandlerFactory and builds page instance (resolve property dependencies).