CSS rule for no matching general sibling - css

If I want to style a div element only when there is a p sibling, I can write the following CSS rule:
p ~ div
Is there a CSS rule for styling an element when there isn't a matching sibling?
For example something like:
p !~ div
<section>
<p></p>
<div></div>
<div></div>
</section>
<section>
<div></div> <!-- Style this one -->
<div></div> <!-- Style this one -->
</section>

If :not() allowed combinators, you would be able to simply do div:not(p ~ div). But it doesn't, so you won't be able to use :not() in that manner.
The selector you need will depend on your structure. In your case, if not having the p causes the first div to be the first child of your section, you can use div:first-child to make sure you select your divs if and only if that condition is met:
div:first-child, div:first-child ~ div
If your structure does not allow such a selector to be constructed, then you will have to rely on an overriding rule as Danield suggests.

How about doing it the other way around:
Set a style for all the divs according to the way you want them when no <p> elements are there.
Then override that style when there is a <p> element.
section div
{
color: green;
}
section p ~ div
{
color: black;
}
FIDDLE

Just give id/class to div and write its corresponding CSS simple

Related

CSS - differences between > and & [duplicate]

For example:
div > p.some_class {
/* Some declarations */
}
What exactly does the > sign mean?
> is the child combinator, sometimes mistakenly called the direct descendant combinator.1
That means the selector div > p.some_class only matches paragraphs of .some_class that are nested directly inside a div, and not any paragraphs that are nested further within. This implies that every element matching div > p.some_class necessarily also matches div p.some_class, with the descendant combinator (space), so the two are understandably often confused.
An illustration comparing the child combinator with the descendant combinator:
div > p.some_class {
background: yellow;
}
div p.some_class {
color: red;
}
<div>
<p class="some_class">Some text here</p> <!-- [1] div > p.some_class, div p.some_class -->
<blockquote>
<p class="some_class">More text here</p> <!-- [2] div p.some_class -->
</blockquote>
</div>
Which elements are matched by which selectors?
Matched by both div > p.some_class and div p.some_class
This p.some_class is located directly inside the div, hence a parent-child relationship is established between both elements. Since "child" is a type of "descendant", any child element is by definition also a descendant. Therefore, both rules are applied.
Matched by only div p.some_class
This p.some_class is contained by a blockquote within the div, rather than the div itself. Although this p.some_class is a descendant of the div, it's not a child; it's a grandchild. Therefore, only the rule with the descendant combinator in its selector is applied.
1 Many people go further to call it "direct child" or "immediate child", but that's completely unnecessary (and incredibly annoying to me), because a child element is immediate by definition anyway, so they mean the exact same thing. There's no such thing as an "indirect child".
> (greater-than sign) is a CSS Combinator.
A combinator is something that explains the relationship between the selectors.
A CSS selector can contain more than one simple selector. Between the simple selectors, we can include a combinator.
There are four different combinators in CSS3:
descendant selector (space)
child selector (>)
adjacent sibling selector (+)
general sibling selector (~)
Note: < is not valid in CSS selectors.
For example:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
div > p {
background-color: yellow;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<p>Paragraph 1 in the div.</p>
<p>Paragraph 2 in the div.</p>
<span><p>Paragraph 3 in the div.</p></span> <!-- not Child but Descendant -->
</div>
<p>Paragraph 4. Not in a div.</p>
<p>Paragraph 5. Not in a div.</p>
</body>
</html>
Output:
More information about CSS Combinators
As others mention, it's a child selector. Here's the appropriate link.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#child-selectors
It matches p elements with class some_class that are directly under a div.
All p tags with class some_class which are direct children of a div tag.
( child selector) was introduced in css2.
div p{ } select all p elements decedent of div elements, whereas div > p selects only child p elements, not grand child, great grand child on so on.
<style>
div p{ color:red } /* match both p*/
div > p{ color:blue } /* match only first p*/
</style>
<div>
<p>para tag, child and decedent of p.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>para inside list. </p>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
For more information on CSS Ce[lectors and their use, check my blog,
css selectors and css3 selectors
html
<div>
<p class="some_class">lohrem text (it will be of red color )</p>
<div>
<p class="some_class">lohrem text (it will NOT be of red color)</p>
</div>
<p class="some_class">lohrem text (it will be of red color )</p>
</div>
css
div > p.some_class{
color:red;
}
All the direct children that are <p> with .some_class would get the style applied to them.
The greater sign ( > ) selector in CSS means that the selector on the right is a direct descendant / child of whatever is on the left.
An example:
article > p { }
Means only style a paragraph that comes after an article.

CSS selectors apply style to all images except the first one

I thought I could do this with advanced CSS selectors, but struggling.
I have a JS Fiddle here with the below example
Basically, how can I target every image here, except the first one? I don't want to use classes or IDs, I just want to use advanced selectors, if possible.
So something like .entry-content img:first-child (although I know that wouldn't work)
<div class='entry-content'>
<div>
<img src='http://placedog.com/400/300'/>
</div>
<div>
<img src='http://placedog.com/400/300'/>
</div>
<div>
<img src='http://placedog.com/400/300'/>
</div>
</div>
If you want to select all img tags except first one use :not subclass:
.entry-content div:not(:first-child) img
Working example:
http://jsfiddle.net/GrAaA/
Browser support:
:not http://caniuse.com/#search=%3Anot
:first-child http://caniuse.com/#search=%3Afirst-child
You'll need to exclude the image in the first div child, rather than just the first img child, as every img is the first and only child of its div while the div elements themselves are siblings.
To do that, you can use this selector:
.entry-content div + div img
This selects the image in every div that comes directly after another div, so your first one won't be matched.
If you have siblings other than div within .entry-content you may need to use the general sibling selector instead:
.entry-content div ~ div img
apply a style to all the images. then apply a style to the first child that negates the other styles. make sure the style for the first child is after the styles for the other images in your stylesheet so that they are applied by the browser in the correct order.
This should help
.entry-content div:first-child img {
border: none;
}​

css explained for selecting the aplicable element

Can somebody please explain what the selectors mean?
As far as I understand having #myId - is css for control with id=myId.
.myClass is Css for controls with class myClass.
Can somebody please explain the other combinations?
div.img a:hover img
{
border:1px solid #0000ff;
}
div.desc
{
text-align:center;
font-weight:normal;
width:120px;
margin:2px;
}
div.img a:hover img
selects images that are inside hovered links, that are inside div elements with class img, and gives them a blue border.
div.desc
selects divs with the class desc.
An id (#) can exist only once in a document. It is really useful to identify an element in CSS ans in JavaScript as well (should you ever need it).`
A class (.) can be used as often as it is required.
Example: you have only one header: <div id="header">Header</div>, but several articles: <div class="article">...</div>
Say you have this HTML document:
<div id="site">
<h1>Some heading...</h1>
<div class="article">
<h1>Title</h1>
<p>Some content...</p>
</div>
<div class="article">
<h1>Title</h1>
<p>Some content...</p>
</div>
</div>
The heading of the articles shouldn't be as big as the heading of the site, so we have to use a more specific selector: .article h1 {...}. This will style every <h1>element in a element of the class "article".
If we want to have an even more specific selector, we would use: div.article h1 {...}. This will only style every <h1> element in a <div> box with the class "article"
div.img a:hover img means: find me an img element which is a descendant of an a element that is currently being hovered over, which is in turn a descendant of a div element with a class name og img.
div.desc simply selects any div with a class name of desc.
Have a look at the standards definition, I always find this useful: CSS selectors at W3C.
div.img a:hover img
This will match any img tag that is within an a tag which is currently in a hover state that is within a div tag that has class="img".
div.desc
This will match any div tag with class="desc".
When items are chained like this with only spaces between them, it matches on that specific hierarchy of elements. For example, in the first one, an img tag that's not in an a tag won't be matched.
You can also delimit items with a comma, which instead of matching a hierarchy of items will match each item individually. So something like div.img, img will match any div tag with class="img" and will match any img tag.
Specifically for the :hover attribute, that's called a pseudo-class. It modifies the attribute to which it's attached (in this case an a) by looking for items of that type which are in a specific state (in this case, being hovered over).

CSS First-child bug? or intended behavior?

I have the following set up
.test div:first-child {};
<div class="test" id="one">
<div id="two">
<div id="three">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Somehow div#three inherits the first-child styles, even though it is not the first-child of div.test. Is this intentional by the browsers? Can someone explain this?
While #two is the first child of #one but #three isn't, #three is still the first child of #two. So both inner divs get the styles.
The descendant combinator (the space character) in your selector tells the browser to select any div in any level of nesting from .test, as long as it's contained somewhere within an element with that class. The :first-child pseudo-class says to only select an element if it's the first child of its parent, whatever that parent may be, not just the element represented on the left side of the combinator.
If you only want to target the first child of .test, use the child combinator >:
.test > div:first-child {}
Because > expresses a parent-child relationship, it is safe to imply that the parent concerned by div:first-child is represented by .test.
This is the intended behaviour. You need to write your CSS rule like this:
.test > div:first-child
The > ensures only the first child of the .test element is selected. Without it, any div that is the first child of any node within .test is selected.

What CSS selector can be used to select the first div within another div

I have something like:
<div id="content>
<h1>Welcome to Motor City Deli!</h1>
<div style=" font-size: 1.2em; font-weight: bolder;">Sep 19, 2010</div>
<div > ... </div>
What is the css selector for the second div (1st div within the "content" div) such that I can set the font color of the date within that div?
The MOST CORRECT answer to your question is...
#content > div:first-of-type { /* css */ }
This will apply the CSS to the first div that is a direct child of #content (which may or may not be the first child element of #content)
Another option:
#content > div:nth-of-type(1) { /* css */ }
You want
#content div:first-child {
/*css*/
}
If we can assume that the H1 is always going to be there, then
div h1+div {...}
but don't be afraid to specify the id of the content div:
#content h1+div {...}
That's about as good as you can get cross-browser right now without resorting to a JavaScript library like jQuery. Using h1+div ensures that only the first div after the H1 gets the style. There are alternatives, but they rely on CSS3 selectors, and thus won't work on most IE installs.
The closest thing to what you're looking for is the :first-child pseudoclass; unfortunately this will not work in your case because you have an <h1> before the <div>s. What I would suggest is that you either add a class to the <div>, like <div class="first"> and then style it that way, or use jQuery if you really can't add a class:
$('#content > div.first')

Resources