I am trying to use the typesafe console on an application that I have. Bear with the explanation, but it is important to get the context
My application is a web application. It has a maven dependency on a jar that uses akka (in other words, the web app doesn't interact akka directly, the akka stuff is transparent to the web app).
I have downloaded typesafe-console developer 1.3.1.
I added the load time weaver to the jvm arguments, my startup arguments look like:
-javaagent:/opt/typesafe-console-developer-1.3.1/lib/weaver/aspectjweaver.jar
-Dorg.aspectj.tracing.factory=default
-Djava.library.path=/opt/typesafe-console-developer-1.3.1/lib/sigar
-Daj.weaving.verbose=true
I do get some weaving output, and it does indicate that it is using the aop.xml in the trace-akka jars.
My application starts up just fine in tomcat, everything runs dandily.
However, when I go to the typesafe console, I don't see anything there.
I did create an application.conf file in my web application like so:
akka {
loggers = ["com.typesafe.atmos.trace.Slf4jTraceContextLogger"]
loglevel = "INFO"
}
atmos {
trace {
enabled = true
traceable {
"*" = on
}
sampling {
"*" = 1
}
}}
My guess is that I missed a step someplace, or perhaps the application config file is not getting picked up?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
It was the application config file was not being loaded.
I just had a little hack to override the application config file for akka and it worked!
Related
I need your opinion on this: Is it possible to use enterprise library logging dll in the setup project?
Here's what I did:
I created a setup project which will call a windows form to install the database. When I installed the project, it did call the windows form. However, when I click on the "Install" button, it seems that there's a problem and I don't know where it is. Then another popup message is displayed which said that it cannot locate the logging configuration.
But the config file for the windows form is there which includes the configuration for the logging dll. I don't have any idea where to look into.
Please help me with this?
Below is the error message:
UPDATE
I observed that when I run the exe file as is, the enterprise library logging config works. But with the setup project, it does not look for it. Any help on this?
Below is the code for this:
[RunInstaller(true)]
public partial class IPWInstaller : Installer
{
public IPWInstaller()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public override void Install(IDictionary stateSaver)
{
base.Install(stateSaver);
string targetPath = Context.Parameters["TargetDir"];
InstallDatabase db = new InstallDatabase(targetPath);
DialogResult dbResult = db.ShowDialog();
if (dbResult != DialogResult.OK)
{
throw new InstallException("Database is not installed.");
}
ConfigureFiles config = new ConfigureFiles(targetPath);
DialogResult configResult = config.ShowDialog();
if (configResult != DialogResult.OK)
{
throw new InstallException("Config files are not saved correctly.");
}
}
}
LATEST UPDATE:
I tried to set the value of a certain configuration to my messagebox. This is the result of it when I run the install project.
Is there a way to call my app.config in the setup project
There are at least a couple of things that can go wrong.
The app is not running as it would if you ran it as an interactive user. It is being called from an msiexec.exe process that knows nothing about your intended environment, such as working directory. None of the automatic things that happen because you run from an explorer shell will happen. Any paths you use need to be full and explicit. I think you may need to explicitly load your settings file.
Something else that can happen in a per machine install is that custom actions run with the system account so any code which assumes you have access to databases, user profile items like folders can fail.
Another problem is that Windows Forms often don't work well when called from a VS custom action. It's not something that works very well because that environment is not the STA threading model that is required for window messages etc.
In general it's better to run these config programs after the install the first time the app starts because then you are in a normal environment, debugging and testing is straightforward, and if the db gets lost the user could run the program again to recreate it instead of uninstalling and reinstalling the setup.
I have an ASP.NET web application written in C# 4.0. The application references a class library that comes with its own configuration file. At runtime, the class library uses similar to the following code to load this specific configuration:
var exeConfigPath = this.GetType().Assembly.Location;
var config = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(exeConfigPath);
This is done because the library has to load its bundled configuration rather than the application configuration. The application configuration should not be concerned of the library's settings and should not be able to alter them.
Now, there are a few other things that need to be done for this concept to work. I have to set the library's configuration file build operation as Content in the properties window and the Copy to be Copy Always or Copy If Newer. So far so good - the file gets automatically both into the class library's bin directory, and the web applications's bin directory, and is correctly renamed from App.config to CustomLibrary.dll.config (as supposed, the library's dll is CustomLibrary.dll).
Now I am facing two issues.
1) When I publish the web application to a filesystem location (mapped in IIS), the CustomLibrary.dll.config appears back as App.config in the bin folder of the published app. OK - I will rename it in the class library project to match the expected convention - and problem solved.
2) Even when published, the IIS compiles the application again and stores it in the ASP.NET Temporary Files. There is a fancy directory structure with a folder dedicated for each assembly referenced. The folder corresponding to the CustomLibrary.dll does not contain the config file in it. Since this.GetType().Assembly.Location will return the path to the temp folder, the application fails to load the configuration and crashes as it should.
I need to preserve the pattern of having the configuration in the class library, and be able to make it work in the web application. When manually copying the .config to the temp folder, the app works, but see, I really hate manual copying to randomly-named folders.
Is there a way to either prevent IIS from using the temp folders, or to make it copy along the config files? I believe the problem I am facing is configuration-related rather than conceptual since the application works as expected when the config file is in place. I'd prefer not to mess with using hard-coded physical paths to the config file either.
Edit:
To make it clearer, I will point out what and why I want to achieve. The idea is that the library and the web project will be developed as separate products - there will be no user or application specific information in the configuration of the library, so it will not change for different use scenarios. It is also rather specific to the class library functionality rather than the end application. It makes sense for me to keep the library's configuration information bundled within it (similar to Java, where a spring context xml file, or a properties file, get bundled with the jar of the library). I'd like to avoid having to copy the configuration in each app/web config of the consumer application. There will be cases where the consumer application is developed by third parties, and I do not want to rely on them doing their configuration right for my stuff to work. Again, the only issue here is not having the config file copied to the right place.
If those are static, internal settings that nobody should see or change, wouldn't you be better off having a file with the configuration included within the class library as an embedded resource? Either that or just a static class with the settings.
That way you'd be certain that nobody alters it, which in your scenario seems to be a plus.
I have come along a way to work arround the described issue, still not a very pleasant one to my requirements.
The solution is to take advantage of the application configuration (web.config in web apps, or app.config) which is always available. I have added as settings the absolute paths to the config file for each library. So I ended up with:
<!--
THIS IS IN THE WEB.CONFIG FILE
-->
<appSettings>
<add key ="ClassLibrary_ConfigPath"
value ="{My Publish Output Folder}\ClassLibrary.dll.config"/>
</appSettings>
and the class library now uses the following code to load its configuration:
Configuration config = null;
try
{
var exeConfigPath = this.GetType().Assembly.Location;
config = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(exeConfigPath);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
if (!IsConfigurationNotFoundError(e))
{
// IsConfigurationNotFoundError logic skipped for brevity
var exeConfigPath =
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["ClassLibrary_ConfigPath"];
if (exeConfigPath != null)
{
config = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(exeConfigPath);
}
}
else
{
throw;
}
}
While this works, I will wait for a better solution if possible. Still, I do not have to copy the entire ClassLibrary.dll.config into the web.config file, but now I must manage filesystem locations and be aware of app-setting names. What I really want is the consumer app of the ClassLibrary.dll not to deal with its configuration in any way. If it were a desktop app, I have this covered, as Visual Studio copies the ClassLibary.dll.config appropriately. I hope there is a way to make it work smoothly for web apps.
The short answer is: you can't. You have to merge both configuration sections and place all settings in the main configuration file of your application. In case of the web application it would be the web.config. Read this
I recently take over a web application project using websphere and log4j running under AIX. To create a development environment, I setup all the components in windows, using eclipse to compile a WAR file and deploy it.
All is working fine except that log file is not created.
I changed the log file in log4j.properties from something like in below and and give everyone full access permission to the directory:
log4j.appender.F1.File=/abc/def/logs/admin.log
to
log4j.appender.F1.File=c:/logs/admin.log
What else can I check?
I create a simple standalone testapp which use the same log4j.properties and it can create the log file, but when the servlet deployed to websphere, it doesn't work. Please help! Thanks!
Ok, I think this article should help you. It seems that WebSphere CE uses log4j by default and controls it with a global properties file. There is a section on how to use application-specific properties files.
Here is what I try and do to troubleshoot similar issues.
Turn on log4j debugging to see where it actually picks up the file from. You need evidence of which file is picked up (so turning the debug on is a worthwhile activity) This provides you information with what log4j is trying to do to locate the configuration file.
-Dlog4j.debug=true
I would not hardcode the log4j location in the code. Instead I
would use the log4j.configuration System property and state that in
the JVM arguments. This way even I don't need to touch my code.
-Dlog4j.configuration=file:///home/manglu/log4j.properties
I would use this approach irrespective of the runtime server that I use (be it Tomcat or WAS CE or WAS)
Hope this helps
I suggest you use environment variables set on your server like this :
You must access the admin console of your server.
Under custom properties
Server_path=/abc/def/logs
In your log4j, use this : {$server_path}/log.txt
Make sure the user running the app has access to that directory.
I want to write a few web tests (over WatiN/Selenium + CassiniDev web server) for my asp.net web application.
Problem I encountered is that I dont know what to do in such situations:
there is a page where user can click the button to call some third-party service. In my web test i want to create mock of this service, which will always return static value (some value in these test case and other value in other test case).
How can i do that?
Currently i use IoC/DI container Microsoft Unity. And my pages gets his dependencies in a manner described in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff664622%28v=pandp.50%29.aspx.
The only solution that comes to my head is: place all dependencies in web.config for each test case and copy necessary web.config on SetUp of test. This solution completly painful!
Any ideas?
I use WatiN and Cassini-dev in my integration tests as well and have had to deal with similar issues. In my setup fixture I deploy my Asp.Net web application to a temporary folder in my test folder which allows me to play around with the configuration before starting up cassini-dev. I use Windsor for my CI which allows me to change injected components at the configuration level. You may also be able to acheive this with Unity.
If the service you are referring to is a web service you just mock out a web service using the interface you have been coding to.
Here are the steps that I take when running my integration tests:
Create a temp web directory
Publish the Asp.Net web application to the temp directory (I use MSBuild to do this)
Deploy temp database (Using MSbuild and database projects but could be done a number of ways)
Deploy temp membership database (see my blog post on how to do this in code)
Update the web.config of the deployed Asp.Net web application to point to the temp databases and change any other settings relevant for testing.
Start up the website using Cassini-Dev. I also hit the site with a http request so that I can verify the site is up before running any tests.
Run the tests.
After running the tests you should clean up.
Stop cassini-dev
Delete the temp hosting folder
Delete the temp databases. I use Sql server SMO objects that allow me to query the Sql Server which I use to delete up any old databases that have been left lying around after any previously failed test runs.
How to deploy a website using MSbuild in code
var properties = new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{"Configuration", isDebug ? "Debug" : "Release"},
{"WebProjectOutputDir", tempHostingDirectory.FullName},
{"DeployToDatabase", "true"},
{"OutDir", Path.Combine(tempHostingDirectory.FullName, "bin\\")}
};
using (var engine = new ProjectCollection(properties))
{
engine
.LoadProject(<web project path>, "4.0")
.Build(new[] {"Build", "ResolveReferences", "_CopyWebApplication"});
}
Unity configuration section usage: http://www.pnpguidance.net/Post/UnityContainerUnityConfigurationSectionAppConfigWebConfig.aspx
Generating asp.net membership database in code: http://bronumski.blogspot.com/2011/06/generating-creating-aspnet-application.html
Msbuild ProjectCollection on MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.build.evaluation.projectcollection.aspx
It sounds like you are trying to mock a web service.
Web services usually inherit from MarshalByRefObject, this means you can create a mock by inheriting from RealProxy to create a transparent proxy that pretends to be the webservice:
class Mock : RealProxy
{
public Mock()
: base(typeof(IStuff)) { }
public IStuff GetStuff()
{
return (IStuff)GetTransparentProxy();
}
public override IMessage Invoke(IMessage msg)
{
IMethodCallMessage message = (IMethodCallMessage)msg;
// the message object provides the MethodInfo that was called
// as well as the arguments.
// <Insert logic here>
return new ReturnMessage(new NotImplementedException("comming soon to a test near you ..."), message);
}
}
I belieave NMock2 uses RealProxy for it's mocks, so you should be able to use it to mock the web service instead.
Easy way to handle developemnt/production URLs in flex air app? I want to point to my local box for testing, but when I launch I want it to automatically point to the production URL.
You can use namespaces and configure the current namespace (DEV/RELEASE) in your compiler options.
CONFIG::release
public function connect()
{
//connect to release url
}
CONFIG::dev
public function connect()
{
//connect to dev url
}
then define these options for the compiler:
-define=CONFIG::release,false
-define=CONFIG::dev,true
I suggest either using a configuration file or changing your hosts file to point domains to localhost or dev servers on your development machine. With the latter option you always use your production URLs in code, but your dev machine will resolve those domains to your local machine because it checks the hosts file first.
The best approach here is to externalize this information into a config file - perhaps an XML file - that is loaded via a relative url. The config file might like look this:
<config>
<serviceEndpoint>http://www.mydomain.com/services</serviceEndpoint>
</config>
Be sure to name your XML elements with valid ActionScript variable names or you may encounter some difficulty working with the file (for instance, E4X expressions may become difficult.
You can then use HTTPService to load "config.xml" which is placed alongside your application's SWF when deployed. This will allow you to repoint a SWF hosted on any domain to backend hosted anywhere else. This is especially useful if you are developing locally and are connecting to a shared development server.
Compiling this information into your SWF is very inflexible and a poor practice.
I typically will look at the url in the contentLoaderInfo object in either the Application (Flex -- http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/201/langref/mx/core/Application.html#url) or root display object (Flash -- http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/display/LoaderInfo.html#url). If the url begins with "file", you know you are in your development/IDE, if it's "http", it's being run in a browser. If you're just working in the browser, you might also pass a parameter to the object that has something like
{
url: $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'];
}
and perform some init/startup method to switch based on the path the app is running under.
I had this very issue in an AIR app I am writing that hits a Rails app via WebORB.
I just need to switch between http://localhost and http://fakeproductionurl.com depending on whether I was running in Flex Builder (via adl).
This is what I ended up using:
if (NativeApplication.nativeApplication.publisherID != "") {
return "http://fakeproductionurl.com";
}
else {
return "http://localhost";
}
It doesn't give you the ability to switch between 3+ different environments, but it's a very easy way to toggle between development / production environments.