QML IntValidator strange behavior for bottom > 0 - qt

I have a few IntValidators inside as many TextInputs and they all behave well, except one. The one misbehaving is the only one with its bottom property set to something greater than zero. The problem is easily riproducible with the code below (Qt 5.2.0):
import QtQuick 2.1
Rectangle
{
id: mainwindow
objectName: "mainwindow"
width: 1024
height: 768
TextInput
{
id: testtextinput
objectName: "testtextinput"
text: "170"
font.pixelSize: 36
x: 100
y: 200
width: 200
height: 200
property size range: Qt.size(160, 180)
validator: IntValidator
{
id: rangevalidator
objectName: testtextinput.objectName + "_rangevalidator"
bottom: testtextinput.range.width
top: testtextinput.range.height
Component.onCompleted:
{
console.log("Component.onCompleted objectName: " + objectName + " bottom: " + bottom + " top: " + top)
}
}
onAccepted:
{
text = "accepted"
}
}
Text
{
id: testisacceptable
font.pixelSize: 36
text: testtextinput.acceptableInput
anchors.top: testtextinput.bottom
anchors.left: testtextinput.left
anchors.right: testtextinput.right
height: 200
}
}
The validator's range is set to [160, 180], so, if I want to type 181, I can just type 18 and nothing more. However, if I want to type 159, the TextInput allows me to write the whole number, tells me that the number won't be accepted setting to false the acceptableInput property, but when I press enter, the onAccepted() slot is executed without problems. Any ideas on what's happening here? A bug?

This bug is solved in Qt 5.3.0 as explained here.

Related

TestCase mouseDrag only clicks item inside Flickable but does not drag

In a QML TestCase, I'm trying to setup automatic scrolling of a ListView that is contained inside a Flickable (to add a custom footer that can be flicked into view, which wouldn't happen with just ListView { footer: Component {} })
However, the mouseDrag only seems to click the correct coordinate, but not drag it to any direction. Here is a simplified version that is as close to the real one as possible:
Implementation.qml
import QtQuick 2.5
FocusScope {
width: 1920
height: 1080
Flickable {
objectName: 'flickableList'
boundsBehavior: Flickable.StopAtBounds
clip: true
width: parent.width
height: 240
contentHeight: 500
ListView {
interactive: false
height: parent.height
width: parent.width
model: ['example1', 'example2', 'example3', 'example4', 'example5']
delegate: Item {
width: 300
height: 100
Text {
text: modelData
}
}
}
}
Item {
id: footer
height: 100
width: parent.width
}
}
TheTest.qml
// The relevant part
var theList = findChild(getView(), 'flickableList')
var startY = 220
var endY = 20
mouseDrag(theList, 100, startY, 100, endY, Qt.LeftButton, Qt.NoModifier, 100)
So, when I'm viewing the UI testrunner, I can see it clearly click on the correct delegate (it has a focus highlight in the actual implementation), ie. the third item "example3", which starts at Y 200 and ends at Y 300). But the drag event never happens. Nothing moves on the screen, and compare(theList.contentY, 200) says it is still at position 0. I would expect it to be at 200, since the mouse is supposed to be mouseDragging from position 220 to 20, ie. scrolling the list down by 200. And 220 is also within the visible height (240).
Just to be sure, I also reversed the Y values, but also no movement:
var theList = findChild(getView(), 'flickableList')
var startY = 20
var endY = 220
mouseDrag(theList, 100, startY, 100, endY, Qt.LeftButton, Qt.NoModifier, 100)
Also, as the 3rd item clearly is clicked on (it gets highlighted), the passed item theList (= the Flickable), should be valid.
Edit:
Oh, and this does scroll the list, but it goes all the way to the bottom of the list (388 px down in the actual implementation, even when the delta is just 30 pixels):
mousePress(theList, startX, startY)
mouseMove(theList, endX, endY)
mouseRelease(theList, endX, endY)
So the question is:
Does mouseDrag only work for specific types of components (ie. does not work on Flickable?), or is there something missing? How can I get it to scroll the list down? Thanks!
Your tag says you're using Qt 5.5 - I would recommend trying Qt 5.14 if possible, as there was a fix that might help:
mouseDrag(): ensure that intermediate moves are done for all drags
[...]
In practice, this means that mouseDrag() never did intermediate moves
(i.e. what happens during a drag in real life) for drags that go from
right to left or upwards.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdeclarative/+/281903
If that doesn't help, or upgrading is not an option, I would recommend looking at Qt's own tests (although they are written in C++):
https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/tree/tests/auto/quick/qquickflickable/tst_qquickflickable.cpp#n1150
I think mouseDrag only works for mouse area. You could wrap every object with that.
But in the end, you need to use a mouse area inside you delegate and Drag and Drop it.
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qml-qtquick-drag.html
import QtQuick 2.5
FocusScope {
width: 1920
height: 1080
Flickable {
objectName: 'flickableList'
boundsBehavior: Flickable.StopAtBounds
clip: true
width: parent.width
height: 240
contentHeight: 500
ListView {
interactive: false
height: parent.height
width: parent.width
model: ['example1', 'example2', 'example3', 'example4', 'example5']
delegate: DelegateList{
textAreaText = modelData
}
}
}
Item {
id: footer
height: 100
width: parent.width
}
}
And the DelegateList.qml
Item {
id: root
property alias textAreaText: textArea.text
width: 300
height: 100
Text {
id: textArea
}
Drag.active: dragArea.drag.active
Drag.hotSpot.x: 10
Drag.hotSpot.y: 10
MouseArea {
id: dragArea
anchors.fill: parent
drag.target: parent
}
}

Why does property binding change in QML not propagate immediately

when applying property bindings in QML I have encountered one problem. When we have a parent component (Window) and a child (Rectangle), which has some properties bind to parent's (width, height, or anchors.fill: parent), when I change parents properties in JS code, and if I want to read the values of the child's properties (that are bound to parent's) in the same JS code, it shows the old values (not updated). It looks like that the change of parents properties hasn't been propagated to child's. Here is the example of this problem:
Window {
id:myWindow
visible: true
width: 640
height: 480
title: qsTr("Hello World")
Rectangle{
id:customRec
width:parent.width
height: parent.height
color: "blue"
}
Button{
id:myBtn
onClicked: {
myWindow.width = 800
myWindow.height = 600
console.log(customRec.width)
console.log(customRec.height)
}
}}
After clicking on the button, it shows:
qml: 640
qml: 480
instead of 800 and 600, new values. Although the rectangle has been scaled well. After clicking again it will show updated values (800 and 600). Can someone please explain what is happening here and how can binding property change be propagated immediately to bound properties. I am using Qt 5.12.2 with msvc2017_64 compiler.
You are printing the properties before they got updated. With the below code you can find that onWidthChanged signal comes after the console log. onWidthChanged signal comes after updating the width.
import QtQuick 2.10
import QtQuick.Window 2.10
import QtQuick.Controls 2.2
Window {
id:myWindow
visible: true
width: 640
height: 480
title: qsTr("Hello World")
Rectangle{
id:customRec
width: parent.width
height: parent.height
color: "blue"
onWidthChanged: console.log("***********")
}
Button{
id:myBtn
width: 100
height: 100
onClicked: {
myWindow.width = myWindow.width +50
myWindow.height = myWindow.height +50
console.log("--------------------------")
console.log("window width" + myWindow.width)
console.log("window height" + myWindow.height)
console.log("customrect width" + customRec.width)
console.log("customrect height" + customRec.height)
}
}
}

QML Scroll View does not allow scrolling of its content

I need to create components dynamically add added to an area of the screen that, of course, needs to be scrollable. I found out that no matter how many of components I added with the scroll bar as its parent, the scroll bars would not appear and the element would not be scrollable.
I did a little fiddling and I think I came up with a minum working example of what I am talking about:
import QtQuick 2.9
import QtQuick.Window 2.2
import QtQuick.Controls 2.2
Window {
visible: true
width: 640
height: 480
title: qsTr("Hello World")
ScrollView {
width: 200
height: 200
clip: true
Label {
text: "ABC"
font.pixelSize: 224
}
// Rectangle {
// color: "#ff0000"
// width: 100
// height: 100
// }
}
}
This is a modified version of the example used int he official documentation. However when I uncomment the square the screen is no longer scrollable (scroll bars never appear).
If I remove the label and leave the rectangle (making it larger so that there is something to scroll to) it still doesn't work.
I am using Qt 5.10.
So the code below worked for me. I defined a rectangle as a backgroud to get border lines to a scrollable table that I need to create.
Rectangle {
id: tableBackground
color: "#ffffff"
border.width: 2
border.color: "#EDEDEE"
radius: 4
anchors.top: tableHeader.bottom
anchors.left: tableHeader.left
width: vmTableWidth
height: vmTableHeight - tableHeader.height
ScrollView {
id: tableArea
anchors.fill: parent
clip: true
ListView {
id: patientListView
anchors.fill: parent
model: patientList
delegate: VMPatientEntry {
onFetchReport: {
// This is a signal emitted by my VMPatientEntry.
}
}
onCurrentIndexChanged: {
// Do stuff when the current index changes.
}
}
}
}
So I hope this answer allows someone to fix their problem as well.

QML Slider value is not updating visually

I am trying to create a Slider in QML. The slider's maximumValue property can change depending on certain states in my application. When the maximumValue property changes I would like to "reset" my slider so that its value property is at the maximumValue. The problem what I am encountering is that when I change the maximumValue property, my value property changes to the right property, but visually it stays at the previous maximumValue property until I don't click on the handle for example.
Here is a simple dummy code, which reproduces this issue:
import QtQuick 2.5
import QtQuick.Window 2.2
import QtQuick.Controls 1.4
import QtQuick.Controls.Styles 1.2
ApplicationWindow {
visible: true
width: 640
height: 480
title: qsTr("Hello World")
property int maxVal: 1
Item {
width: 20
height: 200
Slider {
anchors.fill: parent
orientation: Qt.Vertical
maximumValue: maxVal
minimumValue: 0
value: 1
stepSize: 1.0
style: SliderStyle {
groove: Rectangle {
width: control.height
height: control.width
color: "red"
}
handle: Rectangle {
width: 20
height: 20
color: "green"
Text {
anchors.centerIn: parent
text: control.value
}
}
}
onMaximumValueChanged: value = maximumValue
}
}
Button {
anchors.right: parent.right
text: "Press Me"
onClicked: maxVal = 100
}
}
Below you can see some screenshots of certain stages.
When the application opens:
When I press the "Press Me" button, which sets the maximumValue to 100 from 1. As you can see the value did change from 1 to 100, but visually it stayed at the 1 position:
Finally when I click on the handler of the slider (green rectangle), then it updates and switches value to 1 from 100.
Here is the same thing as a gif:
Anybody encountered this issue before?
It looks like QTBUG-63354, which will be fixed in Qt 5.9.3.

How I can dropdown options when I check on checkbox?

I have one Checkbox with onCheckedChanged handler and what I want is, when the Checkbox is checked, dropdown a menu with several texts and text fields. I have the following code:
CheckBox {
id: box
onCheckedChanged: {
// TODO here to dropdown a menu with settings
}
}
I have texts and text fields like the following:
Component {
id: label
Text {
color: "red"
antialiasing: true
smooth: true
}
}
I'm a newbie in QML so please be patient.
You didn't really say where this menu is located, if it's floating or if it is to just appear maybe displacing other elements on the view. Anyway, to anwser your question, you can achieve what you're asking by setting the height of your 'menu' to zero then, when the CheckBox is checked, setting it to however tall you want it to be. To make the menu grow smoothing you can use a NumberAnimation.
You can change your onCheckedChanged() slot to look like this:
onCheckedChanged: {
menu.height = checked ? 100 : 0
}
and add the following, as a child of your menu element:
Behavior on height { NumberAnimation {...} }
to make the menu's height grow from 0 to 100 over a period of time to make it grow smoothly.
Another approach, which I'd prefer, is to use States with a Transition (instead of a Behavior).
Here is an example of a 'menu' which, when the CheckBox is checked, will slide out from beneath the CheckBox:
import QtQuick 2.4
import QtQuick.Controls 1.3
import QtQuick.Window 2.2
ApplicationWindow {
title: qsTr("Hello World")
width: 640
height: 480
visible: true
Rectangle {
id: checkboxContainer
anchors.top: parent.top
anchors.left: parent.left
anchors.right: parent.right
height: 100
color: "pink"
CheckBox {
id: menuCheckBox
anchors.centerIn: parent
text: qsTr("Click Me")
}
}
Rectangle {
id: menu
anchors.top: checkboxContainer.bottom
anchors.left: parent.left
anchors.right: parent.right
height: 0 //This is the default value when the 'default' state is active. That is whenever we're not in the "openState"
clip: true // this hurts rendering performance a bit but is required to make sure child elements don't exceed the bounderies of this object (so when height is zero you don't see the text)
color: "lightblue"
states: [
State {
name: "openState"
when: menuCheckBox.checked // This state is only active when the check box is checked. When you uncheck the check box we move to the 'default' state (which sets the menu's hight back to zero)
PropertyChanges {
target: menu
height: 100
}
}
]
transitions: Transition {
NumberAnimation {
property: "height"
duration: 350 //This means when the height property is changed it will take 350ms to move from what its at to what your changing it to (i.e. 0 to 100 or 100 to 0).
easing.type: Easing.InOutQuad
}
}
Text {
anchors.centerIn: parent
color: "red"
antialiasing: true
smooth: true
text: qsTr("HELLO")
}
}
}
I hope this answers your question.

Resources