I am getting an XML data from server (please refer to xmlData value).
I need to:
Create another XML with non-duplicates Folders
Create another XML with final count on monthly basis.
I am unable to do this with below code and getting duplicate records.
private var xmlData:XML = new XML("<root><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD></root>");
var folderDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
var folderDGDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
private function loaded():void{
var item:XML;
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>ALL</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
for each (item in xmlData.SUMMARY_RECORD){
if (folderDGDataXML.FOLDER_NAME.(Name==item.FOLDER).toString() == ""){
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>"+item.FOLDER+"</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
}
if (folderDataXML.SUMMARY_RECORD.(Name==item.MONTH).toXMLString() == ""){
folderDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<SUMMARY_RECORD><Name>"+item.MONTH+"</Name><COUNT>"+item.COUNT+"</COUNT></SUMMARY_RECORD>"));
}else{
var count:int = Number(folderDataXML.SUMMARY_RECORD.(Name==item.MONTH).COUNT) + Number(item.COUNT);
folderDataXML.SUMMARY_RECORD.(Name==item.MONTH).COUNT = count;
}
}
}
Final output, folderDGDataXML:
<root>
<FOLDER_NAME>
<Name>ALL</Name>
</FOLDER_NAME>
<FOLDER_NAME>
<Name>Folder1</Name>
</FOLDER_NAME>
<FOLDER_NAME>
<Name>Folder1</Name>
</FOLDER_NAME>
</root>
folderDataXML:
<root>
<SUMMARY_RECORD>
<Name>Feb</Name>
<COUNT>100</COUNT>
</SUMMARY_RECORD>
<SUMMARY_RECORD>
<Name>Feb</Name>
<COUNT>100</COUNT>
</SUMMARY_RECORD>
</root>
What am I doing wrong?
After getting correct XML, I need to populate datagrid & column chart.
Try this one
In XML Checking the elements present or not with hasOwnProperty or we can use in operator anyhow our case if it is based on value try like this way folderDGDataXML.descendants("FOLDER_NAME").(Name.text() == "Folder1"); //Return always XMLList. With the help of length() we can predict element with value occur or not.
Hope this will work for you.
var xmlData:XML = new XML("<root><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD></root>");
var folderDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
var folderDGDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
var item:XML;
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>ALL</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
for each (item in xmlData.SUMMARY_RECORD)
{
var folderName:String = item.FOLDER.text();
var monthName:String = item.MONTH.text();
var existXMLList:XMLList = folderDGDataXML.descendants("FOLDER_NAME").(Name.text() == folderName);
if (existXMLList.length() == 0)
{
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>"+item.FOLDER+"</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
}
var monthXMLList:XMLList = folderDataXML.descendants("SUMMARY_RECORD").(Name.text() == monthName);
if (monthXMLList.length() == 0)
{
folderDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<SUMMARY_RECORD><Name>"+item.MONTH+"</Name><COUNT>"+item.COUNT+"</COUNT></SUMMARY_RECORD>"));
}
else
{
monthXMLList..COUNT = Number(monthXMLList..COUNT) + Number(item.COUNT);
//If more than one node it throws error. you need to use loop operation
}
}
trace("folderDGDataXML" + folderDGDataXML);
trace("folderDataXML" + folderDataXML);
Related
In protractor, I want to verify whether added value is displaying in the grid.
How do I validate it?
The grid looks like this:
Try it at your end and let me know it works:
var a = element(by.xpath("//div[contains(text(), 'test_protractor')]")).getText().then(function(msg){
console.log(msg)
expect(msg).toEqual("test_protractor")
})
If there are multiple and you want to get only first row then
var a = element.all(by.xpath("//div[contains(text(), 'test_protractor')]")).get(1).getText().then(function(msg){
console.log(msg)
expect(msg).toEqual("test_protractor")
})
Let me assume you have created a new row with below details,
var newRow = {
"obligation_name" : "sudharsan",
"status" : "",
"module" : "Test Module"
}
If you want to verify that the newly entered row is displayed,You can try the below code,
var rowList = element.all(by.repeater("(colRenderIndex, col) in colContainer.renderedColumns"));
var expectedRow = rowList.filter(function(rowElement,index) {
var columnList = rowElement.all(by.css("div.ui-grid-cell-contents"));
return columnList.getText().then(function(columnValues) {
return (columnValues[0]== newRow["obligation_name"]) && (columnValues[1] == newRow["status"]) && (columnValues[2] == newRow["module"]);
});
});
expect(expectedRow.count()).toBeGreaterThan(0);
I am using a database-first approach with a custom html helper to get a state of a checkbox using ajax (without using form in the view). I have two tables:
Tbl_1 -> Id, state (true or false), name (name of checkbox)
Tbl_2 -> Id, user_guid, timestamp, Tbl_1Id (foreign_key)
When I do insert operations, it does without any problem but when I try to update it (based upon the logged in user as it also gets GUID, the table gets appended/inserted with new data).
My controller:
public ActionResult SetState(checkboxstate cbstate)
{
var UserId = new Guid(System.Security.Claims.ClaimsPrincipal.Current.FindFirst("sub").Value);
var ent = new StartopDatabaseEntities();
var cbs = ent.checkboxstates.Where(w => w.Name == "World").FirstOrDefault();
if (cbs == null) // when there are no records in the database
{
ent.checkboxstates.Add(cbstate);
ent.checkboxstateUpdates.SingleOrDefault(c => c.Id == cbstate.Id);
var cbsOp = new checkboxstateUpdates();
cbsOp.timestamp = DateTime.Now;
cbsOp.user_guid = UserId;
cbstate.checkboxstateUpdates.Add(cbsOp);
ent.SaveChanges();
} // record in database, update (I've only one user now, so has to update only this one)
else
{
var cbsOp = new checkboxstateUpdates(); // declare in global
var chc = new checkboxstate(); // to be declared in global
var newCbs = ent.checkboxstateUpdates.Include(c => c.checkboxstate).ToList();
foreach (var u in newCbs)
{
if(u.user_guid==UserId && u.CheckboxStateId == u.checkboxstate.Id)
{
chc.state = cbstate.state;
chc.name = cbstate.name;
ent.checkboxstates.Add(chc);
cbsOp.Tidspunkt = DateTime.Now;
cbsOp.OpdateretAfBruger = UserId;
ent.checkboxstateUpdates.Add(cbsOp);
ent.SaveChanges();
}
}
}
Can anyone explain please why it's not updating but appending/inserting same data with a new Id (primary key)? I have a simple view where Ajax sends a call to the controller with the state and name of the checkbox. I have also tried
Db.Entry(obj).state = EntityState.Modified
without any help
You have not written the code for the logic which want to achieve..
I am not clear on the logic of if block also but the else part can be fixed as following.
var newCbs = ent.checkboxstateUpdates.Include(c => c.checkboxstate).Where(u.user_guid == UserId).FirstOrDefault();
if(newCbs != null) {
newCbs.checkboxstate.state = cbstate.state;
newCbs.checkboxstate.name = cbstate.name;
newCbs.Tidspunkt = DateTime.Now;
newCbs.OpdateretAfBruger = UserId;
ent.SaveChanges();
}
Solved this with the help from #David & #Chetan:
I did some modify in the code as per David:
u.checkboxstate.state=cbstate.state;
u.checkboxstate.name=cbstate.name;
u.timestamp=DateTime.Now;
ent.saveChanges();
I was using the wrong logic i.e. getting instance of the class rather than the 'ent' object. Thanks guys for the help.
Using org.as3commons.reflect I can look-up the class name, and instantiate a class at runtime. I also have (non-working) code which invokes a method. However, I really want to set a property value. I'm not sure if properties are realized as methods internally in Flex.
I have a Metadata class which stores 3 pieces of information: name, value, and type (all are strings). I want to be able to loop through an Array of Metadata objects and set the corresponding properties on the instantiated class.
package com.acme.reporting.builders
{
import com.acme.reporting.model.Metadata;
import mx.core.UIComponent;
import org.as3commons.reflect.ClassUtils;
import org.as3commons.reflect.MethodInvoker;
public class UIComponentBuilder implements IUIComponentBuilder
{
public function build(metadata:Array):UIComponent
{
var typeClass:Class = ClassUtils.forName(getTypeName(metadata));
var result:* = ClassUtils.newInstance(typeClass);
for each (var m:Metadata in metadata)
{
if (m.name == "type")
continue;
// Attempting to invoke as method,
// would really like the property though
var methodInvoker:MethodInvoker = new MethodInvoker();
methodInvoker.target = result;
methodInvoker.method = m.name;
methodInvoker.arguments = [m.value];
var returnValue:* = methodInvoker.invoke(); // Fails!
}
return result;
}
private static function getTypeName(metadata:Array):String
{
if (metadata == null || metadata.length == 0)
throw new ArgumentError("metadata is null or empty");
var typeName:String;
// Type is usually the first entry
if (metadata.length > 1 && metadata[0] != null && metadata[0].name == "type")
{
typeName = metadata[0].value;
}
else
{
var typeMetadata:Array = metadata.filter(
function(element:*, index:int, arr:Array):Boolean
{
return element.name == "type";
}
);
if (typeMetadata == null || typeMetadata.length != 1)
throw new ArgumentError("type entry not found in metadata");
typeName = typeMetadata[0].value;
}
if (typeName == null || typeName.length == 0)
throw new Error("typeName is null or blank");
return typeName;
}
}
}
Here's some usage code:
var metadata:Array = new Array();
metadata[0] = new Metadata("type", "mx.controls.Text", null);
metadata[1] = new Metadata("text", "Hello World!", null);
metadata[2] = new Metadata("x", "77", null);
metadata[3] = new Metadata("y", "593", null);
this.addChild(new UIComponentBuilder().build(metadata));
I realize that I have to declare a dummy variable of the type I was to instantiate, or use the -inculde compiler directive. An unfortunate drawback of Flex.
Also, right now there's code to account for typecasting the value to it's specified type.
Dynamic execution in AS3 is much simpler than in other languages. This code:
var methodInvoker:MethodInvoker = new MethodInvoker();
methodInvoker.target = result;
methodInvoker.method = m.name;
methodInvoker.arguments = [m.value];
var returnValue:* = methodInvoker.invoke(); // Fails!
can be simplified to this:
var returnValue:* = result[method](m.value);
EDIT:
Since it's a property, it would be done like this:
result[method] = m.value;
and there is no return value (well, you can call the getter again but it should just return m.value unless the setter/getter do something funky.
OK, I am sorting an XMLListCollection in alphabetical order. I have one issue though. If the value is "ALL" I want it to be first in the list. In most cases this happens already but values that are numbers are being sorted before "ALL". I want "ALL" to always be the first selection in my dataProvider and then the rest alphabetical.
So I am trying to write my own sort function. Is there a way I can check if one of the values is all, and if not tell it to do the regular compare on the values?
Here is what I have:
function myCompare(a:Object, b:Object, fields:Array = null):int
{
if(String(a).toLowerCase() == 'all')
{
return -1;
}
else
if(String(b).toLowerCase() == 'all')
{
return 1;
}
// NEED to return default comparison results here?
}
//------------------------------
var sort:Sort = new Sort();
sort.compareFunction = myCompare;
Is there a solution for what I am trying to do?
The solution from John Isaacks is awesome, but he forgot about "fields" variable and his example doesn't work for more complicated objects (other than Strings)
Example:
// collection with custom objects. We want to sort them on "value" property
// var item:CustomObject = new CustomObject();
// item.name = 'Test';
// item.value = 'Simple Value';
var collection:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
var s:Sort = new Sort();
s.fields = [new SortField("value")];
s.compareFunction = myCompare;
collection.sort = s;
collection.refresh();
private function myCompare(a:Object, b:Object, fields:Array = null):int
{
if(String((a as CustomObject).value).toLowerCase() == 'all')
{
return -1;
}
else if(String((b as CustomObject).value).toLowerCase() == 'all')
{
return 1;
}
// NEED to return default comparison results here?
var s:Sort = new Sort();
s.fields = fields;
var f:Function = s.compareFunction;
return f.call(null,a,b,fields);
}
Well I tried something out, and I am really surprised it actually worked, but here is what I did.
The Sort class has a private function called internalCompare. Since it is private you cannot call it. BUT there is a getter function called compareFunction, and if no compare function is defined it returns a reference to the internalCompare function. So what I did was get this reference and then call it.
private function myCompare(a:Object, b:Object, fields:Array = null):int
{
if(String(a).toLowerCase() == 'all')
{
return -1;
}
else if(String(b).toLowerCase() == 'all')
{
return 1;
}
// NEED to return default comparison results here?
var s:Sort = new Sort();
var f:Function = s.compareFunction;
return f.call(null,a,b,fields);
}
Thanks guys, this helped a lot. In our case, we needed all empty rows (in a DataGrid) on the bottom. All non-empty rows should be sorted normally. Our row data is all dynamic Objects (converted from JSON) -- the call to ValidationHelper.hasData() simply checks if the row is empty. For some reason the fields sometimes contain the dataField String value instead of SortFields, hence the check before setting the 'fields' property:
private function compareEmptyAlwaysLast(a:Object, b:Object, fields:Array = null):int {
var result:int;
if (!ValidationHelper.hasData(a)) {
result = 1;
} else if (!ValidationHelper.hasData(b)) {
result = -1;
} else {
if (fields && fields.length > 0 && fields[0] is SortField) {
STATIC_SORT.fields = fields;
}
var f:Function = STATIC_SORT.compareFunction;
result = f.call(null,a,b,fields);
}
return result;
}
I didn't find these approaches to work for my situation, which was to alphabetize a list of Strings and then append a 'Create new...' item at the end of the list.
The way I handled things is a little inelegant, but reliable.
I sorted my ArrayCollection of Strings, called orgNameList, with an alpha sort, like so:
var alphaSort:Sort = new Sort();
alphaSort.fields = [new SortField(null, true)];
orgNameList.sort = alphaSort;
orgNameList.refresh();
Then I copied the elements of the sorted list into a new ArrayCollection, called customerDataList. The result being that the new ArrayCollection of elements are in alphabetical order, but are not under the influence of a Sort object. So, adding a new element will add it to the end of the ArrayCollection. Likewise, adding an item to a particular index in the ArrayCollection will also work as expected.
for each(var org:String in orgNameList)
{
customerDataList.addItem(org);
}
Then I just tacked on the 'Create new...' item, like this:
if(userIsAllowedToCreateNewCustomer)
{
customerDataList.addItem(CREATE_NEW);
customerDataList.refresh();
}
I am calling a web Method from javascript. The web method returns an array of customers from the northwind database. The example I am working from is here: Calling Web Services with ASP.NET AJAX
I dont know how to write this javascript method: CreateCustomersTable
This would create the html table to display the data being returned. Any help would be appreciated.
My javascript
function GetCustomerByCountry() {
var country = $get("txtCountry").value;
AjaxWebService.GetCustomersByCountry(country, OnWSRequestComplete, OnWSRequestFailed);
}
function OnWSRequestComplete(results) {
if (results != null) {
CreateCustomersTable(results);
//GetMap(results);
}
}
function CreateCustomersTable(result) {
alert(result);
if (document.all) //Filter for IE DOM since other browsers are limited
{
// How do I do this?
}
}
else {
$get("divOutput").innerHTML = "RSS only available in IE5+"; }
}
My web Method
[WebMethod]
public Customer[] GetCustomersByCountry(string country)
{
NorthwindDALTableAdapters.CustomersTableAdapter adap =
new NorthwindDALTableAdapters.CustomersTableAdapter();
NorthwindDAL.CustomersDataTable dt = adap.GetCustomersByCountry(country);
if (dt.Rows.Count <= 0)
{
return null;
}
Customer[] customers = new Customer[dt.Rows.Count];
for (int i = 0; i < dt.Rows.Count; i++)
{
NorthwindDAL.CustomersRow row = (NorthwindDAL.CustomersRow)dt.Rows[i];
customers[i] = new Customer();
customers[i].CustomerId = row.CustomerID;
customers[i].Name = row.ContactName;
}
return customers;
}
Try to look what is the result variable value in debug mode. If the structure seems the structure that i'm imagining, something like this could work:
function CreateCustomersTable(result) {
var str = '<table>';
str += '<tr><th>Id</th><th>Name</th></tr>';
for ( var i=0; i< result.length; i++){
str += '<tr><td>' + result[i].CustomerId + '</td><td>' + result[i].Name + '</td></tr>';
}
str += '</table>';
return str;
}
And then You can do somethig like this:
var existingDiv = document.getElementById('Id of an existing Div');
existingDiv.innerHTML = CreateCustomersTable(result);
I wish this help you.
Something like this, assuming you have JSON returned in the "result" value. The "container" is a div with id of "container". I'm cloning nodes to save memory, but also if you wanted to assign some base classes to the "base" elements.
var table = document.createElement('table');
var baseRow = document.createElement('tr');
var baseCell = document.createElement('td');
var container = document.getElementById('container');
for(var i = 0; i < results.length; i++){
//Create a new row
var myRow = baseRow.cloneNode(false);
//Create a new cell, you could loop this for multiple cells
var myCell = baseCell.cloneNode(false);
myCell.innerHTML = result.value;
//Append new cell
myRow.appendChild(myCell);
//Append new row
table.appendChild(myRow);
}
container.appendChild(table);
You should pass the array as JSON or XML instead of just the toString() value of it (unless that offcourse is returns either JSON oR XML). Note that JSOn is better for javascript since it is a javascript native format.
Also the person who told you that browser other then IE can not do DOM manipulation should propably have done horrible things to him/her.
If your format is JSON you can just for-loop them and create the elements and print them. (once you figured out what format your service returns we can help you better.)