Vimeo embeded videos sending HTTP requests on HTTPS page - http

I use a site that has SSL with Extended Validation enabled. In other words, when a user accesses my site, the address tool bar becomes green with the name of my company showing that it's secure. If my page gets any resources from HTTP page, I lost the green status and it becomes an ugly orange with exclamation mark.
The problem is that my page has a Vimeo video embedded (with iFrame). When you access it, the address tool bar is green but if you pass your mouse over the video, it becomes orange! After some investigation, it was detected that a http site is called (http://pdl.vimeocdn.com/...).
Searching google show me the following answer from Vimeo:
https://vimeo.com/forums/topic:98803
In other words, it's NEVER going to be fixed :(
Is there any way we can BLOCK this call from this embeded video?

That call is the actual video file, so you wouldn't want to block it. We are working with our CDN to get HTTPS video delivery working, and we're very close.

You seem to have covered most of the question - in the absence of Vimeo fixing the problem, the only practical way to avoid this is to proxy the vimeo access via your own site and rewrite the content passing through to change the URLs to point to your (HTTPS) proxy - which is hardly a very appropriate solution.

Related

How can I serve a tracking image that won't get removed by Hotmail?

I'm building an emailshot tracking function in my ASP.NET site which will serve up a linked image when the email is opened, so allowing me to count the email opens.
It's all above-board, opted-in etc, etc, and I've tried two methods:
calling a .aspx page that serves (direct to the Response stream) a Base64-encoded image stored in a database
calling a .ashx HTTP handler that serves an image from a physical folder
Both of these techniques work absolutely fine - the image is served, and I can process the hit in the page code - if I use my POP email or my Gmail accounts.
However, Hotmail blocks them both. It doesn't even give the option of displaying images - there's no trace of the original link if I View Source on the browser email display.
Links to images only seem to display correctly in the Hotmail browser window if I:
Use an actual domain name in the link (rather than an IP address or localhost for testing) AND
Link to physical files (rather than pages that serve them) using <img src="http://domain/imagefilename.ext"/>.
Is there an alternate approach that will at least give the option of viewing the image? I'm not trying to conceal the tracking in any way - there will usually be other linked images in the emails anyway.
Nor does the thing being served have to be an image - is there anything else that can be served (and hence counted) that isn't treated as suspicious by over-zealous mail servers such as Hotmail?
Cheers.
You can add a querystring value at the end of the url. And then configure IIS to handle that extension.
WELL what are you asking is a nightmare for email server.this same technique is used by spammers to get valid emailid out of junk emailids. For now i can assure you tracking opening of email is impossible using any white hat or gray hat techniques on any reputiable servers.
plese see these links for more details:-
http://emailuniverse.com/ezine-tips/?id=502
https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/22662/way-to-ensure-that-my-sent-email-was-read
However dont take myword 'impossible' for granted, there are some protected techineques available but i am not sure about it
http://mailchimp.com/
good luck

ssl get null my session in first login

I have ssl in my e-commerce web site. At first, browser always asking "do you want to show this web site's content" in all page and when I redirect to mycart page browser shows the same alert like that "This webpage contains content that will not be delivered using a secure HTTPS connection, which could comprise the safety of the entire webpage....Yes...No....". After I clicked to yes, all my sessions get null. Do you have any suggestions for me?
KR,
Çağın
The problem is your secure page is accessing information (scripts, images, etc.) from pages that are not secure. For example if you reference a javascript file (say jQuery) from a nonsecure site (say Google) then certain browsers (like IE) will display this message. You need to search through your references and find these. In other words searching src="http or something along those lines will pull up the nonsecure references.
Depending on what you are referencing you can move those items to your site so that they are now "secure". Also, in some cases changing your reference from src="http to src="https can resolve the problem.
Once you resolve this alert you can check again to see if you are having sessions issues as you could have some other issues to address.

easiest way to find the HTTP include in a HTTPS throwing security warning?

I often have to go into other people's work to make modifications for short-term contracts and a lot of times I have to deal with security warnings throwing in IE because something is including HTTP content from maybe an image, or css or whatever, onto a HTTPS secure page.
I was just curious if there is a well known program or service that will scan a URL and come back with exactly what is coming from HTTP instead of HTTPS on a page?
I use fiddler, but for reasons having to do with my own inadequacies, I find the program difficult at times, and am un-able to zero in on the offending content in a timely manner.
Any advice from the true pros?
Using Fiddler:
In main menu > Tools > Fiddler options, tab HTTPS, uncheck Capture HTTPS CONNECTs. Then, in main menu > Rules, check Hide HTTPS CONNECTs.
This way, the only thing you'll see in your Fiddler capture will be the HTTP requests and responses (without the HTTPS requests or CONNECTs getting in the way).
I would load up the page in Firefox and use Firebug's Net panel to examine all the resources that the page loads.
There's no 'set in stone' way as far as I know, but the easiest way I know of is to either use a tool such as Opera Dragonfly or Chrome's Web Inspector, view the 'Network' tab and see where the resources are being loaded from. You can sometimes (depending on what you use) order this alphabetically and you will clearly see between http:// and https://.
Also as already mentioned, you could just search the source for http://.

non-secure items in Sharepoint 2007

When accessing our sharepoint site via HTTPS, users inside our network receive a prompt stating "Display nonsecure items?".
When accessing the site from outside our network via HTTPS, some images do not display at all. Some links do not function correctly as well.
We have found that this occurs when site administrators create images and/or link and display them using HTTP.
How can we seamlessly integrate HTTP and HTTPS so that we don't have to tell site administrators to use only HTTPS when creating images and links?
I have looked at our Alternate Access mappings, and here is the relevant info there:
http://computername Default http://computername
http://HostName Default http://HostName
http://subdomain.domain.com Intranet http://subdomain.domain.com
https://subdomain.domain.com Extranet https://subdomain.domain.com
http://computername:port Default http://computername:port
http://subdomain2.domain.com Default http://subdomain2.domain.com
http://computername:port2 Default http://computername:port2
...Some explanation:
ComputerName is the name of the server.
HostName is just a single hostname DNS entry we have so people can quickly type for example "Sharepoint" in their address bar.
Subdomain is basically sharepoint.ourdomain.com. pretty self explanitory
Subdomain2 is for our Business Intelligence services server.
We have two entries with port numbers. One goes to central admin. the other gives an error and i'm not sure what its used for (if anything).
I inherited support of this application. I hope things arent too messed up.
So TLDR: How can I get HTTP and HTTPS working seamlessly together inside/outside our network to avoid missing images and invalid links?
Thanks all.
The problem is that the urls in the links and image src are absolute rather than relative.
http://subdomain.domain.com/someimage.gif is always going to use http as its an absolute link.
/someimage.gif is a relative link (the leading / means relative from the hostname) so if this url is from a http site it will use http, from a https site will use https (well technically depends upon the document BASE but you can ignore that for your purposes)
E.g. given the relative URL /somepage/someimage.gif
When accessed from this page
Will mean this
http://example.com/somepage/
http://example.com/somepage/someimage.gif
httpS://example.com/somepage/
httpS://example.com/somepage/someimage.gif
http://NEWDOMAIN.com/somepage/
http://NEWDOMAIN.com/somepage/someimage.gif
and everything will work just fine with no warnings.
The built in CEWP puts all links in as Absolute. To fix -
MSDN - Fixing absolute URLs for all Alternate Access Mappings (AAM) of Content Editor Web Part with a Control Adapter

http image viewable from inside page, but not direct url

I do not believe this is possible, but I figure there are people out there way smarter than me, so why not check ..
I would like to have an HTTP image that is viewable from within a page when used w/in an img tag, but NOT visible if the img src link is called directly. Does that make sense? Viewable in page, but not if called directly.
Quick edit .. acceptable alternative is to embed image in page in such a way as url is not human readable / able to be extracted and typed into browser.
Update 2 ... .NET IIS7 env.
Note that "security" products such as Norton Internet Security and Norton Personal Firewall prevent the HTTP Referer: (TBL's spelling mistake, not mine) header being sent by default. As these products are widely used, referrer blocking will break things for an awful lot of people.
FWIW, if I was keen to get your image other than by viewing your page (although I can't imagine why I should be) I would just grab the bits as they came over the network when I viewed your page, using something like Charles or Fiddler. It's completely impossible to make content available over the web but prevent people from making a copy.
I believe that you can achieve something like this by relying on the referrer header supplied by the browser - when the referrer is a web page on your own site, you serve up the image, but not otherwise.
It's not 100% reliable (as passing the referrer isn't mandatory in the HTTP spec) but works well enough for some sites.
This is achieved through configuration of your webserver; you therefore might have more luck asking this on ServerFault.
Yes, there are lots of articles on how to setup mod_rewrite rules in apache to try and prevent direct access to files.
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/apache-mod_rewrite-hot-linking-images-leeching-howto/
It depends on how it gets built. You can always make sure your referrer is the page that you expect it to be hosted from and lock down requests there.
If you have some notion of authentication, you could bury the image under some type of php/ruby script or asp.net http handler that requests the image from the server or database (in a place that is not publicly viewable but is reachable by your server-side code) and that handler could check for your authentication status before returning it.
Frankly, I re-worked my solution so I didn't really have to worry bout it ... know that's a cop out, as it doesn't REALLY answer the question, but there it is. My concern that users would be able to defraud the "game" I was creating if they could figure out the sequence that was being used to name the images. Quick and dirty solution .... don't make image file names sequential / predictable.

Resources