Related
Suppose we have a vector, we can easily enough lapply, sapply or map across 1 element at a time.
Is there a way to do the same across groups of (>1) elements of the vector?
Example
Suppose we are constructing API calls by appending comma-separated user_identifiers to the URL, like so:
user_identifiers <- c("0011399", "0011400", "0013581", "0013769", "0013770", "0018374",
"0018376", "0018400", "0018401", "0018410", "0018415", "0018417",
"0018419", "0018774", "0018775", "0018776", "0018777", "0018778",
"0018779", "0021627", "0023492", "0023508", "0023511", "0023512",
"0024120", "0025672", "0025673", "0025675", "0025676", "0028226",
"0028227", "0028266", "0028509", "0028510", "0028512", "0028515",
"0028518", "0028520", "0028523", "0029160", "0033141", "0034586",
"0035035", "0035310", "0035835", "0035841", "0035862", "0036503",
"0036580", "0036583", "0036587", "0037577", "0038582", "0038583",
"0038587", "0039727", "0039729", "0039731", "0044703", "0044726"
)
get_data <- function(user_identifier) {
url <- paste0("https://www.myapi.com?userIdentifier=",
paste0(user_identifier, collapse=","))
fromJSON(url)
}
In the above, get_data(user_identifiers) would return the APIs response for all 60 user_identifiers in one single request.
But suppose the API accepts a maximum of 10 identifiers at a time (so we cannot do all 60 at once).
A simple solution could be to simply map/lapply/sapply over each element, e.g. sapply(get_data, user_identifiers - this would work fine - however, we would make 60 API calls, when all we really need is 6. If we could map/lapply/sapply over groups of 10 at a time; that would be ideal
Question
Is there an elegant way to map/lapply/sapply over groups of n elements at a time (where n>1)?
We can split user_identifiers in groups of 10 and use sapply/map/lapply
sapply(split(user_identifiers, gl(length(user_identifiers)/10, 10)), get_data)
where gl creates groups from 1 to 6 each of length 10.
gl(length(user_identifiers)/10, 10)
# [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
# 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
#Levels: 1 2 3 4 5 6
The same groups can be created with rep
rep(1:ceiling(length(user_identifiers)/10), each = 10)
As #thelatemail mentioned, we can use cut and specify number of groups to cut the data into
sapply(split(user_identifiers, cut(seq_along(user_identifiers),6)), get_data)
I have a dataset of Ages for the customer and I wanted to make a frequency distribution by 9 years of a gap of age.
Ages=c(83,51,66,61,82,65,54,56,92,60,65,87,68,64,51,
70,75,66,74,68,44,55,78,69,98,67,82,77,79,62,38,88,76,99,
84,47,60,42,66,74,91,71,83,80,68,65,51,56,73,55)
My desired outcome would be similar to below-shared table, variable names can be differed(as you wish)
Could I use binCounts code into it ? if yes could you help me out using the code as not sure of bx and idxs in this code?
binCounts(x, idxs = NULL, bx, right = FALSE) ??
Age Count
38-46 3
47-55 7
56-64 7
65-73 14
74-82 10
83-91 6
92-100 3
Much Appreciated!
I don't know about the binCounts or even the package it is in but i have a bare r function:
data.frame(table(cut(Ages,0:7*9+37)))
Var1 Freq
1 (37,46] 3
2 (46,55] 7
3 (55,64] 7
4 (64,73] 14
5 (73,82] 10
6 (82,91] 6
7 (91,100] 3
To exactly duplicate your results:
lowerlimit=c(37,46,55,64,73,82,91,101)
Labels=paste(head(lowerlimit,-1)+1,lowerlimit[-1],sep="-")#I add one to have 38 47 etc
group=cut(Ages,lowerlimit,Labels)#Determine which group the ages belong to
tab=table(group)#Form a frequency table
as.data.frame(tab)# transform the table into a dataframe
group Freq
1 38-46 3
2 47-55 7
3 56-64 7
4 65-73 14
5 74-82 10
6 83-91 6
7 92-100 3
All this can be combined as:
data.frame(table(cut(Ages,s<-0:7*9+37,paste(head(s+1,-1),s[-1],sep="-"))))
I have a dataframe, where one column contains strings.
q = data.frame(number=1:2,text=c("The surcingle hung in ribands from my body.", "But a glance will show the fallacy of this idea."))
I want to use the word_stats function for each individual record.
is it possible?
text_statistic <- apply(q,1,word_stats)
this will apply word_stats() row-by-row and return a list with the results of word_stats() for every row
you can do it many ways, lapply or sapply apply a Function over a List or Vector.
word_stats <- function(x) {length(unlist(strsplit(x, ' ')))}
sapply(q$text, word_stats)
Sure have a look at the grouping.var argument:
dat = data.frame(number=1:2,text=c("The surcingle hung in ribands from my body.", "But a glance will show the fallacy of this idea."))
with(dat, qdap::word_stats(text, number))
## number n.sent n.words n.char n.syl n.poly wps cps sps psps cpw spw pspw n.state p.state n.hapax grow.rate
## 1 2 1 10 38 14 2 10 38 14 2 3.800 1.400 .200 1 1 10 1
## 2 1 1 8 35 12 1 8 35 12 1 4.375 1.500 .125 1 1 8 1
Say I have data that look like this:
level start end
1 1 133.631 825.141
2 2 133.631 155.953
3 3 146.844 155.953
4 2 293.754 302.196
5 3 293.754 302.196
6 4 293.754 301.428
7 2 326.253 343.436
8 3 326.253 343.436
9 4 333.827 343.436
10 2 578.066 611.766
11 3 578.066 611.766
12 4 578.066 587.876
13 4 598.052 611.766
14 2 811.228 825.141
15 3 811.228 825.141
or this:
level start end
1 1 3.60353 1112.62000
2 2 3.60353 20.35330
3 3 3.60353 8.77526
4 2 72.03720 143.60700
5 3 73.50530 101.13200
6 4 73.50530 81.64660
7 4 92.19030 101.13200
8 3 121.28500 143.60700
9 4 121.28500 128.25900
10 2 167.19700 185.04800
11 3 167.19700 183.44600
12 4 167.19700 182.84600
13 2 398.12300 418.64300
14 3 398.12300 418.64300
15 2 445.83600 454.54500
16 2 776.59400 798.34800
17 3 776.59400 796.64700
18 4 776.59400 795.91300
19 2 906.68800 915.89700
20 3 906.68800 915.89700
21 2 1099.44000 1112.62000
22 3 1099.44000 1112.62000
23 4 1100.14000 1112.62000
They produce the following graphs:
As you can see there are several time intervals at different levels. The level-1 interval always spans the entire duration of the time of interest. Levels 2+ have time intervals that are shorter.
What I would like to do is select the maximum number of non-overlapping time intervals covering each period that contain the maximum number of total time within them. I have marked in pink which ones those would be.
For small dataframes it is possible to brute force this, but obviously there should be some more logical way of doing this. I'm interested in hearing some ideas about what I should try.
EDIT:
I think one thing that could help here is the column 'level'. The results come from Kleinberg's burst detection algorithm (package 'bursts'). You will note that the levels are hierarchically organized. Levels of the same number cannot overlap. However levels successively increasing e.g. 2,3,4 in successive rows can overlap.
In essence, I think the problem could be shortened to this. Take the levels produced, but remove level 1. This would be the vector for the 2nd example:
2 3 2 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 3 2 3 4
Then, look at the 2s... if there are fewer than or only one '3' then that 2 is the longest interval. But if there are two or more 3's between successive 2's, then those 3s should be counted. Do this iteratively for each level. I think that should work...?
e.g.
vec<-df$level %>% as.vector() %>% .[-1]
vec
#[1] 2 3 2 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 3 2 3 4
max(vec) #4
vec3<-vec #need to find two or more 4's between 3s
vec3[vec3==3]<-NA
names(vec3)<-cumsum(is.na(vec3))
0 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 8
2 NA 2 NA 4 4 NA 4 2 NA 4 2 NA 2 2 NA 4 2 NA 2 NA 4
vec3.res<-which(table(vec3,names(vec3))["4",]>1)
which(names(vec3)==names(vec3.res) & vec3==4) #5 6
The above identifies rows 5 and 6 (which equate to rows 6 and 7 in original df) as having two fours that lie between 3's. Perhaps something using this sort of approach might work?
OK here is a stab using your second data set to test. This might not be correct in all cases!!
library(data.table)
dat <- fread("data.csv")
dat[,use:="maybe"]
make.pass <- function(dat,low,high,the.level,use) {
check <- dat[(use!="no" & level > the.level)]
check[,contained.by.above:=(low<=start & end<=high)]
check[,consecutive.contained.by.above:=
(contained.by.above &
!is.na(shift(contained.by.above,1)) &
shift(contained.by.above,1)),by=level]
if(!any(check[,consecutive.contained.by.above])) {
#Cause a side effect where we've learned we don't care:
dat[check[(contained.by.above),rownum],use:="no"]
print(check)
return("yes")
} else {
return("no")
}
}
dat[,rownum:=.I]
dat[level==1,use:=make.pass(dat,start,end,level,use),by=rownum]
dat
dat[use=="maybe" & level==2,use:=make.pass(dat,start,end,level,use),by=rownum]
dat
dat[use=="maybe" & level==3,use:=make.pass(dat,start,end,level,use),by=rownum]
dat
#Finally correct for last level
dat[use=="maybe" & level==4,use:="yes"]
I wrote these last steps out so you can trace in your own interactive session to see what's happening (see the print to get an idea) but you can remove the print and also condense the last steps into something like lapply(1:dat[,max(level)-1], function(the.level) dat[use=="maybe" & level==the.level,use:=make.pass......]) In response to your comment if there are an arbitrary number of levels you will definitely want to use this formalism, and follow it with a final call to dat[use=="maybe" & level==max(level),use:="yes"].
Output:
> dat
level start end use rownum
1: 1 3.60353 1112.62000 no 1
2: 2 3.60353 20.35330 yes 2
3: 3 3.60353 8.77526 no 3
4: 2 72.03720 143.60700 no 4
5: 3 73.50530 101.13200 no 5
6: 4 73.50530 81.64660 yes 6
7: 4 92.19030 101.13200 yes 7
8: 3 121.28500 143.60700 yes 8
9: 4 121.28500 128.25900 no 9
10: 2 167.19700 185.04800 yes 10
11: 3 167.19700 183.44600 no 11
12: 4 167.19700 182.84600 no 12
13: 2 398.12300 418.64300 yes 13
14: 3 398.12300 418.64300 no 14
15: 2 445.83600 454.54500 yes 15
16: 2 776.59400 798.34800 yes 16
17: 3 776.59400 796.64700 no 17
18: 4 776.59400 795.91300 no 18
19: 2 906.68800 915.89700 yes 19
20: 3 906.68800 915.89700 no 20
21: 2 1099.44000 1112.62000 yes 21
22: 3 1099.44000 1112.62000 no 22
23: 4 1100.14000 1112.62000 no 23
level start end use rownum
On the off chance this is correct, the algorithm can roughly be described as follows:
Mark all the intervals as possible.
Start with a given level. Pick a particular interval (by=rownum) say called X. With X in mind, subset a copy of the data to all higher-level intervals.
Mark any of these that are contained in X as "contained in X".
If consecutive intervals at the same level are contained in X, X is no good b/c it wastes intervals. In this case label X's "use" variable as "no" so we'll never think about X again. [Note: if it's possible that non-consecutive intervals are contained in X, or that containing multiple intervals across levels could ruin X's viability, then this logic might need to be changed to count contained intervals instead of finding consecutive ones. I didn't think about this at all, but it's just occurring to me now, so use at your own risk.]
On the other hand, if X passed the test, then we've already established it's good. Mark it as a "yes." But importantly, we also have to mark any single interval contained in X as "no," or else when we iterate the step it will forget that it was contained inside a good interval and mark itself as "yes" as well. This is the side effect step.
Now, iterate, ignoring any results that we've already determined.
Finally any "maybe"s leftover at the highest level are automatically in.
Let me know what you think of this--this is a rough draft and some aspects might not be correct.
I hope someone could suggest me something for this "problem", because I really don't know how to proceed...
Well, my data are like this
data<-data.frame(site=c(rep("A",3),rep("B",3),rep("C",3)),time=c(100,180,245,5,55,130,70,120,160))
where time is in minute.
I want to select only the records, for each site, for which the difference is more than 60, so the output should be Like this:
out<-data[c(1:4,6,7,9),]
What I have tried so far. Well,to get the difference I use this:
difference<-stack(tapply(data$time,data$site,diff))
but then, no idea how to pick up those records which satisfied my condition...
If there is already a similar question, although I've searched for a while, I apologize for this.
To make things clear, as probably the definition of difference was not so unambiguous, I need to select all the records (for each site) which are separated at least by 60 minutes, so not only those that are strictly subsequent in time.
Specifically,
> out
site time
1 A 100#included because difference between 2 and 1 is>60
2 A 180#included because difference between 3 and 2 is>60
3 A 245#included because separated by 6o minutes before record#2
4 B 5#included because difference between 6 and 4 is>60
6 B 130#included because separated by 6o minutes before record#4
7 C 70#included because difference between 9 and 7 is>60
9 C 160#included because separated by 60 minutes before record#7
May be to solve the "problem", it could be useful to consider the results of the difference, something like this:
> difference
values ind
1 80 A#include record 1 and 2
2 65 A#include record 2 and 3
3 50 B#include only record 4
4 75 B#include record 6 because there are(50+75)>60 m from r#4
5 50 C#include only record 7
6 40 C#include record 9 because there are (50+40)>60 m from r#7
Thanks for the help.
data[ave(data$time, data$site, FUN = function(x){c(61, diff(x)) > 60}) == 1, ]
# site time
# 1 A 100
# 2 A 180
# 3 A 245
# 4 B 5
# 6 B 130
# 7 C 70
Edit following updated question:
keep <- as.logical(ave(data$time, data$site, FUN = function(x){
c(TRUE, cumsum(diff(x)) > 60)
}))
data[keep, ]
# site time
# 1 A 100
# 2 A 180
# 3 A 245
# 4 B 5
# 6 B 130
# 7 C 70
# 9 C 160
#Calculate the differences
data$diff <- unlist(by(data$time, data$site,function(x)c(NA,diff(x))))
#subset data
data[is.na(data$diff) | data$diff > 60,]
Using plyr:
ddply(dat,.(site),function(x)x[c(TRUE , diff(x$time) >60),])