Dealing with a Flex client that needs to connect through BlazeDS to a Java backend. Currently, we have a requirement for fifty-plus clients to be attached at any given time. We need to test the load of this requirement against the server to see if we are going to have any performance issues.
So, I have written a client emulator that will act like real clients and connect to the server though Blazeds. The emulator was to make this test require less hardware for I would connect 50 client from one machine (or two 25, basically minimize hardware needs). Instead of having fifty different machines to run clients on. The issue I am running into is a limitation of emulated clients allowed from one session. There seems to be a five client limit. This goes for both IExplorer and FireFox browsers. The problem is with the JMS subscriptions. The JMS topic seem to get connected but never subscribed.
I played around with some settings on the BlazeDS server side to no avail.
- max-streaming-connections-per-session
- max-streaming-clients
After the sixth connection I start getting a
16:18:21.578 [ERROR] com.ray.sv.flex.util.SocketLogTarget SocketLogTarget failed with SecurityError: [SecurityErrorEvent type="securityError" bubbles=false cancelable=false eventPhase=2 text="Error #2048: Security sandbox violation: http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/ClientEmulator/clientemulator.swf cannot load data from 127.0.0.1:1337."]
Very strange, but what is stranger is that client needs to recover from server disconnects. Which was a totally different issue all together with the remote object calls and subscribing timing issues, kept getting Duplicate Session Id errors. But now I have that ironed out, but I see the same issue when the client fails a connection five times.
The sixth time always fails with the same error. And this is with only one client connected.
Has anyone seen this same issue?
Thanks for your time.
Related
I am in the process of building a Blazor Server-Side database application.
One of my requirements is that the user can open each website page in a different tab.
I have found that after 5 tabs are opened, any new pages are blocked from rendering. If I close one page, then the 6th page can render. Apparently this is due to the fact that browsers can support a limited number of SignalR connections at one time. I have read the limit for Chrome is 6 at a time (although I can only get 5 working).
Error Messages in Chrome:
Error: Connection disconnected with error 'Error: Server returned handshake error: Handshake was canceled.'
Error: Error: Server returned handshake error: Handshake was canceled.
Uncaught (in promise) Error: Cannot send data if the connection is not in the 'Connected' State.
at e.send (blazor.server.js:1)
Is there a solution for this problem? Or do I need to explore porting to Blazor Client?
I found the following article about this topic but not sure it it can be applied to a Blazor application:
SignalR and Browser Connection limit
It's a little scary as I have already built quite a bit of code, and don't want to spend too much time trying to hack a workaround.
I finally managed to replicate it on my internal network, it seems to have been resolved now that I have installed WebSockets.
Open Server Manager
Open Add Roles and Features
Expand WebServer (IIS)
Expand Application Development
Select WebSocket Protocol
After installing this, I opened 20 tabs of my blazor server application, each one on a different page and the issue did not re-occur (I also did a couple of refreshes on each to be sure).
I came across this after reading
Blazor works best when using WebSockets as the SignalR transport due to lower latency, reliability, and security. Long Polling is used by SignalR when WebSockets isn't available or when the app is explicitly configured to use Long Polling.
From the Blazor docs.
I am inside a network where I need proxy settings to access the internet.
I have a weird problem.
The internet is working fine.
But it is one particular instance when i get this error:
Network Error (tcp_error)
A communication error occurred: "Operation timed out"
The Web Server may be down, too busy, or experiencing other problems preventing it from responding to requests. You may wish to try again at a later time.
For assistance, contact your network support team.
This happens when I use hadoop in local mode.
I can access the UI interface. I can see the jobs running. but when I try to see the logs of each task.. i am not able to access those logs.
UI--> job-->map--> task--> all <-- this is where the error is..
Any clues?
THanks
Not sure about exactly what your tcp action is, or about Hadoop or your proxy setup, but if you can reliably repeat the error, and the timeout error happens at approximately the same time each time you test, and that time is on the order of minutes, my guess would be that you've got a true processing delay (perhaps caused by blocking somewhere) at the server, but not necessarily.
I'm using SignalR with Redis as a message bus on a server that sits behind an Nginx proxy for load balancing. I used SignalR's PersistentConnection class to write a simple chat program that broadcasts messages to users belonging to the same certain group. Users are added to a group in OnConnectedAsync, removed in OnDisconnectAsync, and the user-to-group mapping is deterministic.
Currently, the client side falls back to long polling for whatever reason (I'm not entirely sure why), and whenever the client sets up a new connection after waiting for and receiving a response, seemingly at random, the server will sometimes respond to the new connection immediately with the previous response, despite there having only been one POST.
The message ID's tend to differ by exactly one, (the smaller ID coming first), with the rest of the response remaining the same. I logged some debug info and am quite positive that my override of OnReceivedAsync is sending one response per one request. I tried the same implementation without the Redis message bus, and got the same problem. Running locally (with long polling) however yielded good results so I suspect that the problem might be with the way the message bus might be buffering messages to refresh clients who might not be caught up, and some weird timing with the cutting/setting up of connections with the Nginx load balancer, but beyond that, I am very much at a loss.
Any help would be appreciated.
EDIT: Further investigation reveals that duplication occurs at somewhat regular intervals of approximately 20-30 seconds. I'm led to believe that the message expiration in the message bus might have something to do with the bug.
EDIT: Bug can be seen here: http://tinyurl.com/9q5t3va
The server is simply broadcasting a counter being sent by the client. You will notice some responses are duplicated every 20 or so.
Reducing the number of worker processes in the IIS (6.0) Server Manager from 2 to 1 solved the problem.
I have a fms 3 server runing a video chat room application. It goes well except everyday it will die once or twice. After restarting the fms server, everything goes working again.
I really need to know the reason why fms server can die.
I checked its log, i saw many
"Server rejected an invalid flow."
Any hint will be greatest welcome.
This error can be caused by making an attempt to make a P2P connection to the server's peer ID. Connections to the server need to use
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/845685
i believe the problem is that you are attempting to make a P2P connection to the server's peer ID; that is, something like
var ns:NetStream = new NetStream(netConnection, netConnection.farID);
ns.play(...);
under the covers, this will open a new RTMFP flow to the server that will appear to the server as a new incoming client, but the initial handshake will be incorrect (the first/only command message is "play" instead of "connect"). i see this on Cirrus all the time.
it's possible that FMS doesn't account properly when rejecting these flows (leaving the connection count higher than it should be), or perhaps it leaves the flow open waiting for a "connect" message that will never come, so the connection count is legitimately higher than you think it is.
in any case, make sure you're not opening a P2P stream to the server's peer ID.
However, this error may not actually be related to the crashes. Additionally, are you even sure FMS is crashing and not just your application? If it's just your application, review your application logs (instead of the core FMS logs) and if you don't have anything useful add more logging to your application.
We currently experience a problem with a self-written server application running on Windows (occurs on different versions). The server listens at a TCP port, accepts connections, exchanges some data and then closes the connections again. There are about 100 clients that connect from time to time.
Sometimes the server stops to work: Log files show that connections are still accepted, but that at the first read attempt a socket error (10054 - Connection reset by peer) occurs. I don't think it is a client issue because it suddenly stops working for all clients.
Now we found out, that the same problem occurs with our old server software, that is even written in another programming language. So it doesn't seem to be an error in our program - I think it has to be some kind of OS / firewall issue? Of course, firewalls have been deactivated, which didn't solve the issue yet.
Any ideas where to look into? Wireshark logs will follow soon..
Excerpt from the log (Timestamp, Thread Id, message)
11:37:56.137 T#3960 Connection from 10.21.13.3
11:37:56.138 T#3960 Client Exception: Socket Error # 10054
Connection reset by peer.
11:37:56.138 T#3960 ClientDisconnected
11:38:00.294 T#4144 Connection from 10.21.13.3
You can see that the exception occurs almost at the same time as the connection is accepted, in this case the client reconnects after a few seconds.
A "stateful" firewall or NAT keeps track of connections, and ought to send RSTs for connectiosn it doesn't know about. If the firewall loses track of connections for some reason, then you'll probably see random connections being reset.
Our router at work does this — it forgets about connections when the PPP connection dies, which is remarkably unhelpful when it rains and the DSL restart takes a bit too long. However, instead of resetting connections, it just drops packets (even more unhelpful!).
Sounds like a firewall or routing issue - maybe stale connections get disconnected after a timeout period. Are you using a ping/keepalive inside your protocol.
Otherwise you may ask Wireshark to see what is going on.
First, thanks for many hints - I'm afraid the problem was a completely different one which you couldn't possibly solve by reading my question.
The server application uses log4net, configured with a log file an ImmediateFlush = true. If every log statement is directly written into the file and multiple socket connections occur this slows down the whole application.
The server needed about a minute to really accept the connection. This was far more than the timeout on clientside. So in the log there was only shown "accepted" followed by "disconnected" - even the log was delayed!
Sorry for the inconvenience...
Have you tried changing the backlog and then see how much time or how many clients are served before this problem occurs
You don't say what Windows versions you're using for the server, but you should be aware that the Windows TCP/IP stack behaves differently in server and client OSes. There are limits on how many simultaneous incoming connections a client OS will allow, and they are significantly lower than you might expect.
What do the logs look like from the client side?
Since the error is stating that the client is dropping the connection; if you see the same error on the client side then it is a firewall or proxy that is dropping the connection (both side seeing the opposite side dropping the connection is indicative of a proxy/firewall).
If the error is not present on the client side; then I would say that your client side is where you will see the actual error.