I've been using the freebase rdf dump and in the latest dump (Jan 26, 2014) I noticed that the file size is smaller and the property looks a lot different. For example, the schema for University of Ottawa (https://www.googleapis.com/freebase/v1/rdf/m/011kn2) doesn't have the property 'ns:location.location.geolocation..location.geocode.latitude' that the old dump used to have. Has Google changed the API or is this a one-time glitch? Thanks!
The fact that the property name has two adjacent periods (..) makes it look buggy to me. Perhaps they just fixed the bug. If so, hopefully it's a permanent improvement not a "glitch."
Related
I'm trying to convert a 4D DICOM image (x,y,z,time) to a different file format. Something goes wrong, because the output image has lost the time dimension.
I'm trying to decide whether:
the DICOM series is broken -- it's possible that a 3rd party, who anonymized data, removed critical information from the header; or
the conversion code is incomplete -- it simply can't handle this flavour of DICOM
The answer to this will determine whether I have to fix the DICOM, or fix the converter.
I've tried diving into the DICOM standard, to understand what specific header values mean, but I don't find this document helpful; it gives a mere word or two for each header field. I see fields in my data that look suspicious, but I don't know if it's actually wrong, or if I don't understand what it's supposed to be telling me.
I can think of several ways to answer my problem:
Are there any tools out there that can confidently classify a DICOM series as either valid or invalid?
Is there a document which describes precisely what each DICOM header value is supposed to contain?
Is there a better approach to figuring out which is broken -- the image, or the converter?
You are not looking at the right document, you should be looking at PS 3.3 - current. For example:
A.4.3 MR Image IOD Module Table
Or as someone mentioned in the comments use dciodvfy from dicom3tools package.
Playing around with Flyway and I have one question, for the Initial Version (for a completely new blank database), can I modularise the SQL files to be something like:
V0_1_0__01Initial_Version.sql
V0_1_0__02Setup_Countries.sql
V0_1_0__03Create_Default_Organisation.sql
and so on, so that I force a precise loading order of the SQL files?
Nothing in the documentation suggests I can't do this, but then again, nothing in the documentation suggests I can do this :-)
Thanks!
No, the ordering is achieved through the version number. You have to move your ordering number into the version number itself.
What Alex is alluding to and what works wonderfully, is simply to do this:
V0_1_0_001__Initial_Version.sql
V0_1_0_002__Setup_Countries.sql
V0_1_0_003__Create_Default_Organisation.sql
As you can see, the 001, 002 and 003 are now part of the version — a bit like a very minor patch level.
Alfresco allows uploading newer versions of documents in the repository and also keeps track of the version history, it seems. However, I could not find any way to compare or diff a document with its prior versions.
Is this possible? are there any good external plugins or tools for this?
I assume you think of something similiar to the good old Unix diff tool which basically compares text files and can show the result in a human readable form.
The general equivalent situation in alfresco is far more complicated. You have an arbitrary amount of properties of different type. The text file you might think of just happens to have character bytes in cm:content.
So to answer your question : I don't know of any extension providing a general diff between versions, but it should not be two hard rolling your own for text files other simple special comparisons. In the former case you might want to have a look at Java library for free-text diff for libraries providing the base functionality.
Looking for the same functionality and found this Alfresco addon
http://code.google.com/p/versions-difference-alfresco-plug-in/
I'm looking for a way to include a full blown English dictionary in an iPhone app (a word game), the database must be able to include all conjugation possibilities for verbs, must include singular and plural spellings. So my app can query the database to check if the spelling is correct.
Is there a free or commercial database that would include those data?
You can use UITextChecker for spell-checking.
Regarding a dictionary, when I built an iOS dictionary library sometime ago (www.lexicontext.com) I used WordNet. WordNet contains a lot of interesting semantic info ...
NSSpellChecker is your easiest option, but it might be more complete to use the online Scrabble official dictionary as well and check it against both (only one match required.)
You could do a web-service request using http://www.hasbro.com/scrabble/en_US/search.cfm
http://www.a2zwordfinder.com/cgi-bin/scrabble.cgi?Letters=&Pattern=______&MatchType=Exactly&MinLetters=3&SortBy=Alpha&SearchType=Scrabble
Change min letters to get different results
The best place to find a database for a spell-checker is probably a free text processing application. So, I'd try with Open Office version of Word. Download it, install it and simply find the dictionary file.
Open Office is licensed under LGPL, so it should be fine, just check if the licence covers the data as well (i.e. the dictionary file).
Maybe this English corpus helps: http://www.wordfrequency.info/free.asp
I can see where to get an rss feed for the BUG LIST, however I would like to get rss updates for modifications to current bugs if possible.
This is quite high up when searching via Google for it, so I'm adding a bit of advertisement here:
As Bugzilla still doesn't support this I wrote a small web service supporting exactly this. You can find its source code here and a running instance here.
What you're asking for is the subject of this enhancement bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256718
but no one seems to be working on it.
My first guess is that the way to do it is to add a template somewhere like template/en/default/bug/show.atom.tmpl with whatever you need. Put it in custom or an extension as needed.
If you're interested in working on it or helping someone with it, visit channel #mozwebtools on irc.mozilla.org.
Not a perfect solution, but with the resolution of bug #255606, Bugzilla now allows listing all bugs, by running a search with no criteria, and you can then get the results of the search in Atom format using the link in the bottom of the list.
From the release notes for 4.2:
Configuration: A new parameter search_allow_no_criteria has been added (default: on) which allows admins to forbid queries with no criteria. This is particularly useful for large installations with several tens of thousands bugs where returning all bugs doesn't make sense and would have a performance impact on the database.