NSTableView reloading a group cell without using reloadData? - nstableview

Is there any way to make a view based NStableView reload its group cells from its datasource/delegate?
reloadDataForRowIndexes:columnIndexes: - although the documentation doesn't mention it, it only works for non group cells
reloadData - works fine but I would like to avoid it since it's a bit overkill for what I'm trying to do.
I have other solutions for this problem (such as using binding for the textFields I want to have changed, or "manually" getting the cell from the table view and changing its textfield values).
But it seems silly that there's no way to reload a group cell..
Am I missing something or should I file a radar with this?

Related

Best way to present table data in JavaFX

I'm writing an business application that imports bank statements and allows the user to categorise entries. Once they have done this they can preview their tax statement such as below:
This is currently a gridpane with each cell containing a vbox containing a label and textfield. I don't like it. Its bulky & inflexible.
Each cell is a unique calculation or sum and I'm finding it difficult to get a layout/grouping that I am happy with. I'd like to add descriptive notes adajecent to some cells but this could/would throw the layout out.
I thought about setting specific cells in a tableview like this table:
but seeing this thread How to set value to cell in TableView in javafx and the comment
In JavaFX you generally don't set the values cell by cell like that.
I'm wondering what would be best practice? It seems a bit short sighted that tableviews cannot be used to present (non uniform) non-jpa data.
Update My current work in progress alternative solution is shown in the table above populated by a small class with 3 variables (category, amount and description). Seems better practice.

Formula within a textbox in a form showing as "#Name?" when opened

I have a Microsoft Access 2010 database program that let's users update certain information within based on permissions. There are 2 versions, one for each facility. I recently added a new form to the 2nd facility by copy/pasting the form from the 1st file and then adding the necessary queries.
Everything worked great except for one column that contains a RowNumber formula for displaying the, you guessed it, row number. This was working in the 1st file and I have made sure that every property matches exactly, but the image below is what I get when I try to open the form. As if to add more chaos to the mix, the 1st file started showing the same results as well, despite working perfectly fine before and me not even touching that specific text box.
I have Googled this issue but have not seen anything with this specific result. Can anyone explain what this means?
Column in question (where formula is located):
Name: Text57
Control Source: =RowNum([Form])
Visible: No
Datasheet Capt: Seq
Column in question:
Name: Label58
Caption: Text57
Visible: Yes
Row numbering on the fly normally is completely academic in Access as it has no meaning. The row number on a form has no relationship to anything in the data, and can change if the underlying data changes in any way.
The RowNum() function is not inbuilt in access as far as I can tell, so I'm not sure how it could work.

How does one do a dynamic table in IBM Notes 8.5.3 or 9.0.1?

I'm writing a Notes Client application. Web compatibility is a secondary concern. The language is LotusScript.
The specification: a form to enter lines from receipts. The lines are all saved as part of the same document so that they can be signed as an atomic unit.
When a line is added, it is to be formatted into a table for presentation. Ultimately, this architecture is like an input/datastore/presentation split.
I've managed to get the data stored and signed, and I think I've managed to get it deserializing properly (the LotusScript debugger makes it difficult to see, but it looks right). The problem now is the UI.
Looking at the Programmable Table, it is always a tabbed table with only one row shown per tab. I need a programmable table which can dynamically have rows added to it for display, without forcing new tabs to be created.
This suggests that I would need to use a Rich Text field to contain a table, but thus far my attempts to get anything to display when I try to update a Rich Text field in edit mode have failed. I am forced to conclude that it is impossible.
I cannot figure out how I'm supposed to do a dynamically-displayed list of tabular data like this. Any advice?
Most people just create a table with one row and N columns, with a multi-valued field in each column, and use code to append values to each of the fields in parallel. You don't get borders between rows this way or the ability to do variable formatting of cells, and you have to be careful to avoid letting data length exceed column widths in order to keep everything aligned properly.
If you truly want a dynamic table for presentation with all the bells and whistles that you can get in terms of cell formatting, then the Midas Rich Text API from Genii Software is a commercial solution that can do the job.
I blogged about this a couple of years ago: http://blog.texasswede.com/dynamic-tables-in-classic-notes/
This is a non-XPages solution, but of course you can also use XPages to achieve the same/similar result. It does not use tabs, as each row is a separate table.
Alternatively, you can build your Rich Text Table in another NotesDocument, which you then save. Then use NotesUIDocument.ImportItem (which is undocumented, but present in the R8.5 mail template) to update your NotesUIDocument.
Don't forget to delete the other NotesDocument when you're done.
Another option is to build the table in HTML in computed text, and re-open the document every time you modify it. I have inherited a system that does that, and I hate it...so be warned :)

Flex : A better way to represnt data from a table having large number of columns

I have to give a functionality on one of my pages is like:
I have data which represents data of a row from a table, and table has many columns.
This data has to be edited, and sent back to the server.
I am showing data in a datagrid, which obviously doesnt look good as we always have one row and that too a large row, so user has to use scroll to look for some values.
I want suggestions for this, like what should i use to make it look better and more user friendly.
I could have hard coded things but considering, if tomorrow table schema or xml respnse change it will break.
Any suggestions will be nice.
If I have clearly understood your problem, you have too much information in a row and you would like too be able to see all of your row data in the meantime.
How about creating dynamically, on a row double click by example, a form popup that would display vertically your columns data ?

Dojo datagrid and treegrid help - datagrid has a reformating flash?

I'm having a bit of a time trying to get Dojo grids (1.5) to play nice. Specifically I've spent about two weeks of work trying to implement a grid that allows for our result set data to collapse into rows, where rows can be expanded. Data comes in as a full set in JSON format, using ItemFileReadStore as the store. Any subsequent sorts or pagings are handled by GETing a new json from the application, and passing in new query parameters in the url.
The nested data was only two layers deep - a top layer to always be displayed and an array of child data with identical structure as the top layer. Each node has a unique ID and a cluster ID - on a parent node the unique ID and cluster ID will match.
I was initially very excited with TreeGrid - but I couldn't see how I could format it to do what I needed - namely eliminate the 'summary row' and one extra row full of null cells (???) that I just couldnt figure out how to remove unless I focused the query to only one cluster. I studied the test examples, built many test pages myself, tried to understand the forestModel, which for what I could tell was unnecessary... I found so little documentation, and sources I found online hinted that TreeGrid might not be reliable...
So I decided I would try to implement the expandable/collapsible rows in dataGrid.
I flattened the JSON data and added another attribute to indicate being a top level node ('alwaysShow' = true). I built my grid programaticaly and applied grid.filter() to pull only those top level nodes. I modified that filter by extending the ItemFileReadStore _FetchItems "filter" method to allow for OR querying instead of AND, and also modified it to allow for keys to point to arrays - when a top level node (small +/- icon in the cell) is clicked, the cluster ID of the parent node is added to the grid.filter.allowed[] and the filter is updated, allowing nodes with that cluster_id value to be displayed.
This worked fine on my small test set of five records (although id say a little slugish...) - but now I am pulling ~900 rows back from the application, and on expanding large clusters (~80 rows) I am seeing a very long flash of blue and white on the filter updates. I've spent most of my day trying to step through in firebug to find where its happening, but the dojo logic is so spread out. Seems to be happening before the call to _Grid.js defaultUpdate.
Its so bad that I am considering trying again with TreeGrid. Im also considering just doing this by hand... Im kicking myself for spending so much time trying to get Dojo to work to begin with. I would also consider a commercial "JSON->table with collapsible row" library if anyone has any recommendations...
Any suggestions or insights? Familiarity with the flashing problem or how I could adapt TreeGrid to my needs? I'm aware this is a bit of a rant... Many thanks for any help.
-robbie
EDIT: I eventually gave up trying to get Dojo to do what I needed and coded it myself in less than a day. Not the best use of three weeks...
EDIT:
I just found a solution that works for me, I have added the following CSS:
.dojoxGridSummaryRow {
visibility: collapse
}
Basically the summaries are probably still created but they are not visible nor taken into account in the table layout. That's good for me. Hope this will solve your issue.
This won't help but just to let you know that:
"- but I couldn't see how I could format it to do what I needed - namely eliminate the 'summary row' "
is the very EXACT same thing I'm trying to achieve and did not find the solution even though this looks like a very simple feature... Will let you know if I found a solution...

Resources