Create tree using multithreading and recursion - asp.net

This question is specifically related creating a tree using multithreading and recursion.
I have got the code running that will create the tree using recursion but the time required to create that tree is more than I want to spend.
The reason for the slowness of that is because I am calling TaxonomyManager in Ektron CMS which takes a little bit to return and all the calls add up quickly. I was wondering if there is a way to create a tree using multithreading.
(I don't have the code at present with me but I will add that code as soon as I get access to that code).
If I go this route what the chances of me corrupting the tree as the tree is one root node and multithreading is going to add those nodes to that node at some point.
Thanks for any input anyone may have.
Edit: Added code. TaxonomyNodes is my class doesn't have a lot of properties. Has Id,Name,Description, Path (Stores the path in similar way as Ektron), HasChildren flag, ParentId, and public List Children.
public List<TaxonomyNodes> CreateTree()
{
try
{
TaxonomyManager tManager = new TaxonomyManager();
TaxonomyCriteria criteria = new TaxonomyCriteria();
criteria.AddFilter(TaxonomyProperty.ParentId, CriteriaFilterOperator.EqualTo, 0);
criteria.OrderByDirection = EkEnumeration.OrderByDirection.Ascending;
criteria.OrderByField = TaxonomyProperty.Id;
List<TaxonomyData> tDataList = tManager.GetList(criteria);
int index = 0;
if (tDataList != null)
{
foreach (TaxonomyData item in tDataList)
{
if (item.Name != "Companies" && item.Name != "Content Information Centers")
root.Insert(index++, new TaxonomyNodes() { ParentId = 0, TaxonomyId = item.Id, TaxonomyDescription = item.Description, TaxonomyName = item.Name, TaxonomyPath = item.Path, HasChildren = item.HasChildren, Children = new List<TaxonomyNodes>() });
}
}
index = 0;
foreach (TaxonomyNodes itemT in root)
{
itemT.Children = CreateNodes(itemT.TaxonomyId, itemT);
}
return root;
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw;
}
}
private List<TaxonomyNodes> CreateNodes(long taxonomyId, TaxonomyNodes itemToAddTo)
{
try
{
TaxonomyManager tManager = new TaxonomyManager();
TaxonomyCriteria criteria = new TaxonomyCriteria();
criteria.AddFilter(TaxonomyProperty.ParentId, CriteriaFilterOperator.EqualTo, taxonomyId);
criteria.OrderByDirection = EkEnumeration.OrderByDirection.Ascending;
criteria.OrderByField = TaxonomyProperty.Id;
List<TaxonomyData> tDataList = tManager.GetList(criteria);
List<TaxonomyNodes> node = new List<TaxonomyNodes>();
if (tDataList != null)
{
foreach (TaxonomyData item in tDataList)
{
node.Add(new TaxonomyNodes() { ParentId = taxonomyId, Children = null, TaxonomyId = item.Id, TaxonomyDescription = item.Description, TaxonomyName = item.Name, TaxonomyPath = item.Path, HasChildren = item.HasChildren });
itemToAddTo.Children = node;
if (item.HasChildren)
{
CreateNodes(item.Id, node[node.Count - 1]);
}
else
{
return node;
}
}
}
return node;
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw;
}
}

Rather than get into multithreading, which, though it may work, is not officially supported by Ektron's APIs and may present other challenges, I would recommend some form of caching or other storage for the data that does not require recursive DB calls.
Options:
1 - Ektron's Taxonomy APIs do include a GetTree method, which can pull the entire tree, up to a specified number of levels, and child items in a single API call rather than recursively. This may perform better and would be easily cached.
2 - Ektron provides API-level caching that can be readily enabled in the web.config by changing
<framework defaultContainer="Default" childContainer="BusinessObjects" />
To:
<framework defaultContainer="Cache" childContainer="BusinessObjects" />
3 - Use an eSync Strategy which will output the data you need (better to use your own streamlined objects than to store Ektron's with all the extra data) to something like an XML file. See this sample, http://developer.ektron.com/Templates/CodeLibraryDetail.aspx?id=1989&blogid=116, which I wrote to do this very thing. It hooks into the DB sync complete event and triggers a console application which writes the entire Taxonomy structure out to an XML file.

Related

I have a "Upload Record" PXAction to load records to grid and release these records

I have a custom PXbutton called UploadRecords, when I click this button I should populate the grid with records and release the records.
Release Action is pressed in the UploadRecords action delegate. The problem I get with this code is, the code here function properly for less records by release action but when passes thousands of records to release, it takes huge time(> 30 min.) and show the error like Execution timeout.
suggest me to avoid more execution time and release the records fastly.
namespace PX.Objects.AR
{
public class ARPriceWorksheetMaint_Extension : PXGraphExtension<ARPriceWorksheetMaint>
{
//public class string_R112 : Constant<string>
//{
// public string_R112()
// : base("4E5CCAFC-0957-4DB3-A4DA-2A24EA700047")
// {
// }
//}
public class string_R112 : Constant<string>
{
public string_R112()
: base("EA")
{
}
}
public PXSelectJoin<InventoryItem, InnerJoin<CSAnswers, On<InventoryItem.noteID, Equal<CSAnswers.refNoteID>>,
LeftJoin<INItemCost, On<InventoryItem.inventoryID, Equal<INItemCost.inventoryID>>>>,
Where<InventoryItem.salesUnit, Equal<string_R112>>> records;
public PXAction<ARPriceWorksheet> uploadRecord;
[PXUIField(DisplayName = "Upload Records", MapEnableRights = PXCacheRights.Select, MapViewRights = PXCacheRights.Select)]
[PXButton]
public IEnumerable UploadRecord(PXAdapter adapter)
{
using (PXTransactionScope ts = new PXTransactionScope())
{
foreach (PXResult<InventoryItem, CSAnswers, INItemCost> res in records.Select())
{
InventoryItem invItem = (InventoryItem)res;
INItemCost itemCost = (INItemCost)res;
CSAnswers csAnswer = (CSAnswers)res;
ARPriceWorksheetDetail gridDetail = new ARPriceWorksheetDetail();
gridDetail.PriceType = PriceTypeList.CustomerPriceClass;
gridDetail.PriceCode = csAnswer.AttributeID;
gridDetail.AlternateID = "";
gridDetail.InventoryID = invItem.InventoryID;
gridDetail.Description = invItem.Descr;
gridDetail.UOM = "EA";
gridDetail.SiteID = 6;
InventoryItemExt invExt = PXCache<InventoryItem>.GetExtension<InventoryItemExt>(invItem);
decimal y;
if (decimal.TryParse(csAnswer.Value, out y))
{
y = decimal.Parse(csAnswer.Value);
}
else
y = decimal.Parse(csAnswer.Value.Replace(" ", ""));
gridDetail.CurrentPrice = y; //(invExt.UsrMarketCost ?? 0m) * (Math.Round(y / 100, 2));
gridDetail.PendingPrice = y; // (invExt.UsrMarketCost ?? 0m)* (Math.Round( y/ 100, 2));
gridDetail.TaxID = null;
Base.Details.Update(gridDetail);
}
ts.Complete();
}
Base.Document.Current.Hold = false;
using (PXTransactionScope ts = new PXTransactionScope())
{
Base.Release.Press();
ts.Complete();
}
List<ARPriceWorksheet> lst = new List<ARPriceWorksheet>
{
Base.Document.Current
};
return lst;
}
protected void ARPriceWorksheet_RowSelected(PXCache cache, PXRowSelectedEventArgs e, PXRowSelected InvokeBaseHandler)
{
if (InvokeBaseHandler != null)
InvokeBaseHandler(cache, e);
var row = (ARPriceWorksheet)e.Row;
uploadRecord.SetEnabled(row.Status != SPWorksheetStatus.Released);
}
}
}
First, Do you need them all to be in a single transaction scope? This would revert all changes if there is an exception in any. If you need to have them all committed without any errors rather than each record, you would have to perform the updates this way.
I would suggest though moving your process to a custom processing screen. This way you can load the records, select one or many, and use the processing engine built into Acumatica to handle the process, rather than a single button click action. Here is an example: https://www.acumatica.com/blog/creating-custom-processing-screens-in-acumatica/
Based on the feedback that it must be all in a single transaction scope and thousands of records, I can only see two optimizations that may assist. First is increasing the Timeout as explained in this blog post. https://acumaticaclouderp.blogspot.com/2017/12/acumatica-snapshots-uploading-and.html
Next I would load all records into memory first and then loop through them with a ToList(). That might save you time as it should pull all records at once rather than once for each record.
going from
foreach (PXResult<InventoryItem, CSAnswers, INItemCost> res in records.Select())
to
var recordList = records.Select().ToList();
foreach (PXResult<InventoryItem, CSAnswers, INItemCost> res in recordList)

WF 4 Rehosted Designer - get foreach InArgument Value

After reading this article:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tilovell/archive/2009/12/29/the-trouble-with-system-activities-foreach-and-parallelforeach.aspx
I have defined the ForEachFactory as follows:
public class ForEachFactory<T> : IActivityTemplateFactory
{
public Activity Create(DependencyObject target)
{
return new ForEach<T>
{
DisplayName = "ForEachFromFactory",
Body = new ActivityAction<T>
{
Argument = new DelegateInArgument<T>("item")
}
};
}
}
All works well but is it possible to check how that DelegeateInArgument in my case named "item" changes its value ?
So if i have defined an array in the variables section and initialized with
{1, 2, 3} i need a way to check how the "item" takes value 1, 2 and then 3.
To be more accurate, i've added this pic, with a breakpoint on the WriteLine activity inside the foreach. When the execution will stop there, is there a way to find out what the value of item is ?
EDIT 1:
Possible solution in my case:
After struggling a bit more i found one interesting thing:
Adding one of my custom activities in the Body of the ForEach, i am able to get the value of the item like this :
So, my activity derives from : CodeActivity
Inside the protected override String[] Execute(CodeActivityContext context) i am doing this job.To be honest, this solves the thing somehow, but it is doable only in my custom activities. If i would put a WriteLine there for example, i would not be able to retrieve that value.
you can access the DelegeateInArgument of a ForEach activity by inspecting the ModelItem trees parent and checking for DelegeateInArgument's. If you need a specific code example to achieve this I may need a some time to code the example. As it has been a long time since I did this, see my question i asked over on msdn
So basically where your break point is, you can access the variable values as these are defined with n the scope of your activity as 'variables'. However the 'item' variable is actually only accessible from the parent loop activity. So you have to get the model item of the current executing activity and then traverse up the tree to find the parent containing the desired DelegateInArgument.
Can you flesh out exactly what you want to achieve? Is it that when your debugging the workflow in the re-hosted designer you want to display the variable values to the user as they change in the UI?
Edit - added tracking example
So as your wanting to display the variable values during execution of the workflow we need to use tracking to achieve this. In the example your using the author has already implemented some basic tracking. So to achieve the extended variable tracking you want you will need to alter the tracking profile.
Firstly amend the WorkflowDesignerHost.xaml.cs file alter the RunWorkflow method to define the SimulatorTrackingParticipant as below.
SimulatorTrackingParticipant simTracker = new SimulatorTrackingParticipant()
{
TrackingProfile = new TrackingProfile()
{
Name = "CustomTrackingProfile",
Queries =
{
new CustomTrackingQuery()
{
Name = all,
ActivityName = all
},
new WorkflowInstanceQuery()
{
**States = {all },**
},
new ActivityStateQuery()
{
// Subscribe for track records from all activities for all states
ActivityName = all,
States = { all },
**Arguments = {all},**
// Extract workflow variables and arguments as a part of the activity tracking record
// VariableName = "*" allows for extraction of all variables in the scope
// of the activity
Variables =
{
{ all }
}
}
}
}
};
This will now correctly capture all workflow instance states rather than just Started/Completed. You will also capture all Arguments on each activity that records tracking data rather than just the variables. This is important because the 'variable' were interested in is actually (as discussed earlier) a DelegateInArgument.
So once we have changed the tracking profile we also need to change the SimulatorTrackingParticipant.cs to extract the additional data we are now tracking.
If you change the OnTrackingRecordReceived method to include the following sections these will capture variable data and also Argument data during execution.
protected void OnTrackingRecordReceived(TrackingRecord record, TimeSpan timeout)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(
String.Format("Tracking Record Received: {0} with timeout: {1} seconds.", record, timeout.TotalSeconds)
);
if (TrackingRecordReceived != null)
{
ActivityStateRecord activityStateRecord = record as ActivityStateRecord;
if (activityStateRecord != null)
{
IDictionary<string, object> variables = activityStateRecord.Variables;
StringBuilder vars = new StringBuilder();
if (variables.Count > 0)
{
vars.AppendLine("\n\tVariables:");
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, object> variable in variables)
{
vars.AppendLine(String.Format(
"\t\tName: {0} Value: {1}", variable.Key, variable.Value));
}
}
}
if (activityStateRecord != null)
{
IDictionary<string, object> arguments = activityStateRecord.Arguments;
StringBuilder args = new StringBuilder();
if (arguments.Count > 0)
{
args.AppendLine("\n\tArgument:");
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, object> argument in arguments)
{
args.AppendLine(String.Format(
"\t\tName: {0} Value: {1}", argument.Key, argument.Value));
}
}
//bubble up the args to the UI for the user to see!
}
if((activityStateRecord != null) && (!activityStateRecord.Activity.TypeName.Contains("System.Activities.Expressions")))
{
if (ActivityIdToWorkflowElementMap.ContainsKey(activityStateRecord.Activity.Id))
{
TrackingRecordReceived(this, new TrackingEventArgs(
record,
timeout,
ActivityIdToWorkflowElementMap[activityStateRecord.Activity.Id]
)
);
}
}
else
{
TrackingRecordReceived(this, new TrackingEventArgs(record, timeout,null));
}
}
}
Hope this helps!

Web Api Help Page XML comments from more than 1 files

I have different plugins in my Web api project with their own XML docs, and have one centralized Help page, but the problem is that Web Api's default Help Page only supports single documentation file
new XmlDocumentationProvider(HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data/Documentation.xml"))
How is it possible to load config from different files? I wan to do sth like this:
new XmlDocumentationProvider("PluginsFolder/*.xml")
You can modify the installed XmlDocumentationProvider at Areas\HelpPage to do something like following:
Merge multiple Xml document files into a single one:
Example code(is missing some error checks and validation):
using System.Xml.Linq;
using System.Xml.XPath;
XDocument finalDoc = null;
foreach (string file in Directory.GetFiles(#"PluginsFolder", "*.xml"))
{
if(finalDoc == null)
{
finalDoc = XDocument.Load(File.OpenRead(file));
}
else
{
XDocument xdocAdditional = XDocument.Load(File.OpenRead(file));
finalDoc.Root.XPathSelectElement("/doc/members")
.Add(xdocAdditional.Root.XPathSelectElement("/doc/members").Elements());
}
}
// Supply the navigator that rest of the XmlDocumentationProvider code looks for
_documentNavigator = finalDoc.CreateNavigator();
Kirans solution works very well. I ended up using his approach but by creating a copy of XmlDocumentationProvider, called MultiXmlDocumentationProvider, with an altered constructor:
public MultiXmlDocumentationProvider(string xmlDocFilesPath)
{
XDocument finalDoc = null;
foreach (string file in Directory.GetFiles(xmlDocFilesPath, "*.xml"))
{
using (var fileStream = File.OpenRead(file))
{
if (finalDoc == null)
{
finalDoc = XDocument.Load(fileStream);
}
else
{
XDocument xdocAdditional = XDocument.Load(fileStream);
finalDoc.Root.XPathSelectElement("/doc/members")
.Add(xdocAdditional.Root.XPathSelectElement("/doc/members").Elements());
}
}
}
// Supply the navigator that rest of the XmlDocumentationProvider code looks for
_documentNavigator = finalDoc.CreateNavigator();
}
I register the new provider from HelpPageConfig.cs:
config.SetDocumentationProvider(new MultiXmlDocumentationProvider(HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data/")));
Creating a new class and leaving the original one unchanged may be more convenient when upgrading etc...
Rather than create a separate class along the lines of XmlMultiDocumentationProvider, I just added a constructor to the existing XmlDocumentationProvider. Instead of taking a folder name, this takes a list of strings so you can still specify exactly which files you want to include (if there are other xml files in the directory that the Documentation XML are in, it might get hairy). Here's my new constructor:
public XmlDocumentationProvider(IEnumerable<string> documentPaths)
{
if (documentPaths.IsNullOrEmpty())
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(documentPaths));
}
XDocument fullDocument = null;
foreach (var documentPath in documentPaths)
{
if (documentPath == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(documentPath));
}
if (fullDocument == null)
{
using (var stream = File.OpenRead(documentPath))
{
fullDocument = XDocument.Load(stream);
}
}
else
{
using (var stream = File.OpenRead(documentPath))
{
var additionalDocument = XDocument.Load(stream);
fullDocument?.Root?.XPathSelectElement("/doc/members").Add(additionalDocument?.Root?.XPathSelectElement("/doc/members").Elements());
}
}
}
_documentNavigator = fullDocument?.CreateNavigator();
}
The HelpPageConfig.cs looks like this. (Yes, it can be fewer lines, but I don't have a line limit so I like splitting it up.)
var xmlPaths = new[]
{
HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/bin/Path.To.FirstNamespace.XML"),
HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/bin/Path.To.OtherNamespace.XML")
};
var documentationProvider = new XmlDocumentationProvider(xmlPaths);
config.SetDocumentationProvider(documentationProvider);
I agree with gurra777 that creating a new class is a safer upgrade path. I started with that solution but it involves a fair amount of copy/pasta, which could easily get out of date after a few package updates.
Instead, I am keeping a collection of XmlDocumentationProvider children. For each of the implementation methods, I'm calling into the children to grab the first non-empty result.
public class MultiXmlDocumentationProvider : IDocumentationProvider, IModelDocumentationProvider
{
private IList<XmlDocumentationProvider> _documentationProviders;
public MultiXmlDocumentationProvider(string xmlDocFilesPath)
{
_documentationProviders = new List<XmlDocumentationProvider>();
foreach (string file in Directory.GetFiles(xmlDocFilesPath, "*.xml"))
{
_documentationProviders.Add(new XmlDocumentationProvider(file));
}
}
public string GetDocumentation(System.Reflection.MemberInfo member)
{
return _documentationProviders
.Select(x => x.GetDocumentation(member))
.FirstOrDefault(x => !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(x));
}
//and so on...
The HelpPageConfig registration is the same as in gurra777's answer,
config.SetDocumentationProvider(new MultiXmlDocumentationProvider(HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data/")));

How to get a diff of pending changes to a model in ASP.NET MVC 2

I am working on an ASP.Net MVC app and I want to show a confirmation page after the user edits some data. What I would like to show is a list of the pending changes that the user made to the model.
For example,
Are you sure you want to make the following changes:
FieldName:
Previous Value: XXX
New Value: YYY
I know I can read my stored value from the database and compare it with the POSTed object but I want this to work generally. What would be some good ways to approach this?
To clarify, I am looking for a general way to get a "diff" of the pending changes. I already know how to get the previous and pending changes. Kind of like how TryUpdateModel() can attempt to update any Model with posted values. I'd like a magical GetPendingModelChanges() method that can return a list of something like new PendingChange { Original = "XXX", NewValue = "YYY"} objects.
You might be doing this already but I wouldn't send my model to the view, create a viewmodel. In this case I would map the model data to the viewmodel twice, my viewmodel might contain OrderInput and OrderInputOrig. Then stick OrderInputOrig in hidden fields. On post back you can compare the values and then redirect, if something changed, to a display view with the original and the changes for confirmation.
Maybe something like this:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(CustomerInput cutomerInput)
{
var changes = PublicInstancePropertiesEqual(cutomerInput.OriginalCustomer, cutomerInput.Customer);
if (changes != null)
{
cutomerInput.WhatChangeds = changes;
return View("ConfirmChanges", cutomerInput);
}
return View();
}
public ActionResult ConfirmChanges(CustomerInput customerInput)
{
return View(customerInput);
}
from: Comparing object properties in c#
public static Dictionary<string, WhatChanged> PublicInstancePropertiesEqual<T>(T self, T to, params string[] ignore) where T : class
{
Dictionary<string, WhatChanged> changes = null;
if (self != null && to != null)
{
var type = typeof(T);
var ignoreList = new List<string>(ignore);
foreach (System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pi in type.GetProperties(System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Public | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Instance))
{
if (!ignoreList.Contains(pi.Name))
{
var selfValue = type.GetProperty(pi.Name).GetValue(self, null);
var toValue = type.GetProperty(pi.Name).GetValue(to, null);
if (selfValue != toValue && (selfValue == null || !selfValue.Equals(toValue)))
{
if (changes == null)
changes = new Dictionary<string, WhatChanged>();
changes.Add(pi.Name, new WhatChanged
{
OldValue = selfValue,
NewValue=toValue
});
}
}
}
return changes;
}
return null;
}
Coming in very late here, but I created a library to do this on MVC models and providing "readable" diffs for humans using MVC ModelMetadata:
https://github.com/paultyng/ObjectDiff
It gives me output when I save a Model similar to:
Status: 'Live', was 'Inactive'
Phone: '123-456-7898', was '555-555-5555'
Etc.
use the TempData Dictionary.
TempData["previousValue"];
TempData["newValue"];

ASP.NET TreeView sort

I am accustomed to winform TreeView having a Sorted property which automatically manages nodes sorting.
I now have to alphabetically sort an ASP.NET TreeView and I'm surprised I cannot find any similar property or callback method.
Is there any way to automatically achieve this operation in ASP.NET or do I have to manually sort and insert my nodes in correct order?
You'll need to write your own sorting function but its reasonably trivial to add this functionality.
http://blog.mdk-photo.com/post/C-Extentionmethod-Tree-Node-View-Sort().aspx
.NET 3.5 supports extension methods so you can add functionality to pre-existing System Classes. Notice the this syntax on the method parameter. More Info Here
public static void Sort(this TreeView tv)
{
TreeNodeCollection T = tv.Nodes.Sort();
tv.Nodes.Clear();
tv.Nodes.AddRange(T);
}
public static void Sort(this TreeNode tn)
{
TreeNodeCollection T = tn.ChildNodes.Sort();
tn.ChildNodes.Clear();
tn.ChildNodes.AddRange(T);
}
The first link contains the rest of the code you'll need to complete the sorting functionality
Three years later and the TreeView still doesn't support sorting natively. Here's a simple method to do sort all nodes alphabetically.
private void SortTreeNodes(TreeNodeCollection treeNodes)
{
var sorted = true;
foreach (TreeNode treeNode in treeNodes)
{
SortTreeNodes(treeNode.ChildNodes);
}
do
{
sorted = true;
for (var i = 0; i < treeNodes.Count - 1; i++)
{
var treeNode1 = treeNodes[i];
var treeNode2 = treeNodes[i + 1];
if (treeNode1.Text.CompareTo(treeNode2.Text) > 0)
{
treeNodes.RemoveAt(i + 1);
treeNodes.RemoveAt(i);
treeNodes.AddAt(i, treeNode2);
treeNodes.AddAt(i + 1, treeNode1);
sorted = false;
}
}
} while (!sorted);
}
Call it like this
SortTreeNodes(myTreeView.Nodes);

Resources