I'm facing some issue when I try to persist a collection of entities using a symfony form. I followed the official documentation but I can't make it work becouse of this error:
Entity of type ProductItem has identity through a
foreign entity Product, however this entity has no identity itself. You have to call
EntityManager#persist() on the related entity and make sure that an identifier was
generated before trying to persist ProductItem. In case of Post Insert ID
Generation (such as MySQL Auto-Increment or PostgreSQL SERIAL) this means you
have to call EntityManager#flush() between both persist operations.
I have to entities linked with a OneToMany relation:
Product
/**
* #ORM\Column(name="id", type="integer", nullable=false)
* #ORM\Id
* #ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="IDENTITY")
*/
protected $id;
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="ProductItem", mappedBy="product",cascade={"persist"})
*/
protected $items;
And ProductItem
/**
* #ORM\Id()
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Product", inversedBy="items")
*/
protected $product;
/**
* #ORM\Id()
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Item")
*/
protected $item;
This is how it is added to the form:
->add('items','collection',array(
'label' => false,
'type' => new ProductItemType(),
'allow_add' => true,
'allow_delete' => true,
'by_reference' => false))
And this is the controller action:
public function newAction()
{
$product= new Product();
$form = $this->createForm(new ProductType(), $product);
if($request->isMethod("POST"))
{
$form->handleRequest($request);
if($form->isValid())
{
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$em->persist($product);
$em->flush();
}
}
}
I'm doing something wrong for sure in the controller because, as the error message says, I have to persist $product before adding $productItems, but how can I do that?
I only get this error when trying to persist a new entity, if the entity has been persisted before, I can add as may items as I want successfully
I had exact same problem last week, here is a solution I found after some reading and testing.
The problem is your Product entity has cascade persist (which is usually good) and it first try to persist ProductItem but ProductItem entities cannot be persisted because they require Product to be persisted first and its ID (Composite key (product, item).
There are 2 options to solve this:
1st I didn't use it but you could simply drop a composite key and use standard id with foreign key to the Product
2nd - better This might look like hack, but trust me this is the best what you can do now. It doesn't require any changes to the DB structure and works with form collections without any problems.
Code fragment from my code, article sections have composite key of (article_id, random_hash). Temporary set one to many reference to an empty array, persist it, add you original data and persist (and flush) again.
if ($form->isValid())
{
$manager = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$articleSections = $article->getArticleSections();
$article->setArticleSections(array()); // this won't trigger cascade persist
$manager->persist($article);
$manager->flush();
$article->setArticleSections($articleSections);
$manager->persist($article);
$manager->flush();
You didn't follow the docs completely. Here is something you can do to test a single item, but if you want to dynamically add and delete items (it looks like you do), you will also need to implement all the javascript that is included in the docs that you linked to.
$product= new Product();
$productItem = new ProductItem();
// $items must be an arraycollection
$product->getItems()->add($productItem);
$form = $this->createForm(new ProductType(), $product);
if($request->isMethod("POST"))
{
$form->handleRequest($request);
if($form->isValid())
{
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$em->persist($productItem);
$em->persist($product);
$em->flush();
}
}
So this should work for a single static item, but like I said, the dynamic stuff is a bit more work.
The annotation is wrong... the cascade persist is on the wrong side of the relation
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="ProductItem", mappedBy="product")
*/
protected $items;
/**
* #ORM\Id()
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Product", inversedBy="items", cascade={"persist"})
*/
protected $product;
Another way to achieve this (e.g. annotation not possible) is to set the form by_reference
IMO, your problem is not related to your controller but to your Entities. It seems your would like to make a ManyToMany between your Product and Item and not creating a ProductItem class which should behave as an intermediate object for representing your relation. Additionally, this intermediate object have no id generation strategy. This is why Doctrine explains you, you must first persist/flush all your new items and then persist/flush your product in order to be able to get the ids for the intermediate object.
Also faced this issue during the work with form to which CollectionType field was attached. The other one approach which could solve this problem and also mentioned in doctrine official documentation is following:
public function newAction()
{
$product= new Product();
$form = $this->createForm(new ProductType(), $product);
if($request->isMethod("POST"))
{
$form->handleRequest($request);
if($form->isValid())
{
foreach ($product->getItems() as $item)
{
$item->setProduct($product);
}
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$em->persist($product);
$em->flush();
}
}
}
In simple words, you should provide product link to linked items manually - this is described in "Establishing associations" section of following article: http://docs.doctrine-project.org/en/latest/reference/working-with-associations.html#working-with-associations
Related
For my Poll Application i created a FormType called CampaignType which holds a CollectionType named blocks which in turn holds a CollectionType named lines, which holds a CollectionType named fields, which holds a CollectionType named pollResults.
In my next code example you can see my code that renders the View to fill a campaign(poll).
public function fillAction(Request $request, $id)
{
$campaign = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(Campaign::class)->find($id);
$entityManager = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
foreach ($campaign->getBlocks() AS $block){
foreach ($block->getLines() AS $line){
foreach ($line->getFields() AS $field){
$pollResult = new PollResult();
$pollResult->setCampaign($campaign);
$pollResult->setField($field);
$pollResult->setUser($this->getUser());
$entityManager->persist($pollResult);
$field->getPollResults()->add($pollResult);
}
}
}
$form = $this->createForm(CampaignType::class, $campaign);
$form->handleRequest($request);
if($form->isSubmitted() && $form->isValid()){
var_dump("true");
//$entityManager->persist($campaign);
$entityManager->flush();
return $this->redirectToRoute("grappt_poll_campaignShow", ['id' => $id]);
}
return $this->render('GrapptPollBundle:Campaigns:fill.html.twig', [
'campaign' => $campaign,
'form' => $form->createView()
]);
}
The only thing that must be persisted in the database are the PollResults.
Every PollResult has an entry for the campaign_id and the field_id it belongs to, the user_id who filled out the campaign and the value the user chose (and of course its own id, which gets generated automatically).
My Problem is that i don't know how to do that.
Where do i have to call $entityManager->persist($pollResult);.
Right now i put it directly under the initialization-stuff.
Do i have to put it into the if($form->isSubmitted() && $form->isValid())-query and loop through every pollResult?
Do i have to call $entityManager->persist($campaign); although nothing changes there?
Furthermore i wonder if i have to add something for the value-entry of each PollResult?
Thanks in advance for every answer
lxg
What will $form->isValid() return ?
It will depend on the validation constraints of you master form. If your validation constraints are in the annotations of your entity, in your master entity you should have the #Assert\Valid() annotation which will be sure that the nested form is valid :
class Campaign
{
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(…)
* #Assert\Valid() // <- this line here
*/
private $blocks;
...
If you prefer to put your validation constraints in your CampaignType, you can put it in the options :
public function buildForm (FormBuilderInterface $builder, array $options)
{
$builder
->add('blocks', CollectionType::class,[
'entry_type' => BlockType::class,
'constraints' => array(new Valid()) // <- this line here
...
So, where should you put the persist()?
The best is to have Symfony's form validation (->isValid()) before any persistance, for security and data sanity (don't persist before ensuring csrf protection for instance). If you may add a lot of data (like persisting thousands of entities after one form submission), you can look into Doctrine's batch processing and bulk inserts : https://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-orm/en/2.7/reference/batch-processing.html
Should you also persist the Campaign object ?
It depends on the cascade persistence rules you have in your entity.
You can find all the rules to fine-tune the cascade here : https://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-orm/en/2.7/reference/working-with-associations.html#transitive-persistence-cascade-operations
Suppose we have a field with ManyToMany relation as
/**
* #var ArrayCollection
*
* #ORM\ManyToMany(targetEntity="Users")
* #ORM\JoinTable(name="users_roles",
* joinColumns={#ORM\JoinColumn(name="User_Id", referencedColumnName="id")},
* inverseJoinColumns={#ORM\JoinColumn(name="Role_Id", referencedColumnName="id")})
*/
protected $userRole;
To remove one related element from table we can have this function in our entity:
/**
* Remove userRole
* #param \Acme\MyBundle\Entity\Users $user
*/
public function remvoveUserRole(\Acme\MyBundle\Entity\Users $user)
{
$this->userRole->removeElement($user);
}
The Question:
The ArrayCollection type has the function removeElement which is used to remove one element of the relationship. There is another function clear which in api says Clears the collection, removing all elements, therefore can I have a function like below in my entity to clear all the related elements so that by flushing it removes all?
/**
* Remove all user Roles
*/
public function remvoveAllUserRole()
{
$this->userRole->clear();
}
will it work for just ManyToMany related tables or it might work for ManyToOne, too?
Ţîgan Ion is right - removeElement/clear only removes those elements from memory.
However, I think you could achieve something as close depending on how did you configure cascade and orphanRemoval in your relationship.
$em = ...; // your EntityManager
$roles = $user->getRoles();
$roles->clear();
$user = $em->merge($user); // this is crucial
$em->flush();
In order for this to work, you need to configure User relationship to
cascade={"merge"} - this will make $em->merge() call propagate to roles.
orphanRemoval = true - since this is #ManyToMany, this will make EntityManager remove free-dangling roles.
Can't test this now, but as far as I can see it could work. I will try this out tomorrow and update the answer in need be.
Hope this helps...
Note: This logic works for ManyToMany relationship, but not for ManyToOne
I tested the way to delete all related roles for specific use (ManyToMany) and it worked. What you need is to define a function in your UserEntity as
/**
* Remove all user Roles
*/
public function remvoveAllUserRole()
{
$this->userRole->clear();
}
Then in your controller or anywhere else(if you need) you can call the function as below
$specificUser = $em->getRepository('MyBundle:Users')->findOneBy(array('username' => 'test user'));
if (!empty($specificUser)) {
$specificUser->removeAllUserRole();
$em->flush();
}
Then it will delete all related roles for the test user and we don't need to use the for loop and remove them one by one
if I'm not mistaken, this will not work, you have to delete the "role
s" from the arrayCollection directly from the database
$roles = $user->getRoles()
foreach $role from $roles
$em->remove($role);
$em->flush();
now you should get an empty collection
p.s: the best way is to test your ideas
Hi I have an action which adds people to a group.
In order to increase the usability the form for it removes the people that are already in the group.
My controller action looks like this:
public function addAction(UserGroup $userGroup)
{
$tempGroup = new UserGroup();
foreach ($userGroup->getUsers() as $user) {
$tempGroup->addUser($user);
}
$form = $this->container->get('form.factory')->create(new UserGroupQuickType(), $tempGroup);
$request = $this->container->get('request');
if ('POST' === $request->getMethod()) {
$form->submit($request);
if ($form->isValid()) {
$group = $form->getData();
/** #var $myUserManager UserManager */
$myUserManager = $this->container->get('strego_user.user_manager');
/** #var $em EntityManager */
$em = $this->container->get('em');
foreach ($group->getUsers() as $toInvite) {
$userGroup->addUser($toInvite);
}
$em->persist($userGroup);
$em->flush($userGroup);
}
}
return array(
'form' => $form->createView(),
'userGroup' => $userGroup
);
}
This code throws an exception:
A new entity was found through the relationship 'Strego\UserBundle\Entity\UserGroup#users'
that was not configured to cascade persist operations for entity: Degi.
To solve this issue: Either explicitly call EntityManager#persist() on
this unknown entity or configure cascade persist this
association in the mapping for example #ManyToOne(..,cascade={"persist"}).
The new found relation with was already there before. Meaning the user "Degi" was already in the group and is not a new entity.
I can avoid this error if I'll leave out the persist but then I'll get an exception: Entity has to be managed or scheduled for removal for single computation.
This is caused by the fact that my "usergroup" entity has the whole time a entity status of 3 (= detached)
I have used the same logic (with temp group etc.) for an entity that has 1 to 1 relationship to my usergroup and from there I can easily add people even to the group.
But not with this action, which is logically doing the exact same thing.
UPDATE:
My previous update was leading in the wrong direction. But here in comparison the (almost) same controller that works:
public function addAction(BetRound $betRound)
{
$userGroup = new UserGroup();
foreach ($betRound->getUsers() as $user) {
$userGroup->addUser($user);
}
$form = $this->createForm(new UserGroupQuickType(), $userGroup);
$request = $this->getRequest();
if ('POST' === $request->getMethod()) {
$form->submit($request);
if ($form->isValid()) {
/** #var $betRoundManager BetRoundManager */
$betRoundManager = $this->container->get('strego_tipp.betround_manager');
/** #var $myUserManager UserManager */
$myUserManager = $this->container->get('strego_user.user_manager');
$group = $form->getData();
foreach ($group->getUsers() as $toInvite) {
if (!$betRound->getUserGroup()->hasUser($toInvite)) {
$betRound->getUserGroup()->addUser($toInvite);
}
}
$this->getDoctrine()->getManager()->flush();
return $this->redirect($this->generateUrl('betround_show', array('id' => $betRound->getId())));
}
}
return array(
'form' => $form->createView(),
'betRound' => $betRound
);
}
This is expected behavior since your have relationship to, not really a new entity but unmanaged object.
While iterating you could try merging $toInvite. Don't worry, if objects you acquired via form have an appropriate identifier (#Id) value set they would be just reloaded from databases instead of marked for insertion. Newly added objects, on the other hand, will be marked.
So, before trying anything, ensure that each of old $toInvite have an ID set.
foreach ($group->getUsers() as $toInvite) {
$em->merge($toInvite);
$userGroup->addUser($toInvite);
}
// safe to do now, all of the added users are either reloaded or marked for insertion
$em->perist($usetGroup);
$em->flush($userGroup);
Hope this helps.
This is happening because $userGroup is already an entity which already exists and $toInvite is a new entity and you are trying to flush $userGroup. To make this code working you need to specify cascade={"persist"} in your entity file (Annotations or yaml whichever you prefer).
Other solution is to do the reverse and persist $toInvite
foreach ($group->getUsers() as $toInvite) {
$toInvite->setUserGroup($userGroup);
$em->persist($toInvite);
}
$em->flush();
I think the first option would be a better choice
After several attempts I found out that this issue were actually 2 issues:
1. I had a listener that updated some rows on persist even if it was not necessary.
2. The paramconverter somehow detaches the entities that are coming in. Which means that my UserGroup and all my users in it are detached. As soon as they are added again to the Usergroup, those Entities seem to be "new" for the EM. Therefore I needed to merge all users AND fix my listener that updates the "createdBy", which otherwise would have also needed to been merged.
I have the following associations in my database (simplified version):
This is a Many-To-Many association but with an attribute on the joining table, so I have to use One-To-Many/Many-To-One associations.
I have a form where I can add as many relations as I want to one order item and create it at the same time (mainly inspired by the How to Embed a Collection of Forms tutorial from the documentation.
When I post the form, I get the following error:
Entity of type TEST\MyBundle\Entity\Relation has identity through
a foreign entity TEST\MyBundle\Entity\Order, however this entity
has no identity itself. You have to call EntityManager#persist() on
the related entity and make sure that an identifier was generated
before trying to persist 'TEST\MyBundle\Entity\Relation'. In case
of Post Insert ID Generation (such as MySQL Auto-Increment or
PostgreSQL SERIAL) this means you have to call EntityManager#flush()
between both persist operations.
I understand this error because Doctrine tries to persist the Relation object(s) related to the order since I have the cascade={"persist"} option on the OneToMany relation. But how can I avoid this behavior?
I have tried to remove cascade={"persist"} and manually persist the entity, but I get the same error (because I need to flush() order to get the ID and when I do so, I have the same error message).
I also tried to detach() the Relation objects before the flush() but with no luck.
This problem seems unique if 1) you are using a join table with composite keys, 2) forms component, and 3) the join table is an entity that is being built by the form component's 'collection' field. I saw a lot of people having problems but not a lot of solutions, so I thought I'd share mine.
I wanted to keep my composite primary key, as I wanted to ensure that only one instance of the two foreign keys would persist in the database. Using
this entity setup as an example
/** #Entity */
class Order
{
/** #OneToMany(targetEntity="OrderItem", mappedBy="order") */
private $items;
public function __construct(Customer $customer)
{
$this->items = new Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
}
}
/** #Entity */
class Product
{
/** #OneToMany(targetEntity="OrderItem", mappedBy="product") */
private $orders;
.....
public function __construct(Customer $customer)
{
$this->orders = new Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
}
}
/** #Entity */
class OrderItem
{
/** #Id #ManyToOne(targetEntity="Order") */
private $order;
/** #Id #ManyToOne(targetEntity="Product") */
private $product;
/** #Column(type="integer") */
private $amount = 1;
}
The problem I was facing, if I were building an Order object in a form, that had a collection field of OrderItems, I wouldn't be able to save OrderItem entity without having saved the Order Entity first (as doctrine/SQL needs the order id for the composite key), but the Doctrine EntityManager wasn't allowing me to save the Order object that has OrderItem attributes (because it insists on saving them en mass together). You can't turn off cascade as it will complain that you haven't saved the associated entities first, and you cant save the associated entities before saving Order. What a conundrum. My solution was to remove the associated entities, save Order and then reintroduce the associated entities to the Order object and save it again. So first I created a mass assignment function of the ArrayCollection attribute $items
class Order
{
.....
public function setItemsArray(Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection $itemsArray = null){
if(null){
$this->items->clear();
}else{
$this->items = $itemsArray;
}
....
}
And then in my Controller where I process the form for Order.
//get entity manager
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
//get order information (with items)
$order = $form->getData();
//pull out items array from order
$items = $order->getItems();
//clear the items from the order
$order->setItemsArray(null);
//persist and flush the Order object
$em->persist($order);
$em->flush();
//reintroduce the order items to the order object
$order->setItemsArray($items);
//persist and flush the Order object again ):
$em->persist($order);
$em->flush();
It sucks that you have to persist and flush twice (see more here Persist object with two foreign identities in doctrine). But that is doctrine for you, with all of it's power, it sure can put you in a bind. But thankfully you will only have to do this when creating a new object, not editing, because the object is already in the database.
You need to persist and flush the original before you can persist and flush the relationship records. You are 100% correct in the reason for the error.
I assume from the diagram that you are trying to add and order and the relation to the contact at the same time? If so you need to persist and flush the order before you can persist and flush the relationship. Or you can add a primary key to the Relation table.
I ended up creating a separated primary key on my Relation table (instead of having the composite one).
It looks like it is a dirty fix, and I am sure there is a better way to handle this situation but it works for now.
Here is my Relations entity:
/**
* Relation
*
* #ORM\Entity
*/
class Relation
{
/**
* #var integer
*
* #ORM\Column(name="id", type="integer")
* #ORM\Id
* #ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="AUTO")
*/
private $id;
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Contact", inversedBy="relation")
*/
protected $contact;
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Order", inversedBy="relation")
*/
protected $order;
/**
* #var integer
*
* #ORM\Column(name="invoice", type="integer", nullable=true)
*/
private $invoice;
//Rest of the entity...
I then added the cascade={"persist"} option on the OneToMany relation with Order:
/**
* Orders
*
* #ORM\Entity
*/
class Order
{
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Relation", mappedBy="order", cascade={"persist"})
*/
protected $relation;
//Rest of the entity...
Et voilà!
After reading the Doctrine reference and the Symfony tutorial on it, I started integrating it in a project. I'm experiencing a problem I thought doctrine could solve:
I want to have Libraries with many Collections, which I assume to be a 'ManytoOne' relationship as the Collection will keep the foreign key.
Some snippets:
In Library:
/**
*
* #var ArrayCollection
*
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Collection", mappedBy="library")
*/
private $collections;
In collection:
/**
* #var Library
*
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Library", inversedBy="collections")
* #ORM\JoinColumn(name="library_id", referencedColumnName="id")
*/
private $library;
Since most of this annotations are default and could be left out it's a pretty basic setup.
A sample controller code:
$library = new Library();
$library->setName("Holiday");
$library->setDescription("Our holiday photos");
$collection = new Collection();
$collection->setName("Spain 2011");
$collection->setDescription("Peniscola");
$library->addCollection($collection);
$em=$this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$em->persist($collection);
$em->persist($library);
$em->flush();
The code above won't set the library_id column in the Collection table, which I assume is because Library is not the owner.
$library = new Library();
$library->setName("Holiday");
$library->setDescription("Our holiday photos");
$collection = new Collection();
$collection->setName("Spain 2011");
$collection->setDescription("Peniscola");
$collection->setLibrary($library); <--- DIFFERENCE HERE
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$em->persist($collection);
$em->persist($library);
$em->flush();
Works. But I want to be able to use the library add and remove methods.
Is it common to alter these add and remove methods to call the setLibrary method?
public function addCollection(\MediaBox\AppBundle\Entity\Collection $collections)
{
$this->collections[] = $collections;
$collections->setLibrary($this);
return $this;
}
and
public function removeCollection(\MediaBox\AppBundle\Entity\Collection $collections)
{
$this->collections->removeElement($collections);
$collections->setLibrary(null);
}
I don't think that's very nice.
Is it best practice in doctrine or ORM in general?
Kind regards and thanks in advance!
Obviously this is the way to go.
For the case someone needs it:
http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-orm/en/2.0.x/reference/working-with-associations.html#association-management-methods
Explains this problem.