Google Analytics sandbox - google-analytics

I have some problems with the google analytics not working on production, I have made some fixes and used some plugins to check that the information sent to google is ok, but the problem is I cannot test properly on my sandbox since I do not have the credentials for the analytics account used on production instance. I will not have access to that account and I do not want to create a dummy account linked to my sandbox because I cannot have my sandbox address indexed by google. Is there any way to install a local server that emulates GA? Or a way to create a GA account and prevent it from indexing my sandbox address? I have found the urchin software that would have given me the possibility to install a local sandbox, but this was discontinued by google and I was not able to find it anywhere.

If by "indexing" you mean "becoming a part of the Google search index an appearing in result pages", that is not in any way related to analytics. If you have a problem that your pages Urls show up in GA (which really is the whole point of Analytics) you can programmatically pass dummy urls to the tracker:
ga('send', {
'hitType': 'pageview',
'page': '/home' // pass a virtual adress here per page
});
That way your sites structure will not be recognizable in GA (however this will make testing more difficult).
If at all possible you should have Google Tag Manager installed on the live page. GTM has a preview mode that allows you to directly in the live site without affecting other users (tags are only visible to visitors with the preview cookie).
As for emulating locally, no, not really. If you still use asynchronous tracking (ga.js) you can use setlocalGifPath and _setLocalServerMode to have the tracking data send to your own server, but that will not give you the interface - it just means you can create a log file with the google parameters that you have to parse yourself.
Universal Analytics does not (to my knowledge) have corresponding methods (they are a remnant from urchin days when people wanted to reprocess their data locally. As you've said urchin is now defunct and it would have been too expensive for a bit of local testing in any case).

Related

Avoiding Google Tag Manager blocking by AdBlockers

I have used Amplitude analytics in the past in my react Web app to send event data. However I just started with Google Tag Manager and noticed it does not run because being blocked by adBlockers. Amplitude was always functional because I loaded their Javascript SDK through NPM install 'github:amplitude/Amplitude-Javascript' and initialized it at app load with client API key. I like the approach of Google Tag manager where I dont have redeploy app to make changes to my analytics logic. How can I take a similar approach to avoiding being blocked by adblockers.
It may very well be that Google products are popular so Adblock specifically just block google analytics products not other analytics products.
You don't. If people don't want to be tracked, that is their decision. You should not be forcing people to provide you with any data they do not want to provide. Especially by using some shady "bypassing" measures. Instead-
You could use a cookie to permanently disable your tracking of those who do not wish to be tracked, to help you preserve reliable analytics. See: http://www.multiminds.eu/2016/05/19/how-to-disable-tracking-via-google-tag-manager/
Or, better yet, simply measure the percentage of visitors who have disabled tracking so your analytical data can remain accurate. See: https://marthijnhoiting.com/detect-if-someone-is-blocking-google-analytics-or-google-tag-manager/
Yes, it's possible.
You can use reverse proxy for Google Tag Manager.
First, download the Google Analytics JavaScript library itself and host it on your server.
Then alter the code in the downloaded library to change the target host from www.google-analytics.com to your own domain name using find-replace.
Replace the link from the default Google Analytics script in your codebase to modified one.
Create a proxy endpoint to Google Analytics servers on your back end. One important step here is to additionally detect the client’s IP address and write it explicitly in requests to Google Analytics servers to preserve correct location detection.
Test the results. You’re done!
more detail info on freecodecamp.org/news/save-your-analytics-from-content-blockers and https://analytics-bypassing-adblockers.netlify.com
There's dataunlocker.com as well as some other open source alternatives (1, 2) which can help to fix reporting accuracy of Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Google Analytics etc.
Talking about ethics and privacy, tools like DataUnlocker are just tools which allow you to bypass ad blockers as if you have implemented server-side analytics. I think by correctly implementing that "we use cookies" consent one can solve any privacy concerns.
I've managed to get around some blockers with the following in a node app:
var request = require('request');
app.get('/proxy*', function(req,res) {
const newurl = req.url.split('/proxy/')[1];
const data = request(newurl);
//data.on('response', function(response){console.log(JSON.stringify(response))});
data.pipe(res);
});
Then in your snippets for GTM prepend: "/proxy/" in the url and now the call goes via your server.
The caveat with the above is that without additional code you can't preview the container, but the container does load correctly. Lack of preview is a different issue to deal with.

Do webservers have to be publicly accessible for Google Universal Analytics to work?

I am using the "Bi-directional cross-domain tracking" script from Google to track visitors on a secondairy domain.
This is the script I am using:
ga('create', 'UA-xxxxxx-1', 'auto', { 'allowLinker': true });
ga('require', 'linker');
ga('linker:autoLink', ['main.com', 'secondary.com']);
ga('send', 'pageview', window.location.pathname);
The script can be found here:
Analyics.js Linker
I also made sure both domains were included in the "Referral exclusion list".
I have installed Google Tag Assistant (a Chrome extension), and it works like it's supposed to. I get a green icon, and also the message that 1 request is made. But I don't see any hits in Google Analytics.
I called with Google helpdesk, and only then I realised that 'secondary.com' is a server (used for testing) accessible only on our internal network.
Is that the reason why there are no results in Google Analytics?
Update
When we put our code in production we did get results in Google Analytics.
But that does not automatically mean that a server should be publicly accessible for the code to work, because maybe the problem was that the test server was on a sub-domain.
To make things clear we have:
companyname.nl (main.com in code)
mycompanyname.nl (secondary.com in code)
test.companyname.nl (the server that is not accessible from the outside)
According to the documentation:
Automatic cookie domain configuration sets the _ga cookie on the highest level domain it can.
So I Assumed test subdomain would work too.
I will unaccept the answer from #eike-pierstorff since it's unclear what's really going on.
To answer your question quite literally, no, webservers must not be publicly accessible for Google Universal Analytics to work. The Google Analytics web tracking code does not run on the webserver, in runs in the browser (or other client program). So if the client can access both the internal network and the public internet this should work (
This is more or less the end of the answer, I'll add a few more things in the hope it will help.
For the Google tracking code to work it must be able to set a cookie (or configured with 'storage': 'none' and have a client id set by your application), so you'd have to check if your internal url is actually a fully qualified domain name (so js cookies can be set; I'm not sure if secondary.com is just an example or if this is the actual format used in the internal domain name). But even then you should at least see traffic from the public url. The fact that you do not (plus you receive a green light from Tag Assistant) suggests that the problem is not at the collection end.
Did you by chance set up any filters that might affect the way data is collected ? In particular include filters are tricky (since they delete all data that doesn't match a pattern, so if the pattern is wrong they delete everything). If you haven't done it yet create a view without any filters to always have a backup of your data when a filter is misconfigured.
Since you mentioned these in the posts, neither the referral exclusion list nor the linker are likely to have anything to do with your problem; the first maintains the original channel attribution when people switch between domains, the second adds a parameter to links and form actions that allows the other domain to pick up the client id and thus continue the session. The worst that could happen is that cross domain tracking does not work, but sessions on both domains would still be (separately) tracked.

Can we use google analytics for Internal website?

I have an Intranet application which is accessible from within company firewall. To track some specific pages, I want to implement Google Analytics in my Intranet application. This application is accessible from outside only when user system has some specific certificate installed.
Is it possible to implement Google Analytics in my Intranet application?
Will this Google analytics work inside company firewall?
How Google analytics work i.e. what is the actual flow of google analytics?
Yes, Google analytics can be used for internal web applications too. Please visit this URL which will clear your doubts. If you click on the given link and able to access analytics.js file from your internal network you can use Google analytics for your internal applications protected from corporate firewall.
Please note that after implementation, tracking data would be available around 24 hours only. So, you need to wait for 24 hours first. Even if you are not able to view the tracking data, please visit this link. You will find the possible reasons behind not working your analytics code.
In order for Analytics to generate reports for your corporate intranet
usage, your corporate network must be able to reach the Analytics
JavaScript file (analytics.js).
...
Your intranet must also be accessible
through a fully qualified domain name such as
http:// intranet.example.com. The Analytics JavaScript won't work if
your intranet can only be accessed using a domain name that isn't
fully qualified, such as http:// intranet
Ref: https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1009688?hl=en
In your example, if a person without the certificate you mentioned can still reach the domain (that is, there is a public DNS entry for the domain name) even if they get an 'access denied' or similar message, the tracking should still work.
Google Analytics is Software as a Service and runs on the Google Servers. If your clients cannot reach the Google server than you cannot send tracking data and Google Analytics will not show anything. You may need to adjust your firewall rules to let calls to the Analytics servers pass (are you that you want a third party javascript to send data from your intranet to the internet, though ? There might be legal ramifications, too, after all implementing a script basically means to hand control of the clients to a third party).
If the server for your intranet is connected to the internet you could collect all hits in a log and pipe this to Google Analytics.
However Google Analytics might not be the best choice. You most certainly do not need campaign data, you probably do not have ecommerce in your company and depending on your type of company geo data and technology data might not be relevant (after all you probably know what computers your employees use and where they are). And for a page counter a self hosted solution will do just as well.
Google Analytics requires that you place a script on each page you wish to track. Whenever a page with the script is loaded, the script runs and sends data to GA, so your users must be connected to the internet as well as the intranet for their usage statistics to register. One security issue to consider is the titles of your intranet's pages will be sent externally across the intranet, which your IT security may have an issue with.
For basic intranet analytics, I'd recommend starting with Piwik which is open source and installs on your server.
It will give you a lot of initial usage data and if your customer decides they want more, you can look into more sophisticated products.

Can you test google analytics on a localhost address?

I have to test out my new GA account on my local machine.
Will this work just by copying the standard snippet supplied by Google onto the page ?
I don't want to spend 24 hours waiting to see if it will or won't work.
This question remains valid today, however the technology has changed. The old Urchin tracker is deprecated and obsolete. The new asynchronous Google Analytics tracking code uses slightly different code to achieve the same results.
Google Analytics Classic - Asynchronous Syntax - ga.js
The current syntax for setting the tracking domain to none on google analytics looks like this:
_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']);
Google analytics will then fire off the _utm.gif tracker request on localhost. You can verify this by opening the developer tools in your favorite browser and watching the network requests during page load. If it is working you will see a request for _utm.gif in the network requests list.
Updated 2013 for Universal Analytics - analytics.js
Google released a new version of analytics called "Universal Analytics" (late 2012 or early 2013). As I write, this the program is still in BETA so the above code is still recommended for most users with existing installations of Google Analytics.
However, for new developments using the new analytics.js code, the Google Analytics, Advanced Configuration - Web Tracking Documentation shows that we can test Universal Analytics on localhost with this new code:
ga('create', 'UA-XXXX-Y', {
'cookieDomain': 'none'
});
Check out the linked documentation for more details on advanced configuration of Universal Analytics.
Update 2019
Both Global Site Tag - gtag.js and Universal Analytics - analytics.js will detect localhost automatically. You do not need to make any change to the configuration.
If gtag.js detects that you're running a server locally (e.g. localhost), it automatically sets the cookie_domain to 'none'.
- developers.google.com
Updated for 2014
This can now be achieved by simply setting the domain to none.
ga('create', 'UA-XXXX-Y', 'none');
See: https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/analyticsjs/domains#localhost
I had the same problem, and all the solutions didn't work until I did two things:
Obvious code:
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXXXX-X']);
_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']);
_gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);
AND
I added localhost another FQDN - domain name. I did this on Windows sistem by editing:
C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts
file, and I put in the following:
127.0.0.1 my.domain.org
Then I went to address http://my.domain.org/WebApp that is serving page with included google analytics JS.
If you are on unix, edit /etc/hosts for same result.
It think that Google should put Intranet configuration in ther GA FAQ. They just say that you need FQDA. Yes, you do, but not for them to access you, you need it just to have Host attribute in HTTP request.
I think another reason for FQDN is COOKIES! Cookies are used to track data and if you don't have FQDN, cookie can not be set, and JS code stops and doesn't get the gif.
After spending about two hours trying to come up with a solution I realized that I had adblockers blocking the call to GA. Once I turned them off I was good to go.
Answer for 2019
The best practice is to setup two separate properties for your development/staging, and your production servers.
You do not want to pollute your Analytics data with test, and setting up filters is not pleasant if you are forced to do that.
That being said, Google Analytics now has real time tracking, and if you want to track Campaigns or Transactions, the lag is around 1 minute until the data is shown on the page, as long as you select the current day.
For example, you create Site and Site Test, and each one ha UA-XXXX-Y code.
In your application logic, where you serve the analytics JavaScript, check your environment and for production use your Site UA-XXXX-Y, and for staging/development use the Site Test one.
You can have this setup until you learn the ins and outs of GA, and then remove it, or keep it if you need to make constant changes (which you will test on development/staging first).
Source: personal experience, various articles.
Now the answer for your question is yes, it will just work by copying the standard snippet. According to documentation, now the standard snippet has automatic cookie domain configuration: ga('create', 'UA-XXXXX-Y', 'auto'); where cookie domain is automatically determined.
In addition, if analytics.js detects that you're running a server
locally (e.g. localhost) it automatically sets the cookieDomain to
'none'.
It will work if you use an IP or set domain to none.
Details here:
http://analyticsimpact.com/2011/01/20/google-analytics-on-intranets-and-development-servers-fqdn/
An easier tool to monitor the tracking tags is to use the Chrome extension (probably available, or the equivalent for other browsers) - Google Tag Assistant. This will show what tags are firing, what problems it has found, and even breaks out stuff like eCommerce values for easy reading. Also works with the Google Tag Manager, and can handle multiple sets of tags on the page.
I just want to add to what's been said so far, it may save a lot of headache, you don't need to wait 24 hour to see if it works, yes the total overview take 24 hour, but in Reporting tab, there is a link on left side to Real-Time result and it will show if anyone currently visiting your site, also I didn't have to set 'cookieDomain': 'none' for it to work on localhost, my setting is on 'auto' and it works just fine (I'm using MVC 5), on top of that I've added the script at the end of head tag as google stated in this page:
Paste your snippet (unaltered, in its entirety) into every web page you want to track. Paste it immediately before the closing </head> tag.
here is more info on how to check to see if analytics works properly.
Following on from Tuong Lu Kim's answer:
Assuming:
ga('create', 'UA-XXXXX-Y', 'auto');
...if analytics.js detects that you're running a server locally (e.g. localhost) it automatically sets the cookieDomain to 'none'....
Excerpt from:
Automatic cookie domain configuration sets the _ga cookie on the highest level domain it can. For example, if your website address is blog.example.co.uk, analytics.js will set the cookie domain to .example.co.uk. In addition, if analytics.js detects that you're running a server locally (e.g. localhost) it automatically sets the cookieDomain to 'none'.
The recommended JavaScript tracking snippet sets the string 'auto' for the cookieDomain field:
Source: https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/analyticsjs/cookies-user-id#automatic_cookie_domain_configuration
I came across this problem recently, and I found it helpful to explore the new documentation by Google on debugging Analytics. It didn't actually care about sending tracking info to Google Analytics, I just wanted to ensure that the events were firing correctly, and the debugging tools gave me the info I needed. YMMV, I realize doesn't exactly answer the question.
For those using google tag manager to integrate with google analytics events you can do what the guys mentioned about to set the cookies flag to none from GTM it self
open GTM > variables > google analytics variables > and set the cookies tag to none

Does anyone use Google Analytics? How Google does it to avoid counting the owner of the website as visitor?

I don't want to be counted as visitor every time I test my page in the hosting. Does Google know i'm the owner of the site by checking if i'm logged in my Gmail account?
I don't think Google does anything like this automatically. But they do provide instructions for excluding based on IP address (or range) and apparently also now by cookie. If you use a CMS or admin interface, you could put the code they provide in an HTML file that you then include into the admin interface pages by IFRAME (to ensure that the cookie stays set for anyone who uses that interface).
One option is to install Ghostery addon your browser. Ghostery can block trackers and scripts used on webpages likes google analytics, google adword and other adwares.
You can also block or unblock the trackers for a specific site or specific tracker for a particular site.This add on is available for Firefox and chrome browsers. If you have this installed on your browser, your visit wont be counted as google analytic script wont be executed.
You can learn more about ghostery at: http://www.ghostery.com/about
There are also often application specific ways of blocking google from counting administrators. For example I've used a wordpress analytics plugin that would automatically not include the tracking code if the user was logged in as an administrator. If you are application has the concept as admin then you could write something similar that controls when the code is added.
If you visit your site frequently from connections with a dynamic IP address, eg. home broadband, then excluding IP addresses is not particularly practical. To go beyond IP exclusion, you can create an isolated page on your site that only you know about that includes a call to Analytics to label your cookie.
The Google Analytics _setVar() function lets you label yourself with an arbitrary string, eg. 'internal'. You only need to do this once per browser as long you don't clear your cookies.
Having labelled yourself as 'internal', you can create an Advanced Segment within Google Analytics to exclude visitors with that label.
Google Analytics relay on you embedding a call to their JavaScript see this link - do not confuse it with how Google does page ranking.
So the answer to your question is that your pages should be smart enough to recognize when the request comes from you and skip the call to the JavaScript.

Resources