Currently, I'm using
<hr align="left" />
on my HTML5 page, but I've read that the align property was deprecated in XHTML 4.01 and supposedly removed from HTML5. I'd like to be using CSS rather than an inline attribute like this, but when I tried
hr{align: left; max-width: 800px;}
or hr{text-align: left;} or hr{left: 0;} or hr{float: left;}, it just showed up in the center.
So what should I use instead of the inline attribute above?
One option would be to set the left margin to zero:
hr{max-width: 800px; margin-left:0;}
You're trying to use something in a way that (as Eliezer Bernart mentions.. and apparently that comment with the link to the MDN doc disappeared) no longer "works that way". You can, as long as you don't mind it being screwy in IE, just set the margin to zero - http://jsfiddle.net/s52wb/
hr {
max-width: 100px;
margin: 0px;
}
A better idea though would be to mimic the HR's old way of doing things by way of CSS without the use of the HR. Check out http://jsfiddle.net/p5ax9/1/ for a demo:
p:first-child:before {
display: none;
}
p:before {
content: " ";
border: 1px solid black;
margin-top: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
display: block;
max-width: 100px;
}
I don't know what browsers were used for some above answers, but I found neither text-align:left nor margin-left:0 worked in both IE (11, Standards mode, HTML5) and Firefox (29).
IE11: text-align:left works, margin-left:0 leaves rule centred.
FF: margin-left:0 works, text-align:left leaves rule centred.
So, either use both, or I found that margin-right:100% works for both!
You can use div tag instead.
<div style="border: thin solid lightgray; width: 100px;"></div>
do this
hr {
display: inline; //or inline-block
text-align: left;
}
<hr> tags have margin-inline-start and margin-inline-end properties set to auto, which centers the element horizontally (similar to setting both left and right margins of an element to auto).
To left-align an hr tag, you can set margin-inline-start to 0:
hr {
margin-inline-start: 0;
}
...and you can right-align an hr tag by setting margin-inline-end to 0:
hr {
margin-inline-end: 0;
}
.line {
height: 2px;
background-color: var(--itemBorder);
color: var(--itemBorder);
}
.width100 {
width: 100% !important;
}
.width90 {
width: 90% !important;
}
.width80 {
width: 80% !important;
}
.width70 {
width: 70% !important;
}
.width60 {
width: 60% !important;
}
.width50 {
width: 50% !important;
}
.width40 {
width: 40% !important;
}
.width30 {
width: 30% !important;
}
.width20 {
width: 20% !important;
}
.width10 {
width: 10% !important;
}
<div class="line width100" />
Related
Jsfiddle to demonstrate my issue.
I have a SPA (Single Page Application).
In the appliation several dialogs can popup on the screen.
Every popup has it own width and height.
The title and content of the dialogs are added by angularJs
The problem i have here is the size of the dialog.
Currently all popups are made and added seperatly. I want to change this into one popup with variable content. The problem that comes with this is that the popup must wrap the contents width.
Example (as shown in the Jsfiddle)
<div class="dialog">
<div class="titlebar"></div>
<div class="content">
The content that is added has css that tells it has a width of 400px
This means the dialog needs to wrap to this 400px
</div>
</div>
How do i solve this by only using CSS?
Some examples of the variation of popups (although the width of both look the same, this is not the case)
Use display:table for the dialog.
Here is your Updated Fiddle.
For young browser you may use :
1) display:flex; property (includes centering) DEMO
.backdrop {
position: fixed;
top:0;
}
.backdrop {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 100;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.dialog {
margin:auto;
position:relative;
}
2) max-content as value for width and not set any width to inner
content . (exept some padding to keep room for the close button) :
DEMO
Info on W3C about those new keywords value, soon avalaible i hope.
CSS updated
.dialog {
width: max-content;
z-index: 101;
margin: auto;
/* basic way t o center */
top:50%;
left:50%;
margin:-80px -150px;
}
.titlebar {
height: 50px;
line-height: 50px;
background-color: #000000;
border-radius: 10px 10px 0px 0px;
}
.title{
color:#FFFFFF;
font-size: x-large;
padding:0 50px 0 10px;
}
.close_button {
position: absolute;
right: 0px;
top: 0px;
line-height:30px;
padding: 5px;
margin: 5px;
border-radius: 10px;
background-color: #ffd549;
color: #000000;
}
.content {
background-color: #FFFFFF;
}
.content-width {
background-color:#FFF000;
}
or as already said , use the display: table, inline-table
Using display: inline-block; text-align: center;
Works in ie >= 8.
Fiddle.
I don't understand the problem.
If you want to center the content-width div element, simply add margin: auto;.
If you want the container to fit the WIDTH of its content, you must change the display property from block to something else, like inline-block or table (as suggested by #jacelysh).
What is it exactly that you are trying to do?
A div without a set width will take up the width of the parent.
try this.
.content {
background-color: #FFFFFF;
min-width: 100%;
}
.content-width {
width: 100%;
background-color:#FFF000;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/VQA4k/6/
Checking again now. You can just remove the width from those two classes and it will work.
This is what you want I think.
http://jsfiddle.net/VQA4k/16/
I know this questions has already been answered before and I've read the topics :
Make div take all space left after another div
Expand div to take remaining width
Expand div to max width when floatleft is set
The magic of overflow hidden (external)
However I can't manage to implement them in my case or they simply don't seem to work as I try to have a fix width on the right and a flexible width on the left (unlike the above examples).
Here is my problem (which is fairly simple) : I have a form with a search field (left) and a span element (right). The span element has a fixed width and height. I want the input to fit the remaining left space.
form :
<div id="container">
<form>
<input type="search" />
<span class="submit"></span>
</form>
</div>
style.css :
#container {
width: 300px;
}
[type="search"] {
/* Positionning
* ------------ */
display: block;
height: 40px;
padding: 0px 10px;
vertical-align: top;
}
.submit {
/* Positionning
* ------------ */
display: block;
height: 40px;
width: 50px;
/* Styling
* ------- */
background-color: #CF0526;
}
From what I've read, I thought that a width: 100%; overflow: hidden on the input and a float: right on the span who be enough, sadly not. Here is a jsfiddle of my problem, hopefully it may help you.
EDIT: I changed the title from "left div" to "left input" as it may matter, especially since this solution does not work while it looks accurate for divs positionning.
You can try with the property calc like this:
input[type="search"] {
width: calc(100% - 40px);
margin:0;
padding:0;
height:30px;
float:left;
}
.submit {
float:left;
width: 40px;
height: 30px;
background-color: red;
}
The demo http://jsfiddle.net/SL3FB/10/ ... Maybe a problem the compatibility
Another solution using box.sizing who has more compatibility: http://jsfiddle.net/SL3FB/18/
You can substract the width from the span to the width from the textfield which is 100%.
Here is the fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/SL3FB/15/.
Code is like this:
width:calc(100% - 50px);
float:left;
Make 'em both float:left; to have a better result!
Hope this works for you.
Use CSS Tables
1) Set display: table-cell for both the input and the span
2) Set a fixed width on the span and (the trick:) width:100% on the input
FIDDLE
#container {
width: 300px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
form
{
display:table;
width: 100%;
}
.submit {
display:table-cell;
width: 40px;
height: 30px;
background-color: red;
}
input
{
width: 100%;
display:table-cell;
}
Does this work for you?
http://jsfiddle.net/SL3FB/4/
I've given your search a width of 85% so it fits up agains the red box.
.search {
width:85%;
}
This is my CSS code;
#wrap {
width:50em;
max-width: 94%;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color:#fff;
}
#head {
width:50em;
height:10em;
max-width: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align:center;
position: relative;
}
#css-table {
display: table;
margin: 1em auto;
position: relative;
width:50em;
max-width: 100%;
}
#css-table .col {
display: table-cell;
width: 20em;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#css-table .col:nth-child(even) {
background: #fff;
}
#css-table .col:nth-child(odd) {
background: #fff;
border-right: 4px double #b5b5b5;
}
And my HTML code;
<div id="cont">
<div id="css-table">
<div class="col">123</div>
<div class="col">123</div>
</div>
</div>
When I scale the Firefox window, the table scales fine even down to 300px width viewport...just like I want to. But in Chrome, the table looks normal only when the viewport is wider than 50em. If I narrow the Chrome window, the table bleeds out on the right side of the wrap.
Is there a reason why is Chrome doing this?
Technically Chrome is following the rules because max-width should only apply to block elements.
From MSDN docs:
The min-width/max-width attributes apply to floating and absolutely
positioned block and inline-block elements, as well as some intrinsic
controls. They do not apply to non-replaced inline elements, such as
table rows and row/column groups. (A "replaced" element has intrinsic
dimensions, such as an img or textArea.)
The table (or in your case display:table) should technically not work or be supported. FF apparently obeys it fine, but you'll probably need to come up with another solution, either removing the display:table or the max-width.
max-width property
MSDN Doc
The solution I found was using table-layout: fixed and width: 100%
Create a div and give it a styling to display block and a max width. You may use traditional <table> and give it a styling of 100% width.
I was able to use a mixin(SASS) to fix the issue.
#mixin clearfix {
&::after{
content: "";
display: table;
clear: both;
}
}
Basically I can't get the div that holds all the content to move down with the content itself. If I take out the fixed height on the comborder div it disappears. The content remains in place, though over the bg image. Does anyone see any solution to this? I've tried a whole lot and can't come up with anything. I just want to base the height of the content div on the height of the content, like a div usually works. Thanks a bunch!
Here's the site: http://www.drdopamine.com/kineticaid/community.php?page=profile&id=1
Here's the relevant CSS:
.wrap {margin: 0 auto; }
.abs { position:absolute; }
.rel { position:relative; }
div.comborder {
width:900px;
height:600px;
background-image: url(http://www.drdopamine.com/kineticaid/pics/bg.jpg);
-moz-border-radius: 30px;
border-radius: 30px;
z-index: 10;
}
div.comcon {
background-color: white;
top: 25px;
right: 25px;
bottom: 25px;
left: 25px;
-moz-border-radius: 15px;
border-radius: 15px;
z-index: 11;
}
Here's the relevant HTML:
<div class="comborder wrap rel" style="margin-top:100px;opacity:0.9;z-index:80;">
<div class="comcon abs" style="opacity:none;">
<div class="comhold rel" style="height:100%;width:100%;border:1px solid transparent;">
<?php
if($_GET['page'] == "profile") {
include_once('profile.php');
}
if($_GET['page'] == "editprofile") {
include_once('editprofile.php');
}
?>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Do this:
body.combody {
background-attachment: scroll;
background-clip: border-box;
background-color: transparent;
background-image: url("http://www.psdgraphics.com/file/blue-sky-background.jpg");
background-origin: padding-box;
background-position: left center;
background-repeat: repeat;
background-size: 110% auto;
height: 100%;
}
div.comborder {
background-image: url("http://www.drdopamine.com/kineticaid/pics/bg.jpg");
border-radius: 30px 30px 30px 30px;
height: 100%;
width: 900px;
z-index: 10;
}
What is important to notice is that both the body and the div have a 100% height.
That might help you.
Absolute positioning removes the content div (and everything else) from the flow of the page. That makes it so the containers don't know the size of the inner elements.
Remove all the .abs classes from everything inside the container, and the white background will correctly stretch as you want. However, it also stretches over the black border, so you'd have to find different way to create it.
More general advice:
.wrap {margin: 0 auto; }
.abs { position:absolute; }
.rel { position:relative; }
These are just plain bad ideas. It looks like you saw or were told about always putting CSS into a CSS file and never in HTML; a good idea when done right, but classes should identify content, not styles. For example:
.sidebar-image { /* css here */ }
.sidebar-donate ( /* css here */ }
.sidebar-infobox { /* css here */ }
It creates duplicate position: tags and so on, but it's also much easier to understand and much easier to get the results you want, since fixing your current problem involves editing the HTML when it should be a CSS problem.
I usually have my structure laid out something like this:
<div id="all">
<div id="page">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
</div>
Where the body will hold a background pattern, "all" will hold a dropshadow for the page going up and down, and "page" may often have a repeating-y background as well.
I have tried variations on using the css height/min-height properties:
html, body {
height:100%;
...
}
#all {
height:100%;
min-height:100%;
}
#page {
height:100%;
min-height:100%;
height:auto !important;
}
It seems like if I remove height:auto from "all" then it seems like it works UNTIL you scroll, then after the scroll the background for all dissappears
example
However if I keep the height:auto there then I get the problem of the background for page not working
example
Hopefully someone knows a fix?
Well, here's what I ended up with for the CSS:
html, body {
height:100%; /* IE6: treaded as min-height*/
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
color: #494949;
text-align: center;
background-color: #3f91a7;
background-image: url(images/bg_body.jpg);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: center top;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12px;
}
#all {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
height:100%; /* IE6: treaded as min-height*/
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
height:auto !important;
background-image: url(images/bg_all.png);
background-repeat: repeat-y;
background-position: center top;
overflow: hidden;
}
#page {
width: 993px;
padding: 0 0 10000px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: -10000px;
margin-left: auto;
text-align: left;
background-color: #FFF;
background-image: url(images/bg_page.jpg);
background-position: center top;
background-repeat: repeat-y;
height:100%; /* IE6: treaded as min-height*/
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
height:auto !important;
}
#header, #footer {
text-align: center;
font-size: 16px;
padding: 20px;
}
#content {
padding: 25px;
}
I haven't had a chance to test it in anything other than Firefox, but, hoipefully it will give you a good start.
I would just flip the location of your div#all and div#page...
<div id="page">
<div id="all">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
</div>
Although the question was posted some years ago, I ran into the same challenge and found this earlier thread today. Although I reckon there might be more fine solutions by now, I wanted to share the one I found today nevertheless.
Had the same problem, background 1 full screen, adaptive and fully below everything else and another repeating(-y) background number 2 should go on top, but not scroll out of sight because it was set to follow the height of the window which was given to the particular div which holds background 2.
Let's start with the divs I created:
<div id="full_background">
<img src="images/bkg_main.jpg" alt="" />
<div id="absolute">Contains background set to repeat-y</div>
<div id="content">Contains the content</div>
</div>
the css looks like this:
* { margin: 0px; padding: 0px; }
html { height: 100%; }
body { height: 100%; }
#full_background { width: 100%; min-height: 100%; position: relative; float: left; }
#full_background>img { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; position: fixed; width: 100%; z-index: 1; display: block; }
#full_background>div { position: relative; z-index: 2; }
#absolute { position: fixed !important; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; background: url("../images/bkg2.png") top left repeat-y; }
#content { width: 290px; margin-left: 20px; padding: 30px; line-height: 1.7em; font-family: 'Lato', sans-serif; position: relative; float: left; }
First off, I added a full screen & resizing background image to my site (using the div full_background and the img tag) using the following solution (very easy css solution which works like a charm in every browser and most older versions down to for example IE7) - http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-256494.html > see last answer by aj_nsc
Next, using the following jQuery method - http://nicholasbarger.com/2011/08/04/jquery-makes-100-height-so-much-easier/ - I created a div with id = absolute, which is given the same height as the browser window (also on resizing). I placed my repeating(-y) background number 2 in here. Set this div to position:fixed and it will stay put when the div with the content is being scrolled through.
Then below this div you put the div with your content, which freely expands downwards beyond the browser window.
Upon scrolling, the two backgrounds will keep filling the full area of the browser window (vertically as well) at all times and stay put, with the content scrolling up and down over them.
This way, upon resizing, you also make sure that both backgrounds keep filling the full background area at all times.
I tested this solution in CH, FF, IE7-9 and Safari and it worked in all of them without any problems whatsoever.
Here's what's happening: You've set html & body to have a height of 100%, but that 100% is the height of the viewport, not the document. Since #all's height is set to 100%, it is set to 100% of the parent's height, which happens to be body, which is set at 100% of the height of the viewport. Everything's inheriting the height of the viewport.
The way to fix this problem is actually the same way you would fix clearing floats that have an outer container. All you have to do is put overflow:auto; on #all. You don't even need any height declarations on any other elements, and you may be able to eliminate either the #all or the #page div.
More info here: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/02/26/simple-clearing-of-floats/
Have you tried:
html,
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
}
#all {
min-height: 100%;
}
? Only for IE 6, you should set height: 100%; for #all (because it interprets that basically as min-height (as a result of a bug). As IE6 doesn't understand the min-height attribute, height effectively becomes a replacement for min-height).
If you set height: 100%; for other browsers, they will take it as 100% height of the viewport, not 100% of the page, so scrolling won't work correctly.
My comment on the downvote:
It has become clear, that my answer doesn't solve the whole problem. What we have here, seems to be quite a complex case - at least no one here seems to have found an answer yet? I've even looked into Ingo Chao's excellent (German) book, which comes to the same conclusion: Setting the parent's height won't work, and setting the child's height won't work, if the parent's height wasn't set explicitly, but rather dynamically by the size of the content.
But my answer could still help to restrict the possibilities a little bit - because setting height on #all will most likely not work on any browser except IE 6. If you disagree, please post a comment, because in that case, I'd also like to learn more about this.
This worked for me:
#page {
width: 993px;
padding: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: auto;
text-align: left;
background-color: #FFF;
background-image: url(http://jeffkilroy.com/hosted/layout1/images/bg_page.jpg);
background-position: center top;
background-repeat: repeat-y;
/* height:100%; IE6: treaded as min-height*/
height: expression(document.body.offsetHeight); /* sets min-height for IE */
overflow: auto;
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
/* height:auto !important; */
}
Forget 100% on the divs, try moving your background image to the html element and the full height border to the body.
html {
height:100%;
background-color: blue;
}
body {
margin: auto auto;
padding: 0;
color: #494949;
/*min-height: 100%; */
height:100%; /*for ie6*/
border-left:solid 2px red;
border-right:solid 2px red;
background-color:#fff;
width: 960px;
}
Have you tried this :
function getWindowHeight() {
var windowHeight = 0;
if (typeof(window.innerHeight) == 'number') {
windowHeight = window.innerHeight;
}
else {
if (document.documentElement && document.documentElement.clientHeight) {
windowHeight = document.documentElement.clientHeight;
}
else {
if (document.body && document.body.clientHeight) {
windowHeight = document.body.clientHeight;
}
}
}
return windowHeight;
}
window.onload = init;
function init(){
document.getElementByID("all").style.height = getWindowHeight() + "px";
}
Or put page instead of all