I thought I had it all working. an <img>, a div.wrapper around it (with position:relative, and an <i class="icon-edit"></i> with absolute position just beneath the right top position of the <img>. something like this:
<div class="userLogo" >
<img ng-show="user.image_url" ng-src="{{user.image_url}}" /> //data from angular, doesn't make a difference here
<div class="userEdit"><i class="icon-edit hand"></i></div>
</div>
with css (less style but you can understand):
.userLogo
{
width: 233px;
height: 233px;
img {
height:233px;
}
float: left;
//border: 1px solid #borders;
position:relative;
}
.userEdit
{
background: #bajeBack;
width: 25px;
height: 25px;
line-height: 25px;
color: #lightGreen;
position: absolute;
top: 13px;
right: 13px;
z-index: 50;
font-size: 19px;
padding: 3px 2px 2px 4px;
text-align: center;
opacity: 0.7;
.icon-edit{
}
}
and then, playing with the webapp it hit me: The image size can change! since I don't want to use a set width/height (that would distort the proportion of some images) I just set the height (to fit the design) and let the browser resize the width accordingly.
My problem; A narrow image would break the design - the edit icon would be hang in air, and not on the image at all, since it's positioned according to the userLogo.
My question: how can I do the same "absolute" positioning according to the image ? since it can't be the container. please enlight me. and don't hesitate to suggest changes to the html if needed. I'll be more the happy to learn something new!
Thanks!
If i understand you correctly, you need to constrain your image to a set space. How about using max-height and max-width.
.userLogo img {
max-height: 233px;
max-width: 233px;
}
It's pretty well supported these days: http://caniuse.com/#search=max-width
Related
I have a div that has image on it done by uploading. It is quite working well until we uploaded diff image sizes. Problem came up when they uploaded a very big image and it is being cutoff (coz of overflow hidden) and just shows like a certain portion of the image, but if i remove the overflow: hidden, it becomes way too big. So then I put a transform(.20, .20) which worked well, but when user uploads a small sized image, it becomes really small because of the transform, which I don't like. I would like to put a min-width or like a conditional transform that if image is below 400px, don't transform it, or transform but not smaller as 400px square img. is that possible? I put min-width on several parts but nothing works.
here is my css & div:
.upload-viewer {
/*
border: 1px solid #e0246f;*/
margin-left: -199px;
height: 188px;
text-align: center;
background-color: #eee;
border: solid 1px #ddd;
-moz-border-radius: 3px;
-webkit-border-radius: 3px;
border-radius: 3px;
padding: 4px 5px;
transform: scale(.20, .20);
position: relative;
top: -70px;
margin-bottom: 50px;
}
<div class="upload-viewer">
<img src="" />
</div>
Min width sets the minimum width you should set the image width to 100%
Like this
.upload-viewer img{
width:100%;
}
Try using max-width
You can set a max-width prop at your img tag
For example:
.upload-viewer img {
max-width: 400px;
}
That way, it will not change your image width if it is lower than 400px, but will limit it to this width.
I'm trying to build buttons that look like this:
I can accomplish this using :after and CSS triangles, but I can't get that working with variable height elements. Is there any way to accomplish this and keep variable height?
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/AaP47/2/
You could use a skewed div in this case. The only issue here is that as your buttons get taller, due to the skew, they will get slightly wider. This may not be an issue if you are only dealing with 1 or 2 lines. If they get very tall it may cause things to noticeably not line up exactly:
http://jsfiddle.net/AaP47/3/
.button.triangle:after {
content: "";
background-color: red;
display: block;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
right: -30px;
top: 0;
width: 60px;
transform: skewX(-10deg);
}
This is also not completely scalable. You would need to decide on the largest height you have to support and adjust accordingly. The taller you need to support, the wider the skewed div must be.
Result (without the red): http://jsfiddle.net/AaP47/4/
Just because I had fun tinkering in a different direction and to offer an option concept even though you apparently already got an answer;
a {
padding-right: 20px;
padding-left: 20px;
text-decoration: none;
color: white;
font-weight: bold;
display: inline-block;
border-right: 30px solid transparent;
border-top: 50px solid #4c4c4c;
height: 0;
line-height: 20px;
}
a p {margin-top: -45px;}
and;
<a href="#">
<p>this is a triangle button<br/>
with multiple lines!</p>
</a>
jfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/AaP47/6/
Cheers!
I am using transform: skew to create the effect of a down arrow on my banner image using both the :before and :after tags. The result should look like the following:
However, in IE 9-11 there seems to be a rounding issue. At some heights there is one pixel from the background image that shows below the skewed blocks resulting in the following:
In my case, the banner is a percentage of the total height of the window. Here is the some sample code which should be able to reproduce the problem:
HTML
<div id="main">
<div id="banner"></div>
<section>
<h1>...</h1>
<p>...</p>
</section>
</div>
CSS
#banner {
position: relative;
background-color: green;
width: 100%;
height: 75%;
overflow: hidden;
}
#banner:before,
#banner:after {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
width: 50%;
height: 1.5em;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
transform: skew(45deg);
transform-origin: right bottom;
}
#banner:after {
right: 0;
transform: skew(-45deg);
transform-origin: left bottom;
}
body {
background-color: #333;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#main {
max-width: 40em;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
position: relative;
height: 100%;
}
section {
padding: 0 1em 5em;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
}
And here a working example.
Yes, seems to be a rounding issue – and I don’t know of anything that one could do to fix this. It’s in the nature of percentage values that they don’t always result in full pixel values – and how rounding is done in those cases is up to the browser vendor, I’m afraid.
I can only offer you a possible workaround (resp. “cover up”) that seems to work – if the layout really is as simple as this, and the main content area has a white background, and no transparency or background-image gets involved there.
Pull the section “up” over the banner by a negative margin of -1px (eliminated top margin of h1 here as well, otherwise it adjoins with the top margin of the section – countered by a padding-top), so that its background simply covers up that little glitch:
section {
padding: 1em 1em 5em;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
position:relative;
margin-top:-1px;
}
section h1:first-child { margin-top:0; }
Well, if you look closely, that makes the corner of triangle look slightly “cut off” (by one pixel) in those situations where the rounding glitch occurs – if you can live with that (and your desired layout allows for it), then take it :-) (And maybe serve it to IE only by some means). If not – then sorry, can’t help you there.
I'm trying to get a gap created within a div's border to fit an image, similar to this:
Is there a way to do this in pure CSS? All I can see is:
.box {
background: url(img.png) bottom left;
border-top: 1px solid #eee;
border-left: 1px solid #eee;
}
But my problem is border-right: 1px solid #eee; creates a line on top of my image, which is of course not desired.
It needs to be responsive. This image is an example, but you get the general idea.
Something like this?
http://jsfiddle.net/6Ufb5/
div {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
position: relative;
}
img {
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
Give the container position relative and the img absolute, shift it to left 10px and shift it down 10px from the top and you have what you desire.
For the responsive part, that's just giving the container and/or img a % width.
Like so:
http://jsfiddle.net/6Ufb5/2/
You can achieve this by using absolute positioning of the image element - and it has to be in a <img> element, not as the background image because it will never overlap the parent border (or even if it does by adjusting the background-position property, the border will lie on top of the background image... a behavior that is expected, by the way.
<div class="box">
Content goes here
<img src="http://placehold.it/300x200" />
</div>
And the CSS:
.box {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid #333;
}
.box img {
position: absolute;
bottom: -1px;
right: -1px;
}
If you want a dynamic and/or responsive solution, you might have to resort to JS to doing so - such as resizing the image depending on the box dimensions, and assigning a height to the box to take into account of the image height (since image is absolutely positioned, it is taken out of the document flow).
See fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/teddyrised/xH6UV/
This might work if you can alter your markup. For accessibility I think the image should be an image and not a background, and this method is responsive (though you may want to alter margins at small sizes with media queries).
http://jsfiddle.net/isherwood/79Js5
.box {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
display: inline-block;
padding: 10px 0 10px 10px;
width: 40%;
}
.box img {
margin-right: -10%;
margin-bottom: -10%;
width: 105%;
}
<div class="box">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x100/f3f3f3" />
</div>
This is may html markup
<header>
<span> <!-- background image here --> </span>
<hgroup>
<h1 class="testing">CSS3 and Compass Documentation</h1>
<h2>here I am going to document my compass and CSS3 learning</h2>
</hgroup>
</header>
And this would be mart of my css:
header span {
background: url(banner.gif) center 0 no-repeat;
background-size: 100% auto;
display: block;
height: 170px; /* maybe this is where it needs changing*/
width: 100%;
}
The problem starts once you start to making the browser window smaller (iphone size for example). The image shrinks (as I want it to) but still the height remains 170px leaving a bigger gap between the image and the hgroup content
I have tried to use height: 100% but that does not work at all (in this case at least).
In case you need a demo http://jsfiddle.net/Jcp6H/
in this case, you would like to have your <span> element resize with the height of your (background)image.
I would advise to use the <img> tag instead of a background-image.
<header>
<img src="http://movethewebforward.org/css/img/beanie-webasaurs.gif" alt="Webasaurs!" />
<hgroup>
<h1 class="testing">CSS3 and Compass Documentation</h1>
<h2>here I am going to document my compass and CSS3 learning</h2>
</hgroup>
</header>
In CSS style your image that way:
header {
max-width: 950px;
}
header img{
display: block;
width: 100%;
}
header h1 {
color: #324a69;
font-size: 3em;
text-align: center;
text-shadow: 1px 1px 0 white;
position: relative;
}
header h2 {
clear: both;
color: #705635;
text-shadow: 1px 1px 0 white;
font-size: 2em;
text-align: center;
}
It is quite hard to size the height of an element based on its background-image...
First off use an image inside of your span as it makes it easier to work with.
<span><img src="banner.jpg" /></span>
I tried this as an example you can replace with whatever you need
header span img {
background: #960;
display: block;
max-height: 170px;
max-width:950px;
width: 100%;
height:100%;
}
All you need to do is set a max-height and max-width, this way they will shrink with the browser without adding extra spaces. If needed you can also set a min-height etc to stop it going too small.
Try it and see if that works for you.