So let's say I have 2 objects. One with the sprite of a circle, other with the sprite of triangle.
My triangle object is set to the position of mouse in every step of the game, while circle is either standing in place or just moving in its own way, whatever.
What I want to do is to have the TRIANGLE move around the circle, but not on it's own, rather on the way your cursor is positioned.
So basically, calculate degree between circle's center and triangle's center. Whenever they are far from each other I just set triangle position to mouse position, BUT when you hover your mouse too close (past some X distance) you can't get any closer (the TRIANGLE is then positioned at maximum that X distance in the direction from circle center to mouse point)
I'll add a picture and hopefully you can get what I mean.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23334107/help2.png
Steps:
1. Calculate the distance between the cursor and the center of the circle. If it is more than the 'limit' then set the triangle's position to the cursor's position and skip to step 4.
2. Obtain the angle formed between the center of the circle and the cursor.
3. Calculate the new Cartesian coordinates (x, y) of the triangle based of off the polar coordinates we have now (angle and radius). The radius will be set to the limit of the circle before we calculate x and y, because we want the triangle to be prevented from entering this limit.
4. Rotate the image of the triangle to 1.5708-angle where angle was found in step 2. (1.5708, or pi/2, in radians is equivalent to 90°)
Details:
1. The distance between two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is sqrt((x1-x2)*(x1-x2) + (y1-y2)*(y1-y2))
2. The angle (in radians) can be calculated with
double angle = Math.atan2(circleY-cursorY, cursorX-circleX);
The seemingly mistaken difference in order of circleY-cursorY and cursorX-circleX is an artefact of the coordinate system in most programming languages. (The y coordinate increases downwards instead of upwards, as it does in mathematics, while the x coordinate increases in concord with math - to the right.)
3. To convert polar coordinates to Cartesian coordinates use these conversions:
triangle.setX( cos(angle)*limit );
triangle.setY( sin(angle)*limit );
where limit is the distance you want the triangle to remain from the circle.
4. In order to get your triangle to 'face' the circle (as you illustrated), you have to rotate it using the libgdx Sprite function setRotation. It will rotate around the point set with setOrigin.
Now, you have to rotate by 1.5708-angle – this is because of further differences between angles in mathematics and angles in programming! The atan2 function returns the angle as measured mathematically, with 0° at three o'clock and increasing counterclockwise. The setRotation function (as far as I can tell) has 0° at twelve o'clock and increases clockwise. Also, we have to convert from radians to degrees. In short, this should work, but I haven't tested it:
triangle.setRotation(Math.toDegrees(1.4708-angle));
Hope this helps!
Related
Given a non-self-intersecting polygon as a list of points (p1...pn), and a point (A) outside that polygon:
I want to calculate the total angular field of view covered by the polygon from the point, as well as the direction from the point towards the middle of that field of view (as either a vector or angle from horizontal).
Visually, I want the angle Θ and direction of the green vector:
Diagram
I tried finding the minimum and maximum angles from horizontal to each of the polygon points, but I don't know how to tell which is the start of the range and which is the end. Assuming the smaller angle is the start gives incorrect results from the left of a simple box.
I'm guessing the solution will have something to do with whether the polygon points are in clockwise or counterclockwise order.
Whether the polygon goes clockwise or counterclockwise doesn't matter. What matters is that the extent of any edge, as seen from the point, must be less than π radians. That will tell us whether the edge -- as seen from the point -- goes counterclockwise from A to B, or from B to A.
For example, suppose the bearings (in radians) from the point to the vertices are {0, 2π/5, 4π/5, 6π/5, 8π/5}. If the edges are represented by the (unordered) pairs (A,C), (A,E), (B,D), (B,E), (C,D). Then the edges run:
0->4π/5
2π/5->6π/5
4π/5->6π/5
8π/5->0
8π/5->2π/5
So the range of the polygon is [8π/5, 6π/5].
Hey I have a problem and I do not get this calculated on Unity 3D
I want to manipulate vertices. Thats ok but I want to move on X Axis where my mouse is. That doesn't work properly.
So what I do is just throw a ray from origin to a direction. So the ray could be infinitiv long.
With this I want to move the vertice of the mesh to the point where the mouse is. I limited it the range with ray_z = vertice_z (pseudo) but if you look the black line which is the ray you notice it getting longer or shorter when I move or rotate the camera. So the vertice is not on the same position like the mouse.
So I don't get calculated. How can I calculate the position from Z (black line) crosses X (red line).
Example:
cam(1,0,0) // cam & the start position of the ray
x_axis(10,0,10) // red line cutting black
ray_position(15,0,15) // the end of the ray (where the mouse could be if you look from cam to mouse)
Btw: The viewport is not top down. I painted wrong.
If you didn't understand I may try again ^^.
You're looking for Plane.Raycast, I think.
Let's say your plane has a <0, 0, -1> normal (the x-y plane) and passes through the origin:
Plane p = new Plane(Vector3.back, Vector3.zero);
Then you can find the point where a camera/mouse ray intersects with that plane:
Ray ray = Camera.main.ScreenPointToRay(Input.mousePosition);
float distanceAlongRay;
p.Raycast(ray, out distanceAlongRay);
Vector3 mouseOnPlane = ray.GetPoint(distanceAlongRay);
mouseOnPlane is the point on the x-y plane where the mouse ray hit. If you're only interested in the x, then use mouseOnPlane.x.
I'd need a formula to calculate 3D position and direction or orientation of a camera in a following situation:
Camera starting position is looking directly into center of the Earth. Green line goes straight up to the sky
Position that camera needs to move to is looking like this
Starting position probably shouldn't matter, but the question is:
How to calculate camera position and direction given 3D coordinates of any point on the globe. In the camera final position, the distance from Earth is always fixed. From desired camera point of view, the chosen point should appear at the rightmost point of a globe.
I think what you want for camera position is a point on the intersection of a plane parallel to the tangent plane at the location, but somewhat further from the Center, and a sphere representing the fixed distance the camera should be from the center. The intersection will be a circle, so there are infinitely many camera positions that work.
Camera direction will be 1/2 determined by the location and 1/2 determined by how much earth you want in the picture.
Suppose (0,0,0) is the center of the earth, Re is the radius of the earth, and (a,b,c) is the location on the earth you want to look at. If it's in terms of latitude and longitude you should convert to Cartesian coordinates which is straightforward. Your camera should be on a plane perpendicular to the vector (a,b,c) and at a height kRe above the earth where k>1 is some number you can adjust. The equation for the plane is then ax+by+cz=d where d = kRe^2. Note that the plane passes through the point (ka,kb,kc) in space, which is what we wanted.
Since you want the camera to be at a certain height above the earth, say h*Re where 1 < k < h, you need to find points on ax+by+cz=d for which x^2+y^2+z^2 = h^2*Re^2. So we need the intersection of the plane and a sphere. It will be easier to manage if we have a coordinate system on the plane, which we get from an orthonormal system which includes (a,b,c). A good candidate for the second vector in the orthonormal system is the projection of the z-axis (polar axis, I assume). Projecting (0,0,1) onto (a,b,c),
proj_(a,b,c)(0,0,1) = (a,b,c).(0,0,1)/|(a,b,c)|^2 (a,b,c)
= c/Re^2 (a,b,c)
Then the "horizontal component" of (0,0,1) is
u = proj_Plane(0,0,1) = (0,0,1) - c/Re^2 (a,b,c)
= (-ac/Re^2,-bc/Re^2,1-c^2/Re^2)
You can normalize the vector to length 1 if you wish but there's no need. However, you do need to calculate and store the square of the length of the vector, namely
|u|^2 = ((ac)^2 + (bc)^2 + (Re^2-c^2))/Re^4
We could complicate this further by taking the cross product of (0,0,1) and the previous vector to get the third vector in the orthonormal system, then obtain a parametric equation for the intersection of the plane and sphere on which the camera lies, but if you just want the simplest answer we won't do that.
Now we need to solve for t such that
|(ka,kb,kc)+t(-ac/Re^2,-bc/Re^2,1-c^2/Re^2)|^2 = h^2 Re^2
|(ka,kb,kc)|^2 + 2t (a,b,c).u + t^2 |u|^2 = h^2 Re^2
Since (a,b,c) and u are perpendicular, the middle term drops out, and you have
t^2 = (h^2 Re^2 - k^2 Re^2)/|u|^2.
Substituting that value of t into
(ka,kb,kc)+t(-ac/Re^2,-bc/Re^2,1-c^2/Re^2)
gives the position of the camera in space.
As for direction, you'll have to experiment with that a bit. Some vector that looks like
(a,b,c) + s(-ac/Re^2,-bc/Re^2,1-c^2/Re^2)
should work. It's hard to say a priori because it depends on the camera magnification, width of the view screen, etc. I'm not sure offhand whether you'll need positive or negative values for s. You may also need to rotate the camera viewport, possibly by 90 degrees, I'm not sure.
If this doesn't work out, it's possible I made an error. Let me know how it works out and I'll check.
let me begin by stating that's i'm dreadful at math.
i'm attempting to reposition and rotate a rectangle. however, i need to rotate the rectangle from a point that is not 0,0 but according to how far its coordinates has shifted. i'm sure that doesn't make much sense, so i've made some sketches to help explain what i need.
the image above shows 3 stages of the red rectangle moving from 0% to 100%. the red rectangle's X and Y coordinates (top left of the red rectangle) only moves a percentage of the blue rectangle's height.
the red rectangle can rotate. focusing only on the middle example ("Distance -50%") from above, where the red rectangle is repositioned at -50 of the blue rectangle's height, its new angle in the above image is now -45º. it has been rotated from its 0, 0 point.
now, my problem is that i want its rotational point to reflect its position.
the red and blue rectangles are the same size, but have opposite widths and heights. since the red rectangle's 0,0 coordinates are now -50% of the blue rectangle's height, and since they have opposite widths and heights, i want the rotational point to be 50% of the red rectangle's width (or 50% of the blue rectangle's height, which is the same thing).
rather than specifically telling the red rectangle to rotate at 50% of its width, in order to do what i want, i need to emulate doing so by using a formula that will position the red rectangle's X and Y coordinates so that its rotational point reflects its position.
Here's an illustrated solution to your problem:
I don't exactly understand what you need, but it seems that a procedure to rotate a rectangle around an arbitrary point may help.
Suppose we want to rotate a point (x,y) d radians around the origin (0,0). The formula for the location of the rotated point is:
x' = x*cos(d) - y*sin(d)
y' = x*sin(d) + y*cos(d)
Now we don't want to rotate around the origin, but around a given point (a,b). What we do is first move the origin to (a,b), then apply the rotation formula above, and then move the origin back to (0,0).
x' = (x-a)*cos(d) - (y-b)*sin(d) + a
y' = (x-a)*sin(d) + (y-b)*cos(d) + b
This is your formula for rotating a point (x,y) d radians around the point (a,b).
For your problem (a,b) would be the point halfway on the right side of the blue rectangle, and (x,y) would be every corner of the red rectangle. The formula gives (x',y') for the coordinates of the corners of rotated red rectangle.
It's quite simple really.
1. Let's settle on your point you want to rotate the rectangle about, i.e. the point of rotation (RP) which does not move when you swivel your rectangle around. Let's assume that the point is represented by the diamond in the figure below.
2. Translate the 4 points so that RP is at (0,0). Suppose the coordinates of that point is (RPx,RPy), therefore subtract all 4 corners of the rectangle by those coordinates.
3. Rotate the points with a rotation matrix (which rotates a point anticlockwise around the origin through some angle which is now the point of rotation thanks to the previous translation):
The following figure shows the rectangle rotated by 45° anticlockwise.
4. Translate the rectangle back (by adding RP to all 4 points):
I assume this is what you want :)
It seems like you could avoid a more complex rotation by more crafty positioning initially? For example, in the last example, position the red box at "-25% Blue Height" and "-25% Red Height" -- if I follow your referencing scheme -- then perform the rotation you want.
If you know the origin O and a point P on the side of rotated rectangle, you can calculate the vector between the two:
(source: equationsheet.com)
You can get the angle between the vector and the x-axis by taking the dot product with this vector:
(source: equationsheet.com)
Given this, you can transform any point on the rectangle by multiplying it by a rotation matrix:
(source: equationsheet.com)
I'm trying to figure out some calculations using arcs in 3d space but am a bit lost. Lets say that I want to animate an arc in 3d space to connect 2 x,y,z coordinates (both coordinates have a z value of 0, and are just points on a plane). I'm controlling the arc by sending it a starting x,y,z position, a rotation, a velocity, and a gravity value. If I know both the x,y,z coordinates that need to be connected, is there a way to calculate what the necessary rotation, velocity, and gravity values to connect it from the starting x,y,z coordinate to the ending one?
Thanks.
EDIT: Thanks tom10. To clarify, I'm making "arcs" by creating a parabola with particles. I'm trying to figure out how to ( by starting a parabola formed by a series particles with an beginning x,y,z,velocity,rotation,and gravity) determine where it will in end(the last x,y,z coordinates). So if it if these are the two coordinates that need to be connected:
x1=240;
y1=140;
z1=0;
x2=300;
y2=200;
z2=0;
how can the rotation, velocity, and gravity of this parabola be calculated using only these variables start the formation of the parabola:
x1=240;
y1=140;
z1=0;
rotation;
velocity;
gravity;
I am trying to keep the angle a constant value.
This link describes the ballistic trajectory to "hit a target at range x and altitude y when fired from (0,0) and with initial velocity v the required angle(s) of launch θ", which is what you want, right? To get your variables into the right form, set the rotation angle (in the x-y plane) so you're pointing in the right direction, that is atan(y/x), and from then on out, to match the usual terminology for 2D problem, rewrite your z to y, and the horizontal distance to the target (which is sqrt(xx + yy)) as x, and then you can directly use the formula in link.
Do the same as you'd do in 2D. You just have to convert your figures to an affine space by rotating the axis, so one of them becomes zero; then solve and undo the rotation.