Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am writing a mobile/web app which has coloured clickable and movable circles.
I am aware of the fact that I can draw them in two ways:
A div using border-radius
A <circle> in a <svg>
Now considering the fact that with svg I can take advantage of doing cool animations, why one over the other?
It seems to depend on what you're going to do with the circles.
If they're just buttons for a link, stick with a div, But if you're going to do all sorts of animation or create a game, I might go with SVG as it's more flexible but not supported by some old or mobile browsers.
I will update this answer with more info if you answer my question comment.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I was going through different video tutorials and a few suggested to use ::before pseudo selector to apply background image.
Is there any specific reason to follow this trend?
It is really a personal preference. Using ::before and ::after pseudo elements in this case allows you to insert images without the need for adding extra html elements.
Here is an example by Bryan Robinson of its clever usage
You can see how it can be used to create a three layered image background with just a single html element.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Given that CSS components (buttons etc.) can be used apart from Bootstrap grid system, what are the actual advantages of using Bootstrap over CSS flex model?
I am asking this questions as I always have big problems with margin/padding in Bootstrap 3 as few pixels (15px or so) are added, preventing me to take advantage of the full width of a container. Also, if I try to manually sent the margin to 0 the whole layout is displaced (including outer containers)
One current disadvantage of using flex is that it doesn't work for IE9 or earlier. It's probably a bit soon to be dumping them yet.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm using src img to place a logo in the header section. What would the pros and cons be of placing the image in a < div > vs leaving it as a plain ol' img src?
I'm thinking that, for the most part, I should be able to apply the same properties (such as margin, class, ID, etc.) to both. Am I missing something?
Note: I'm not interested in a background-image since I consider the logo content.
tl;dr wrapping is always good thing, if you are going to maintain that code for long enough time.
because you can created very targeted css, show, hide could be easier, round corners and adding text for accessibility will be easier etc..
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
How does transform: and its values, such as rotate scale and skew etc get applied to the image?
First thing you need to understand is, there are a lot of self help available for basic things like your question. You should Google it before you ask to StackOverflow, where people spend their time to answer questions.
This one helps you a lot: 3D Transforms in CSS
Perspective
RotateX / RotateY
Card Flip
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a way to create a background using CSS without the image? with color, and texture?
As Dustin said, there's no "texture" CSS feature. however, if you're using CSS3, you can do some pretty cool tricks like gradients or shadowing to make some neat backgrounds.
No, there is no "texture". However if you find a color and could drop the texture then you can. I would just find a small image to repeat.