svg - flip upside down ex. graph - css

I'm trying to work out a simple svg example - creating bar graph.
However, I don't have clear grasp of how it works. I rotated an existing graph
upside down but seems like there is a small offset. Corresponding jsfiddle here - http://jsfiddle.net/rhvP8/2/
<div style="width:300px;height:300px;">
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1" style="width:100%;height:100%" viewBox="0 0 300 300">
<g>
<rect width="14.55" height="40%" x="0" y="0" fill="black"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="20%" x="50" y="0" fill="green"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="80%" x="100" y="0" fill="red"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="90%" x="150" y="0" fill="yellow"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="10%" x="200" y="0" fill="pink"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="60%" x="250" y="0" fill="orange"></rect>
</g>
</svg>
</div>
<div style="width:300px;height:300px;">
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1" style="width:100%;height:100%" viewBox="0 0 300 300">
<g transform="rotate(180)">
<rect width="14.55" height="40" x="-50" y="-300" fill="black"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="20" x="-100" y="-300" fill="green"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="35" x="-150" y="-300" fill="red"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="90" x="-200" y="-300" fill="yellow"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="10" x="-250" y="-300" fill="pink"></rect>
<rect width="14.55" height="60" x="-300" y="-300" fill="orange"></rect>
</g>
</svg>
</div>

The thing you need to remember is that the rotate() transform will rotate an object about the coordinates (0,0), which in this case is the top left corner of the graph. Since the graph is 300p wide and 300px tall, rotating through 180° causes the graph to spin off beyond the top left corner. A translate transform can be used to readjust the coordinates so that the drawing appears within the viewbox again. Hopefully this illustration will explain:
Here's an updated JSfiddle with a few other fixes: http://jsfiddle.net/rhvP8/4/

An alternative to squeamish's solution is just to use the version of rotate that takes the rotation origin as well: rotate(angle x y).
Since you know your graph is 300x300, using rotate(180 150 150) works fine.
Demo here

Easy way: the scaleY() CSS function, defines a transformation that resizes an element along the y-axis (vertically).
svg {
transform: scaleY(-1);
}
View browser compatibility here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/transform-function/scaleY()#browser_compatibility

Related

Tilted background with rounded corners

I'm trying to create a background for my divs which is like a rectangle (with rounded corners) but with the right corner lower than the left one. The height difference between those two corners must remain the same independently of the total height of the background.
Something like that :
I don't know which solution is the best : a full svg, or working only with clip-path in my css.
I tried to create manually an svg but the result seems not enough precise.
<svg width="500" height="200">
<defs>
<mask id="roundCorner">
<rect width="100%" height="100%" fill="white"/>
//left corner
<rect width="50" height="50" fill="black"/>
<circle r="50" cx="50" cy="50" fill="white"/>
//right corner
<rect x='450' y="25" width="50" height="50" fill="black"/>
<circle r="50" cx="450" cy="76" fill="white"/>
//line
<path d="M50 0 L500 30 L500 0 Z" fill='black' />
</mask>
</defs>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="lime" mask="url(#roundCorner)"/>
</svg>
So how can I achieve a clean background like this in an efficient way ?

Responsive SVG Mask

I have looked at several other answers on Stack:
Responsive SVG Clip Path or Mask Image
Responsive SVG image mask
But none seem to work for me. I have an SVG mask based on a path. I want it to expand to fill all available space (or contract) whilst keeping the aspect ratio of the path.
svg {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="100%" height="100%" viewBox="0 0 237.859 264.582" preserveAspectRatio="xMinYMin meet">
<defs>
<pattern id="triangle-image" patternUnits="userSpaceOnUse" width="3918" height="3918">
<image xlink:href="images/aspirational-photos/christian-buehner-JQFHdpOKz2k-unsplash.jpg" x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" />
</pattern>
<pattern id="triangle-pattern" width="100%" height="100%" patternUnits="userSpaceOnUse">
<path id="triangle-path" d="M237.844,32.946c-0.001-9.981-4.42-19.279-12.121-25.512c-7.82-6.331-17.85-8.78-27.518-6.721
c-3.373,0.717-6.639,1.979-9.707,3.751l-129.11,74.56l-42.942,24.8C6.147,109.771-0.001,120.42,0,132.312
c0,11.892,6.149,22.541,16.449,28.487l84.623,48.833l87.457,50.486c7.179,4.143,15.193,5.435,23.174,3.736
c15.41-3.279,26.166-16.532,26.156-32.222L237.844,32.946z"
fill="#fff" fill-rule="evenodd" width="100%" height="100%" />
</pattern>
<mask id="triangle-mask" width="100%">
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="url(#triangle-pattern)" />
</mask>
</defs>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="url(#triangle-image)" mask="url(#triangle-mask)"/>
</svg>
The SVG seems to obey the path values no matter what I do. Is there a way to make it expand or contract like an image would?
I've simplified your code in the sense that I'm applying the mask to the image instead of using patterns. Also the mask is the path. I'm not using width="100%" since the width af an svg element will take all the space available i.e 100%.
I would like to understand why you need it height="100%"
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 240 265">
<defs>
<mask id="triangle-mask">
<path d="M237.844,32.946c-0.001-9.981-4.42-19.279-12.121-25.512c-7.82-6.331-17.85-8.78-27.518-6.721
c-3.373,0.717-6.639,1.979-9.707,3.751l-129.11,74.56l-42.942,24.8C6.147,109.771-0.001,120.42,0,132.312
c0,11.892,6.149,22.541,16.449,28.487l84.623,48.833l87.457,50.486c7.179,4.143,15.193,5.435,23.174,3.736
c15.41-3.279,26.166-16.532,26.156-32.222L237.844,32.946z"
fill="#fff" />
</mask>
</defs>
<image xlink:href="https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/s.cdpn.io/222579/beagle400.jpg" mask="url(#triangle-mask)"/>
</svg>
Alternatively if you need all those patterns please remove width="100%"for the mask in your code.

Applying coloured opacity to SVG image

I have an SVG that contains a <g> element, within this is a <path>, within here I specify a fill of #image0
Later in the same SVG I have my <def>, within here is my <pattern> and then the 
</pattern>
</defs>
I would like to apply a coloured, semi transparent overlay on top of the image. e.g. a #F5A9A9 50% opacity overlay.
Well, you can do just that: paint a semi-transparent rectangle on top of the image:
<defs class="g-def">
<pattern id="image0" width="1" height="1" y="0" x="0"
patternContentUnits="objectBoundingBox"
viewBox="0 0 1 1" preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid slice">
<image preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet"
width="1" height="1" x="0" y="0"
xlink:href=".....AElFTkSuQmCC"
data-naturalWidth="960" data-naturalHeight="960"></image>
<rect width="1" height="1" fill="#F5A9A9" opacity="0.5"></rect>
</pattern>
</defs>

Confusion about the order of CSS transform

All:
When I try CSS transform, something about the order of scale and translate confused me:
<svg>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #3333cc; fill:none;"/>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #000000; fill:none;" transform="scale(2) translate(10, 10)"/>
</svg>
<svg>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #3333cc; fill:none;"/>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #000000; fill:none;" transform="translate(10, 10) scale(2)"/>
</svg>
These two give different effects. Could anyone give me some explanation about how the CSS transform be processed and rendered?
Thanks
From W3C
x = ""
The x-axis coordinate of the side of the rectangle which has the smaller x-axis coordinate value in the current user coordinate system.
and Mozilla Developer Network:
This attribute indicates an x-axis coordinate in the user coordinate
system. The exact effect of this coordinate depend on each element.
The reason they don't look the same is because scaling the element also scaled the user coordinate system.
I've added two more SVG elements so we can see what it looks like with just the first transform applied to it.
<svg>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #3333cc; fill:none;"/>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #000000; fill:none;" transform="scale(2)"/>
</svg>
<svg>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #3333cc; fill:none;"/>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #000000; fill:none;" transform="scale(2) translate(10, 10)"/>
</svg>
<svg>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #3333cc; fill:none;"/>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #000000; fill:none;" transform="translate(10, 10)"/>
</svg>
<svg>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #3333cc; fill:none;"/>
<rect x="0" y="0" width="20" height="30" style="stroke: #000000; fill:none;" transform="translate(10, 10) scale(2)"/>
</svg>
In the first one the scale is applied first. Now both the rect and the user coordinate system is 2x as big as the purple rect. So when it is moved to 10,10 that is not the same location as it is for the purple rect.
In the second, the rect is moved first. It has the same coordinate system as the purple rect so it ends up in the exact same place. It is then scaled so it's upper left hand corner stays in the same place.
Every transform function like scale, translate represents a matrix. And matrix concatenation/multiplication is not commutative. So M1 x M2 must not be equal to M2 x M1.
E.g. a scaling matrix (column major order), scale(2, 2):
m11=2.000 m21=0.000 m31=0.000
m12=0.000 m22=2.000 m32=0.000
m13=0.000 m23=0.000 m33=1.000
E.g. a translation matrix, translate(10, 10):
m11=1.000 m21=0.000 m31=10.000
m12=0.000 m22=1.000 m32=10.000
m13=0.000 m23=0.000 m33=1.000
Scale * Translate:
m11=2.000 m21=0.000 m31=20.000
m12=0.000 m22=2.000 m32=20.000
m13=0.000 m23=0.000 m33=1.000
Translate * Scale:
m11=2.000 m21=0.000 m31=10.000
m12=0.000 m22=2.000 m32=10.000
m13=0.000 m23=0.000 m33=1.000

SVG graph with variable width

I am trying to create an SVG graph with a fixed width to the left for the x axis labels and then a variable width to fill the remaining space for the actual graph results. The image below shows what I am trying to achieve. Thus far I have been unable to work out how to create the fixed width and variable width area.
Any help with this would be much appreciated!
Many thanks.
I would nest a couple of SVG elements inside your main like so:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="500px" height="500px" >
<svg width="100">
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="red" />
</svg>
<svg x="100" >
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="blue" opacity="0.5"/>
</svg>
</svg>
NOTE I made the blue SVG element translucent so you can see that none of the red SVG was behind it.
I would also recommend using viewBox to give you more control over your drawing...
EDIT:
OK then I need to ask you a question about aspect ratios. If you take a square (width = height) and chop off a fixed portion from ONE side you no longer have a square and you have to think about what that means to your graph.
I believe this SVG will demonstrate more or less what you want:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
width="600px" height="500px" viewBox="0 0 1200 1000">
<svg width="200">
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="red" opacity="0.5"/>
</svg>
<svg x="200" width="1000" height="1000" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="blue" opacity="0.5"/>
<rect x="80%" y="10%" width="10%" height="50%" fill="green"/>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="70" height="40" fill="gray"/>
</svg>
NOTE the aspect ratio (AR) of the outermost SVG's dimensions MUST match the outermost viewBox's AR but can have different values. Likewise for the second inner SVG, but now you are dealing with a slice of the total that is a true square and not a rectangle. You can vary the width and height of the outer most SVG and so long as you maintain the same AR all the code on the inside will not have to change - it will all scale automajically :)
Also note the different scales in use and the different value types I used for co-ordinates. Because my second inner SVG's viewBox set the user co-ordinates to 100 X 100, 10% and 10 amount to the same thing...
You could also set the preserveAspectRatio="none" or some other value to achieve different effects but for a graph I kinda think lining things up is important so I wouldn't.
One final note - you could (and in your case should) omit the viewBox on the inner SVG. That way the scale is consistent on all parts of your graph. I was just showing off the power of viewBox :)
It just occurred to me that you may prefer a rectangle to a square so here is a code sample for that:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
width="800px" height="400px" viewBox="0 0 1600 800" >
<svg width="200">
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="red" opacity="0.5"/>
</svg>
<svg x="200" width="1400" height="800" viewBox="0 0 175 100" >
<rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="blue" opacity="0.5"/>
<rect x="80%" y="10%" width="10%" height="50%" fill="green"/>
<rect x="10" y="10" width="70" height="40" fill="gray"/>
</svg>
NOTE the width of the inner SVG is set to 175 so that the aspect ratio of 1400/800 is maintained.

Resources