First stackoverflow post, so please forgive if I'm missing something obvious. I did search for an answer first but didn't find one I recognized as relevant.
In this jsfiddle, I have a div that I'm using as a hover target to get some transitions to happen to an <a> element.
http://jsfiddle.net/ramatsu/Q9rfg/
Here's the markup:
<div class="target">Target
<p>.LightMe</p>
</div>
And the css:
body {
background-color: #099;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin-top:200px;
}
.target{
position: absolute;
left: 40%;
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
padding: 20px;
background-color: #ccc;
cursor: pointer;
}
a {
display: block;
position: relative;
padding: 1px;
border-radius: 15%;
}
a.LightMe {
/*Starting state */
background-color: white;
border-style:solid;
border-color:#fff;
top: -120px;
left: -200px;
height: 80px;
width: 80px;
z-index: 10;
opacity: 0;
transition:left 0.55s ease, opacity .5s .7s ease;
-webkit-transition:left 0.55s ease, opacity .5s .7s ease;
-o-transition:left 0.55s ease, opacity .5s .7s ease;
}
.target:hover a.LightMe {
/*Ending state*/
left: 80px;
opacity: 1;
transition:left 0.55s .7s ease, opacity .5s ease;
-webkit-transition:left 0.55s .7s ease, opacity .5s ease;
-o-transition:left 0.55s .7s ease, opacity .5s ease;
}
.target:hover {
transition: background-color 500ms ease;
-webkit-background-color 500ms ease;
-o-background-color 500ms ease;
background-color:#999;
}
Hover over the grey box labeled Target and back off again to see the transitions on the <a> element. It's doing what I want: opacity fades in during position delay, then it slides to the desired position. when moving out of the hover target, the <a> slides to it's original position, then opacity fades back out. All good so far.
The catch is, if the user hovers over the hidden <a> element, it triggers the same set of transitions, which causes all kinds of unintended havoc.
I'd like to prevent any response to a hover directly over the <a> element, and really like to continue to keep it in css if possible.
I tried adding an explicit hover to <a> and .LightMe to override this, to no avail. (Though that could be that I just didn't get the selector syntax right.)
I added the background-color transition to .target intentionally for testing, and it provided an interesting clue: hovering over the <a> triggers the upstream transitions of the .target div. That's about where my brain broke and I decided I'd better seek help.
I'm working with a few things here that are above my head, I just started from the closest thing I could find and worked toward what I needed. This was the starting point jsfiddle (with thanks to the author):
You can start your 'top' position outside of the viewer port and delay the 'top' transition until after your 'left' transition is over. That way the <a> element will not be clickable until the left transition start.
See: http://jsfiddle.net/Q9rfg/4/
Or you can also use this method, combined with the sibling selector as suggested by aorcsik.
Update: another hacky solution is to place a div which is outside, the hover sensitive element, that covers the moving link. Check it out: http://jsfiddle.net/aorcsik/Q9rfg/2/
The problem with my original idea (below) was, that you could not click on the moving link, since it returned to its original position, once you hovered out of the gray box, also the cursor changed over the hidden link.
I would try to get the <a> out of the gray box, put it after, and reference it in css with the sibling selector +.
.mainclass.subclass:hover + a.LightMe {
/* ... */
}
This way it won't trigger the hover effect of the gray box when itself is hovered, and you stay in pure css land.
This would make positioning a bit trickier, here is a fiddle, check it out: http://jsfiddle.net/aorcsik/Q9rfg/1/
Related
I´m trying to build up a new site. The work is nearly done, but I need a last detail. I´m using a grid with thumb/headline and link-function to detail sites.
I want to visualize the link-function with some hover-effects (delivered by my template).
This is the link to the project-site - and I´m looking for help on my mainpage:
https://emc.ow-media.de/
If you hover the thumb of the document or the thumbs of the three links at the end of the page, you can see a hover effect. I want to use this effect also on the grid element at the top (the 6 thumbs).
Can you give me a hint, how to get this working with CSS?
Thanks a lot!
You have sample already there. If you inspect the element, you can see how it works. The code the bottom elements use is as follows:
CSS:
figure.sc_image a {
content: '';
width: 100%;
display: block;
height: 100%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
opacity: 0;
position: absolute;
-webkit-transition: all .4s ease-in-out;
-moz-transition: all .4s ease-in-out;
-ms-transition: all .4s ease-in-out;
-o-transition: all .4s ease-in-out;
transition: all .4s ease-in-out;
}
figure.sc_image a {
background-color: rgba(50,172,121,0.8) !important;
}
figure.sc_image a:hover {
opacity: 1;
}
HTML:
<figure class="sc_image sc_image_shape_square">
<img src="https://emc.ow-media.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Leistungen-Potentialanalyse1.jpg" alt="">
<a class="img_icon icon-file-pdf" href="http://emc.ow-media.de/was-wir-tun-detail"></a>
</figure>
Essentially what is happening, is that there is an invisible element a, with set opacity of 0. When someone hovers the element it gets to set the opacity of 1. The animation is done by the transition property, which eases the change of opacity. You can mimic the effect on your other elements.
Suppose I'm using transition, to smoothly change an element's position on hover. I also change the value of transition itself to achieve a different animation in each direction.
It seems like when I move the mouse over the elements, the new transition value is used for the "forward" transition, and when I un-hover, the old value is used for the "reverse" transition.
I couldn't find much documentation about this. Is the order guaranteed?
div {
background: red;
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
left: 0px;
transition: left 1s linear, top 1s ease-in-out;
}
:hover div {
top: 150px;
left: 400px;
transition: left 1s linear, top 1s linear;
}
div:nth-child(2) { transition-delay: 0.1s; }
div:nth-child(3) { transition-delay: 0.2s; }
div:nth-child(4) { transition-delay: 0.3s; }
Hover on me!
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
[...] all 3 properties change their values when I hover on the element, and it's not intuitively clear in which order the changes are applied, at least coming from background experience with a framework such as Core Animation where "model" and "presentation" layers are separate things and the parameters of an animation are set up before the animation starts running. I think your answer makes sense though...
I think the key difference here is that thinking about transition in terms of "animations starting while the element is/isn't :hovered" is the wrong way to think about it.
You are right, the paradigm you're used to (an MVC paradigm) doesn't really apply to CSS. At least not at the level where you as a CSS "writer" are affected. The relevant spec for this, by the way, is CSS Transitions
In CSS, changes to CSS properties apply immediately. Transitions allow you to apply a change to a value over some duration. In your case, you have four divs who are all set to be 30px from the top and 0px from the left edges of the screen.
On hover, thanks to your :hover div selector, new styles apply. Normally they'd apply instantaneously, but because you gave them a transition, it happens over a duration. You can see each one move individually thanks to the transition-delay you gave some of them, as well. To make it even easier to see, I changed the color of each div to be unique. It should be pretty clear which ones move first.
As soon as you remove your mouse, the :hover pseudo-class no longer applies, and so the styles under div are re-applied. Again, they would be instantaneously applied, but the transition you set (along with the transition-delay on 3 of the 4 divs) changes that to occur over a longer duration. So, just as when the :hover` styles apply, the red div moves first, then the others after an increasing 0.1s delay each.
div {
background: red;
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
left: 0px;
transition: left 1s linear, top 1s ease-in-out;
}
:hover div {
top: 150px;
left: 400px;
transition: left 1s linear, top 1s linear;
}
div:nth-child(2) { transition-delay: 0.1s; background: blue; }
div:nth-child(3) { transition-delay: 0.2s; background: green; }
div:nth-child(4) { transition-delay: 0.3s; background: yellow; }
Hover on me!
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
this question might be obvious but i'm new in css.
I'm animating a shape so when you hover it, it stretches. I've completed the hover on with a nice ease transition but when you move off the mouse the transition doesn't work. Is there a way to make it happen also in the hover off moment?
.shape1{
position: absolute;
background:red
top:512px;
width:180px;
height:140px;
}
.shape1:hover {
height: 160px;
top:492px;
transition: 0.2s ease;
}
Your answer
You have added the transition property on the hover state of the element. Therefore the transition is not applied when you leave the cursor from the element.
.shape1{
position: absolute;
background: red;
top: 512px;
width: 180px;
height: 140px;
transition: .2s ease; /* move this here from :hover */
}
Further information
Besides this you can also add specific properties to the transition. For example, if you only want the height to be animated you could it like this:
.shape1 {
transition: height .2s ease;
/* this inly affects height, nothing else */
}
You can even define different transition-times for each property:
.shape1 {
transition: height .2s ease, background-color .5s linear;
/* stacking transitions is easy */
}
Add the transition before the :hover, so the transition always applies
.shape1 {
transition: 0.2s ease;
}
The :hover selector is used to select elements when you mouse over them.
W3Schools
When you add also transition to your shape1 class it should works
I've created a menu that adjusts itself as it gets past a certain point of the screen. Everything works great, except for transitions and only on Chrome.
I tried adding a -webkit- version of the transition, but it doesn't work either.
This is my CSS
.past-main {
height: 97px !important;
margin-left: -40px;
width: 100%;
top: 0px !important;
position: absolute;
-webkit-transition: height 300ms opacity 300ms top 300ms ease 0s;
transition: height 300ms, opacity 300ms,top 300ms ease 0s;
opacity: 1!important;
height: 90px !important;
margin-top:0px !important;
}
.past-maina {
-webkit-transition: top 800ms ease 0s;
transition: top 800ms ease 0s!important;
top:0px!important;
}
.past-mainb {
-webkit-transition: all 800ms ease 0s;
transition: all 800ms ease 0s;
margin-top:0px!important;
}
To add more context, the various levels of your header menu gets those classes applied when the user scrolls past a certain point:
some wrapper elements get past-maina and past-main
each menu item (they are li elements) gets past-mainb
Before scrolling down, each menu item has varying margin-top values; afterwards they all get 0. These are set with style rules like
.desktop-nav ul li:nth-child(1) {
margin-top: -10px;
}
Now, this selector has a higher specificity (22) than your .past-mainb selector (10), which, I'm guessing, is why you added the !important annotation to the latter's rule: otherwise, it wouldn't take effect.
But this had an undesired side effect: important declarations always win over transitions! Thus, if you want your transitions to take effect you can't use !important.
The simple cheat is to up the specificity of the "past main" style rules. For example, add an ID selector. Or perhaps better: instead of adding a class when the user scrolls, remove a "before main" class instead, and rewrite all the rules giving specific menu-item margins to use it:
.desktop-nav.before-main ul li:nth-child(1) {
margin-top: -10px;
}
I'm new to CSS and now facing a problem which I can't get rid of.
I made an animation using css3 keyframes. This animation simply changes the rotation of an image whenever someone hovers it. Now I wanted to link this image to a website, but the way I did it, the animation doesn't run at all.
<div class="tunein"><a href="http://www.google.com/">
<img src="https://www.google.com/images/srpr/logo3w.png"></a></div>
.tunein{
position: absolute;
top: 40%;
left: 10%;
display: block;
-webkit-transform:rotate(12deg);
-moz-transform:rotate(12deg);
}
.tunein a:hover{
animation: rotate 0.5s ease-out;
-moz-animation:rotate 0.5s ease-out;
-webkit-animation:rotate 0.5s ease-out;
}
js fiddle for you:
http://jsfiddle.net/9jMqc/
When i add the class tag into the a-element, the offset changes dramatically but the animation works.
I'd propose moving the events onto the <a> link, so moving them as per http://jsfiddle.net/9jMqc/2/
.tunein a {
display: block;
-webkit-transform:rotate(12deg);
-moz-transform:rotate(12deg);
}
.tunein a:hover{
animation: rotate 0.5s ease-out;
-moz-animation:rotate 0.5s ease-out;
-webkit-animation:rotate 0.5s ease-out;
}
I think you were perhaps missing display: block on the <a> link previously - Just for reference, you shouldn't need to use display: block on <div></div>'s as that's their default unless otherwise declared in your CSS.