Using CSS I am running into trouble getting a div later on the page to show up using the hover command over an img tag. I'm writing the page using Bootstrap 3 - Any idea why this may be a problem? The words in "hovershow" appear at the right spot on the page when they are not originally hiden using CSS which makes me think there's a problem with the command itself.
HTML
<div class="col-md-4 col-sm-4">
<img id="Email_Logo" class="featurette-image img-responsive" src="img/Email_Icon_Send1.jpg" data-src="holder.js/500x500/auto" alt="Generic placeholder image">
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-6 col-md-offset-3">
<div class="hovershow"><p>This should show on hover</p></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
.hovershow{
display:none;
}
#Email_Logo:hover .hovershow{
display: block;
}
That's definitely not how CSS works.
The following CSS implies there is an element .hovershow somewhere within #Email_Logo:
.#Email_Logo:hover .hovershow{
display: block;
}
And well... that's not the case. What you want can either be achieved by some easy Javascripting or a change in your HTML 'tree' and CSS.
Related
I have a doubt about using Angular. I need to place the sentences next to each other. These are two different components that I created. I want recipe-list works and recipes-details works and these two sentences should show next to each other
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-5 ">
<app-recipe-list></app-recipe-list>
</div>
<div class="col-md-7">
<app-recipes-details></app-recipes-details>
</div>
</div>
<p>recipe-list works!</p> <p>recipes-details works!</p>
The problem is, that component here take full width of window. So first, apply class to component directly:
<div class="row">
<app-recipe-list class="col-5"></app-recipe-list>
<app-recipes-details class="col-7"></app-recipes-details>
</div>
But also give them style display: inline-block;. The best way would be to apply :host pseudoclass in component's css (recipe-list.component.css and recipes-details.component.css):
:host {
display: inline-block;
}
I have an image, single character in a span (equal sign), and then a div where child elements are added/replaced via js.
However, I can't for the life of me figure out how to get it all aligned properly (fear I'm over thinking and complicating it.)
I'm using bootstrap's grid (row/col) system as well.
Something akin to...
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-2 col-offset-lg-1">
<div class="response-part">
<img src="foo" />
<span class="opensans">=</span>
<div id="rp1" class="opensans inline" style="width: 50px;">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-lg-2">
<div class="response-part">
<img src="foo" />
<span class="opensans">=</span>
<div id="rp2" class="opensans inline" style="width: 50px;">
<span class="opensans">X</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
See jsfiddle
Wanting image centered middle along equal sign (vertical-align) as well as span within neighboring div (and the text in that span appearing just a few pixels off the bottom line.)
I saw this but none of the solutions are addressing the problem for me (I can only guess it is because of the third element and font, etc.)
UPDATE1: Edited sample html to correctly reflect the scenario in which the response-part.div is empty (initial state, possible transition state as user interacts with the page.) Updated fiddle
UPDATE2: I "fixed" the issue occurring with no child elements by adding an initial element in the initial html for the response-part, and then adding one back in when the user removes all other elements. A bit hackish, would appreciate a fix that didn't involve this workaround if possible. Updated fiddle
PS: I initially considered using bootstrap v4 (with flexbox support) but it is still alpha. Alternatively, I also looked into using FlexboxGrid, however I still need bootstrap for other features and FlexboxGrid uses similar classes ("row", etc) as bootstrap, which I assumed would cause name conflicts (if I included both in my project, eg: which "row" class would be used!)
Try using display: flex; on your response-part class. Something like this:
.response-part {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
}
I edited your fiddle. Take a look on it: https://jsfiddle.net/gusLnyyh/6/
I have added the "clear:both;" css command to my responsive theme,however it doesn't work,elements wrap around my block.
Here is the HTML of my block:
<div id="block-views-categories-normal-view-block-1" class="block block--views contextual-links-region block--views-categories-normal-view-block-1">
<div class="contextual-links-wrapper contextual-links-processed">
<div class="block__content">
<div class="view view-categories-normal-view view-id-categories_normal_view view-display-id-block_1 view-dom-id-4d6cdd2580eef8f5826096ea0f8157c1">
<div class="view-content">
<div class="responsive-table-wrapper">
<div class="responsive-table-scroller">
<table class="views-view-grid responsive-table-processed">
etc
I have tried
#block-views-categories-normal-view-block-1{
clear:both;
}
and
.views-view-grid {
clear:both;
}
Am I missing something?
Need to see some more code and corresponding CSS to answer.
My guess is that you're not clearing the float of the proper element.
By putting clear: both on the table class, you're telling it to clear the float of some child table elements.
Unless you altered the display property of the table elements, your clear is in the incorrect place.
You need to clear the parent of your floats to fix the painting issue in the browser.
I am facing very annoying problem.
I have 2 div's like bellow, first div is product image, and second one is overlay that should be shown when user hovers over product image.
It does work, but when image is hovered, overlay doesnt stop flickering.
I tried few "hacks" by setting opacity and nothing works.
<div class="product-container">
<div class="product-image"><img src="http://placehold.it/200x200">
<div class="overlay">PRICE</div>
</div>
URL is http://jsfiddle.net/MZ3eE/
I know JS could be used, but in this case i need pure CSS solution.
After looking at the new fiddle
you need to do this
.product-container:hover .overlay-box {
display: block;
}
instead of
.product-img-box:hover + .overlay-box {
display: block;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/avxLA/1/
Apply the :hover to the .product-image div instead of the img like so:
.product-image:hover .overlay {
display:block;
}
updated fiddle
For starters, there is an unclosed <div> there, so not quite sure how you want it. Anyway if you want it like this:
<div class="product-container">
<div class="product-image">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200">
<div class="overlay">PRICE</div>
</div>
</div>
then like others said :
.product-image:hover .overlay {display:block;}
will do fine. Otherwise if you want it like that(which makes more sense tbh):
<div class="product-container">
<div class="product-image"><img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"></div>
<div class="overlay">PRICE</div>
</div>
you should put it on the containers :hover like that :
.product-container:hover .overlay {display:block;}
I have a 3-column layout that works pretty well:
http://jsfiddle.net/nicorellius/YNyHW/7/
My goal is to add a pre-existing modular unit into the center div, the one with class two-inner. The markup is like so:
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<div>
<div class="container">
<div class="one">
<div class="one-inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="two">
<div class="two-inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="three">
<div class="three-inner"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The CSS can be seen in the fiddle. Part of the modular unit is actually built from some PHP where some data from a database is fetched and displayed. I have some arrays that I'm using for testing that mimic 6 entries and gives the modular unit a 2-wide by 3-tall box layout. My problem is that when I add this unit into the layout above, I get something like the test site below.
The markup for the modular unit is like so:
<section class="unit">
<section class="buttons margin-top-2em">
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 1</button>
</div>
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 2</button>
</div>
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 3</button>
</div>
</section>
<div class="row">
<?php // loop through some arrays to get module unit ?>
</div>
</section>
I've tried various tweaks to try and get it up but the only thing that does it is making the heights of the outer classes one, two, and three close to zero.
Although I've tried changing heights and other bits to get it to fit, I'm still having trouble figuring out why that center div won't go up. What am I missing?
The CSS for the unit class is in the fiddle. On it's own, it works OK, and I have some breakpoints that collapse it down into a single column. I just cant get passed this part...
EDIT
After trying some ideas from #kozlovski5, I am able to get the divmoving up and down as I need. But there is something going on that is making me uneasy. I'm not too familiar with the display: table, display: table-cell layout so Im sure I'm missing something. For example, when I add text to the divs in question, either the classes one, two, or three, or the inner classes, the adjustments recommended by #kozlovski5 go away. So in other words if I don't use top: -37.5em; and just fill the divs with text, everything seems to work as it should. It's when I try to model the layout with bordered sections that I get the strange behavior.
I ended up going with floats instead. See test site above for final.
I applied:
div > .modular {
display: block;
}
This seems to solve the problem. Here is an updated jsFiddle. http://jsfiddle.net/YNyHW/4/
OP has provided a test case for his website, so my updated answer is:
.two-inner {
background-color: #cba;
border: 1px solid gray;
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
top: -596px;
left: 0;
}
Ugghhh.. Another Edit
I think the whole display: table and div > div. { display: table-cell;} is causing this issue and instead of working on patches let's hit the problem head straigh on instead of working on fixes.
Just get rid of the display table etc. And use floats instead here is an example:
http://jsfiddle.net/YNyHW/6/