Qt Signals and slots mechanism blocked by a loop in main - qt

I have a following situatuion.
2 Socket objects are created in the main in a for loop (the original problem has 1000 objects). Upon creation the start() method is invoked.
start() creates a QTcpSocket which tries to connect to some host.
Socket has slots which catch the connected() signal from QTcpSocket and print some debug output
What happens is that chronologically first ALL the Socket objects are created after which the sockets are started. Here is an example output of debug options:
1. Created Socket object 1
2. Invoked Socket object 1 start()
3. Created Socket object 2
4. Invoked Socket object 2 start()
5. Socket object 1 TcpSocket Connected
6. Socket object 2 TcpSocket Connected
Code:
//main.cpp
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QApplication a(argc, argv);
for (int i=0; i<10; i++)
{
Socket *socket = new Socket();
qDebug() << "Socket object created";
socket->Start();
}
return a.exec();
}
//socket.cpp
Socket::Socket(QObject *parent)
: QObject(parent)
{}
void Socket::Start()
{
qDebug()<<"Start method invoked";
socket = new QTcpSocket(this);
connect(socket,SIGNAL(connected()), this, SLOT(on_connect()), Qt::DirectConnection);
socket->connectToHost("192.168.5.5",12345);
}
void Socket::on_connect()
{
QTcpSocket* socket = qobject_cast<QTcpSocket *>(QObject::sender());
qDebug() << socket->socketDescriptor() << " Connected.";
}
This is not the behavior I expected because the documentation states:
When a signal is emitted, the slots connected to it are usually
executed immediately, just like a normal function call. When this
happens, the signals and slots mechanism is totally independent of any
GUI event loop.
Question:
How to ensure the slots are executed "immediately" (not only after the loop in the main finishes) when the signal is emitted?
The only available solution (without introducing new threads) i currently see:
Drop the use of signals and slots in this case, and implement everything in the start method. Something like this:
Socket::start(){
...
if(!tcpsocket->waitForConnected(200)) qDebug() << "Socket object X TcpSocket Connected"
...
}

Your slot is indeed triggered immediately when QTcpSocket's signal connected() is emitted.
However, connected() is not emitted the moment you try to connect that socket to somewhere.
The documentation writes:
This signal is emitted after connectToHost() has been called
and a connection has been successfully established.
The establish of a connection requires an event loop.

establishing the connection happens asynchronously (read connectToHost will return immediately before it even checks whether the connection has already been established) and will notify your code using the signals that are triggered by events
these events are handled only in the event loop or when you call WaitForConnect (which will spin up it's own even loop only handling those events)
this means that the sequence you get is perfectly normal

I don't think you can do that without introducing new threads, only solution is seems your solution.
Or using DirectConnection instead of leaving it empty (Which is AutomaticConnection and which is QueuedConnection in your case) may be a solution. But I don't think that it will work because you need to wait in order to run that slot. I'm not sure, just give it a try.

Related

Strange undocumented QTimer/QEventLoop behaviour after the timer is manually restarted

I have recently stumbled upon this while working with QTimer that calls a function with internal QEventLoop
So, say we have a QTimer instance
QTimer* timer = new QTimer;
somewhere in the constructor we start it and it begins ticking away once every 100ms
timer->start(100);
now the fun part, we connect it to a slot that has internal QEventLoop
void SlotFunction()
{
qDebug() << "entered";
QEventLoop loop;
loop.exec();
}
putting aside how stupid this loop really is, we see that we will never finish processing the slot and timer's subsequent timeouts will keep stacking into execution queue. Everything is ok and as it should be.
What is NOT as it should be comes next: since QEventLoop makes sure our app stays responsive while the slot mindlessly idles away we can make a button and its clicked() slot that looks like:
void OnClicked()
{
timer->start(100);
}
what I am doing here is essentially restarting current timer cycle, nothing less, nothing more. Right? Nope! After this restart, SlotFunction fires again suggesting that tick after timer's restart is not in fact equal to all other ticks that were issued before it...
My only question is : WTF?! Why manually restarting the timer enables it to enter the slot additional time? I've asked on freenode but the only answer I got was "It is as it should be"
I tried this and every click creates another "entered" line.
The main Eventloop cannot handle another event since we are stuck in a new eventloop.
This is quite easy to see when implementing a second slot and also connecting this slot to the timeout signal.
The maineventloop will get stuck when calling the next eventloop and not processing any more queued events.
The timer itself will also not queue any more events, since the queueing up itself would be done in the now stuck main-eventloop. The timer does not run in its own eventloop (thats why Qtimers are no precision timers).
As soon as the button is clicked the new eventloop checks the timer if an event timeout() should be generated.
As soon as the new event is handled we again are stuck in another eventloop...
This will go on until we exit the application.
When exiting the application we see the loops reversing and calling the second slot as often as we clicked the button and ran into the first slot
Code:
#include <QDebug>
#include <QTime>
MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent) :
QMainWindow(parent),
ui(new Ui::MainWindow)
{
ui->setupUi(this);
timer = new QTimer;
timer->setInterval(2000);
connect(timer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(timerslot()));
connect(timer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(timerslot2()));
timer->start();
}
MainWindow::~MainWindow()
{
delete ui;
}
void MainWindow::on_pushButton_clicked()
{
timer->start(2000);
}
void MainWindow::timerslot()
{
qDebug()<<"In";
QEventLoop loop;
loop.exec();
}
void MainWindow::timerslot2()
{
qDebug()<<"More";
}
Output on start:
In
Output on every click:
In
Output after 3 clicks:
In
In
In
In
Output exiting the application:
In
In
In
In
More
More
More
More

Qt event loop and unit testing?

I'we started experimenting with unit testing in Qt and would like to hear comments on a scenario that involves unit testing signals and slots.
Here is an example:
The code i would like to test is (m_socket is a pointer to QTcpSocket):
void CommunicationProtocol::connectToCamera()
{
m_socket->connectToHost(m_cameraIp,m_port);
}
Since that is an asynchronous call i can't test a returned value. I would however like to test if the response signal that the socket emits on a successful connection (void connected ()) is in fact emitted.
I've written the test below:
void CommunicationProtocolTest::testConnectToCammera()
{
QSignalSpy spy(communicationProtocol->m_socket, SIGNAL(connected()));
communicationProtocol->connectToCamera();
QTest::qWait(250);
QCOMPARE(spy.count(), 1);
}
My motivation was, if the response doesn't happen in 250ms, something is wrong.
However, the signal is never caught, and I can't say for sure if it's even emitted. But I've noticed that I'm not starting the event loop anywhere in the test project. In the development project, the event loop is started in main with QCoreApplication::exec().
To sum it up, when unit testing a class that depends on signals and slots, where should the
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
return a.exec();
be run in the test environment?
I realize this is an old thread but as I hit it and as others will, there is no answer and the answer by peter and other comments still miss the point of using QSignalSpy.
To answer you original question about "where the QCoreApplication exec function is needed", basically the answer is, it isn't. QTest and QSignalSpy already has that built in.
What you really need to do in your test case is "run" the existing event loop.
Assuming you are using Qt 5:
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qsignalspy.html#wait
So to modify your example to use the wait function:
void CommunicationProtocolTest::testConnectToCammera()
{
QSignalSpy spy(communicationProtocol->m_socket, SIGNAL(connected()));
communicationProtocol->connectToCamera();
// wait returns true if 1 or more signals was emitted
QCOMPARE(spy.wait(250), true);
// You can be pedantic here and double check if you want
QCOMPARE(spy.count(), 1);
}
That should give you the desired behaviour without having to create another event loop.
Good question. Main issues I've hit are (1) needing to let app do app.exec() yet still close-at-end to not block automated builds and (2) needing to ensure pending events get processed before relying on the result of signal/slot calls.
For (1), you could try commenting out the app.exec() in main(). BUT then if someone has FooWidget.exec() in their class that you're testing, it's going to block/hang. Something like this is handy to force qApp to exit:
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
QApplication a( argc, argv );
//prevent hanging if QMenu.exec() got called
smersh().KillAppAfterTimeout(300);
::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
int iReturn = RUN_ALL_TESTS();
qDebug()<<"rcode:"<<iReturn;
smersh().KillAppAfterTimeout(1);
return a.exec();
}
struct smersh {
bool KillAppAfterTimeout(int secs=10) const;
};
bool smersh::KillAppAfterTimeout(int secs) const {
QScopedPointer<QTimer> timer(new QTimer);
timer->setSingleShot(true);
bool ok = timer->connect(timer.data(),SIGNAL(timeout()),qApp,SLOT(quit()),Qt::QueuedConnection);
timer->start(secs * 1000); // N seconds timeout
timer.take()->setParent(qApp);
return ok;
}
For (2), basically you have to coerce QApplication into finishing up the queued events if you're trying to verify things like QEvents from Mouse + Keyboard have expected outcome. This FlushEvents<>() method is helpful:
template <class T=void> struct FlushEvents {
FlushEvents() {
int n = 0;
while(++n<20 && qApp->hasPendingEvents() ) {
QApplication::sendPostedEvents();
QApplication::processEvents(QEventLoop::AllEvents);
YourThread::microsec_wait(100);
}
YourThread::microsec_wait(1*1000);
} };
Usage example below.
"dialog" is instance of MyDialog.
"baz" is instance of Baz.
"dialog" has a member of type Bar.
When a Bar selects a Baz, it emits a signal;
"dialog" is connected to the signal and we need to
make sure the associated slot has gotten the message.
void Bar::select(Baz* baz) {
if( baz->isValid() ) {
m_selected << baz;
emit SelectedBaz();//<- dialog has slot for this
} }
TEST(Dialog,BarBaz) { /*<code>*/
dialog->setGeometry(1,320,400,300);
dialog->repaint();
FlushEvents<>(); // see it on screen (for debugging)
//set state of dialog that has a stacked widget
dialog->setCurrentPage(i);
qDebug()<<"on page: "
<<i; // (we don't see it yet)
FlushEvents<>(); // Now dialog is drawn on page i
dialog->GetBar()->select(baz);
FlushEvents<>(); // *** without this, the next test
// can fail sporadically.
EXPECT_TRUE( dialog->getSelected_Baz_instances()
.contains(baz) );
/*<code>*/
}
I had a similar issue with Qt::QueuedConnection (event is queued automatically if the sender and the receiver belongs to different threads). Without a proper event loop in that situation, the internal state of objects depending on event processing will not be updated. To start an event loop when running QTest, change the macro QTEST_APPLESS_MAIN at the bottom of the file to QTEST_MAIN. Then, calling qApp->processEvents() will actually process events, or you can start another event loop with QEventLoop.
QSignalSpy spy(&foo, SIGNAL(ready()));
connect(&foo, SIGNAL(ready()), &bar, SLOT(work()), Qt::QueuedConnection);
foo.emitReady();
QCOMPARE(spy.count(), 1); // QSignalSpy uses Qt::DirectConnection
QCOMPARE(bar.received, false); // bar did not receive the signal, but that is normal: there is no active event loop
qApp->processEvents(); // Manually trigger event processing ...
QCOMPARE(bar.received, true); // bar receives the signal only if QTEST_MAIN() is used

QSocketNotifier warning -- using socket inside a thread

I am able to remove this warning, please suggest on below points.
QSocketNotifier: socket notifiers cannot be enabled from another thread
Whenever new request comes to QTcpServer i create new object -- xxx . This object then create thread for this socket & send receive data in
dowork_socket() function of yyy object. Inside dowork_socket() function i emit signal signalTcpSocketWriteData() to send data from socket.
Object creating the thread for new socket - xxx (I am not pasting full code):----
yyy * ptr;
QTcpSocket *m_pTcpSocket;
public slots:
void writeDataSlot( QByteArray data )
{
m_pTcpSocket->write( data );
m_pTcpSocket->flush();
}
Object in which thread is moved -- yyy (I am not pasting full code) :----
xxx *TcpSocketWrapper_ptr;
signals:
void signalTcpSocketWriteData( QByteArray);
public slots:
void dowork_socket();
Inside above object yyy contructor I am connecting signal signalTcpSocketWriteData to slot writeDataSlot :---
connect(this, SIGNAL(signalTcpSocketWriteData( QByteArray)), TcpSocketWrapper_ptr, SLOT(writeDataSlot( QByteArray )), Qt::QueuedConnection );
dowork function of object yyy :--
void TcpSocketThreadObject::dowork_socket()
{
QByteArray block;
block.append(" \n hi again .. !!!");
emit signalTcpSocketWriteData(block);
}
I am able to send data success fully by above method & above warning is removed.
1> Now my question is suppose two threads are created & both thread simultaneously emit the signal then will there be conflict in running the slot ?
2> Will it cause some critical section problem or events are queued & will not be executed simultaneously ?
Please suggest on this two points.
that seems too complicated. You don't need to create threads to work with sockets.
Whatever, if you do this, here's two points needs to be kept in mind:
QTcpSocket is Not thread-safe itself
as long as you use Qt::QueuedConnection when connecting slot (or at least proper using of implicit connections between different threads do this) all code executing inside connected slot will be execited in object's thread loop. In other words, signals emitted from different thread(s) will be queued.

When is QThread quit() or finished()?

I'm new to Qt, and want to simply display a video in Qt GUI. I basically got everything figured out, except for some details handling the QThread, which is really annoying.
I reformulate my question into a simpler program, hope it will explains better
first I define this QObject class
#include <QObject>
#include <QDebug>
class myObject : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit myObject(QObject *parent = 0);
bool stop;
signals:
void finishWork();
public slots:
void dowork();
void onfinishThread();
};
myObject::myObject(QObject *parent) :
QObject(parent)
{
stop = true;
}
void myObject::dowork(){
qDebug()<<"start working!";
while(!stop){
qDebug()<<"working...";
}
emit finishWork();
qDebug()<<"finish do work!";
}
void myObject::onfinishThread(){
qDebug()<<"thread is finished!";
}
then the main function
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include <QThread>
#include <iostream>
#include <windows.h>
#include "myobject.h"
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
myObject* myObj = new myObject();
QThread* myThread = new QThread;
myThread->connect(myObj, SIGNAL(finishWork()), SLOT(quit()));
myObj->connect(myThread, SIGNAL(started()), SLOT(dowork()));
myObj->connect(myThread, SIGNAL(finished()), SLOT(onfinishThread()));
myObj->moveToThread(myThread);
myObj->stop = false;
myThread->start();
cout<<"Press ENTER to continue....."<<endl<<endl;
cin.ignore(1);
myObj->stop = true;
Sleep(10);
if(myThread->isRunning()){
qDebug()<<"The thread is still running?!!!";
}
/*
myObj->stop = false;
Sleep(1000);
myThread->start();
myObj->stop = true;
*/
myObj->deleteLater();
myThread->deleteLater();
return a.exec();
}
As you can see, I even used cin to try let the dowork() run first, but it didn't work at all, the output is
so I'm really confused on how scheduling works for QThread...
Also, if you uncomment the part
/*
myObj->stop = false;
Sleep(1000);
myThread->start();
myObj->stop = true;
*/
the output is exactly the same! only stays a while after printing
The thread is still running?!!!
Would anyone help me with this? Thanks a lot. You may simply copy all the code and test it yourself.
-------------------------Original Question, bad explanation, please ignore....----------------------------------------
I made a videoObj Class with only one function to Query the frames, the function is defined as:
void videoObj::ProcessFrame(){
bool getframe;
qDebug()<<"get in ProcessFrame";
while(!stop_flag){
getframe = capture_.read(imgOriginal_);
if(!getframe){
qDebug()<<"Video End!";
break;
}
cv::cvtColor(imgOriginal_, imgOriginal_, CV_BGR2RGB);
QImage qimgOriginal((uchar*)imgOriginal_.data, imgOriginal_.cols, imgOriginal_.rows, imgOriginal_.step, QImage::Format_RGB888);
emit imgProcessed(qimgOriginal);
this->thread()->msleep(10);
//qDebug()<<"processing frames";
}
emit stopProcess();
qDebug()<<"Stop thread";
}
Basically above code is just query frames and whenever got one emit the
SIGNAL imgProcessed(qimgOriginal)
and whenever the stop_flag is set on, stop the while loop and emit the
SIGNAL stopProcess()
I use this class in the MainWindow Class, here is how I define the connection in the constructor:
MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent) :
QMainWindow(parent),
ui(new Ui::MainWindow)
{
ui->setupUi(this);
video_obj_ = new videoObj();
video_thread_ = new QThread;
this->connect(video_obj_, SIGNAL(imgProcessed(QImage)), SLOT(onImgProcssed(QImage))); \\this is for displaying the image
video_obj_->connect(video_thread_, SIGNAL(started()), SLOT(ProcessFrame()));
video_obj_->moveToThread(video_thread_);
video_thread_->connect(video_obj_, SIGNAL(stopProcess()), SLOT(quit()));
}
Above code works fine in frame query. The problem I don't understand is, if I set video_obj_->stop_flag on in any MainWiow member function, the ProcessFrame() in videoObj Class should emit stopProcess() signal and trigger quit() of video_thread_, and then the thread should finish, that is video_thread_->finished() is true.
However, if I do something like:
connect(video_thread_, SIGNAL(finished()), this, SLOT(onStopProcess())); //onStopProcess() see below
void MainWindow::on_btnStart_clicked()
{
video_obj_->stop_flag = 1;
this->thread()->msleep(10);
video_obj_->capture_.open(ui->lineEditVidoeAddress->text().toStdString());
//... something about videoCapture setting here, not related
video_obj_->capture_.set(CV_CAP_PROP_POS_FRAMES, 0);
video_obj_->stop_flag = 0;
this->thread()->msleep(10);
if(video_thread_->isRunning()){
qDebug()<<"The thread is still running?!!!";
}
video_thread_->start();
}
void MainWindow::onStopProcess(){
qDebug()<<"thread is finished";
}
It will give me the output:
Stop thread
The thread is still running?!!!
thread is finished
Which means triggering the quit() is not finish the thread, or quit() has not been triggered.
If I use:
video_thread_->wait(); //instead of video_thread_->wait(10);
The program will just freeze.
Is anyone can help me with this, it really confuse me about this quit() and finished()...
Thanks!
Since when you call stop_flag=1, the video_thread_ finishes the current function which is
ProcessFrame
before ProcessFrame finish, quit is called on the video_thread_ through emit stopProcess().
However, quit is different from terminate, terminate can exit the thread any time (but it is not safe), quit works with the event loop, if the thread has no eventloop, quit has no effect.
I guess before qthread execute the next event in the eventloop, it checks some flag, which can be set by quit, it the flag is set by quit, then it won't execute the next event in the eventloop. Or it can also be that a quit event is inserted into the eventloop, and the next event in the eventloop will be quit.
After stop_flag = 1, you called video_thread_->wait, that will block the video_thread_ from executing the next event in the eventloop, thus the quit will not take effect before time out, however, the nextlines which print "not finished?!!!" is executed immediately. Instead of calling video_thread->wait, if you call currentThread()->Sleep(some_enough_time), then there will be time for the video_thread_ to execute the next event and quit.
You can read the Qt documentation of QThread, wait is used with terminate to terminate a thread synchronously.
============================== The new code ================================
When you do:
myObj->connect(myThread, SIGNAL(started()), SLOT(dowork()));
The signal source is myThread, the slot also belongs to myThread, since the object "myThread" is created in the main thread, thus as a object it lives in the main thread. You can call myThread->thread() to see this, it will return the main thread instead of the new thread.
However, the started signal is emitted from the new thread namely the thread that myThread represents, thus the connection is a Qt::QueuedConnection. dowork() is posted in the event queue of main thread, and it'll be executed only after a.exec() which executes the main threads eventloop.
The same thing happens to the other 2 connect calls, all the slots will be executed in the eventloop of the main thread.
First the start is emitted from the new thread when myThread->start is called, dowork is posted in the main thread's event queue.
Nothing really happens before you call a.exec();
So the program will go ahead to cin and then set stop to true, and then print "Thread is still running?!!".
Second When a.exec() is called, the dowork is executed in the main thread and "start work" is printed. Nothing is done because the stop flag is already true, and the finishwork signal is emitted from the main thread, print "finish do work";
Third The last step the finishwork is emitted, and the quit slot is directly called. However, before the new thread can really quit, the main thread has already finished the eventqueue, because no more events are posted to the main thread. The application exits without waiting for quit() to take effect.
To test this is true, do not modify any of your code, just add after
emit finishWork();
currentThread()->sleep(1000);
you will see "thread is finished!" printed, because this make time for the new thread to emit finished(), and the onfinishThread() will be add to the main thread's eventqueue.
BTW, your way of working with thread looks like java style, which is not the standard qt way. You can read this before you work on qt thread.
This is not a scheduling issue.
That you did in your code looks like:
Create a thread.
Then this thread emits a signal that it started, run slot dowork()
start a thread.
Wait for user input
echo about thread is running
execute event loop
At point 3 thread is already running and signalled about that. Because myObj is created in main thread and not moved to any other thread (to process events there), your thread does not do anything else now, but just spins event loop. At the same time event that tells you want to run myObj's dowork() is posted on the main thread. At last then it comes to step 6 you start to execute event loop of it, and first thing it finds is event that it needs to call dowork() on myObj.
To make it clear to you how Qt threads and signal-slot connection works, I recommend you to read this article on Qt blog.
In simple to fix it, you can move your object myObj to the thread that you wan't to run.
But to make this really correct, I bet that you really want is to subclass QRunnable and (re-)implement it's run method to do the stuff you wan't in QThread, so that thread does it's job, than finished correctly, so you can join on it. Or depending on your goal you might be even better with using QtConcurrent::run(aFunction)

Implementing a TCP Server

Can anyone tell me if I'm doing this right?
Using Qt I'm implementing a TCP Server by inheriting from the QTcpServer class. On an incoming connection I create a new thread, a new Worker object, and I move the object to the new thread and start the thread. From here, the server keeps listening for new clients and each thread then is in its run method for object Worker.
Now, I create a timer because I need to send updates to each client based on 1 second intervals AND when a song is playing. In the readyRead slot I read data using readAll and then perform some work and send a reply.
However, when I go back to my run method I need to just continue sending song data updates to the clients (with no response from the client). Should this all just go in a while(true) loop and then I check some boolean to start and stop the timer? The track information I need to send is the song progression time.
I guess my question is, should I be doing it this way? It seems a little complex, but then again that's concurrency for you. Basically I need the TCP server to send data to the client repeatedly when some condition is true. I feel like just an endless while loop that checks when to start and stop the timer is useless work.
Would posting code make this clearer?
This question is a very old one, but perhaps it could still help.
About threads in Qt:
Many people think about parallel processing in Qt like in .NET where you need for every operation another thread, in qt this is not necessary!
In qt you only need a thread if you have blocking code like calculating big things or waiting syncron for an answer from a SQLServer
If i have understand you correctly you don't have such a blocking operation.
So i have programmed a very small TcpServer without inheriting and without a single thread (except the main eventloop thread of course), which hopefully solves your problem and help others:
#include <QObject>
#include <QSet>
#include <QTcpServer>
#include <QTcpSocket>
#include <QTimer>
class TcpServer : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
TcpServer()
{
// handle new connections
this->connect(&this->serverTcp, &QTcpServer::newConnection, this, &TcpServer::handleClientConnect);
// init client refresh timer
this->timer.setInterval(1000);
this->connect(&this->timer, &QTimer::timeout, this, &TcpServer::handleClientUpdates);
this->timer.start();
}
bool startListen(qint16 port)
{
return this->serverTcp.listen(QHostAddress::Any, port);
}
private slots:
void handleClientConnect()
{
QTcpSocket* socketClient = *this->setConnectedClients.insert(this->serverTcp.nextPendingConnection());
this->connect(socketClient, &QTcpSocket::disconnected, this, &TcpServer::handleClientDisconnect);
this->connect(socketClient, &QTcpSocket::readyRead, this, &TcpServer::handleClientData);
}
void handleClientDisconnect()
{
this->setConnectedClients.remove((QTcpSocket*)this->sender());
}
void handleClientData()
{
QTcpSocket* socketSender = (QTcpSocket*)this->sender();
// handle here the data sent by the client
}
void handleClientUpdates()
{
// construct here your update data
QByteArray baUpdateResponse = "test";
// send update data to all connected clients
foreach(QTcpSocket* socketClient, this->setConnectedClients) {
socketClient->write(baUpdateResponse);
}
}
private:
QTcpServer serverTcp;
QTimer timer;
QSet<QTcpSocket*> setConnectedClients;
};

Resources