Here is 8 floating blocks with equal content with some problems:
if I use padding:10px for sideblock .inner to create "border" it does not work good (padding-bottom it's look like disapeared)
if I put a cursor on block - it can't be appeared at the top, and do not move othes block
How makes block working well?
HTML:
<div class="sideblock"><div class="style-menu"><div class="inner">
Everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you, and you can change it, you can influence it, you can build your own things that other people can use.</div></div></div>
CSS:
.sideblock {
width: 220px;
height: 80px;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 10px;
float: left;
}
.sideblock .inner {
background: #ffffff;
padding: 10px;}
.sideblock .style-menu {
padding: 3px;
background: #157ba1;
background: linear-gradient(to right, #157ba1 0%,#5fa31c 100%);}
.sideblock:hover {
box-shadow: 0px 0px 5px #000;
overflow: visible;
height: auto;}
Here is my code - http://jsfiddle.net/2HqZV/1/
Thx for support
Well i assume you want the have the same look as when the div is hovered but then smaller? You shouldn't have to use any overflow on the div it self atfirst, it should response to your given height.
When you inspect your element you can easially see the heights of your elements.
You'll see that your .style-menu div hasn't the same height as .sideblock, to fix that you can add a inherit height to your style-menu:
.sideblock .style-menu {
height: inherit;
padding: 3px;
background: #157ba1;
background: linear-gradient(to right, #157ba1 0%,#5fa31c 100%);
}
Now when you look further you see that your padding at the .inner div element expends the actual given height. What you want is the padding to be inline. You can easially do this with box-sizing. And finally you can 'cut' the text by adding a overflow:
.sideblock .inner {
background: #ffffff;
padding: 10px;
height: inherit;
box-sizing: border-box;
overflow: hidden;
}
jsFiddle
I hope this is what you meant.
btw, i find your way of adding a border very unique ^^
Update
So to let every element that expends ignore every other element, you should take it out of the document flow. You can do this with position: absolute;. However what absolute position does is indeed ignoring all the other elements, but you want to have the same position. Because the element has no offset positioning (top, right, bottom, left) it will be placed at the left corner of your screen(acts like it is the only element in the DOM). To keep the elements position we are not changing the .sideblock but the content of that; .style-menu:
.sideblock:hover .style-menu
{
box-shadow: 0px 0px 5px #000;
position: absolute;
}
Because this element goes on top of the other, you want to add the shadow here.
Now the .sideblock element has no content because the content has become absolute and so out of the document flow. To fix this you can give this element a min-height:
.sideblock:hover
{
min-height: 80px;
height: auto;
}
jsFiddle
Related
I have an issue where you can clearly see the parent in the top right and top left corners of the child.
I have tried with using overflow: hidden; on parent as well as using border-radius on the child.
The issue is a bit hard to explain but you can clearly see the issue on the fiddle.
https://jsfiddle.net/2Lccaf0u/
edit: Here is an image showing the issue as well (using chrome)
An easy fix would be to make the outer element have a large radius than the inner for only the top portion
body {
background: #000;
}
.outer, .outer2 {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
border-radius: 15px 15px 5px 5px;
background: #fff;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.inner, .inner2 {
background: #111;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
border-radius: 5px;
}
Edit: It's happening because that is how the browser renders it. Not all browsers will produce the same result.
http://jsfiddle.net/hga7Lxt8/1/
float: right;
margin-left: 10px;
There is no margin to the left of the orange-red box (the top borders of the rows reach right up to it), even though it has such style attribute. What is wrong?
You can see the real problem when you apply a semi-transparent background-color.
What you need to understand is that content floats around a floating element, not containing boxes (unless they also float or have a display property set to something other than block).
You fix it by setting margin-right: 110px; on your .row:
http://jsfiddle.net/hga7Lxt8/4/
What you want to achieve can only be faked and would not "work" if your floating element has any transparency (or box-shadows).
The row elements are continuing behind the orangered box. Try:
.right {
float: right;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: orangered;
}
.row {
border-top: 1px solid;
overflow: auto;
margin-right: 110px;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/thrb5936/
I've spent 2 days trying to sort this out and I can't. I'd appreciate any help.
I have a container set to fill 100% vertically, which it does just fine. In the container I have another div for my header. Underneath the header, I want another div to also fill vertically 100% (from the bottom of the header to the bottom of the screen) regardless of how little content there is. The problem is, when I set the height for this div at 100%, it overflows past the bottom of the browser window, even if there is no other content in it. Just a long blank space. The overflow is the same size as my header.
If I remove my header, it works fine. And if I tell this div to not be 100%, then it will only go as deep as the content forces it, which won't be enough in some cases. I tried using overflow: hidden, but then that hides the shadow effect I have on the div.
You can view the page here
And the code in question is here:
#container {
height: 100%;
position: relative;
width: 960px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
margin-bottom: -80px;
}
#bodybox {
height: 100%;
width: 960px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: -80px;
background-color: #FFF;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0px 5px 20px 0px rgba(0,0,0,0.75);
-moz-box-shadow: 0px 5px 20px 0px rgba(0,0,0,0.75);
box-shadow: 0px 5px 20px 0px rgba(0,0,0,0.75);
}
You'll notice my footer is hovering over the bottom. That's because of the overflow. I'm using this sticky footer solution in case that's important.
I'm a bit of a novice at CSS and I really want to avoid excessive Photoshop usage or tables, but I can't seem to get any tip or suggestion I've read to fix this. Please help. Thanx.
try
#bodybox{
height: calc(100% - 142px);
...
where 142px is the height of the header. Calc calculates the height according to the arithmetic in the parentheses. Note the equation will not more without the spaces before and after the operator. The same equation can be used to counter the effect of margins too.
If you set an element to have a relative height/width (with percentages), the height/width will be relative to it's direct parent (if some exceptions do not apply, I will not explain them here). But that doesn't take positioning into account. So your content div has exactly the height you asked it to be, but because it is pushed down by the header it appears to be taller.
You could use calc to calculate the height you want, or use the oldschool push back method.
You start with building the container, header and content div:
<div class="conatiner">
<div class="header"></div>
<div class="content"><h1>My Content</h1></div>
</div>
And apply some styles:
.container { width: 300px; height: 100%; } /* height can be anything */
.header { width: 100%; height: 100px; } /* header SHOULD have a fixed height */
.content { width: 100%; height: 100%; }
And to push back you add to the styles of the .content div: margin-top: -100px;, where the 100px should be the same height as the header. With the minus in front you tell the browser to pull it back instead of push it down.
Now you have two more problems to solve. The first one is that the content div covers the header div. You can fix that with applying z-index, although that requires you to add position too (as z-index only applies to positioned elements). So add those two rules to both header and content:
z-index: 1/0; /* header has z-index: 0, content has z-index: 1 */
position: relative; /* to 'activate' z-index 'behavior' */
Now we're almost there, but as you might see the content also disappears behind the header. To fix this, add a padding to the content div:
.content { padding-top: 100px; } /* again the 100px should be the same as the header height */
And now don't despair if you see the content div pushed down again. That is because the padding adds up to the height. Luckily my great friend box-sizing helps us out!
.content { box-sizing: border-box; -moz-box-sizing: border-box; }
And here we are (fiddle)!
Note: there are some other strategies, like, absolute positioning of the content div and/or header, using the calc functions, and others. Choose what suits you best.
Quick fix:
#header_bkgd {
overflow: hidden;
}
I'm guessing its to do with the fact that they both have a margin-bottom of 80px? one is taking off the other forcing it to overflow.
Do this:
CSS:
#bodybox{
margin-bottom: -80px; //Remove
// rest of the css
}
#container {
margin: 0
}
I've got a set up similar to this: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/iAJnx where the main content is rather long. What I want to do is to put a border round the visible part of the screen as in this screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/ENtLau4.png
What I want to do is to create 4 divs that are positioned at the edges of the screen, but I'm struggling both with the positioning and giving the divs height and width without content. Does anyone have an idea about this?
Note: I've already tried using an overlay, but it makes the content non-clickable.
Try this:
HTML:
<div class="border-box"></div>
CSS:
body { position: relative; }
.border-box {
border: 5px solid blue;
box-shadow: 0 0 100px 100px #fff;
position: fixed;
pointer-events: none;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
right: 10px;
top: 10px;
}
How it works:
I absolutely positioned an overlay with borders, that will stick the edges of the screen by using top, bottom, left, right definitions. To make the content below selectable, you set pointer-events: none; on the overlay.
Example: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/BxJbh
If you want to achieve the same results without adding additional HTML markup, you can use the :before sudo selector to prepend a block to the body. Simply add this CSS and it will produce the same results:
body:before {
border: 5px solid blue;
box-shadow: 0 0 100px 100px #fff;
display: block;
content: '';
position: fixed;
pointer-events: none;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
right: 10px;
top: 10px;
}
Example: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/BDhql
you have to set in your content id (#content)
border:4px solid blue;
min-width:700px; //change accordingly.
min-height:1600px //change accordingly
The above code will fix the problem of border as well as the height & width you want to set without having any content.
At the moment I have a layout that pulls a number of thumbnails into a grid - each is defined by a style that keeps them a fixed ratio, (roughly 16:9) which is defined by pixel dimensions (389px x 230px) but they are looking a bit small on high-res screens.
The images are actually pulled into the DIV as a background that covers 100% width and height of the DIV and then the DIV's obviously control the aspect and size.
What I am looking to do is have these DIV's dynamically resize based on the page size of the device but to keep the ratio of the DIV's.
Is this possible?
My thoughts would be to set the width based on the percentage of the page but then I'm not sure how I would set the height and keep the correct aspect ratio (due to different resolutions etc.)
What would be the best way to do this?
EDIT - Thanks for all your ideas so far, thought maybe I should show you how I'm pulling in the data at the moment.
In my HTML I've got the following code which generated the grid
<a class="griditem" href="../video.php?video=13" style="background-image:url(../video/Relentless/Relentless.jpg); background-size:100% 100%;">
<div class="titles">
<h5>Relentless Short Stories</h5>
<h6>Frank Turner: The Road</h6>
</div>
This is styled with the following CSS
.griditem {
position: relative;
float: left;
margin-right: 17px;
margin-bottom: 17px;
background-color: #777;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
-moz-box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
-webkit-border-radius: 2px;
-moz-border-radius: 2px;
border-radius: 2px;
width: 389px;
height: 230px;
text-align: left;
}
.titles {
padding: 5px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 10px;
left: -1px;
right: -1px;
background: transparent url(../images/layout/white80.png) top left;
-moz-border-radius: 1px 1px 0 0;
border-radius: 1px 1px 0 0;
text-align: left;
}
The reason I'm implementing it this way is so that the Div can float over the bottom of the image.
Just a quick idea which might be useful for you.
It is based on the fact that vertical padding/margin use the WIDTH of the parent box when it is set to percentages, so it is possible to resize a div relative its parent box
http://jsfiddle.net/xExuQ/2/
body,html { height:100%; }
.fixed-ratio-resize {
width: 50%; /* child width = parent width * percent */
padding-bottom: 50%; /* child height = parent width * percent */
height: 0; /* well, it is not perfect :) */
}
If you want to put some (non-background) content into this nicely resized box, then put an absolutely positioned div inside it.
Reference:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#margin-properties and
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#padding-properties says:
Margins: "The percentage is calculated with respect to the width of the generated box's containing block. Note that this is true for 'margin-top' and 'margin-bottom' as well. If the containing block's width depends on this element, then the resulting layout is undefined in CSS 2.1."
Paddings:"The percentage is calculated with respect to the width of the generated box's containing block, even for 'padding-top' and 'padding-bottom'. If the containing block's width depends on this element, then the resulting layout is undefined in CSS 2.1."
EDIT
http://jsfiddle.net/mszBF/6/
HTML:
<a class="griditem" href="#" style="background-image: url(http://pic.jpg);">
<span class="titles">
<span class="name">Unicomp Studios</span>
<span class="title">Springs Buckling (2012)</span>
</span>
</a>
CSS:
.griditem {
float: left;
margin-right: 17px;
margin-bottom: 17px;
min-width: 100px; /* extremely narrow blocks ==> crap looking */
width: 30%;
background: blue no-repeat;
background-size: contain; /* from IE9 only: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/background-size */
border: 1px solid transparent; /* prevent .titles:margin-top's margin collapse */
}
.titles {
/* <a> elements must only have inline elements like img, span.
divs, headers, etc are forbidden, because some browsers will display a big mess (safari) */
display: block; /* so display those inline elements as blocks */
padding: 5px;
margin: 0 auto;
margin-top: 105%;
background: yellow;
}
.titles > span {
display: block;
}
I know this might not be the best solution, but
<html>
<style type="text/css">
#cool{
width:40%;
background:blue;
padding-bottom:10%;
}
</style>
<div id="cool" >
</div>
</html>
Here Ive used padding-bottom, to maintain its height relative to its width. U can set padding-bottom as a percentage. Hope this helped.