I'm trying to understand the concept of uploading and how Base64 may/may not relate.
When I have a an HTML form (with the multipart attribute) that uploads an attachment (e.g. an image/executable) upon submission - does the browser Base64 encode it first, and then send that to a processing page? Or does the browser send raw binary data to the target page?
Related
I am trying to POST with URL encoded data. Based on the web server logs, I am not actually sending any data from Twilio (request size is always 131 bytes, no matter what I type in the Studio widget box).
What does a working form body look like? Do I need to encode it myself? How do I escape an "=" that is not part of the key-value structure?
When making an HTTP request with the widget, when it is set to make Form URL encoded requests you can set the HTTP parameter keys and values which will automatically encode the values. There are known as URL parameter as the encoding is Form URL encoding. The parameters are encoded as if they were in a URL, but they are sent as the POST body.
I am looking for a way to send a post request to a specific URI from PowerApps.
Basically I have a small audio file (webm) captured from the microphone and it's encoded using Base64. Now I have to send it to a server via post request and the encoded data should be put in the body of the request, since it is too big (for Nginx) to be put in the URL itself (?data=).
Can I achieve it in PowerApps?
Binary to encoded text (in PowerApps):
Set(BinaryAudioData_2, Substitute(JSON(Mic2.Audio,JSONFormat.IncludeBinaryData),"""",""));
Set(AudioFile, Mic2.Audio); Collect(Collection3, AudioFile);
You can trigger a Power Automate Flow from PowerApps, then Flow can target the specific URI. Read more
I'm trying to use the HERE route match API, and I'm confused about the file parameter when attempting to use the GET interface. The API for the file parameter states:
Base64 encoded string that contains the (zipped or plain) trace file
content. Zipped can be PKZip (used by zip, WinZip, 7Zip etc) or ZLib
(used by deflate) format. Only used for GET requests. In POST
requests, the file is sent as request body, not Base64 encoded, plain
or zipped. Note: Browsers limit the size of the file to a few KB when
passed in a GET request.
I've chosen to use the GPX format for my waypoints. Questions:
What is the required character encoding of the underlying XML
characters when sending plain or zipped trace file content?
Are there specifications for the compression method (Deflate, Deflate64,
etc.) and compression level?
Are there required specifications for
the type of base64 encoding?
I can definitively answer #3, and that requires URL safe encoding.
I'm developing a web page with a form which returns a PDF document based on the form data. Currently I use the HTTP response fields
Content-Type: application/pdf
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="foo.pdf"
However, since the field Content-Disposition is non-standard and doesn't work in all browsers I'm looking for a different approach. Do I have to save the PDF document on the server? What is the modus operandi?
Edit: By "doesn't work in all browsers" I mean that with some browsers the filename is not set to foo.pdf. Dillo, for instance, just sets the default filename (in the download dialog) to the basename of the URL path (plus query string).
Do I have to save the PDF document on the server?
No. As far as the HTTP client is concerned it, the inner workings of the server are completely opaque to it. All it sees is a TCP stream of bytes from the server and how exactly that stream is produced doesn't matter as long as it matches the specified Content-Type.
Just send the PDF right after the HTTP headers and you're done with.
Update due to comment
So if you're wondering how to supply a filename without using a header field: Just augment the URL with it. I.e. something like
http://${DOMAIN}/${PDF_GENERATOR}/${DESIRED_FILENAME}
In the HTTP server add a rewrite rule to simply omit the filename part and redirect to just
http://${DOMAIN}/${PDF_GENERATOR}
The HTTP client does not see that, all it see is some URL ending with a "filename", that it can present the user as a default for saving.
I'm currently implementing a client application that POST's a file over HTTP and have implemented base64 encoding on the file's data parameter.
However, it appears that when inspecting the traffic between a simple HTML page with a file upload form and the server that no Content-Transfer-Encoding header is sent in the body when describing the file's parameter.
Is this the preferred way of POST'ing a file over HTTP?
No, the preferred way is using multipart/form-data encoding, exactly as you would use with HTML form based file uploads.