I am subclassing QDoubleSpinBox to add some features (like incrementing the value based on the location of the cursor in the lineedit) and to change some features I find annoying. One of the latter is that intermediate values are emitted: e.g. if you want to enter the value 323 it will emit 3 then 32 then finally 323. I'd like to set it to only emit on entry (i.e. only actually change value on entry).
Anyway, I can't figure out how to capture these intermediate edits. I overrode setValue to see if I could stop it there somehow, but it apparently isn't called (or at least my override isn't). I'm not sure how the value is actually getting set while editing in line edit.
More generally, the logic of this box escapes me. Is there some documentation that explains e.g. "if you type a digit into the lineedit then this series of routines is called... while if you hit the up arrow, this series of routines is called?"
In case it matters, I'm using PyQt5
EDIT: Here is another case in which having access to this is important. Say I want to implement an undo/redo structure for the box. The only way I can think of to get access to the changed values is to connect to the valueChanged signal. But if I'm subclassing the box it seems a little convoluted to listen for a signal rather than just watch the value change 'internally' Or am I missing something here?
You could use the following signal:
void QAbstractSpinBox::editingFinished() [signal]
This signal is emitted editing is finished. This happens when the spinbox loses focus and when enter is pressed.
based on the documentation of QAbstractSpinBox:
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtwidgets/qabstractspinbox.html#editingFinished
There is nothing that combines the arrow based changes and the editingFinished changes.
My use case was to let the user enter the value without getting the signal on each new digit, while still making ↑, ↓, Page Up, Page Down keys and arrow buttons work as usual, emitting the signal on each activation.
QAbstractSpinBox::editingFinished signal doesn't provide this functionality: it's only ever emitted when focus is lost or Return/Enter is pressed.
What does work exactly as I need is the keyboardTracking property of QAbstractSpinBox. If it's true (the default), the spinbox emits valueChanged on each digit typed. If you set it to false, it behaves exactly as I described in the beginning of this answer.
Related
I'm using Qt Designer and pyqt code to write an app.
I have a very simple question: in my UI I have 2 checkboxes and what I need is to set the first checkbox as always unchecked when the second checkbox is unchecked.
In other words the first checkbox can be checked only when the second checkbox is checked, but the second checkbox can be checked also if the first one is not checked.
In Qt Designer I have not find an easy way to do that with the Signals/Slots function.
I had a look in the Qt API and I tried to write some code:
class CreateRIVLayerDialog(QDialog, FORM_CLASS):
def __init__(self, iface)
# some more code here...
if self.addCheckDB.isChecked():
self.addCheck.setChecked(False)
but without results.
Does anybody have some hints?
Thanks
The simplest way is with two signal connections, one of which can be done in Qt Designer.
Your design requires that "the first checkbox can be checked only when the second checkbox is checked". This is equivalent to saying the first checkbox should be disabled when the second checkbox is unchecked. Disabling the checkbox makes it clear to the user that the option is unavailable.
So in Qt Designer, you should connect the toggled signal of checkbox2 to the setEnabled slot of checkbox1. (It may also be necessary to set the initial enabled state of checkbox1 in Qt Designer as well).
Then, in your code, you should make a second connection, like this:
self.checkbox2.toggled.connect(
lambda checked: not checked and self.checkbox1.setChecked(False))
This will clear the checked state of checkbox1 whenever checkbox2 is unchecked.
If you wanted to do the whole thing in code, it would look like this:
self.checkbox1.setEnabled(False)
self.checkbox2.toggled.connect(self.checkbox1.setEnabled)
self.checkbox2.toggled.connect(
lambda checked: not checked and self.checkbox1.setChecked(False))
Just use signals. You are correct when saying that you cannot directly do that via the designer since you have to invert the checked property. The easiest and most readable way that comes to my mind is using a common slot plus an internal member variable that holds the checked state for both:
Add self._toggle = INITIAL_VALUE to your class - the INITIAL_VALUE holds a boolean value, which you use to check/uncheck your checkboxes
self._toggle = True
self.check1 = QCheckBox('Check 1', self)
self.check1.setChecked(self._toggle)
self.check2 = QCheckBox('Check 2', self)
self.check2.setChecked(not self._toggle)
Add a slot:
#pyqtSlot()
def toggle(self):
self._toggle = not self._toggle
self.check1.setChecked(self._toggle)
self.check2.setChecked(not self._toggle)
Connect the clicked signal of both checkboxes to this slot.
Warning! Do not use the stateChanged signal here or you will start an infinite recursion. :3
self.check1.clicked.connect(self.toggle)
self.check2.clicked.connect(self.toggle)
What I'm doing here is basically taking over the change of the state of both checkboxes and do it manually using the value of self._toggle for the first checkbox and the inverted value of self._toggle for the second checkbox.
If you want less inverting inside the slot the following also works though it is less readable omho:
#pyqtSlot()
def toggle(self):
self.check2.setChecked(self._toggle) # Old value of our check1 becomes the value of check2
self._toggle = not self._toggle # Invert
self.check1.setChecked(self._toggle) # New value is assigned to check1
Note: You can also use isChecked() inside the slot and do all of the above without the extra variable however I find this more readable and with much less function calls (every isChecked() and setChecked() is a function call)
I know I am late to this party but there is a way to accomplish this easier and I think how the original person wanted. Here you go. If you have a checkbox_1 and you check/uncheck it, it connects to the following function.
def Change_the_Checkbox_Function(self):
if self.checkbox_1.isChecked():
if self.checkbox_2.isChecked():
pass
else:
self.checkbox_2.setChecked(True)
else:
self.checkbox_2.setChecked(False)
If you want checkbox_1 to check or uncheck many other checkboxes (like a select all), then instead of checkbox_1 directly calling the above function, you have another function that calls other functions to check/uncheck the boxes, as follows:
def Select_ALL_checkboxes(self):
self.Change_the_Checkbox_1_Function()
self.Change_the_Checkbox_2_Function()
self.Change_the_Checkbox_3_Function()
....etc
To me, this follows the most logical way without getting too technical. It works well and is fast. May not be the most efficient or prettiest, but I found this to be the best way to check/uncheck many checkboxes at once.
I may have worked myself into a corner but this sounded to me like a good idea at the time.
I have been developing an interface that permits a user to modify settings of a robotic device, i.e. speed, directions, force, etc. with a very large series of options in the form of ComboBoxes. The problem is that there are about a thousand of these things, in sub categories. e.g. Speed category x1, x2, x3, Y1, y2, etc. So rather than create a thousand comboboxes in QT, I thought the good idea was to create one set of 50 (ish) and then provide a few button to switch between categories. So when the user selects speed QT, populates the comboboxes with the appropriate options, sets the style sheets and text for the labels etc. So it appears as though a dedicated page exists. Then if the user selects Direction, QT Writes the current index of each box to a dedicated array and then repopulates the boxes, labels etc with the appropriate content. I then do this over and over for the various needs of the system.
All of that seems to work fine. However I am now in a bind where the options provided to navigate to each page have grown. For instance I have forward / backward buttons (like you woudl expect in a set-up wizard), as well as action menus at the top to jump to a page. So now the code is becoming very repetitious. If you select the next button, I write the current values to array, then repopulate. If you jump to the page from anywhere, I look to see where I am, write it to array, and populate the boxes. Thus if I need to change anything I have to make the change in numerous places in the code.
I know that this is not optimal. What I woudl like to do is run a continuous loop as I woudl normally do with Micros in C. So the program can look at a variable in each pass and if it is then it does. I am not however skilled enough to figure this loop out in QT. So my new thought was...
Is it possible to trigger an action or slot with a variable. For example, if the user presses the Next button it triggers a slot for a button that does not exist, so that QT will execute a particular line of Code? Then I can have 1 dedicated section focused on reading and writing boxes, with a bunch of actions that will take me there.
You can make a signal that is triggered with an emit call in your code, so you'd hook up the next button signal of clicked to a slot that does some work and moves on, or directly calls another signal that you've created that triggers a slot elsewhere, or do some work in a lambda triggered by the button press.
I would first load all the ComboBoxes options in a QStringList array (or maybe an array of QList<QLatin1String> lists - for memory saving and code efficiency).
Then I would keep an array of a 1000 integers for current ComboBox indexes.
When the user changes a value in some ComboBox, the currentIndexChanged signal will trigger the corresponding slot (a single slot for all the ComboBoxes would be enough - sender()->objectName() to get the name of the ComboBox which had sent the signal):
void WindowWidget::on_ComboBox_currentIndexChanged(int index)
{
name = sender()->objectName();
/* here change the corresponding integer in the current
indexes array */
}
On Next/Back button push repopulate the ComboBoxes. Also, provide some 'Save' button for saving the ComboBoxes indexes (or trigger the Save slot on some action, i.e. on window close either even on a timer signal).
I am subclassing QFileDialog to try to get some custom behavior. I would like to connect to signals emitted by components of the dialog, e.g. the textEdited signal when the file name line edit is manually edited. I understand that QFileDialog emits some signals itself, but these do not cover the cases I would like to respond to.
I have two ways about this I can think of, but don't know how to implement. One is to somehow attain a reference to the component to connect to it's signal. The other would be something with event filters, but the event source is the dialog itself, so I don't know how to determine where mouse clicks or key presses occur.
Are either of these methods feasible? Or another way?
Here is one option (your first suggestion):
dialog = QFileDialog()
layout = dialog.layout()
# for i in range(layout.rowCount()):
# for j in range(layout.columnCount()):
# try:
# print i,j
# print layout.itemAtPosition(i,j).widget()
# except:
# pass
line_edit = layout.itemAtPosition(2,1).widget()
line_edit.setText('Hello Stack Overflow')
dialog.exec_()
This gives you access to the QLineEdit in the dialog, which has a bunch of signals you can connect to.
I've also included the code I used to find this widget. I just iterated over the widgets in the layout of the dialog and found the indices of the one I was after. So if you need access to anything else in the dialog, you should be able to find it pretty easily!
Downside to this method: If the layout changes in a future version of Qt, this will break. I suppose you could make the algorithm more robust by looking for widgets that are instances of QLineEdit, but there are always risks with hacky approaches like this!
I am working in Qt4.7, and I have a QListWidget in my dialog. I have a QString that needs to match the current text in the row of this widget (the individual rows are editable). Looking at the signals associated with QListWidget, there seem to be signals for when a different index is selected but none for when the text of a the currently selected row changes. I thought currentTextChanged(QString) would do it, but it didn't. I also thought to try to connect each individual row to something, but QListWidgetItem doesn't have any built-in signals. Does anyone know of a way to do this? Thanks!
At first it seems like QListWidget::itemChanged is the way to go, but soon you run into a problem: the signal is sent for everything - inserts, changing colors, checking boxes, and anything else that "changes" the item! Predelnik pointed that out in his answer. Some people have tried to put in flags and filter everywhere by intercepting various signals to find out if editing was the actual event. It gets very messy.
There is also QAbstractItemModel::dataChanged , which would seem like a good solution. It even has a parameter "const QVector& lstRoles" so you could scan for Qt::EditRole and see if it was really edited. Alas, there's a catch - it gets called for everything just like QListWidget::itemChanged and unfortunately, for QListWidget anyway, the roles parameter is always empty when it's called (I tried it). So much for that idea...
Fortunately, there's still hope... This solution does the trick! :
http://falsinsoft.blogspot.com/2013/11/qlistwidget-and-item-edit-event.html
He uses QAbstractItemDelegate::closeEditor, but I prefer using QAbstractItemDelegate::commitData.
So make a connect like so...
connect(ui.pLstItems->itemDelegate(), &QAbstractItemDelegate::commitData, this, &MyWidget::OnLstItemsCommitData);
Then implement the slot like this...
void MyWidget::OnLstItemsCommitData(QWidget* pLineEdit)
{
QString strNewText = reinterpret_cast<QLineEdit*>(pLineEdit)->text();
int nRow = ui.pLstItems->currentRow();
// do whatever you need here....
}
Now you have a slot that gets called only when the list item's text has been edited!
I guess you need to look into the following signal:
void QListWidget::itemChanged(QListWidgetItem * item)
But be careful because it's being sent every time some property of item changed, not only text. I remember when we ran into the problem once when we changed item colors and got tons of false positive slots called because of that. If you need more fine tuning I guess it's better to write model/view classes yourself and not rely on QListWidget.
I am using PyQt4, but this is general enough that it could just apply to QT.
I have a series of QComboBoxes that I fill from left to right (i.e. selecting an item in the leftmost will populate the next one. Selecting an item in that one will populate the next, and so on)
I am having difficulty getting my signals to fire under all situations (i.e. regardless of whether the current index changes or not AND regardless of whether the item is set by the user or set programatically).
More detail:
I rely on the signals of the first QCombox to fire whenever an item is selected so that I can populate the next QCombobox in the gui. I then rely on THAT QCombobox to emit a signal so that I can populate the next one. And so on.
I want to pre-select an item in each QCombobox based on the user's last interaction with the gui.
I have a unique function per QCombobox that is responsible for populating and pre-selecting just that QCombobox. The code looks something like this:
comboBox1.blockSignals(True)
comboBox1.clear()
comboBox1.addItems(sorted(itemList))
comboBox1.blockSignals(False)
comboBox1.setCurrentIndex(intLastSavedState1)
where intLastSavedState1 is an integer that is derived from the text that was last selected by the user the last time they had used the app. I had hoped that the last line of this function would fire a signal that would cause the next combo box's function to load and pre-select an item (comboBox2). And that action would then cause the next comboBox's function to activate and it would cascade to the next and the next. But it is not working across all cases.
I have tried two versions of the signals:
self.connect(comboBox1, QtCore.SIGNAL("currentIndexChanged(const QString&)"), self.load_comboBox2)
and
self.connect(comboBox1, QtCore.SIGNAL("activated(const QString&)"), self.load_comboBox2)
In the first case, the signal will fire only if the intLastSavedState1 is different than whatever is currently selected in the combo box. This causes an issue if the user had last selected item 0 from that list. In this case QT does not recognize my script setting the the current index to 0 as being a change (since after loading the box it appears to think it is already on index 0), and so the signal does not fire.
In the second case, the signal will fire regardless of what is currently selected in the combo box... but only if activated by the user. It will not fire when my script tries to set the current index programatically.
These appear to be my only two options regarding the signals. So... is there another way of pre-selecting items in a QCombobox that will trigger a signal each and every time?
Well... sometimes just the act of asking a question can lead you to a (partial) answer.
I have a work-around but I am still interested in hearing if someone has a better idea.
I am now programatically setting the index of the QCombobox to -1 immediately after loading it up. Then, when I programatically set the actual index based on the user's history, it will always be considered a change (i.e. it will never be -1) and the signal will fire
using: currentIndexChanged(const QString&)
So my code looks like this now:
comboBox1.blockSignals(True)
comboBox1.clear()
comboBox1.addItems(sorted(itemList))
comboBox1.setCurrentIndex(-1)
comboBox1.blockSignals(False)
comboBox1.setCurrentIndex(intLastSavedState1)
and my signal looks like this:
self.connect(comboBox1, QtCore.SIGNAL("currentIndexChanged(const QString&)"), self.load_comboBox2)
This functions... does anyone have a better idea?
Thanks agian.
You can check current Index of your ComboBox and then either call your slot or do call setCurrentIndex().
Example:
if comboBox1.currentIndex() == index:
self.load_comboBox2(index)
else
comboBox1.setCurrentIndex(index)
This way you will not end up calling slot twice.