I have below directory structure -
rootFolder
---CFC (contains all cfc file)
---SERVICES (contains all service file)
application.cfc
I have created one service named (userService.cfc) which have the below script
import services.userService;
component accessors="true" alias="services.userService"
{
remote userService function init()
{
return This;
}
remote any function getUser()
{
var userObj = new cfc.sessionUser();
return userObj;
}
}
If i call this service from inside the application, this is working fine
Again if i am trying to call it from outside the application, need to change this statement as below and again it is working fine.
import rootFolderName.services.userService;
component accessors="true" alias="rootFolderName.services.userService"
{
remote userServicefunction init()
{
return This;
}
remote any function getUser()
{
var userObj = new rootFolderName.cfc.sessionUser();
return userObj;
}
}
But If i put this code on another rootFolder suppose on "rootFolderName1" name i have to changed all the place where i used the rootFolderName. I got one solution by CFADMIN folder mapping on server level. but i want it on application level.
Can we configure it on Application.cfc? I have used Mappings also but that is not working.
Actually i have two separate application one flex application which is trying to access the second application services remotely. second application have cfc and sevices.
Please help on this.
I would review Ben Nadel's post on the use of ExpandPath() in writing app level CF mappings
http://www.bennadel.com/blog/2519-ExpandPath-Works-With-ColdFusion-s-Per-Application-Mappings.htm
Related
I've got two hosted services in my web service: Domain and ComplianceService. ComplianceService needs to reference data and methods in Domain, like so:
public ComplianceService(ILogger<ComplianceService> logger, Domain domain, IRuleRepository ruleRepository)
{
// Initialize the service.
this.logger = logger;
this.domain = domain;
this.ruleRepository = ruleRepository;
}
My initialization in startup.cs looks like this:
// Add the dependencies.
serviceCollection.AddSingleton<RulesActivator>()
.AddSingleton<Accruals>()
.AddSingleton<IRuleRepository, ComplianceRuleRepository>()
.AddSingleton<IViolation, Violation>();
// Add the hosted services.
serviceCollection.AddHostedService<Domain>();
serviceCollection.AddHostedService<ComplianceService>();
When I try to run this, I get this message:
System.InvalidOperationException: 'Unable to resolve service for type 'ThetaRex.OpenBook.ServerDomain.Domain' while attempting to activate 'ThetaRex.OpenBook.WebApi.ComplianceService'.'
If I add Domain to the IoC, like this:
serviceCollection.AddSingleton<Domain>()
.AddSingleton<RulesActivator>()
.AddSingleton<Accruals>()
.AddSingleton<IRuleRepository, ComplianceRuleRepository>()
.AddSingleton<IViolation, Violation>();
It runs, but I get two copies of Domain. I can force it to work like this:
// Add the hosted services.
serviceCollection.AddHostedService(sp => sp.GetRequiredService<Domain>());
if (this.Configuration.GetValue<bool>("ComplianceEnabled"))
{
serviceCollection.AddHostedService<ComplianceService>();
}
But this seems really clumsy and counterintuitive. How come the AddHostedService can instantiate ComplianceService, but can't instantiate the dependent service?
I have a service which I use both from a custom command and an HTML page. I want to prevent multiple executions of the the service in parallel. For the command there is the Lock component that does that. But is it possible to achieve the same thing for a controller method ?
The lock component doesn't work if the service is called from a controller:
$store = new FlockStore(sys_get_temp_dir());
$factory = new Factory($store);
$lock = $factory->createLock('MY_SERVICE');
I wanted to avoid calling the command from the controller (that's why I created a service) mainly because the service doesn't have the same output for the HTML page and the CLI.
Inject the lock Factory into your service directly instead of creating the lock in the command AND in the controller.
First you have to install Lock Component:
composer require symfony/lock
Then, for example, you can declare your service like this:
use Symfony\Component\Lock\Factory as LockFactory;
class MyService {
private $lock;
public function __construct(LockFactory $lockFactory) {
$this->lock = $lockFactory->createLock('LOCK_KEY');
}
public function doWork() {
$this->lock->acquire();
try {
// DO THINGS
} finally {
$this->lock->release();
}
}
}
I said:
The lock component doesn't work if the service is called from a controller:
Actually the issue I had was the Symfony built-in dev server which is single-threaded, so requests can't be executed in parallel, while the CLI PHP is multi-threaded. I couldn't run the script in parallel through the dev server, request were queued, service script was never locked.
The lock component is working the same whether it's called from a command or a controller.
Using the lock like this in the service works fine:
use Symfony\Component\Lock\Factory;
use Symfony\Component\Lock\Store\FlockStore;
$store = new FlockStore(sys_get_temp_dir());
$factory = new Factory($store);
$lock = $factory->createLock('LOCK_KEY');
if ($lock->acquire()) {
//some locked code
$lock->release();
}
So, I'm trying to create a sample where there are the following components/features:
A hangfire server OWIN self-hosted from a Windows Service
SignalR notifications when jobs are completed
Github Project
I can get the tasks queued and performed, but I'm having a hard time sorting out how to then notify the clients (all currently, just until I get it working well) of when the task/job is completed.
My current issue is that I want the SignalR hub to be located in the "core" library SampleCore, but I don't see how to "register it" when starting the webapp SampleWeb. One way I've gotten around that is to create a hub class NotificationHubProxy that inherits the actual hub and that works fine for simple stuff (sending messages from one client to all).
In NotifyTaskComplete, I believe I can get the hub context and then send the message like so:
private void NotifyTaskComplete(int taskId)
{
try
{
var hubContext = GlobalHost.ConnectionManager.GetHubContext<NotificationHub>();
if (hubContext != null)
{
hubContext.Clients.All.sendMessage(string.Format("Task {0} completed.", taskId));
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
}
BUT, I can't do that if NotificationHubProxy is the class being used as it's part of the SampleWeb library and referencing it from SampleCore would lead to a circular reference.
I know the major issue is the hub in the external assembly, but I can't for the life of me find a relevant sample that's using SignalR or MVC5 or setup in this particular way.
Any ideas?
So, the solution was to do the following two things:
I had to use the SignalR .NET client from the SampleCore assembly to create a HubConnection, to create a HubProxy to "NotificationHub" and use that to Invoke the "SendMessage" method - like so:
private void NotifyTaskComplete(string hostUrl, int taskId)
{
var hubConnection = new HubConnection(hostUrl);
var hub = hubConnection.CreateHubProxy("NotificationHub");
hubConnection.Start().Wait();
hub.Invoke("SendMessage", taskId.ToString()).Wait();
}
BUT, as part of creating that HubConnection - I needed to know the url to the OWIN instance. I decided to pass that a parameter to the task, retrieving it like:
private string GetHostAddress()
{
var request = this.HttpContext.Request;
return string.Format("{0}://{1}", request.Url.Scheme, request.Url.Authority);
}
The solution to having a Hub located in an external assembly is that the assembly needs to be loaded before the SignalR routing is setup, like so:
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.Load(typeof(SampleCore.NotificationHub).Assembly.FullName);
app.MapSignalR();
This solution for this part came from here.
I am currently investigating the possibility of using a Java Web Service (as described by the Info*Engine documentation of Windchill) in order to retrieve information regarding parts. I am using Windchill version 10.1.
I have successfully deployed a web service, which I consume in a .Net application. Calls which do not try to access Windchill information complete successfully. However, when trying to retrieve part information, I get a wt.method.AuthenticationException.
Here is the code that runs within the webService (The web service method simply calls this method)
public static String GetOnePart(String partNumber) throws WTException
{
WTPart part=null;
RemoteMethodServer server = RemoteMethodServer.getDefault();
server.setUserName("theUsername");
server.setPassword("thePassword");
try {
QuerySpec qspec= new QuerySpec(WTPart.class);
qspec.appendWhere(new SearchCondition(WTPart.class,WTPart.NUMBER,SearchCondition.LIKE,partNumber),new int[]{0,1});
// This fails.
QueryResult qr=PersistenceHelper.manager.find((StatementSpec)qspec);
while(qr.hasMoreElements())
{
part=(WTPart) qr.nextElement();
partName = part.getName();
}
} catch (AuthenticationException e) {
// Exception caught here.
partName = e.toString();
}
return partName;
}
This code works in a command line application deployed on the server, but fails with a wt.method.AuthenticationException when performed from within the web service. I feel it fails because the use of RemoteMethodServer is not what I should be doing since the web service is within the MethodServer.
Anyhow, if anyone knows how to do this, it would be awesome.
A bonus question would be how to log from within the web service, and how to configure this logging.
Thank you.
You don't need to authenticate on the server side with this code
RemoteMethodServer server = RemoteMethodServer.getDefault();
server.setUserName("theUsername");
server.setPassword("thePassword");
If you have followed the documentation (windchill help center), your web service should be something annotated with #WebServices and #WebMethod(operationName="getOnePart") and inherit com.ptc.jws.servlet.JaxWsService
Also you have to take care to the policy used during deployment.
The default ant script is configured with
security.policy=userNameAuthSymmetricKeys
So you need to manage it when you consume your ws with .Net.
For logging events, you just need to call the log4j logger instantiated by default with $log.debug("Hello")
You can't pre-authenticate server side.
You can write the auth into your client tho. Not sure what the .Net equivilent is, but this works for Java clients:
private static final String USERNAME = "admin";
private static final String PASSWORD = "password";
static {
java.net.Authenticator.setDefault(new java.net.Authenticator() {
#Override
protected java.net.PasswordAuthentication getPasswordAuthentication() {
return new java.net.PasswordAuthentication(USERNAME, PASSWORD.toCharArray());
}
});
}
I followed the instructions in this tutorial to set up Zend AMF as a way of passing data from my flash app to my PHP app:
http://codeigniter.com/forums/viewthread/180414/
So I have the directory structure and everything as described there. This is my gateway controller:
class Gateway extends CI_Controller
{
function __construct()
{
parent::__construct();
$this->load->library('zend');
//root_folder + application + controllers + amf + services
define('SERVICES_FOLDER', APPPATH.'controllers/amf/services/');
}
public function index()
{
$server = new Zend_Amf_Server();
$server->setProduction(false);
//$server->addFunction('testservice');
$server->addDirectory(SERVICES_FOLDER);
echo $server->handle();
}
}
And the APPPATH is /application/ so the path defined by SERVIES_FOLDER is "/application/controllers/amf/services" which is where my file 'testservice.php' sits.
When I try and connect to that service in flash:
var gateway:String = "http://mysite.com/amf/gateway";
con.connect(gateway);
con.call("Testservice.getMessage", new Responder(onResult, onFault));
It calls the onFault method and displays the error:
Plugin by name 'Testservice' was not found in the registry;
Which makes me think that the addDirectory() line in Gateway.php was the problem somehow. Interestingly, I also cannot access the testservice function through a URL, ie by going to mysite.com/amf/services/testservice.
Any thoughts on what might be going on here?
Figured it out, sort of.
Instead of using the addDirectory method which I was having no luck with, I used the setClass method and created another class within the gateway.php file that has the functions, and now I can connect to those functions from flash.
I had an issue with this when using parent::__construct() in my service controllers. Once I removed that, the problem went away.