Due to browser performance implications I can't use box-shadow CSS property because I have many similarly looking elements on my page that should have same looking style including shadow. That's the reason I would like to implement shadows using traditional PNG imagery.
Facts
My elements have predefined and more importantly fixed pixel width
They have fluid height (auto) depending on their content
They have content directly in the element and some child elements will be positioned outside their border
CSS3 can be used but performance-critical parts (gradients, shadows...) should be avoided
CSS pseudo elements can be used without limitation
Requirements
There should be no additional wrapper element added in order to have fluid shadow
Application should run smoothly on mobile browsers - shadows seem to slow down performance significantly on mobile devices since their processing power is much lower than desktop computers.
Possible direction
I thought of using :before and :after pseudos to display top-to-bottom and bottom shadows on the containing element, but these pseudos display within their parent element and positioning parent z-index higher than these children has no effect.
Visual demo of end result
This JSFiddle Demo in pure CSS3 that I would like to achieve but using PNG shadows. In reality there are numerous of these boxes so you can imagine mobile browsers are struggling with all these shadows.
Item is one such box (see blow) that needs PNG shadow. Left menu is child element positioned outside of the box.
Display in Chrome
HTML
<div class="item">
<menu>
<li>Yes</li>
<li>No</li>
<li>Maybe</li>
</menu>
<div class="content">
Some content
</div>
</div>
CSS3 LESS
.item {
position: relative;
width: 300px;
background-color: #fff;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #ccc;
margin: 20px 20px 20px calc(20px + 3.5em);
min-height: 5em;
&:first-child {
margin-top: 0;
}
&:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 10px;
height: 5em;
background-color: #fff;
}
menu {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: -3.5em;
width: 3.5em;
margin: 0;
border: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style: none;
background-color: #fff;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #ccc;
li a {
display: block;
text-align: center;
padding: 2px 0;
}
}
.content {
padding: .75em 1em;
}
}
Probably I am missing something, but looks like you want something in this way:
demo
The CSS is
.base {
width: 300px;
height: 150px;
font-size: 100px;
font-weight: bolder;
background-color: lightgreen;
position: relative;
z-index: auto;
}
.base:after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
left: 30px;
background-color: green;
z-index: -1;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.child {
position: absolute;
left: 150px;
top: 50px;
border: solid 1px black;
color: red;
}
And just change the background of the :after to your image.
I have applied this solution to your fiddle.
The relevant CSS is for the before pseudo element:
.item:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: -10px;
left: -10px;
right: -10px;
bottom: -10px;
z-index: -1;
background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/100/100);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: 100% 100%;
}
I have used a kitten picture, that is being scaled to cover all the needed size. Just change that to whatever you want.
I needed to do it that way because I had onky a pseudo element available.
The key for that to work (and where you probably had the difficulty) is to add z-index: auto to .item
Updated demo
Well, I had said that it wasn't posible, but I have find a way.
The standard technique would be to use 2 elements, just to avoid stretching the image (as you said). The problem is that we only have 1 pseudo element available.
The solution then would be to use 1 pseudo element, but with 2 backgrounds, to solve the issue.
CSS (only relevant part)
.item:before {
background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/320/10), url(http://placekitten.com/320/500);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: 100% 9px, 100% calc(100% - 9px);
background-position: left bottom, left top;
}
We will need an image (the first one) only 10 px in height, to cover the bottom shadow. And another one, with enough height to cover the maximumitem posible, and that will be used for the remaining part of the shadow. The dark part is that we need now a calc() height, with limited support. (anyway, better than border image)
demo 3
Related
I have a container that uses inset box shadow. The container contains images and text. The inset shadow apparently does not work on images:
The white section here is the container. It contains a white image, and there is inset box shadow applied to it.
body {
background-color: #000000;
}
main {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
width: 90%;
height: 90%;
background-color: #FFFFFF;
box-shadow: inset 3px 3px 10px 0 #000000;
}
<main>
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Solid_white.png">
</main>
Is there a way to make the inset box shadow overlap images?
Just to chime in on this, because I was just creating something similar...
I hate polluting my markup with extra elements for the sake of styling, so the CSS solution is to use the :after pseudo element:
main::after {
box-shadow: inset 3px 3px 10px 0 #000000;
content: '';
display: block;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
}
<main>
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Solid_white.png">
</main>
It's probably too late for what you were trying to do, but is the better solution in my estimation.
Because the shadow is part of the parent container it renders below the image. One alternative is to have a div which places a shadow overtop the image like so:
body {
background-color: #BBB;
}
main {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
width: 90%;
height: 90%;
background-color: #FFFFFF;
border-radius: 20px;
}
main img {
border-radius: 20px;
}
.shadow {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
box-shadow: inset 3px 3px 10px 0 #000000;
border-radius: 20px;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
<main>
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Solid_white.png" />
<div class="shadow"></div>
</main>
Edit: I've updated the fiddle to include border radius on the shadow and on the img which solves the issue identified in the comments.
The reason it's not overlapping is because the image is inside the div, so the image is on top of it. The image is higher (closer to the user) than the div.
You can change the image to use position: relative; z-index: -1, and have the containing div use a border instead of setting background color on the body. You'll need to use box-sizing: border-box to include the border in the width of the div.
DEMO
body {
background-color: #FFF;
}
main {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border: 60px solid black;
box-shadow: inset 3px 3px 10px 0 #000000;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
img {
z-index:-1;
position: relative;
}
For those, who're using absolute-positioned, full-size :before/:after pseudo elements, consider using pointer-events: none on the pseudo-element so the original elements remain clickable.
The best way to achieve this in 2020 would be to use mix blend mode on the image. use the box-shadow on the parent element of the img and use mix-blend-mode: multiply.
You could set the image as the div's background instead:
background-image:url(http://www.placehold.it/500x500)
jsFiddle example
https://stackoverflow.com/a/21415060/6235358
that's a great way to do it but we can do it in a better way using the ::after pseudo-class so you'll not have to add an empty <div> to your HTML
As Rilus mentioned we could use a pseudo class. Unfortunately this does not seem to work on an img tag for some reason however we can use a combination of inner and outer containers to achieve the affect we need.
.outer:hover .inner:after {
position: absolute;
content: '';
color: white;
display:block;
bottom: -0px;
right: -0px;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 11;
border: solid 10px red;
}
http://jsbin.com/kabiwidego/1/
not sure about ie 10 though as it seems to handle pseudo classes that are absolutely positioned slightly differently to most browsers.
One simple fix if you are clever with your decimals is to store your content in a separate div which you then select and implement a certain number of pixels from the top.
For example, let's say your header has a height of 50px. You could begin your #content div id 53.45px from the top (or whatever height your drop shadow is) and then your shadow would appear above the images.
One issue with this is that if you are using a rather transparent shadow, the more transarent it is the more tacky it may look by implementing this css.
In practice the code would be as follows:
HTML:
<header>
Whatever's in your header
</header>
<div id="content>
Page content
</div>
CSS:
header {
height: 50px;
box-shadow: 0 5px 5px rgba(0,0,0,1);
}
#content {
top: 55px;
}
Even if i'm late for the party, I had the same issue these days and worked on a solution. For me, the best solution (mobile friendly) is this one:
JSFiddle:
.image-inset-container {
margin-bottom: 30px;
}
.image-inset-shadow {
position: relative;
}
.image-inset-shadow img {
border-radius: 20px;
}
.image-shadow {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
box-shadow: inset 3px 3px 10px 0 #000;
border-radius: 20px;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
<body>
<h4>Reimagined Web Design</h4>
<p>With your input and business goals in mind, we bring your brand to life through custom human-facing graphics and
visual elements targeted toward your audience for good user experience and created in future-forward technology,
guaranteeing a successful new web design.</p>
<div class="image-inset-container">
<div class="image-inset-shadow"><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Solid_white.png" alt="img1" />
<div class="image-shadow"></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>We initiate a collaborative process where your team is involved in every step to create a frictionless and
delightful
experience for your customers. Our designers immerse themselves in your industry and your brand aesthetic to
deliver
a website that represents your business while achieving your goals for a connected future.</p>
</body>
First time really using the pseudo :after selector. Not sure if the problem I'm running into is a limitation of it or I'm just missing something obvious.
Here's my live code.
li.current:after {
border-width: 1px 1px 0 0;
content: ' ';
background: #256f9e;
display: block;
height: 13px;
position: absolute;
width: 10px;
top: 6;
margin:0px auto;
z-index: 99;
transform: rotate(-224deg);
-webkit-transform: rotate(-224deg);
-moz-transform: rotate(-224deg);
-ms-transform: rotate(-224deg);
-o-transform: rotate(-224deg);
transform-origin: 50% 50%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 50% 50%;
-moz-transform-origin: 50% 50%;
-ms-transform-origin: 50% 50%;
-o-transform-origin: 50% 50%;
text-align: center;
float: center;
}
I've created a little triangle (Or rather a box that has been rotated to look like a triangle). I want it centered within the <li></li> but can't figure it out using my normal methods.
The things that have failed (in no particular order):
text-align: center;
float: center;
margin: 0 auto;
margin-right: 0;
margin-left: 0;
What am I missing? I doubt it matters, but I'm using AngularJS. Thought I'd mention it in case there is a known conflict between Angular & Pseudo selectors (which I doubt).
Thanks.
The issue is your use of absolute positioning & the method you're using to try and center it. If you position an element absolutely, the ol' margin: 0 auto; method won't work to center the thing. I point you to an explanation as to why this is at the end of the question, but in case you just want this to work let's get to the solution first.
Here's some working code. View it on JSFiddle
#tool-menu li {
...
position: relative;
}
li.current:after {
...
position: absolute;
width: 10px;
top: 6;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -5px;
}
Let's break down what's going on here.
Setting up a new Containing Block
In your original Fiddle, the pseudoelement is positioned absolutely relative to the viewport. An example might be the best way to show what this means, and why we don't want this. Consider setting it to top: 0. This would keep it latched to the top of the browser window (or, in this case, the JSFiddle frame), rather than the parent (the li). So, if our menu happened to be at the bottom of the page, or even moving around, the pseudoelement would be floating independent from it, stuck to the top of the page.
This is the default behavior of an absolutely positioned element when you don't explicitly set the position on any parent elements. What we want is to have its position defined relative to the parent. If we do this then the pseudoelement sticks with the parent, no matter where it happens to be.
To make this happen, you need to set the parent, #tool-menu li, to be explicitly positioned (which means setting it to be anything other than position: static). If you choose to use position: relative;, it won't change the computed location of the parent on the page, and does the thing we want. So that's why I used that one.
In technical terms, what we're doing here is creating a new containing block for the child.
Positioning the Pseudoelement
Now that our absolute positioning will be determined in relation to the parent, we can take advantage of the fact that we can use percentages to define where to place the child. In this case, you want it centered, so I set it be left: 50%.
If you do just this, though, you'll see that this lines up the left edge of the pseudoelement at 50%. This isn't what we want – we want the center of the pseudoelement to be at the middle. And that's why I added the negative margin-left. This scoots it over a bit to line the middle up with the center of the parent.
And once we do that, it's centered! Brilliance!
Why didn't my margin: auto; work?
The auto value of a margin is calculated from a fairly complex algorithm. At times, it computes to 0. I know from experience that this is one such instance of that happening, though I haven't yet traced my way through the algorithm to see exactly why. If you'd like to run through it, take a look at the spec most browsers have most likely implemented.
Using calc to center
You can also use the calc function in css to center the pseudo element.
Note: This isn't supported in IE8 and below (caniuse) but you can provide a fallback for older browsers.
View it on this code pen. I'm also using MarkP's css border method to draw the triangle.
li.current:after {
content: '';
display: block;
height: 0;
position: absolute;
width: 0;
overflow: hidden;
bottom: -5px;
left: calc(50% - 5px);
z-index: 2;
border-top: 5px #256f9e solid;
border-left: 5px transparent solid;
border-right: 5px transparent solid;
}
Wouldn't be better to just define the width as a percentage, make it a block element and text-align it in the center?
"float: center;" is invalid, and won't work. Mixing floated and absolute positioned elements are a sure way to get trouble with your layout as they don't really work that well togheter.
Try something like this:
li.current:after {
content: 'YOUR CONTENT';
display: block;
width: 100%;
text-align: center; }
Using margin:auto to center
As long as the element has a width declared you can use the absolute centering method.
To use this method the right and left properties must be set to 0 for margin: auto to be effective.
This method can be expanded to implement horizontal centering as well.
see link for full info:
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2013/08/09/absolute-horizontal-vertical-centering-css/
li.current:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
display: block;
right: 0;
bottom: -5px;
left: 0;
margin: auto;
border-width: 5px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: transparent;
border-top-color: #256f9e;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
ul {
list-style-type: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
<div>
<ul>
<li class="current"></li>
</ul>
</div>
Not directly related (have already voted up jmeas) but you may also find it easier to use the CSS border trick to make the triangle. e.g.
li.current:after {
content: '';
display: block;
height: 0;
position: absolute;
width: 0;
overflow:hidden;
bottom: 0;
left: 50%;
margin: 0 0 -5px -5px;
z-index: 99;
border-top: 5px #256f9e solid;
border-left: 5px transparent solid;
border-right: 5px transparent solid;
}
Similar tactics as to what jmeas has suggested with regards to the vertical positioning. We align to the bottom and then use a negative margin-bottom to push this out to the desired location.
With transform: translate() centering can be accomplished without a fixed size. This is because translate(<x>%) will use the (psuedo-)element's own size, while left and margin-left will use the container's size. By using these together we can therefore find the exact center-point.
tl;dr
To center vertically:
.container {
position: relative;
}
.container:after {
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
To center horizontally:
.container {
position: relative;
}
.container:after {
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
Full example
.container {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
background: #4aa;
color: white;
padding: .5ex 1ex;
}
.container:after {
content: ":after";
position: absolute;
background: #a4a;
color: white;
padding: .5ex 1ex;
/* position below container */
top: 100%;
/* move right by 50% of containers width */
left: 50%;
/* move left by 50% of own width */
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
<p class="container">
Container with content
</p>
This may be the simplest way to do it:
.child_class::after{
position: absolute;
content: 'YourContentHere';
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
top: 50%;
}
the simplest way to do this -
With pesudo element :after or :before use display: inline-block;
Try something like this:
content: url(../images/no-result.png);
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
Using display: grid to center ::before
...worked nice for me. I'm using fa-Icons on this page and centered them within an element with 50% border-radius:
i {
font-size: 0.9rem;
border: 1px solid white;
border-radius: 50%;
width: 30px;
aspect-ratio: 1;
margin-inline: 5px;
}
i::before {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: grid;
place-items: center;
}
This tutorial can help you to make center CSS pseudo-elements.
https://techidem.com/centering-pseudo-before-after-elements-content/
h2 {
text-align: center;
color: #181818;
padding-bottom: 20px;
margin-bottom: 35px;
border-bottom: 1px solid #eaeaea;
position: relative;
}
h2::after {
content: "";
width: 70px;
height: 4px;
background-color: #ff0000;
left: calc( 100% - ( 50% + 35px ) );
position: absolute;
display: block;
bottom: 0;
}
<h2>Most Recent Posts</h2>
You may use container queries with grid layout
element {
container-type: size;
&::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
width: 100cqw;
height: 100cqh;
display: grid;
place-items: center;
}
}
Container queries: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Container_Queries
I personally don't really like the idea to change position attribute or do some margin manipulation. I think the easiest way is two lines of CSS:
.element::after {
/* your css */
line-height: initial;
vertical-align: initial;
}
And there is no need to touch the parent.
I'm trying to create a CSS button and add an icon to it using :after, but the image never shows up. If I replace the 'background' property with 'background-color:red' then a red box appears so I'm not sure what's wrong here.
HTML:
<a class="button green"> Click me </a>
CSS:
.button {
padding: 15px 50px 15px 15px;
color: #fff;
text-decoration: none;
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
.button:after {
content: "";
width: 30px;
height: 30px;
background: url("http://www.gentleface.com/i/free_toolbar_icons_16x16_black.png") no-repeat -30px -50px no-scroll;
background-color: red;
top: 10px;
right: 5px;
position: absolute;
display: inline-block;
}
.green {
background-color: #8ce267;
}
You can check this fiddle to see what I mean exactly.
Thanks for any tips.
A couple things
(a) you cant have both background-color and background, background will always win. in the example below, i combined them through shorthand, but this will produce the color only as a fallback method when the image does not show.
(b) no-scroll does not work, i don't believe it is a valid property of a background-image. try something like fixed:
.button:after {
content: "";
width: 30px;
height: 30px;
background:red url("http://www.gentleface.com/i/free_toolbar_icons_16x16_black.png") no-repeat -30px -50px fixed;
top: 10px;
right: 5px;
position: absolute;
display: inline-block;
}
I updated your jsFiddle to this and it showed the image.
As AlienWebGuy said, you can use background-image. I'd suggest you use background, but it will need three more properties after the URL:
background: url("http://www.gentleface.com/i/free_toolbar_icons_16x16_black.png") 0 0 no-repeat;
Explanation: the two zeros are x and y positioning for the image; if you want to adjust where the background image displays, play around with these (you can use both positive and negative values, e.g: 1px or -1px).
No-repeat says you don't want the image to repeat across the entire background. This can also be repeat-x and repeat-y.
I've got a div and apply :before and :after an image as content. That works perfectly. Now I would need to apply a background image so it does repeat as the div resizes, but it does not seem to work. Is background image on :before and :after supposed to be working?
The current code:
HTML:
<div id="videos-part">test</div>
CSS:
#videos-part{
background-color: #fff;
height: 127px;
width: 764px;
margin: -6px 0 -1px 18px;
position: relative;
}
#videos-part:before{
width: 16px;
content: " ";
background-image: url(/img/border-left3.png);
position: absolute;
left: -16px;
top: -6px;
}
#michi; define height in your before pseudo class
CSS:
#videos-part:before{
width: 16px;
content: " ";
background-image: url(/img/border-left3.png);
position: absolute;
left: -16px;
top: -6px;
height:20px;
}
Background images on :before and :after elements should work. If you post an example I could probably tell you why it does not work in your case.
Here is an example: http://jsfiddle.net/namas/3/
You can specify the dimensions of the element in % by using background-size: 100% 100% (width / height), for example.
color: transparent;
make the tricks for me
#videos-part:before{
font-size: 35px;
line-height: 33px;
width: 16px;
color: transparent;
content: 'AS YOU LIKE';
background-image: url('');
background-size: 25px;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
you can set an image URL for the content prop instead of the background-image.
content: url(/img/border-left3.png);
This itself wont solve everything. Need to consider repeat, size, position etc using other properties.
The problem with other answers here is that they use position: absolute;
This makes it difficult to layout the element itself in relation to the ::before pseudo-element. For example, if you wish to show an image before a link like this:
Here's how I was able to achieve the layout in the picture:
a::before {
content: "";
float: left;
width: 16px;
height: 16px;
margin-right: 5px;
background: url(../../lhsMenu/images/internal_link.png) no-repeat 0 0;
background-size: 80%;
}
Note that this method allows you to scale the background image, as well as keep the ability to use margins and padding for layout.
For some reason, I need float property of a pseudo-element to be set to left or right for the image to appear. height and width of the pseudo-element should be both set but not in percentage. I'm on Firefox 67.
I have used html and body attributes to have a gradient background and a flower background for my website.
I have also used a div to have the bottom right hand flower where it is. Works great, but not when scrolling. How do i get the bottom right hand corner image to stick to the bottom of the screen ?
You will want to set position: fixed; instead of position: absolute;.
Here's more info on the Position Property.
.bottomright {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0px;
right: 0px;
}
.demo {
background-color: HotPink;
padding: 20px;
margin: 5px;
}
Hello<br>
<div class="demo bottomright">
I'm a Div!
</div>
there
if you put the flower inside a div and position it absolute bottom and right this will stick it there.
For example, something like this will work
#mystylename{
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
right:0;
}
you may need to tweak it to get it sat where you want and also maybe add a z-index
If you require animation, set you div as absolute before the animation and then after the animation re set it to fixed as the below example.
$('.mydiv').animate({
opacity: 1,
right: "50px",
bottom: "50px",
height: "toggle"
}, 1000, function() {
// Animation complete.
}).css('position','fixed');
css for the above div is below as well.
.mydiv {
text-align: center;
background: #00DD88;
background: -moz-linear-gradient(center top , #00DD88 0%, #00CC00 100%) repeat scroll 0 0 transparent;
border-radius: 30px 30px 30px 30px;
text-shadow: 0 1px 0 rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
margin: 5px 0 10px 15px;
position: absolute;
right: -980px;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
display: none;
z-index: 100;
}
I know this is old but it will definitely help someone :)
A css-only trick for this old post is to put a after the div and position the top -1.2em so it overlaps the bottom of the element above it.
html:
<textarea class="no-whitespace-right">This is a test resize it.</textarea>
<span class="float-lower-left">length could go here</span>
css:
.no-whitespace-right {
/* any whitespace to the right and the overlap trick fails */
width: 100%;
}
.float-lower-left {
position: relative;
float: right;
right: 1em;
top: -1.2em;
/* push it up into the element before it. This is a trick for bottom-right */
right: 1em;
z-index: 200;
opacity: 0.5;
font-weight:bolder;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/qwm3pu8d/
You might need to use JavaScript to accomplish this task. Such techniques will accomplish the effect you desire, but they tend not be animate very smoothly. When scrolling, such a "stuck" object will tend to skip and stutter. I found an example here but have not tried it myself. I recommend searching for a few examples and trying out the one that looks cleanest and most modern.
You will want to set position: fixed; instead of position: absolute;