I need to recreate the above image using HTML, CSS, SVG, or some other similar means. It'll be solely for visual purposes, not needing any type of actual functionality. Preferably the non-white parts would be transparent so that I could easily change the background color and have other elements within the center
The reason why I cannot use a transparent image is because I need to be able to easily scale it and possibly change the color of the bars with little trouble
I know how to do approximately the same thing using this CSS approach, but that would require a separate element for every single segment which I do not want.
The other option I thought up would be to create a doughnut graph in Raphael.js with a whole lot pieces in it, but that also seems like a lot of work for the simple outcome that I want
So before I start a long and complex process using one of the methods I mentioned, is there a simpler, more optimized way to create the effect I desire? I'm not asking for the finished output, merely insight as to what methods are optimal to create this type of effect
Edit
The optimal solution would be a pure CSS approach that does not require a separate element for each segment. Otherwise the answers provided are great solutions!
You could just do this with stroke-dasharray:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
<circle cx="50" cy="50" r="30" stroke-dasharray="0.628" stroke-width="2"
fill="none" stroke="black"/>
</svg>
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/75WsM/
Easy loop should be enough.
<div id="R">
</div>
<script>
var createCircle = function(step,posX,posY,radius){
var paper = Raphael("R",500,500);
for(var i = 0; i < 360; i=i+step){
var currentRect = paper.rect(posX+radius,posY, 2,20);
currentRect.attr({'fill':'#ffffff',stroke:0});
currentRect.rotate(i,posX+radius,posY + radius);
}
}
createCircle(3,50,50,94);
</script>
http://jsfiddle.net/mBKP4/2/
Related
I'm trying to use a symbol from my defs.svg as a background image in CSS, as opposed to a direct path to an individual SVG file.
So instead of:
background: url(spoon.svg);
I want to do something like this:
background: url(defs.svg#spoon);
With #spoon being a symbol in defs.svg with id="spoon". Unfortunately, this isn't working for me. Has anyone come across a solution that doesn't involve custom JS/etc?
You'd need to define view and use tags inside your defs.svg so CSS would know where to look and what to show.
So, for example, say you have inside your SVG a symbol defined as this:
<symbol id="poop" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
<!-- Your shapes here -->
</symbol>
And before closing the svg tag, you must add the view and use defining tags:
<view id="poop-view" viewBox="0 0 100 100" /><!-- This ID used here is what you'll use in your CSS! -->
<use xlink:href="poop" width="100" height="100" x="0" y="0"></use>
Note that at this point, you can open your raw SVG file in a browser and it will show your drawing - before it showed blank!
And now you can set your SVG symbol in your CSS:
div{background-image:url("defs.svg#poop-view")} /* Remember, it's the ID used on your <view> def! */
Also, be sure your SVG includes a xmlns:xlink namespace on the opening tag, or it won't be supposed to work.
Disclaimer: I'm trying to use this setup at work hosting the SVG file on a server on my university, but for some reason this doesn't work (even SVG files won't show if <?xml>and <!DOCTYPE> tags are missing on the SVG), so be sure to check the sanity of your SVG file.
Find more about this on Jennifer Hiller's codepen blog.
I have created SVG code from coreldraw and want to place it inline in my HTML5 document and have a couple of queries.
How universal is SVG now-a-days? Any suggestions on backwards compatibility?
I have taken out the style data from the svg and put that into my css, I guess that's not a problem - or is it? I also added a hover rule...
.Borderline {stroke:#0099FF;stroke-width:7.45541;stroke-linejoin:round}
.BorderFill1 {fill:#71C6FF}
.BorderFill2 {fill:#CBEAFF}
.BorderFill1:hover {fill: green; }
Can I remove any of the following data that is not needed. (but I want it to work and look the same)
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="myimgleft" xml:space="preserve" width="100px" height="105px" version="1.1" style="shape-rendering:geometricPrecision; text-rendering:geometricPrecision; image-rendering:optimizeQuality; fill-rule:evenodd; clip-rule:evenodd" viewBox="0 0 92 97" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g id="Layer_x0020_1">
<metadata id="CorelCorpID_0Corel-Layer"/>
<path class="BorderFill1 Borderline" d="M55 51c10,0 18,0 24,0 4,-5 9,-10 9,-15 0,-6 0,-22 0,-32l-16 14c-5,-4 -8,-6 -17,-14l0 47z"/>
<path class="BorderFill2 Borderline" d="M79 51c-5,-1 -41,0 -47,0l0 -14c-8,8 -25,25 -28,28l28 28 0 -13c7,0 11,1 17,-2 6,-2 23,-21 30,-27z"/>
</g>
</svg>
Any other hints / tips that might be useful are very welcome.
1 MDN keeps an accurate list of compatibility per-element. Here's the list for SVG: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Element/svg
Feature Chrome Firefox (Gecko) IE Opera Safari
Basic support 1.0 1.5 (1.8) 9.0 8.0 3.0.4
2 Keep the style in your SVG - it'll make it easier to swap out for other SVG images later. You want to be able to quickly update your svg. This one is more a matter of preference.
3 I wouldn't get in the habit of tweaking vector-art exported from CorelDraw by hand. You may think to run it through a minifier, but hand-tuning is almost certainly more work than it's worth.
Here's the first minifier Google gives me:
http://petercollingridge.appspot.com/svg-optimiser
For cases where you're not inlining, you can give .svgz (compressed svg) a shot, which will make it significantly smaller: https://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/24797/when-should-i-use-svg-or-svgz-for-my-web-graphics
4 Hmm, other tips - well good on you for using vector art on your site. Too many web devs/designers take the shortcut of doing everything in raster. While that gets you a nice looking image for a demo, in the long run it's really hurting your site. With ubiquitous tablets + phones, pinch + zoom is everywhere and your images need to scale nicely.
Personally, I've never loved the idea of inlining svg - I've always preferred saving as .svg and src-ing it like an image. I see why you are inlining it, though, as you're using some hovers.
I am trying to resize an svg to the exact size which I want it (32x32).
Look at the example at http://jsfiddle.net/Uy94k/6/
This fiddle is a short outtake of a larger .svg file which I include in my html file and refeer to which image I want using:
<svg class="small" viewBox="0 0 512 512" preserveAspectRatio="none">
<g filter="">
<use xlink:href="#login"></use>
</g>
</svg>
(Any easier way to do this by the way?).
As you can see, I've tried using preserveAspectRatio, but without luck. I've also tried different styling techniques (ie. sizing in span tags outside the svn, styling in the svn tags, fiddling with height both in and where I call it by id.).
If you use a developer tool to look at the height/width of the images in the fiddle, you will see that it is 26x20.. But why is that?
Tweeking the viewBox values (guessing the value of viewBox="120 70 340 340" in this case) kinda did the trick. But it is error prone, not nice, and tedious to tweek the parameters.. Look at the example at http://jsfiddle.net/veZSX/1/ for a tweeked vs untweeked version.
There must be a better way?
Feel free to ask for more context if you're wondering why this is necessary, or want to suggest a better way to solve the bigger problem. (It involves laying out a bunch of building floor plans onto a campus map and finding the absolute location of certain things that are in those building maps; more detail was bogging the question down.)
The short version is that I want to take an SVG file that has <image xlink:href="something.svg" /> references and merge it into one big file with each referenced SVG being embedded with an <svg> and inline SVG XML content.
So, my top-level source file (composed in Inkscape) looks like this:
<image xlink:href="floorplans/bldg1.svg"
width="165.52684" height="107.10559" y="-1937.7657"
x="2507.1565" transform="matrix(0,1,-1,0,0,0)" />
And my attempt at a merged version to inline all the vector data:
<svg x="2507.1565" y="-1937.7657" width="165.52684" height="107.10559"
transform="matrix(0,1,-1,0,0,0)" viewBox="0 0 1224 792">
<g id="surface0">
<path style="fill:none;stroke-width:0.72;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:rgb(0%,0%,0%);...
So, basically I'm using a script to replace <image> with <svg> and paste in the contents of the root <svg> of "floorplans/bldg1.svg". (Copying attributes from the <image> to the <svg>, and copying the viewBox attribute from the original <svg> to the new one.)
This technique worked for things that aren't rotated, but Chrome seems to be saying this particular element is off the top of the viewport. I'm new to SVG, but I'm thinking the order of the transformations isn't the same on the <svg> as it is on the <image>. Did I make a dumb mistake I'm not spotting, or is there more involved in converting an <image xlink:href="something.svg" transform=... /> to an <svg> with inline XML?
Thanks.
The transform attribute doesn't apply to the <svg> element according to the SVG specification. You can put the transform that was on the <image> element on the <g> element either outside or inside the <svg> instead.
The reason for transform behaving this way is that the <svg> element sets up the coordinate system, and the transform depends on that (a question that would arise if it did apply is "should the transform be interpreted in the coordinate-space before or after the svg coordinate system is setup?")
I am starting to learn RaphaelJS, but it does seem to be a steep learning curve as I am not very versed in javascript. But it seems like such a good library that I am willing to put the time in to learning it.
What I would like to know is:
How can one use an existing vector image in RaphaelJS
(If I download a "vector" image can I tell RaphaelJS to draw the coordinates?)
Is there a way to convert an image (jpg, gif or whatever) into a vector graphic that RaphaelJS can use.
My confusion is that on the sample pages the images are drawn in coordinates which makes sense to me. However, if a download a vector image from the net, where are the coordinates?
I am aiming to make images on my web page that are clickable, much like the RaphaelJS example of the map of Australia that has a hover event on it.
The easiest vector image format to read is svg since svg is XML and XML is just plain text.
Convert your vector image to svg using something like Illustrator or Inkscape and then open it in your text editor. You'll find that most of the shapes like <path /> and <rect /> have a direct equivalence in Raphael. For example, the <path /> object defines path coordinates in its d attribute and it has the same syntax as paths in Raphael:
<path
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:12"
d="m 116.6,832.4 c 0,0 5.8,85.5 127.6,87.0 121.8,1.4 137.7,-79.7244"
/>
You can convert that to Raphael's:
var path = paper.path(
"m 116.6,832.4 c 0,0 5.8,85.5 127.6,87.0 121.8,1.4 137.7,-79.7244"
);
path.attr({fill:'none',stroke:'#000000';'stroke-width':12});
Take note though of any transformations applied to objects and groups (the <g /> element), you'll have to repeat them in Raphael. Say for example you see the following:
<path
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:12"
d="m 116.6,832.4 c 0,0 5.8,85.5 127.6,87.0 121.8,1.4 137.7,-79.7244"
transform="translate(-124,370)"
/>
then after creating the path in Raphael you'll need to apply the translate():
path.translate(-124,370);
You can probably write a script to convert svg files to Raphael syntax or load the svg file in the browser as text and use the browser's XML DOM parser to process it and draw it using Raphael.