I was just play around with an layout and I'm having a problem.
My header element is pushed right to the top of the container
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/CslkH
I'm missing something but I cant think what!
I have even set a margin-top and it's still push to the top of the container?
Please help guy's
Your .header has a margin-top: 25px which, due to margin collapse, causes the .container to also move down.
Instead of that top-margin, use a padding-top on the .container.
Here's your updated pen: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/pbvFI
Add overflow:auto to your #container div:
#container {
background-color: #93C;
width: 1000px;
height: 1000px;
overflow:auto;
}
jsFiddle example
Your floats are causing this and setting the overflow restores the block formatting context.
Related
HI hope someone can help answer my question its really starting to bug me!
The site is here http://www.calypsopretattoo.com/
When you click on the about tab the information comes up but a margin on the right hand side of the page appears and creates a massive white space?
I've tried editing the css a number of times but nothing. any ideas??
#aboutp
{
width:100%;
}
causes the issue..remove it...:)
Remove width:100%; form #aboutp ID this will work
the parent div miss a position relative.
you use position absolute without using position relative to parent div
div {
height: 900px;
width: 1000px;
overflow: hidden;
margin-right: 0px;
position: relative; /*add to inline style or make a class for this parent div*/
}
I have here a code in Dabblet: http://dabblet.com/gist/5705036
I wanted to have these segment to stick at their position even if the browser is re-sized without using absolute positioning. Like for example, The main content container breaks a new line when the browser is re-sized [I use CSS Floats in most of my containers].
Is there something wrong with my coding?
Do floats proper for layouts ? or I need to use anything else?..
I just can't fix it by myself and by doing a lot of research , still, haven't got a good idea to use it as a way to fix this. [Also, I use HTML5 tags such as: section, article, nav, etc.. ]
Just remove the float:left; from maincontent id and apply a display:table-cell;. Your issue will be resolved.
Here is the code.
#maincontent {
border: 1px solid #BBBBBB;
border-radius: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
display: table-cell;
margin-top: 15px;
min-height: 400px;
padding: 2px 6px;
width: 700px;
}
Hope this helps.
First of all You should always clear parent element if You use floats inside the parent element. Your right element go down because You don't have minimal width of container, ther is sample of code:
#contentWrapper {
width: 1000px;
overflow: hidden; /*scroll / auto it's depends on You */
}
I noticed that in your code you had a space in <div id="contentWrapper "> which stopped your CSS for that element from appearing. Also, you needed 2 more pixels of width on your #contentWrapper.
#contentWrapper {
width: 992px;
}
Removing the space and changing the width of #contentWrapper worked for me. I had a quick look at the maths but haven't worked out why it needs to be 992px. Anyone?
So, in answer to your question, I'd say floats are fine and your approach is good, there were just those two minor errors.
Everything is wrapped in a div with an id="main_wrap"
the main wrap has this style:
#main_wrap{
margin:0 auto;
width:960px;
position:relative;
}
Since everything is wrapped inside of this div, I don't understand why a horizontal scroll bar would appear at the bottom.
If any of the children have borders, padding (or sometimes margins) applied to them, that adds to the width and height. Using overflow: hidden; would avoid the scroll bars. But, if something has too much width, you probably want to find where it is coming from to avoid possible problems in the future.
Note that you may be able to use box-sizing: border-box to prevent borders and padding from adding additional width (or height). This is particularly useful when you are using something like width: 100%, but width: 100% also isn't necessary in most cases - elements with display: block applied will fill the width by default AND keep padding and borders from adding additional width.
For example:
html, body { margin: 0; padding: 0; }
div {
background: #111;
color: #eee;
padding: 1em; /* This doesn't add to width - still at 100% width */
border: 2px solid #5e5; /* This also doesn't add to width - still at 100% width */
}
<div>Test</div>
Try add overflow hidden:
#main_wrap{
margin:0 auto;
width:960px;
position:relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
That should work (but is hacky).
If the elements are side by side and have a combined width or , as BDawg says margins or paddings, that cause it to exceed 960px a scroll bar could appear. Post your entire code and we can figure it out very quickly. Hiding the overflow should work but it would not really explain why the scroll bar is appearing. Giving us your entire markup will help find the root of the problem.
Somewhere you've left any DOM elements unseen which occupies the extra width. it's better to find and fix the children than to use overflow:hidden . overflow:hidden will hide the scroll bar if user zooms in the page.
Working 100%
if you are using bootstrap it takes
margin-left & right 15px (or) -15px
you need to change 15px to 0px
Example
.main_wrap .row{
margin-left:0px;
margin-right:0px;
}
If you change width to 100% it helped you, but if you don't want, just try add external <div style="width:100%"></div> like this:
<div style="width:100%">
<div class="main_wrap">
%your content%
</div>
</div>
In this example the image is not centered. Why? My browser is Google Chrome v10 on windows 7, not IE.
<img src="/img/logo.png" style="margin:0px auto;"/>
add display:block; and it'll work. Images are inline by default
To clarify, the default width for a block element is auto, which of course fills the entire available width of the containing element.
By setting the margin to auto, the browser assigns half the remaining space to margin-left and the other half to margin-right.
You can center auto width div using display:table;
div{
margin: 0px auto;
float: none;
display: table;
}
Under some circumstances (such as earlier versions of IE, Gecko, Webkit) and inheritance, elements with position:relative; will prevent margin:0 auto; from working, even if top, right, bottom, and left aren't set.
Setting the element to position:static; (the default) may fix it under these circumstances. Generally, block level elements with a specified width will respect margin:0 auto; using either relative or static positioning.
In my case the problem was that I had set min and max width without width itself.
Whenever we don't add width and add margin:auto, I guess it will not work. It's from my experience. Width gives the idea where exactly it needs to provide equal margins.
there is a alternative to margin-left:auto; margin-right: auto; or margin:0 auto; for the ones that use position:absolute; this is how:
you set the left position of the element to 50% (left:50%;) but that will not center it correctly in order for the element to be centered correctly you need to give it a margin of minus half of it`s width, that will center your element perfectly
here is an example: http://jsfiddle.net/35ERq/3/
For a bootstrap button:
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
I remember someday that I spent a lot of time trying to center a div, using margin: 0 auto.
I had display: inline-block on it, when I removed it, the div centered correctly.
As Ross pointed out, it doesn't work on inline elements.
img{display: flex; max-width: 80%; margin: auto;}
This is working for me. You can also use display: table in this case.
Moreover, if you don't want to stick to this approach you can use the following:
img{position: relative; left: 50%;}
put this in the body's css:
background:#3D668F;
then add:
display: block;
margin: auto;
to the img's css.
I'm trying to build a quick overview that shows the upcoming calendar week. I want it arranged horizontally so it can turn out to be quite wide if we show a full calendar week.
I've got it set up right now with an inner div with a fixed width (so that the floated "day" divs don't return below) and an outer div that's set to width: 100%. I'd LIKE for the outer div to scroll horizontally if the page is resized so that the inner div no longer fits in it, but instead the outer div is fixed larger at the width of the inner div and the page itself scrolls.
Gah I'm not good at explaining these things... Here's a bit of code that might clear it up..
The CSS:
.cal_scroller {
padding: 0;
overflow: auto;
width: 100%;
}
.cal_container {
width: 935px;
}
.day {
border: 1px solid #999;
width: 175px;
height: 200px;
margin: 10px;
float: left;
}
and the (simplified) structure:
<div class="cal_scroller">
<div class="cal_container">
<div class="day">Monday</div>
<div class="day">Tuesday</div>
<div class="day">Wednesday</div>
<div class="day">Thursday</div>
<div class="day">Friday</div>
</div>
</div>
So to try again - I'd like the cal_scroller div always be the page width, but if the browser is resized so that the cal_container doesn't fit anymore I want it to scroll WITHIN the container. I can make it all work if I set a fixed width on cal_scroller but that's obviously not the behavior I'm going for. I'd rather not use any javascript cheats to adjust the width of the div if I don't have to.
Your cal_scroller class is 100% + 20px (padding) wide. Use a margin on cal_container instead, like so:
.cal_scroller {
padding: 10px 0;
overflow: auto;
width: 100%;
}
.cal_container {
margin: 0 10px;
width: 935px;
}
See here for a description of how the box model works (in short, the everything is outside the width/height of an element).
Also, block elements (like <div>s) are 100% width by default, making your 100% width declaration redundant.
One problem I see is your width: 100% rule. div.cal_scroller is already a block-level element, so it'll default to filling the entire page width. (Not to mention that padding is added on top of width, so you end up with that div being bigger than the page.)
Just get rid of that width rule, and you should be golden. (I just tried myself, and it worked like a charm.)
I didn't read your question very carefully, but when you have width: 100% and padding, that's generally not what you want.
100% + 20px > 100% - that might be the problem.
I struggled with this a lot but the simplest solution I found was adding:
.cal_container { white-space: nowrap; }
This way you don't have to give it a width at al. It just makes sure everything stays in one line.