I have two images which both need to be in the HTML (so no background image), and on hover of one, it swaps for the other.
I thought I had the code working but it seems to be glitchy. I can't work out the issue.
JSFiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/5tCju/
Here is my CSS:
#wrapper img.on,
#wrapper.gridWrap img.on {
display:none;
}
#wrapper img.default:hover img.on,
#wrapper img.default:hover img.on {
display:inline;
}
#wrapperimg.default:hover,
#wrapper img.default:hover {
display:none;
}
Any way this can be done by swapping the images between display:block; and display:inline; ?
To get this to work, you need to set the :hover pseudo-class to the parent container (.wrapper) instead of the images.
jsFiddle Demo
#wrapper
{
display: inline-block;
}
#wrapper:hover img.default,
#wrapper img.on
{
display:none;
}
#wrapper:hover img.on,
#wrapper img.default
{
display:inline-block;
}
Here is the Pure CSS Solution.
WORKING DEMO
The HTML:
<div class="images"> </div>
The CSS:
.images{background: url(http://icons.iconarchive.com/icons/icojoy/maneki-neko/256/cat-2-icon.png) no-repeat 0 0; height:300px; width:300px;}
.images:hover{background: url(https://si0.twimg.com/profile_images/2940708431/842924fb3e2cc1f7fddf1b195c3f6c81.jpeg) no-repeat 0 0; height:300px; width:300px; cursor:pointer;}
I hope this is what you are looking for.
Playing with the display property forces the browser to re-create the page flow, thus the flickering. A usual solution is to avoid the <img> tag and play with background-image but, if you want to use your current markup, you can simply place one image above the other:
#wrapper{
position: relative;
}
#wrapper img{
position: absolute;
}
... and the hide/display the second one:
#wrapper img.on{
opacity: 0;
}
#wrapper img.on:hover{
opacity: 1;
}
(Updated fiddle)
display would probably work better but I haven't tried it.
#wrapper img.on{
display:none;
}
#wrapper:hover img.default{
display:none;
}
#wrapper:hover img.on{
display:block;
}
UPDATED FIDDLE
your mistake was your were not using :hover properly. .on is not a child of .default thats why the statement #wrapper img.default:hover img.on was not working..as .on and .default both are child of #wrapper thats why you should use :hover for your wrapper in order to change images
Simple CSS Solution:
#wrapper img { position: absolute; float: left; }
#wrapper .on { display: none; }
#wrapper:hover .on { display: block; }
http://jsfiddle.net/5tCju/3/
Reversed version:
#wrapper img { position: absolute; float: left; }
#wrapper:hover .on { display: none; }
http://jsfiddle.net/5tCju/4/
Related
<style type="text/css">
ul,li{ padding:0; margin:0; overflow:hidden;}
li{ list-style:none;}
img{ border:0;}
.box{ width:950px;}
.box li{ float:left; width:300px; height:250px; margin-right:10px; margin-bottom:20px;}
#box_img1 {width: 300px;
height: 250px;background-image: url('support.png');}
#box_img1 a:hover {width: 300px;
height: 250px;background-image:url('GotJobButton.png');}
#box_img2 {width: 300px;
height: 250px;background-image: url('support.png');}
#box_img2 a:hover {width: 300px;
height: 250px;background-image:url('object.png');}
</style>
<ul class="box">
<li id="box_img1"></li>
<li id="box_img2"></li>
</ul>
Question:
I want to make it change picture on mouseover. But it does not work, so what goes wrong here?
You are changing the background of the anchor element, not its parent list item. This should be resolved if you use
#box_img1:hover { background-image:url('GotJobButton.png'); }
#box_img2:hover { background-image:url('object.png'); }
You also do not need to respecify the width and height of the element, as they have already been defined and should be retained even in the hover state.
You put the background-image on the box, but the :hover on the a. Right now, you're changing the background-image of the link, instead of the background image of the link.
Either put
#box_img1 a { // current code + display: block; }
or
#box_img1:hover { // but not sure if this is allowed/supported across all browsers }
Basically, the current setup has space between the top of the page and the #header div. I want to remove that space. Tried searching, came up with adding
position:absolute;top:0;left:0;
to the #header div, it works (positions it at the top without space) but the rest of my divs loose all their structure. How to position it at the very top and preserve the current layout of the rest of the divs?
I am also using an image underneath the divs as a background. Using this code.
body
{
background-image:url('../imagez/bestone1400.jpg');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-position:top, center;background-size:100%; 2000px;
}
Thanks in advanced.
#container
{
width:100%;
}
#header
{
background-color:#FFA500;
height:400px;
}
#leftcolumn
{
background-color:#FFD700;
height:200px;
width:10%;
float:left;
}
#content
{
background-color:#EEEEEE;
height:200px;
width:80%;
float:left;
}
#rightcolumn
{
background-color:#FFD700;
height:200px;
width:10%;
float:right;
}
#footer
{
background-color:#FFA500;
clear:both;
text-align:center;
}
There is likely padding or margin on html or body. Try something like:
html, body {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
There may also be padding or magins on divs or other elements, so a universal selector might work:
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
But it is generally good practice to implement a css reset, like this one, which may be the best solution.
You should remove the Default browser padding, margin and border, use:
/*reset default browser settings */
html, body {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
border: 0px;
}
I want to change the image from normal to brighter when it's on hover, My code:
<div class="nkhome">
<img src="Images/btnhome.png" />
</div>
.nkhome{
margin-left:260px;
top:170px;
position:absolute;
width:59px;
height:59px;
}
.nkhome a img:hover {
background:url(Images/btnhomeh.png);
position:absolute;
top:0px;
}
Why doesn't work the hover? When my mouse is on it, it shows the first image, not the hover image.
You've got an a tag containing an img tag. That's your normal state.
You then add a background-image as your hover state, and it's appearing in the background of your a tag - behind the img tag.
You should probably create a CSS sprite and use background positions, but this should get you started:
<div>
</div>
div a {
width: 59px;
height: 59px;
display: block;
background-image: url('images/btnhome.png');
}
div a:hover {
background-image: url('images/btnhomeh.png);
}
This A List Apart Article from 2004 is still relevant, and will give you some background about sprites, and why it's a good idea to use them instead of two different images. It's a lot better written than anything I could explain to you.
Simply this, no extra div or JavaScript needed, just pure CSS (jsfiddle demo):
HTML
<a href="javascript:alert('Hello!')" class="changesImgOnHover">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/50x25/00f/ff0.png&text=Hello!" alt="Hello!">
</a>
CSS
.changesImgOnHover {
display: inline-block; /* or just block */
width: 50px;
background: url('http://dummyimage.com/50x25/0f0/f00.png&text=Hello!') no-repeat;
}
.changesImgOnHover:hover img {
visibility: hidden;
}
You're setting the background of the image to another image. Which is fine, but the foreground (SRC attribute of the IMG) still overlays everything else.
.nkhome{
margin-left:260px;
top:170px;
position:absolute;
}
.nkhome a {
background:url(Images/btnhome.png);
display:block; /* Necessary, since A is not a block element */
width:59px;
height:59px;
}
.nkhome a:hover {
background:url(Images/btnhomeh.png);
}
<div class="nkhome">
</div>
It will not work like this, put both images as background images:
.bg-img {
background:url(images/yourImg.jpg) no-repeat 0 0;
}
.bg-img:hover {
background:url(images/yourImg-1.jpg) no-repeat 0 0;
}
Hi you should give parent position relative and child absolute and give to height or width to absolute class as like this
Css
.nkhome{
margin-left:260px;
width:59px;
height:59px;
margin-top:170px;
position:relative;
z-index:0;
}
.nkhome a:hover img{
opacity:0.0;
}
.nkhome a:hover{
background:url('http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/example.jpg');
width:100px;
height:100px;
position:absolute;
top:0;
z-index:1;
}
HTML
<div class="nkhome">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/100/000/fff.jpg" />
</div>
Live demo http://jsfiddle.net/t5FEX/7/
or this
<div class="nkhome">
<a href="Home.html"><img src="http://dummyimage.com/100/000/fff.jpg" onmouseover="this.src='http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/example.jpg'"
onmouseout="this.src='http://dummyimage.com/100/000/fff.jpg'"
/></a>
</div>
Live demo http://jsfiddle.net/t5FEX/9/
Here are some easy to folow steps and a great on hover tutorial its the examples that you can "play" with and test live.
http://fivera.net/simple-cool-live-examples-image-hover-css-effect/
Exact solution to your problem
You can change the image on hover by using content:url("YOUR-IMAGE-PATH");
For image hover use below line in your css:
img:hover
and to change the image on hover using the below config inside img:hover:
img:hover{
content:url("https://www.planwallpaper.com/static/images/9-credit-1.jpg");
}
Make on class with this. And make 2 different images with the self width and height. Works in ie9.
See this link.
http://kyleschaeffer.com/development/pure-css-image-hover/
Also you can 2 differents images make and place in the self class name with in the hover the another images.
See example.
.myButtonLink {
margin-top: -5px;
display: block;
width: 45px;
height: 39px;
background: url('images/home1.png') bottom;
text-indent: -99999px;
margin-left:-17px;
margin-right:-17px;
margin-bottom: -5px;
border-radius: 3px;
-webkit-border-radius: 3px;
}
.myButtonLink:hover {
margin-top: -5px;
display: block;
width: 45px;
height: 39px;
background: url('images/home2.png') bottom;
text-indent: -99999px;
margin-left:-17px;
margin-right:-17px;
margin-bottom: -20x;
border-radius: 3px;
-webkit-border-radius: 3px;
}
I am using the code below, but .under is not rising above (and covering up) #portfolio_content .img img as it should on hover.
#portfolio_wrap {
overflow:hidden;
width:980px;
float:left
}
#portfolio_content {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:0 auto;
overflow:hidden;
width:650px!important
}
#portfolio_content ul {
list-style:none
}
#portfolio_content .img a { }
#portfolio_content .img a:hover { }
#portfolio_content .img {
display:block;
float:left;
height:210px;
margin:0 35px 35px 0!important;
overflow:hidden;
padding:0;
width:307px
}
#portfolio_content .img img {
display:block;
position:absolute!important;
overflow:hidden;
z-index:3!important
}
#portfolio_content .img .title, #portfolio_content .img .title a {
font-size:22px;
margin:100px 0 10px 0;
float:left!important;
width:307px;
text-align:center;
position:relative
}
.desc {
font-size:13px;
display:block;
text-align:center!important;
margin:0 auto!important;
width:307px
}
.under {
z-index:2!important;
display:inline;
position:absolute;
width:307px;
height:210px
}
.under:hover { z-index:4!important }
Any thoughts? I am assuming this is related to z-index, but I don't know what I have done wrong.
Without seeing the page rendered, I would have to assume the problem is that you cannot actually hover over .under (z-index:2) as it is hidden under the #portfolio_content .img img (z-index:3) initially and therefore you would just be hovering the img instead.
You cannot hover over .under since it's always "under" your images, tw16 is right.
Instead of playing with z-indexes, try actually placing .under inside .img but on top of your images and with display:none, and then do something like :
.img:hover .under{
display:block;
}
I might add your markup isn't quite optimized and .img should be directly placed on the a tags, not on useless inside spans, which are waaaay too many anyway :)
Edit : (as answer to comment)
In case there is no image to show, your markup will be different (as i suppose generated by a server side script, like php) as when there is one to display (for instance you won't echo the img tag).
You can as well use that condition to write 2 differents classes, for instance .img and .no-img :
.no-img .under{
display:block;
}
.img .under{
display:none;
}
.img:hover .under{
display:block;
}
I've seen a few questions like this in my search, but either the question didn't get answered properly or no answer was given. So, I'll ask again.
<style>
.parent { overflow-y:scroll; overflow-x:visible; width:100px; }
.child { position:relative; }
.child-menu { position:absolute; top:0px; left:-100px; display:inline-block; }
</style>
<div class="parent">
<!-- Lots of the following divs -->
<div class="child">
Text Line
<div class="child-menu">some pop out stuff</div>
</div>
</div>
Alright, that's just an example. But basically, what I'm trying to accomplish is have the .child classes be scrollable on the y axis...scroll up and down. But I want the x-axis....the child-menu's to be visible outside the .parent container.
Does that make sense? So what is happening is that when the page renders, the browser is interpreting the overflow as auto altogether and not respecting the separate axis. Am I doing something wrong or are the browsers just not up to CSS3 spec yet on this? Mostly only tested on Chrome.
I figured it out!
The parent should be overflow:auto;
The .child should be position:relative;
The .child-menu should be position:fixed; with NO top or left positioning.
If you do this, it will keep it it inline with the content.
If you need to move the child-menu use margins and not top or left. Example margin-left:-100px;
EDIT
As it seems people still use this, please note that you will have to use javascript to move the fixed items as the page scrolls.
It solved here!
They use css and JS.
.child:hover .child-menu { display: block; }
.parent { overflow-y:auto; overflow-x:hidden; width:100px; height:150px }
.child { position:static; }
.child-menu { position:absolute; display:inline-block; display: none; }
https://css-tricks.com/popping-hidden-overflow/
https://jsfiddle.net/68fBE/2/
.parent {
overflow-y: auto;
width: 100px;
}
.child-menu {
display: block;
position: fixed;
top: auto;
left: auto;
}