So you have a set of inline divs. Their width is hard coded but the content inside can be changed meaning the height of the divs are different.
Is there any way to enure that all divs remain the same height, without having the danger of content spilling out its parent div?
I've tried inheriting min-height but it seems that this is not dynamic. So if the parent div has a min-height set to 320px and the sibling divs are inheriting this value, if any sibling were to become higher than 320 because of content, it and the parent div will change, but the other siblings will stay at 320.
Is there any way around this without the use of anything other than css?
Simply make use of CSS' table display.
Take the following example markup:
<div>
<figure>Example one</figure>
<figure>This is example twooooo</figure>
<figure>3</figure>
</div>
If you want all three figure elements to remain a constant height whilst ensuring they never escape outside the boundaries of the div container, simply:
div {
display:table;
}
div > figure {
display:table-cell;
}
All three figure elements will now remain the same height - the height of the element with the most content or the min-height of the containing divider, whichever is greater.
Here's a JSFiddle example showing this in action. Notice how I've given the div a grey background colour and that the figure elements never escape outside the boundary.
For browser support, see: http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-table
Related
As of now I have div A inside of div B, and A's height is set to 100% because I want it to cover everything from the start of it to the bottom of its parent div.
However, having its height set to 100% doesn't perform the way I was hoping (that it would simply span all the way from its starting point to the bottom of its parent), instead it sets its height to exactly match its parent div. Since div A starts a few hundred pixels down inside div B, this causes div A to overflow an extra few hundred pixels below div B.
Example below:
The real trick is that div B needs to be able to expand vertically depending on its content, while div A continues to fill the area from its vertical start to the bottom of its parent.
Is there some other method to consider? I understand that I could use the calc unit, however, calc doesn't work on safari up until safari 6, and that would rule out a lot of mobile devices.
I might be misunderstanding what you're trying to achieve here but wouldn't a
overflow:hidden;
on the Div B work out?
I know this kind of question get asked everyday, but I don't seem to find a solution to this particular one...
So, the idea is pretty simple, I want to create a 3 column fixed width layout, with 100% width header and footer.
Everything seems to work aside from the footer.
Here is an example: http://jsfiddle.net/xMQLy/1/
So essentially the problem seems to be that, because the main body + lateral columns does not have a fixed height, the footer is not positioned at their bottom.
How would I go fixing that?
thanks
Using absolute or fixed for the position CSS property rips an element from the context of the parent. So, the parent width/height won't be affected by this child's size. The float properties also have this effect: It's not possible to effectively style using position:absolute/fixed or float.
I've thrown away these properties, and revised your code: #Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/xMQLy/5/
Some changes:
Thrown away useless CSS properties:
.wrapper{position:relative;top:0}
`.leftcol and .rightcol {floar:right/left}
Grouped together common styles (.leftcol, .main, .rightcol).
Updated HTML source, added a <div class="wrapper-align"> wrapper around each div in the source, and removed whitespace between these wrappers [1]
[1]The .leftcol, .main, .rightcol elements can be positioned next to each other applying display:inline-block on each div. However, the default alignment for these elements is the bottom. Because the columns have to be located at the top, vertical-align:top has to be used. This CSS property can only be used at inline elements. To achieve this layout without messing with float or display:absolute/fixed, an inline wrapper around a display-block element is necessary.
The whitespaces have to be removed, to prevent creating a gap between the elements. To illustrate, compare these pages: No whitespace vs White space.
In my project, I need to implement a container div that should have an unknown (unlimited) width, without breaking to a new line if its width overflows through the browser's window.
The container div has the CSS property of (white-space: nowrap; display:inline;) and the components inside this div has (float:left) CSS property. All widths are set statically. To test the behaviour, i used a button that calls a javascript function that appends a component inside the container div.
The problem is that when the total width of the container div increased to more than the browser's window width, the components inside the container div will break to a new line. I wonder whether it is possible to have a div with unlimited width?
Many Thanks..
The white-space: nowrap property does not apply to floated elements. Simply put, when you float an element to the left or right, there is no white space between them.
See white-space (CSS property) for more information on what white space is and the line that specifically states you can't do this with floats.
Try setting them to display: inline-block so that the parent actually considers them to be content.
Try adding a specific height to the container div, or removing the float: left rule from the components inside the div.
I am trying to stretch div as soon as some text is loaded.I am able to do that by giving min-height:140 px and height:100% to its parent container. But content in my div is crossing its parent container. How can I limit the inner div so that it will not cross its parent container.
Please help me as I am trying for it from so long.
thanks in advance
HP
Use the overflow attribute in your CSS.
#myDiv {
overflow:auto;
}
Depending on the width you assign, this will get the nested div to display a scrollbar once it's width exceeds that of its parent.
Every single element on a page is a rectangular box. The sizing, positioning, and behavior of these boxes can all be controlled via CSS. By behavior, I mean how the box handles it when the content inside and around it changes. For example, if you don't set the height of a box, the height of that box will grow as large as it needs to be to accommodate the content. But what happens when you do set a specific height or width on a box, and the content inside cannot fit? That is where the CSS overflow property comes in, allowing you to specify how you would like that handled.
overflow:auto;
Reference
w3schools
css tricks
I've got 4 divs inside a parent div. To get them to appear side by side, I've given all 4 divs a style with float:left. The divs do appear side by side, but the parent div's height does not grow to encompass the height of the child divs. What am I missing?
This is a quirk cause by the implementation of floating elements, and occurs when you have a parent element that contains nothing but floating child elements. There are two methods to solve it. One is to set the parent element's overflow property to hidden, sometimes known as the overflow method. The other is known as the clearfix method, and involves the use of the :after pseudo-class.
The clearfix method has the advantage of allowing for specifically positioned elements to "hang" outside of the parent container if you ever need them to, at the expense of a bit of extra CSS and markup. This is the method I prefer, as I utilize hanging elements frequently.
Set overflow: hidden; on the parent div.
Explanation: floating elements removes them from the regular document flow. So, if a given element contains only floated elements, it will not have any height (or, by extension, width -- unless it has an implicit width that is default on block elements).
Setting the overflow property to hidden tells the parent element to respect the width of it's children, but hide everything that falls outside it's width and height.
Of course, the other option is to add an element after the floated divs, inside the parent, with clear: both; This makes the last element be positioned after all the floats, within the regular document flow. Since it's inside the parent, the parent's height is whatever the heights of the floated items are, plus regular padding and the height of the cleared item.
After the 4 divs, you need to "cancel" the float style.
This is done through the creation of a p for example, like: <p style="clear: both"></p>
Your parent div will automatically get the right size.
millinet's answer will work, or you could float the parent div which will also allow it to expand to contain its content
I think you should give the parent div a height of 100% not fixed so that it encompasses the height of child divs if they grow.
I recommend the clearfix method as well. This problem occurs because floating an element removes any height that it would normally contain.
PositionIsEverything posts a complete explanation as well as corresponding solutions for IE6, since the :after pseudoselector is not supported by older browsers.
If you want the divs to be side-by-side, you could try using inline-block:
<style>
.alldivs {
display: inline-block;
}
</style>
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="div1" class="alldivs"></div>
<div id="div2" class="alldivs"></div>
<div id="div3" class="alldivs"></div>
<div id="div4" class="alldivs"></div>
</div>