I am writing a webpage that can be used to download an executable that can run on your machine and can access System Registry on user approval. The site has live id authentication before the user can download the executable to run. This executable reads system registry for a list of installed metro apps. The executable then uploads data from the scan to a database in the cloud. Is there a way for the executable to somehow get access to the live id that the user logged into the webpage with? I would like to upload the live-id + results of the scan to the database. The database will be keyed off the user's live id. We would need to assume that the user may not be logged on his local machine with the live id account.
Any help will be greatly appreciated, as would any other means to achieve this result.
I’m not really sure you can easily associate this using only .exe file. You can experiment with following options
Change your app so that it can read live ID from an xml config file and then instead having users to download only exe you get them to download exe + config in a zip file for example.
Second option is to have the user to manually enter live ID before running the app.
Another option would be to match MAC address used to access the application with MAC address used to send the results. When user logs in you store it’s MAC address somewhere and then match that with MAC address used for sending data. Not an ideal solution really but you can work on something similar in this direction.
Related
I have problem with node-red.
I have a server and i have node-red running on it, i know how to create user authentification by editing setting.js file but what i want to do is that i want to be able to create other users from a webpage that is running on the same server.
I can run a python script that edit the setting.js file and i can edit it mannualy,
but i want to be able to create and remove users from the webpage that is running on the same server.
i am using ubuntu and ngninx on my server.
The Node-RED security documentation includes a section on adding custom user authentication here. It explains how you can replace the hard coded user information with a module that will authenticate a given user. Editing the settings.js is probably not the right approach, especially as it will require you to restart Node-RED after each change.
With this approach you can build your own back end to store and manage users. There are a couple of examples of such code available, including this one that I have written that uses MongoDB to hold the user information. The management app that creates users can be found here, but you can write your own in Python if you want.
Just as a reminder, Node-RED is not a true multi-user environment, even if you declare a number of users, they will all only have shared access to one instance and set of flows. If you want a truly multi-tenant (each user has their own instance and flows) deployment you should probably look at the entire series of posts in that collection that explains how to build such a system. You can start here.
I am about to embark on the development of a line of business application using the Universal Windows Platform (Windows 10). One of the requirements of the application is the synchronisation of data from a server to a local SQLite database; this is required because the application needs to be usable where there is no network connectivity.
It is likely that multiple (windows domain) users will be accessing the application on the same device, sometimes simply by "swapping users", other times by logging off the first user and logging on as a new user.
I realise that UWP applications are installed at a user level, however I would like to be able to share the SQLite database between these users instead of forcing each user to download their own copy of the data.
Is this possible? I am struggling to find any reference to this kind of sharing within the Microsoft documentation - but of course that documentation is new and far from complete!
I guess at the end of the day I am looking for access to a folder that is accessible by any user running that application on the same device, such as the "x:\Users\Public" folders that are available from the desktop, but without having to ask the user to provide access to that folder via any picker control - instead simply being able to "open" it.
Thanks.
In case anyone runs across this, this functionality is now available as described in this blog post:
We introduced a new storage location Windows 10, ApplicationData.SharedLocalFolder, that allows multiple users of one app to share local data. Obviously this feature is only interesting with devices that will be used by more than one person. For such scenarios, for example in educational uses, it may make sense to place any large downloads in Shared Local. The benefits will be two-fold: any user can access these files without the need to re-download them, also there will be storage space savings
Keep in mind that Shared Local is only available if the machine has the right group policy, otherwise when you call ApplicationData.Current.SharedLocalFolder you will get back a null result.
In order to enable Shared Local the machine administrator should enable the corresponding policy.
Alternatively, the administrator could create a REG_DWORD value called AllowSharedLocalAppData with a value of 1 under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\AppModel\StateManager
Note that data store in ShareLocal will only be persisted as long as the app is installed on the device and won’t be backed up by the system.
In Solution Explorer , Right click on Package.appxmanifest then click on ViewCode , end of this file in both projects add below code :
<Extensions>
<Extension Category="windows.publisherCacheFolders">
<PublisherCacheFolders>
<Folder Name="FolderName" />
</PublisherCacheFolders>
</Extension>
</Extensions>
After that in code you can access this folder with below line of code :
StorageFolder sharedDownloadsFolder = ApplicationData.Current.GetPublisherCacheFolder("FolderName");
It`s so important that the folder you will share between two these Apps depend on same publisher info at Certificate File [ProjectName]_TemporaryKey.pfx , if this Certificate File and publisher Info of app is same in both Projects , then you can access the same SharedFolder in both application and use it for create or use dataBase file(like SQLite Database file) or other files that need to be share in both applications.
I have read in a few places that each user needs to have their own front-end file when using an access split DB. Is this true? If I place a single copy of the front end on the network, and allow each user to open a local instance of that file, will it create conflicts? Do I really need to put 10 copies of the same file on the network and let each user open his/her own copy? I am having trouble believing that, though I have seen it mentioned a few times on the web (unless I misinterpreted). Thanks guys!
Running the FE over a network connection will add more bandwidth clutter, too. You really must deploy the FE to each workstation for the best user experience.
The way we handle it with our current project is to have a copy of the FE on the server that each user downloads. There's a 'local' version number baked in to the FE app, and a 'latest' version on the BE. If there's a mismatch detected due to a new version of the FE being deployed, a VB script will download the latest version and replace the one currently on the User's PC (using a batch file). It's set to do this version check when it first starts up and then periodically while the app is running (with an ability to opt-out if the User's in the middle of some work).
I hope I can get some help with this from someone here on this awesome website.
Im a complete noob when it comes to writing batch scripts and I would really like some help.
My situation..
I currently have a network drive on a PC running Windows Server 2008. The drive letter is I:/
within the I-drive, I have a folder named aaaaeast and within that folder is all of my .mdb's
I would like the .bat to copy a specific .mdb from I:/aaaaeast/ to a XP SP3 machine I have in the other room on startup.
Ive tried
copy \myserver\myshare\myfolder\myfile.txt c:\myfiles
But it fails to find the network path.
I know this is got to be a permission issue. My network doesnt have a domain and all the PC's I map to the I:/ map through the Guest account on the Win 2008 server using (username: Guest with no password)
Can someone please help or point me in the right direction.
Ok, this works for me where I work. There is a mapped drive to the location where the master .mdb is.
That is "i:\" drive.
copy i:\ets\lead\software\paint\leadmain.mdb c:\paint
it copies the .mdb to the "c:\paint" drive on the computer where the client clicked on the .bat file. It has been a while so I can't remember where the .bat file sits. Pretty sure it is on the client's computer.
Open Notepad, add the code above, and save making sure to pick the option "All files" down below. That way you can change the extension to .bat from .txt.
copy \\myserver\myshare\myfolder\myfile.txt c:\myfiles
Note: double-backslash
A UNC path (path to a network resource) requires that the target computer name be preceded by two backslashes. Otherwise, starting with \ means "start at the root of the current drive". (Perhaps this was just a typo in the post—that wouldn't cause an error 53.)
Regarding accounts, Windows doesn't really like no-password accounts. There are times when it won't let authentication succeed for a null password. You might try creating an account (with the same name as the username/password on the XP machine) on the 2008 machine and trying it just to see if the user has access to the share. A simple test of that would be something like "dir \myserver\myshare".
If you didn't want to sync accounts, you could create a third user on the 2008 machine and map the share (from the XP machine) as that user. You can also tell Windows to remember the credentials it used for that mapping if you wanted to (i.e. for convenience, definitely not security).
SO ... here is the scenario ... i have a workflow on a document library that copies a file to a windows directory ... this workflow is set to be started at the time when a new item is added to the document library ... so everything works fine when you are manually uploading files to the doc library ... but the problem occurs when we use emails to populate the doc library instead of the manual uploading of files.
When an email is received ... the workflow starts successfully and runs properly (i have kept workflow history entries to check every section of code is being executed or not) ... the workflow stops when the section where the file is being copied to the windows folder is reached.
I basically think this is a problem with the permissions or access issues. Because when we upload the file manually (i.e. from doc library > upload) everything works fine. But maybe there is some other permission set which is used while an email is received by the doc library ... i have tried by assigning permissions to "Everyone" on the windows folder ... but no luck...
Can someone let me know which windows user account is used when an email is received by a document library? (i think its the IIS default account - but isnt it included in Everyone?? )
One solution which i can devise in my mind is that for the file transfer to the windows folder i should use temporary impersonation for the specific code segment (which writes the doc library file to windows folder) but any suggestions are welcome.
P.S. I dont have access to the server right now so i can only devise approaches in my mind ... cant test them right nw... so it would be good to have all suggestions u have so that once i get the access i can try all stuff :D
This is a well known situation. The system does not know who sent the email so it cannot impersonate a user it has no knowledge about.
Depending on which version of SharePoint you are running, the workflow may not start at all or it may start under the account that published the workflow.
For details see this Microsoft Support Article.