I have a table inside a div, and the table won't fill the container div. Why not?
HTML:
<div class="fill">
<table class="table">
...
</table>
</div>
CSS:
.fill {
position:relative;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
.table {
position:absolute !important;
left:0 !important;
right:10px !important;
bottom:0 !important;
top:39px !important;
}
The table only fills a small portion of the container div. Why?
UPDATE:
Or, If I try the following, it doesn't work in Firefox, but it does in Chrome.
HTML:
<div class="fill">
<div class="wrap">
<table class="table">
...
</table>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.fill {
position:relative;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
.wrap {
position:absolute;
left:0;
right:0;
top:39px;
bottom:0;
}
.table {
position:relative;
height:100%;
width:100%;
}
This second version is closer to what I want (since it DOES work in Chrome).
In regards to your original question, this is the answer to your 'why not':
If the height of the containing block is not specified explicitly
(i.e., it depends on content height), and this element is not
absolutely positioned, the value computes to 'auto'.
Source: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#the-height-property
Your 'fill' div is set to 100% height, but what is its parent element's height set to? And if its parent element's height is also a percentage, what is its parent's height set to, and so on?
Add borders to your updated example and you could see, the height of 'fill' is 0 as it has no parent with a specified height, and so the height of 'wrap' is also zero. Add a parent wrapper to wrap the whole example with a height of 500px or so and it works as expected in (at least) Firefox and Chrome.
CSS:
.fill {
position:relative;
width:100%;
height:100%;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.wrap {
position:absolute;
left:0;
right:0;
top:39px;
bottom:0;
border: 1px solid blue;
}
.table {
position:relative;
height:100%;
border: 1px solid green;
}
.parent {
height: 300px;
}
HTML:
<div class="parent">
<div class="fill">
<div class="wrap">
<table class="table">
<tr><td>...</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Tables are special, they don't behave like other block elements. Normally, a table will be just wide enough to hold its contents, and no more. Setting a width of 100% for the table should force it to fill the space allotted for it.
On .table, put width=100%
You may have to set a width for the td as well.. Depending keeping your layout structured
Your parent div of the table has a width and height of 100% which is going to be whatever the parent element is. The table needs to not be position: absolute, and therefore no need to have top, left, right, bottom set.
table {
border: 1px solid blue;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
Here's my fiddle of what you wanted, minus the top and right offsetting you have.
http://jsfiddle.net/jaredwilli/5s4DD/
You can instead use margin to set the top and right but you then cannot use the 100% width, that will not work. You can use display:inline-block, while not having a 100% width but instead dynamically setting the width to be 10px less than the width of the fill div's width using javascript but that's another thing. Same goes for the top positioning. You could do some other things too, but there's a lot of playing with things that you would need to do.
Also, you can use table, no need for a class unless you have multiple tables in the page.
And remove all of the !important's from your CSS.
It's never necessary to use !important, just saying.
Related
I've been enjoying and having success mocking up webpages with CSS. But then I decided to play with a "fixed menu" and my understanding is now not so clear.
So my brief knowledge make a blank HTML doc and then create a "container" div and place all your further elements within the "parent" container. No problem with this and all has been well with floating elements and such.
But when placing a "fixed" element within my parent div I'm lost as to why the fixed element observes the parent's left margin and ignores it's right margin.
html, body{margin: 0; padding: 0;}
#container
{
margin:0px auto;
width:90%;
height:500px;
background:#A8A8A8;
}
.fixed-menu
{
position: fixed;
height: 50px;
width:100%;
background-color: #00a087;
}
<body>
<div id="container">
<div class="fixed-menu"></div>
</div>
</body>
So with the above the "fixed" block does align with the left margin of the parent container but runs completely to the right edge of the browser page. I have figured out that I can make the fixed block 90% and resolve the issue but I don't understand why. Why would the block not be 90% of the parent "container" block.
I look forward to you knowledge.
Thanks
Update your css like below to achieve your desired result. Inherit your width from the parent instead of using 100%.
.fixed-menu
{
position: fixed;
height: 50px;
width:inherit;
left:auto;
right:auto;
background-color: #00a087;
}
DEMO
as stated by #freestock.tk, a fixed element is "fixed" to the screen viewport.
the width (and height of set in %) is computed relative to the screen viewport.
it looks like it's aligned to left margin of the parent container because you did not positioned it with left or right css properties, it's not constrained by the parent container, it is just at the same horizontal position in this peculiar case.
if you set
left:0;
it will align to the left margin of the viewport and ignore the parent container, this should help you better understand his fixed positioning.
html, body{margin: 0; padding: 0;}
#container
{
margin:0px auto;
width:90%;
height:500px;
background:#A8A8A8;
}
.fixed-menu
{
position: fixed;
left:0;
height: 50px;
width:100%;
background-color: #00a087;
}
<body>
<div id="container">
<div class="fixed-menu"></div>
</div>
</body>
You where almost there, just add to .fixed-menu few css rules more :
.fixed-menu {
left:0;
right:0;
margin:0 auto;
width: 95% // now you can change width and fixed element will be centered always
}
I tried a responsive css layout,but "top:50%" can't work and the "left:50%" can.
Why it happened?
<div style="position:relative;top:0%;left:0%;height:100%;width:100%">
<div style="position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;">
</div>
</div>
Define a dimension for the parent container, e.g. div:
<div style="border: 2px solid red;position:relative;top:0%;left:0%;height:200px;width:300px">
<div style="border: 2px solid green;position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;height:50%;width:50%">
</div>
</div>
Or
Another way is to just stretch the parent container, i.e. div, by its top, bottom, left, and right properties. Like this:
<div style="border: 2px solid red;position: absolute;top: 0px;bottom: 0px;left:0px;right:0px;">
<div style="border: 2px solid green;position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;height:50%;width:50%">
</div>
</div>
Consider your original HTML:
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
<div style="position:relative;top:0%;left:0%;height:100%;width:100%">
<div style="position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;">test</div>
</div>
The inner/child div has position: absolute, so it is out of the content flow of the parent element and will not contribute to the height or width of the parent element.
The parent div is in the content flow, but has no content, so its intrinsic
height would be zero. However, you specified height: 100%, but this will not do anything because the div has no height reference on which to base a computed value. So the computed height value for the parent div is zero.
As a result, the child element's top offset computes to 50% of zero,
so it is positioned at the top edge of the parent block.
You would need either to specify a height for the parent div or assign
html, body {height: 100%}
as this would allow the div to compute its height based on the height of the
body, which is based on the height of the html, which being 100%, takes that of the screen.
See the link below. I believe you're going to have a better result with Fixed for what it is you're trying to do, although I'm still not 100% sure I understand what that is.
http://jsfiddle.net/8q107wvb/1/
body {background:#e9e9e9; color:#202020;}
#wrapper {width:500px; background:#fff; margin:50% auto;}
.centered-content {position: fixed; top: 50%; left: 50%; background:#fff; padding:20px;}
This is another to solve this issue
* {
height: 100%;
}
.first{
position:relative;
top:0%;
left:0%;height:100%;
width:100%"
}
div{
position:absolute;
top:50%;
left:50%;
}
<div class="first">
<div style=>Check this</div>
</div>
I have a header that should stay at least as wide as the below div is or wider. Everything looks fine as the windows is larger than the content but when the window gets smaller so does the top div.
#top{
border:1px solid black;
height:200px;
width:100%;
}
#content{
margin:auto;
width:1000px;
height:600px;
border:1px solid red;
}
<body>
<div id="top"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
</body>
Any suggestions?
http://jsfiddle.net/Z242Y/
I believe your problem is with the fixed width you have on the content where as the top div has a percentage width, so to fix just change the content div to a percentage width that is a little smaller like I did, I set it to 80%
#content{
margin:auto;
width:80%;
height:600px;
border:1px solid red;
}
Here is your updated FIDDLE
Hope that helps.
When you give an element a width of 100% in CSS, you’re basically making this element’s content area exactly equal to the explicit width of its parent — but only if its parent has an explicit width.
Try setting the width of the #top using javascript.
var x = $('#content').width();
$('#top').width(x);
JS Fiddle
Firstly, you can wrap your html in a container as such:
<div id = "divContainer">
<div id="top"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
</div>
Then, you can give it a fixed width, so that it will decide the width of its contained elements. In this way, both the top and content div will always have the same width.
For that, you will need your CSS to be as such:
#divContainer {
width: 1000px;
}
#top {
border:1px solid black;
height:200px;
width:auto;
}
#content {
margin:auto;
height:600px;
border:1px solid red;
}
You can see it here: http://jsfiddle.net/G4L4V/
Note: In this approach, the two divs will always have the same width.
In case you want to enforce the 1000px width and still have the content width to be smaller than the top div, then you could make a slight adjustment in the #content class as such:
#content {
margin:auto;
width:90%;
height:600px;
border:1px solid red;
}
I have a simple HTML page and it contains two divs aligned vertically. The page is scrollable because of second div. I want the first div's position to be fixed, or nonscrollable, so that only the second div is scrollable. I added position:fixed to first div's css but this time, the second div was placed on first div, so the first div disappears under the second div.
CSS
body {
width:1000px;
height:100%;
margin:0 auto;/*body ortalama*/
}
#div1 {
height:300px;
background-color:#00CC66;
}
#div2 {
display:block;
word-wrap:break-word;
padding:30px;
font-size:72px;
background-color:#FF3;
}
HTML
<div>
<div id="div1"></div>
<div id="div2">
<p>
<!--Content Here-->
</p>
</div>
</div>
Fixed is always relative to the parent window, never an element. Once the position is set to fixed its taken out of the document flow.
Fixed positioning is a subcategory of absolute positioning. The only difference is that for a fixed positioned box, the containing block is established by the viewport.
so in the second div2 add these
position:relative;
top:300px; /*Bump it down by the height of div1;*/
Hope it helps;
You should add a height and set overflow auto instead of scroll because with scroll you will have the scrollbar always even if the content is less than the specified height. For example:
#div2 {
background-color: #FFFF33;
display: block;
font-size: 72px;
height: 200px;
overflow: auto;
padding: 30px;
word-wrap: break-word;
}
Add this css to #div2 (you'll need to specify a height for #div2 otherwise the the scroll bar won't know where to start):
overflow-y:auto;
height:50px;
See the example here: http://jsfiddle.net/38xkn/1/ (scroll to the right first as you've set the body width to 100px, then you'll see the scroll bar for #div2).
Okay, here is another option. It's layout is somewhat different but it should get the job done. It uses absolute positioning on div1 to get it to the top, and a percentage width to stop it covering the scroll bar for div2. It's not perfect so you may need to tweek it slightly.
HTML
<body>
<div>
<div id="div1">a</div>
<div id="div2">
<p> SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDDDDDDDDDLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAMSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDDDDDDDDDLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
CSS:
body{
width:100%;
height:100%;
margin:0 auto;/*body ortalama*/
overflow:hidden;
}
#div1{
height:300px;
background-color:#00CC66;
position:absolute;
top:0;
width:97.5%;
}
#div2{
display:block;
word-wrap:break-word;
padding:30px;
font-size:72px;
background-color:#FF3;
overflow-y:auto;
max-height:50px;
padding-top:300px;
}
EXAMPLE:
http://jsfiddle.net/38xkn/6/
Good browsers out of equation, it needs to be valid on IE 8 and sup;
How to center image on a floated div without knowing image width or height ?
The image is semantically relevant so, it cannot be a background;
The html:
<div class="logo-organization-home">
<img src="images/logoOrganization1.png" alt="logo organization 1"/>
</div>
And the css:
.logo-organization-home {
float:left;
background-color: #fafaed;
border: 4px solid #f7f4ee;
width: 18%;
}
I've tried display:table-cell; no success;
I've tried text-align center with a certain padding: no success;
Failed try:
http://cssdesk.com/pQnRG
Thanks
To center horizontaly, use: 'text-align:center' for .logo-organization-home
If the containing element has a width, you can use the following:
.logo-organization-home img {
display:block;
margin:0 auto;
}
Concerning horizontal centering, the example that you linked to here: http://cssdesk.com/pQnRG does not work properly since the width of the div is smaller than the width of the image. If you increase the width to 40% for example, you'll see that the image will be centered correctly, even when the containing div has a padding.
Concerning vertical centering, display:table-cell "requires a !DOCTYPE. IE9" on IE8. http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_class_display.asp Alternatively, although unethical, you can use a table/row/cell directly as an additional container:
.logo-organization-home {
float:left;
background-color: #fafaed;
border: 4px solid #f7f4ee;
width: 18%;
}
table{
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
td{
vertical-align:center;
text-align:center;
}
And the HTML:
<div class="logo-organization-home">
<table><tr><td>
<img src="images/logoOrganization1.png" alt="logo organization 1"/>
</td></tr></table>
</div>