LATEST UPDATE: Issue answered here. Some one else at stackoverflow had a similar issue and it was resolved. Solution provided for convenience. This is the line of code I was missing:
comboHeaderColumn.useLabelFunctionForFilterCompare = true;
that line is followed by these:
comboHeaderColumn.filterComboBoxBuildFromGrid = true;
comboHeaderColumn.labelFunction = formatState;
where formatState is a local method that formats the data for the combobox.
UPDATE: I've now got the combobox's loading with the correct data, but when I select a value nothing happens. The combo boxes load only data that is in the column, and when you select a value in the combobox, it's supposed to filter the rows on that value. It doesn't.
Thanks for looking. I'm having trouble getting multiple filters to work in Flex in Flash Builder 4 using the ExtendedDataGrid and ComboBox's. Here is an image of part of the grid:
The User Name and City filter properly if you type text into the box's above the column header and the Request Date lets you select date ranges if you click on the Custom bar, but the Request Reason and State ComboBoxes do not list anything. I've created them using comboHeaderColumn.filterComboBoxBuildFromGrid = true; but all it does is put "[object Object]" as the only other selection under All.
I've used this article but it will only allow you to use a single filter for the entire grid.
My finished grid will have about 20 columns and from 20,000 to 450,000 rows of data so the filters are really important and I'll need more than one.
The code is very straight forward and loops through all the returned data and if the column is identified as a filter column it does this:
comboHeaderColumn.filterComboBoxDataProvider = codeValuePairs;
comboHeaderColumn.filterComboBoxLabelField = "Value";
comboHeaderColumn.filterControl = "ComboBox";
comboHeaderColumn.filterOperation = FilterExpression.FILTER_OPERATION_TYPE_EQUALS;
comboHeaderColumn.headerText = ac.Header;
comboHeaderColumn.dataField = ac.Name;
if( ac.Header == "State" || ac.Header == "Request Reason" )
{
comboHeaderColumn.filterComboBoxBuildFromGrid = true;
}
ProfileDataColumns.push(comboHeaderColumn);
This creates 2 entries in the combo box: All and [object Object]
What am I missing??? Anyway, after half a day searching I decided to reach out.
Any suggestions or direction to an article would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Related
I need to create a report that displays an empty ALV with 4 columns and that is editable (the user can input on the fields of the ALV).
The ALV is going to be used as an input for the user and the data is then going to be read from the ALV.
What would be the best approach for this?
When youre setting the fieldcatalog, you need to declare "editable". For example
wa_fieldcat-fieldname = 'REMARKS'.
wa_fieldcat-scrtext_m = 'Purchase Order'.
wa_fieldcat-col_pos = 1.
wa_fieldcat-outputlen = 10.
wa_fieldcat-editable = 'X'.
wa_fieldcat-key = 'X'.
APPEND wa_fieldcat TO it_fieldcat.
CLEAR wa_fieldcat.
Then you need to declare in your process after input(PAI) the check changed data of the alv.
alv->checked_changed_data
I am working on a report in AX 2009. I want to filter data of InventSiteID on the basis of ExpDate.
I have 2 datasource in the query which is attached to report. Both the data source are same InventExpired. I have to show 4 fields in dialog i.e. SiteID, Exp Date for datasource1 and same for datasource 2 and then filter it out.
In your report, you can use
SysQuery::findOrCreateRange(this.queryRun().query().dataSourceNo(1),
fieldNum(InventExpired, ExpDate)
).value(SysQuery::value(yourFilterDate));
That will filter the first datasource with the date entered.
If you need to filter by dates greater than or less than the filter date, you can use
SysQuery::findOrCreateRange(...).value('>' + SysQuery::value(yourFilterDate));
or
SysQuery::findOrCreateRange(...).value('<' + SysQuery::value(yourFilterDate));
Do you know how to add the fields to the dialog?
If you don't, you should override the dialog() method, and in the dialog() method, after the call to super(), you should use:
Dialog d = ret;
expDateField = d.addField(typeid(yourDateEDT), "Expiry Date");
To get the values from the fields and use them in your report, you should use
expDateField.value()
I haven't tested this, but I've done similar things on numerous occasions so I'm fairly confident this will work. Let me know if you have any problems with this
If you want to specify a range here is how I accomplished it. Hope this helps somebody...
Method1:
qbds3 = qry.dataSourceTable(tableNum(DMxVehicleTable));
SysQuery::findOrCreateRange(qbds, fieldNum(DMxVehicleTable,VehicleMSRPRetails)).value(strFmt('(VehicleMSRPRetails >= %1) && (VehicleMSRPRetails <= %2)', queryValue(VehicleMinPrice), queryValue(VehicleMaxPrice)));
Method2:
qbds4 = qry.dataSourceTable(tableNum(DMxSysYearTable));
SysQuery::findOrCreateRange(qbds4, fieldNum(DMxSysYearTable,Year), 1, 1).value('>' + SysQuery::value(VehicleModelYearStart));
qbds4.addRange(fieldNum(DMxSysYearTable, Year)).value(strFmt('< %1', queryValue(VehicleModelYearEnd)));
I'm creating a table that displays information from a MySQL database, I'm using foreignkeys all over the place to cross-reference data.
Basically I have a datagrid with a column named 'system.' The system is an int that represents the id of an object in another table. I've used lableFunction to cross-reference the two and rename the column. But now sorting doesn't work, I understand that you have to create a custom sorting function. I have tried cross-referencing the two tables again, but that takes ~30sec to sort 1200 rows. Now I'm just clueless as to what I should try next.
Is there any way to access the columns field label inside the sort function?
public function order(a:Object,b:Object):int
{
var v1:String = a.sys;
var v2:String = b.sys;
if ( v1 < v2 ){
trace(-1);
return -1;
}else if ( v1 > v2 ){
trace(1);
return 1;
}else {
trace(0);
return 0;
}
}
One way to handle this is to go through the objects you received and add the label as a property on each of them based on the cross-referenced id. Then you can specify your label property to display in your data grid column instead of using a label function. That way you would get sorting as you'd expect rather than having to create your own sort function.
The way that DataGrids, and other list based classes work is by using itemRenderers. Renderers are only created for the data that is shown on screen. In most cases there is a lot more data in your dataProvider than what is seen on screen.
Trying to sort your data based on something displayed by the dataGrid will most likely not give you the results you want.
But, there is no reason you can't call the same label function on your data objects in the sortFunction.
One way is to use the itemToLabel function of the dataGrid:
var v1:String = dataGrid.itemToLabel(a);
var v2:String = dataGrid.itemToLabel(b);
A second way is to just call the labelFunction explicitly:
var v1:String = labelFunction(a);
var v2:String = = labelFunction(b);
In my experience I have found sorting to be extremely quick, however you're recordset is slightly larger than what I usually load in memory at a single time.
I encounter this problem repeatedly, and haven't a clue what is causing it. I get an exception in the DataBind: SelectedValue which is invalid because it does not exist in the list of items.
Here are some important pieces of information:
I reload listOrgs periodically when the underlying data has changed.
The Organization.DTListAll call returns 2 Int, String pairs.
There are no duplicate or null values in the returned data
After the first two lines below, listOrgs.Items.Count is 0, and the Selected Value is 0
The selected value after the DataBind operation executes is the ID value from the first row in the data
This exception happens the very first time this code is executed after a fresh page load
listOrgs.Items.Clear();
listOrgs.SelectedValue = "0";
listOrgs.DataSource = new Organization().DTListAll(SiteID);
listOrgs.DataTextField = "OrganizationName";
listOrgs.DataValueField = "OrganizationID";
listOrgs.DataBind();
Apparently the solution I posted wasn't entirely effective... Eventually in my application I changed to this:
listOrgs.Items.Clear();
listOrgs.SelectedIndex = -1;
listOrgs.SelectedValue = null;
listOrgs.ClearSelection(); // Clears the selection to avoid the exception (only one of these should be enough but in my application I needed all..)
listOrgs.DataSource = new Organization().DTListAll(SiteID);
listOrgs.DataTextField = "OrganizationName";
listOrgs.DataValueField = "OrganizationID";
listOrgs.DataBind();
I kept getting this error.
Weird thing is that before I set the datasource and rebind after deleting an item the selected index = -1.
If I explicitly set the selectedIndex = -1; then it works and doesn't throw an error.
So even though it was already -1 setting it to -1 stops it from erroring.
Weird eh?
Try setting listOrgs.SelectedValue = "0" after you refresh the DataSource
At the moment you are trying to select the first item in an empty list.
Change the first two line with this :
listOrgs.SelectedItem.Selected = false;
listOrgs.Items.Clear();
In case you still have this problem this is how i resolved it:
listOrgs.SelectedIndex = -1; // Clears the SelectedIndex to avoid the exception
listOrgs.DataSource = new Organization().DTListAll(SiteID);
listOrgs.DataTextField = "OrganizationName";
listOrgs.DataValueField = "OrganizationID";
listOrgs.DataBind(); //Unless you have "listOrgs.AppendDataBoundItems = true" you don't need to clear the list
#PMarques answer helped me out and did solve my problem.
However whilst experimenting, it clicked in my head why I was gettign the error in the first place.
I was setting the "Text" attribute thinking that it might create an encompassing label or fieldset + legend, for me (which it doesn't).
The Text property for a list is infact the SelectedValue property for a ListControl.
So my mistake in misinterpreting what the text property did.
Not sure it is your case, but I had the same problem and apparently there was no explanation, then I realized doing a copy and paste on notepad of a field of database that at the beginning of the value there was a NULL.
Curious thing was that a select joining tables was working. I deleted the row and reinserted, after was working fine.
I was getting the same error repeatedly and try ending up by not setting the default selected value to Index -1.
I commented my code ddlDRIBidAmt.SelectedValue = -1
This value was set at the time where my Page Controls were reset to default values.
I know its too late to answer, but what I tried is an dirty solution but it worked.
After databinding, I am insert a item at index 0
ddl.Items.Insert(0, new ListItem("---Select---","-1"));
And on setting,
I am placing try catch, In catch i am setting Value to -1
I need to access columns of infragistics ultragrid in same sequence in which they are being displayed in grid. If i can get the index of column in same sequence as they are visible on grid, i can fix my issues.
Thanks in advance.
Lalit
UltraGridColumn column = this.ultraGrid1.DisplayLayout.Bands[0].Columns[0];
Debug.WriteLine( "Columns in visible order: ");
// Get the first visible column by passing in VisibleRelation.First.
column = column.GetRelatedVisibleColumn( VisibleRelation.First );
while ( null != column )
{
Debug.WriteLine( " " + column.Key );
// Get the next visible column by passing in VisibleRelation.Next.
column = column.GetRelatedVisibleColumn( VisibleRelation.Next );
}
http://help.infragistics.com/Help/NetAdvantage/NET/2008.2/CLR2.0/html/Infragistics2.Win.UltraWinGrid.v8.2~Infragistics.Win.UltraWinGrid.UltraGridColumn~GetRelatedVisibleColumn.html
I suppose you could try to handle the event that is fired when the order is changed and keep track of all the changes, but this seems like it is asking for subtle bugs to creep in.
I considered looping through all the columns and trying to use some property that would tell me their current position (maybe the TabOrder?) and use that to compile an inorder list of the columns. I guess you might have to loop through each colum using the Column.GetRelatedVisibleColumn() method.
I have not actually implemented it yet as I have other higher priority issues but that may be the road I end up going down.
This is an old question, but I recently had same issue and solved it this way:
var selectedCells = this.Selected.Cells;
List<int> columns = new List<int>();
foreach (var cell in selectedCells)
{
if (!columns.Contains(cell.Column.Index))
columns.Add(cell.Column.Index);
}
columns.Sort((x, y) => this.DisplayLayout.Rows.Band.Columns[x].Header.VisiblePosition.CompareTo(this.DisplayLayout.Rows.Band.Columns[y].Header.VisiblePosition));
You can then use columns to access columns in order they are shown.