I am trying to keep my line of text from breaking in two using some code that is similar to this.
<h3>
<div class="home_widget">
<div class="home_widget_lc">join us</div>
on sundays</div>
</h3>
Using this code it is breaking between the "us" and "on." I want it all on one line.
The answer is to change the "home_widget_lc" div into a span.
(Of course you can change the display property of the div, but if you don't have a need for a block there, don't use a block element in the first place!)
Fix the markup: h3 is not allowed to have block-level children like div. Use span instead:
<h3>
<span class="home_widget">
<span class="home_widget_lc">join us</span>
on sundays</span>
</h3>
Or, unless you have some reason to wrap the content of h3 in a container, assign the class to the h3 element (this may imply that the CSS code needs to be simplified, too):
<h3 class="home_widget">
<span class="home_widget_lc">join us</span>
on sundays
</h3>
If you cannot change the markup, you need to hope that it will work reasonably despite the invalidity and to add CSS that more or less tries to turn the div elements to span elements, in the styling sense. In practice, it suffices to do that for the inner div:
.home_widget_lc { display: inline; }
Depending on whether the class name home_widget_lc is used elsewhere for other purposes, you may need to write a more specific selector to prevent the rule from having undesired effects on other elements, e.g.
h3 div.home_widget div.home_widget_lc { display: inline; }
Use -
div {display:inline;}
or -
div.home_widget_lc {display:inline;}
Fiddle - http://jsfiddle.net/Sa9W4/
You can also check this for more clarification - http://quirksmode.org/css/css2/display.html
This is because you have used separate div for join us
<div class="home_widget_lc">join us</div>
and div is block element which starts from next line. The alternative of overwriting this feature of block elements you can use display:inline with those elements.
if you don't need special class only for join us you do something like this
<div class="home_widget_lc">join us on sundays</div>
can you alter the HTML?
<h3>
join us on sundays
</h3>
All in one line.
By default <div> tags are set to display: block.
Either change the CSS:
.home_widget, .home_widget_lc {
display: inline;
}
or change the HTML:
<h3>
<span class="home_widget">
<span class="home_widget_lc">join us</span>
on sundays
</span>
</h3>
Related
I have a text that contains some HTML, and then I use the v-html to display the text. Since the text is rather long, I need a Read more that the user can click on. The Read more must be on the same line as the text.
The code becomes like this:
<div v-html="some-variable-containing-html"></div>
<a #click="makeMoreTextVisible()">Read more</a>
Since I want the Read more to start exactly where the HTML text ends, I would normally use display:inline, but here it does not work.
Has anyone come across this problem?
The div is display:block by default, which starts the element on its own line, pushing Read more to the next line.
You could change the div to a span, which is display:inline by default. This assumes that the HTML variable doesn't contain an element that pushes elements to the next line like the original div.
demo 1
If your HTML variable contains display:block elements (such as div or p), you could apply a class to the HTML container that forces its last child element (with :nth-last-child) to display:inline:
<template>
<div>
<div class="container" v-html="myHtml"></div>
<a #click="makeMoreTextVisible()">Read more</a>
</div>
</template>
<style>
.container {
display: inline;
}
.container :nth-last-child(1) {
display: inline;
}
</style>
demo 2
I wrote simple CSS to align text using the w3schools example with:
text-align:center
When I add an underline in the same format, the underline works.
Here's the snippet:
.CenterIt {
text-align:center;
}
.UnderlineIt {
text-decoration:underline;
}
<span class="UnderlineIt">
<span class="CenterIt">Registration Form</span>
</span>
Here's the w3schools page (the align text section):
https://www.w3schools.com/css/css_align.asp
In my full code I have the text I want to center inside another box. I've tried it both inside that box and outside any boxes. It doesn't center.
.CenterIt {
text-align:center;
display:block;
}
.UnderlineIt {
text-decoration:underline;
}
<span class="UnderlineIt">
<span class="CenterIt">Registration Form</span>
</span>
The display property of span by default is inline. i.e.,
display:inline;
Therefore, <span> will take only the width of its content. In contrast, block elements like <div>, by default, take the full line (and thereby the full width of the page) for its content.
To make the text-align work for <span>, you need to change it into a block element.
Set
display: block;
for the span with .CenterIt class. This will make .CenterIt take the full line (and thereby the full width of the page), and then the text-align: center; will centralize the content.
Try this. You need to wrap it with a container unit of <div>
<div class="UnderlineIt">
<div class="CenterIt">Registration Form</div>
</div>
Following will work as well
<span class="UnderlineIt">
<div class="CenterIt">Registration Form</div>
</span>
It might work better if you run “display: flex;” on the container span and “justify-content: center;” on the child span. Flexbox is a little easier to use when placing items within a container.
Because your html, is in wrong format. You cant have a span child of a span.
try like this:
<div class="CenterIt">
<span class="UnderlineIt">Registration Form</span>
</div>
to have the span centered , without a parent div you would need to put the display, as block.
so you could have on your html and css like this:
span{display:block;}
.CenterIt {
text-align:center;
}
.UnderlineIt {
text-decoration:underline;
}
html:
<span class="UnderlineIt CenterIt">Registration Form</span>
Currently I have the following piece of code available which needs to be styled:
<div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item">
<p>summary</p>
<p>body</p>
</div>
I would like to keep the HTML as-is and style the 'p' of both the summary and the body in a different way.
Is that possible? How? Thank you!
Yep it is :
div p:nth-child(1){
color: red;
}
div p:nth-child(2){
color: blue;
}
<div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item">
<p>summary</p>
<p>body</p>
</div>
You need to use :nth-child() cssSelector to apply different styles for each tag. Look at below example.
div p:nth-child(1){
color:red;
}
div p:nth-child(2){
color:green;
}
You can either do that:
<p style="background-color:#000000;"></p>
Or do that:
First, add the "id" tag in your paragraphs tags.
<p id="bodyParagraph"></p>
Second, on the head tags include the:
<style>
#bodyParagraph{
background-color:#000000;
}
</style>
Why wouldn't you want to add specific classes to the summary paragraph and another for the body paragraph? Nothing wrong with that.
<p class="summary"> and <p class="body"> with their respective styling.
If you really want to avoid using a specific class for each, I'd suggest checking out the :first-child and nth-child pseudo-elements, so you style the first paragraph of that particular div one way and any other paragraphs a different way.
Assuming that the body paragraph might be multiple paragraphs, I'd strongly recommend against this approach since it will be hacky, more confusing, and more time consuming than just giving each paragraph its own style.
Sources:
W3Schools - first-child pseudo-element and W3Schools - nth-child pseudo-element
I am kind of new to css and trying to create a layout that presents a list of books. Therefore I want to display a cover image (represented by a fixed width div in the fiddle) at the left side of a two column layout. To the right of the cover I want to present information about the book: The title and an ordered list which has property-value items.
These items should fill the remaining part of the width. The property and its corresponding value should be placed on the same line.
One of the property value items also contains a button, which is just represented by a span here. The button should be placed in the same line right after the property.
I have run into several problems, which I couldn't sort out so far:
The property list is not formatted correctly. I guess that is because I haven't been able to configure the containing list item to extend to the full width. In the end a property value item should be displayed on the same line.
The Title is underlined and I would like to see that underline extend to the full width of the body. Currently it is truncated and I haven't been able to figure out a way to make that happen.
I have created a fiddle, which should show the problems: http://jsfiddle.net/7Xeb7/3/
This is my basic html structure:
<body>
<ul class="book">
<li>
<div class="cover"></div>
</li>
<li class="bookdetail">
<div class="title">Title</div>
<ol class="attributes">
<li>
<span class="property">property <span>btn</span></span>
<span class="value">value</span>
</li>
<li>
<span class="property">property</span>
<span class="value">value</span>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ul>
</body>
Short Answer
Your HTML is somewhat more complicated than necessary and makes unorthodox use of list elements for things that aren't really lists. Simplifying it would make styling the page easier. I have done so in this jsFiddle, where I think your problems have been taken care of by absolutely positioning .cover and adding appropriate padding to .bookdetails: http://jsfiddle.net/7Xeb7/10/. (Edit: new jsfiddle reflects comments)
Long Answer
As much as possible, the HTML tags you use should be semantically-related to the content they represent. So use ul or ol for lists of things, use img for images, and use heading tags (h1, h2, etc.) for headings. There's no need to use tables here (which are generally frowned upon for layout since they violate this semantic logic). Here I've preserved your structure and CSS classes but used more logical tags:
<div class="book">
<img class="cover" src="" alt="Book Title Here" />
<div class="bookdetail">
<h2 class="title">Title</h2>
<ol class="attributes">
<li>
<span class="property">property</span> <!-- this span wasn't closed before! -->
<span class="button">btn</span></span>
<span class="value">value</span>
</li>
<li>
<span class="property">property</span>
<span class="value">value</span>
</li>
</ol>
</div><!-- /.bookdetail -->
</div><!-- /.book -->
Once the HTML has been cleaned up you can more easily make the necessary CSS changes. Your main issue is getting .bookdetail in the right place. It's hard at the moment because you're trying to balance a fixed-width element (.cover) with a variable-width element (.bookdetail) that you want to take up the whole of its container - except for the fixed-width element.
This can be solved fairly easily by absolutely positioning .cover, so it no longer has any effect on the positioning of other elements in .book. Then you can just set the padding of .bookdetail to 0 0 0 140px - which is automatically relative to the most recent parent element with a specified position, which I've made .book. So .bookdetail expands to fill book like you want, but the right padding (or margin, if you prefer) means that it doesn't overlap with the cover image.
I've also made a few other CSS changes, visible in the jsFiddle, to make .title display better and to accommodate my HTML changes, but they're not directly relevant to solving your main issue so I'll leave them there.
I have changed your layout accordingly using div and tables
<div class="leftColumn">
</div>
<div class="rightColumn">
<div class="header">
Title
</div>
<div class="content">
<table width="100%">
<tr><td>Property1<td><td>Value</td>
<tr><td>Property2<td><td>Value</td>
<tr><td>Property3<td><td>Value</td>
<div>
</div>
and css
.leftColumn
{
float:left;
width:30%;
height:250px;
background-color:red;
}
.rightColumn
{
float:right;
width:70%;
height:250px;
background-color:green;
}
.header
{
font-size:25px;
padding:15px;
height:30px;
verticle-align:middle;
border-bottom:1px solid #ccc;
}
have a look here
you are missing width attribute for dimensions but not sure if this is how you want to see it:
http://jsfiddle.net/Riskbreaker/7Xeb7/4/
I added width: 100% on you bookdetail class
.bookdetail {
vertical-align:top;
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
}
I want to select spans that are not the descendants of a specific class, let's call it "no". Here's my CSS:
div:not(.no) span{background-color:#00f;}
Here's the HTML
<div>
<span>yes 1</span>
</div>
<div class="no">
<span>no 1</span>
</div>
<div class="no">
<div>
<span>no 2</span>
</div>
</div>
Two questions:
Why does my CSS apply to both yes 1 and no 2?
Why does the whole thing break if I switch to a universal selector?
*:not(.no) span{background-color:#00f;}
Here's the code in JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/stephaniehobson/JtNZm/
Both of the span elements' parent div elements don't have the class no, regardless of whether any other ancestors do have it or not:
<div> <!-- This is div:not(.no), pretty much a given -->
<span>yes 1</span>
</div>
<div class="no"> <!-- In this case, although this is div.no... -->
<div> <!-- ... this is div:not(.no)! -->
<span>no 2</span>
</div>
</div>
Both html and body, which are ancestors of your div and span elements, satisfy *:not(.no) when using a universal selector (or rather, when omitting a type selector). This causes all of your span elements to have the background color.
One solution to this is to anchor your negation filter to the body element using the child combinator, if your top-level div elements will always be children of body:
body > div:not(.no) span { background-color: #00f; }
jsFiddle demo
Another solution is to simply use override styles.
BoltClock is correct. It might make more sense if you phrase the selector like this:
Select any span element
that is descended from a div element
whose class value does not contain the word no.
Each of the selected spans in your example is in fact descended from a div whose class value does not contain the word no—the fact that the second of them is also descended from a div whose class value does contain the word no doesn’t negate (ha!) the previous statement.
What’s interesting is I would wager that if you moved the second no down a level, the second span would still be matched. CSS doesn’t have a notion of element proximity, so any ancestor div should suffice to match the selector, regardless of whether it’s “closer” to the span or not.
I think the best choice is to split your statement into 2:
div span { background-color:#00f; }
.no span { background-color:#fff; }
You can see the effect here: http://jsfiddle.net/JHTqp/