I would like to know how to achieve that in CSS3
I would like to know how to make the div bigger on one side and smaller on the other side
But at the same time the content is NOT skewed of affected
i tried prespective:300;
it gives the effect needed partially but the content is still affected and a negative value doesn't fix it.
Any solutions?
Hmmm I think you can use a inner div. First, skew the parent div. Second, unskew the inner div. If you skew the parent with 50deg, then unskew the child with -50deg. I hope this helps. Good luck!!!
Related
I have been searching for an answer to this for some time.
i want to add space to the bottom of my web page, as content sits too close to edge.
I have tied 'padding-bottom' in wrapper tag, in body tag and in style tag.. not working.
any help on this appreciated..
thanks,
Keith.
http://www.reddogonline.eu/av.html
you have a serious design problem.
all your elements are relatively position with top offset, that cause the wrapper and body to be actually smaller then you think. because this offset is not taken in consideration when determining the wrapper height. (so the height of the wrapper is only the sum of his children height, without the offset between them)
when you add padding-bottom to the wrapper or the body, it works (of course), but you don't see it. because your elements overlaps the wrapper..
you will be able to see that I'm right by setting overflow:hidden; to the wrapper (or inspecting your site with a tool). suddenly, half of your content disappears..
you need to remove the position:relative; from your elements, and use margin-top instead of top to make the desired space between the elements.
That way: the wrapper and body height will be set right, and the padding will work as you expect it.
You're positioning relatively all your elements. That's causing the padding/margin problems too. Why would you position your elements like this?
Try removing relative positioning and add top/bottom margins to your elements. The results will be the same in terms of visual effect.
It will also be much simpler adding new sound boxes, as you don't have to calculate a top positioning for each one.
I'm sort of new at Web Design, I'm getting there, though. But I'm still having trouble with elastic layouts and floats. I think that's where my problem with this page lies but I'm too inexperienced to understand it.
Here's my problems illustrated:
https://img.skitch.com/20120327-nwrm3t1u8cwppnwnegw8f2q7st.jpg
Here's a fiddle with my code:
http://jsfiddle.net/C3Dw2/1/
This is what it SHOULD look like:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v410/justice4all_quiet/register_13.jpg
I also want to have the right scrolling section fit in it's parent div. Right now, it's flowing out of it.
Ugh.
Any help would be awesome.
EDIT
The only issue remaining now is the icons not staying in their parent divs.
http://jsfiddle.net/xehMG/2/
See the fiddle for code and demo:
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/C3Dw2/4
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/C3Dw2/4/embedded/result/
see screen shot for output:
Set min-height on each of the elements that u've given height and width in percentage.Percentage will be effective only when the resolution is big enf to encompass ur children elements.
If you want to use percentages - note the min-width required for their children and set that min-width for its parent.Also use overflow:hidden|scroll|auto as a fall back to control the overflow of the children out of its parent.
I have a topbar with position:fixed which also contains anchor links (jdjd).
The problem is that the target is placed in the top of the viewport (behind the fixed topbar).
how can I fix so the the browser scrolls so that the target is shown just below the topbar?
As far as i know there is no clean soloution. If you use inline scrollbar it can be achieved, but it needs a fixed height then.
2 soloutions found using CSS: http://css-tricks.com/hash-tag-links-padding/
Else you could pretty easy use JQUERY to measure the users height, put it into a container div, and have scrolling on that.
See: http://jsfiddle.net/jpGdu/
Another soloution could be giving the element ur linking to a padding top (if it's h1 or whatever) :)
Not sure why you're being downvoted, it seems like an honest a good question.
I'd put a margin-top on the viewport, equal to the height of the fixed topbar.
http://jsfiddle.net/justiceerolin/KfMLJ/ as an example
I have two <div>s inside a parent <div>. Both the inner ones are styled with no padding, border or margin and as width:50%; display:inline-block;. The outer <div> also has no padding, etc. Firebug shows the outer <div> to be of 1240px width, and each inner one to be 620px. So why do they appear one below the other and not side-by-side? If i lower their width to 618px, it works. Huh?
display:inline-block is inconvenient in the way that it takes in consideration mark-up whitespace when drawing the elements, AFAIK. Try setting font-size:0 to the parent element if it doesn't have any other text, and set the desired font-size for the child elements.
P.S., first try eliminating white-space in the mark-up between the elements, to see if that corrects the issue.
It sounds like a fairly simple solution, if you have two blocks, A and B and they are the exact same size and you are looking at them straight on and they are lined up perfectly you will only see one block.
You're trying to make something display that doesn't fit inside of the container. You've already solved your problem size the container up or the contents down mildly to fit them together.
i have a container div which is position:relative and the squares are position:absolute because i want to play with their positions.
Like what you see, the container does not fit the content except if the squares are positioned in Relative, is there a solution for this?
I don't want to just set the height for container because the squares are not static so i want something that resizes automatically.
Thanks
Unfortunately it is not possible to contain absolute positioned elements..
They are taken completely out of the normal flow, so nothing knows how to wrap around them..
I need a bit more clarity in your question and depiction but I think I catch what you are saying.
I am guessing what is in the image above is what is currently happening but you want the gray, relatively positioned container to "surround" the abolutely positioned containers, wherever they may be?
If so, I would add just one more DIV after all your absolutely positioned containers that has clear:both attributed to it. That's my personal little tip for making sure the parent container hugs all of its kids, no matter where they go running off to.
Hope that helps
If you know the height of the absolutely positioned elements, however, you can set the 'containing' div to a min-height of their top offset plus that known height. Again, it won't contain it in the proper sense, but it will be at least that tall.