I'm trying to extract all (only) the duplicate values from a pipe delimited file.
My data file has 800 thousands rows with multiple columns and I'm particularly interested about column 3. So I need to get the duplicate values of column 3 and extract all the duplicate rows from that file.
I'm, however able to achieve this as shown below..
cat Report.txt | awk -F'|' '{print $3}' | sort | uniq -d >dup.txt
and I take the above in loop as shown below..
while read dup
do
grep "$dup" Report.txt >>only_dup.txt
done <dup.txt
I've also tried the awk method
while read dup
do
awk -v a=$dup '$3 == a { print $0 }' Report.txt>>only_dup.txt
done <dup.txt
But, as I have large number of records in the file, it's taking ages to complete. So I'm looking for an easy and quick alternative.
For example, I have data like this:
1|learning|Unix|Business|Requirements
2|learning|Unix|Business|Team
3|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
4|learning|Unix|Business|Team
5|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
6|learning|Unix|Business|Team
7|learning|Windows|Business|Requirements
8|learning|Mac|Business|Requirements
And my expected output which doesn't include unique records:
1|learning|Unix|Business|Requirements
2|learning|Unix|Business|Team
4|learning|Unix|Business|Team
6|learning|Unix|Business|Team
3|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
5|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
This may be what you want:
$ awk -F'|' 'NR==FNR{cnt[$3]++; next} cnt[$3]>1' file file
1|learning|Unix|Business|Requirements
2|learning|Unix|Business|Team
3|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
4|learning|Unix|Business|Team
5|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
6|learning|Unix|Business|Team
or if the file's too large for all the keys ($3 values) to fit in memory (which shouldn't be a problem with just the unique $3 values from 800,000 lines):
$ cat tst.awk
BEGIN { FS="|" }
{ currKey = $3 }
currKey == prevKey {
if ( !prevPrinted++ ) {
print prevRec
}
print
next
}
{
prevKey = currKey
prevRec = $0
prevPrinted = 0
}
$ sort -t'|' -k3,3 file | awk -f tst.awk
3|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
5|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
1|learning|Unix|Business|Requirements
2|learning|Unix|Business|Team
4|learning|Unix|Business|Team
6|learning|Unix|Business|Team
EDIT2: As per Ed sir's suggestion fine tuned my suggestion with more meaningful names(IMO) of arrays.
awk '
match($0,/[^\|]*\|/){
val=substr($0,RSTART+RLENGTH)
if(!unique_check_count[val]++){
numbered_indexed_array[++count]=val
}
actual_valued_array[val]=(actual_valued_array[val]?actual_valued_array[val] ORS:"")$0
line_count_array[val]++
}
END{
for(i=1;i<=count;i++){
if(line_count_array[numbered_indexed_array[i]]>1){
print actual_valued_array[numbered_indexed_array[i]]
}
}
}
' Input_file
Edit by Ed Morton: FWIW here's how I'd have named the variables in the above code:
awk '
match($0,/[^\|]*\|/) {
key = substr($0,RSTART+RLENGTH)
if ( !numRecs[key]++ ) {
keys[++numKeys] = key
}
key2recs[key] = (key in key2recs ? key2recs[key] ORS : "") $0
}
END {
for ( keyNr=1; keyNr<=numKeys; keyNr++ ) {
key = keys[keyNr]
if ( numRecs[key]>1 ) {
print key2recs[key]
}
}
}
' Input_file
EDIT: Since OP changed Input_file with |delimited so changing code a bit to as follows, which deals with new Input_file(Thanks to Ed Morton sir for pointing it out).
awk '
match($0,/[^\|]*\|/){
val=substr($0,RSTART+RLENGTH)
if(!a[val]++){
b[++count]=val
}
c[val]=(c[val]?c[val] ORS:"")$0
d[val]++
}
END{
for(i=1;i<=count;i++){
if(d[b[i]]>1){
print c[b[i]]
}
}
}
' Input_file
Could you please try following, following will give output in same sequence of in which lines are occurring in Input_file.
awk '
match($0,/[^ ]* /){
val=substr($0,RSTART+RLENGTH)
if(!a[val]++){
b[++count]=val
}
c[val]=(c[val]?c[val] ORS:"")$0
d[val]++
}
END{
for(i=1;i<=count;i++){
if(d[b[i]]>1){
print c[b[i]]
}
}
}
' Input_file
Output will be as follows.
2 learning Unix Business Team
4 learning Unix Business Team
6 learning Unix Business Team
3 learning Linux Business Requirements
5 learning Linux Business Requirements
Explanation for above code:
awk ' ##Starting awk program here.
match($0,/[^ ]* /){ ##Using match function of awk which matches regex till first space is coming.
val=substr($0,RSTART+RLENGTH) ##Creating variable val whose value is sub-string is from starting point of RSTART+RLENGTH value to till end of line.
if(!a[val]++){ ##Checking condition if value of array a with index val is NULL then go further and increase its index too.
b[++count]=val ##Creating array b whose index is increment value of variable count and value is val variable.
} ##Closing BLOCK for if condition of array a here.
c[val]=(c[val]?c[val] ORS:"")$0 ##Creating array named c whose index is variable val and value is $0 along with keep concatenating its own value each time it comes here.
d[val]++ ##Creating array named d whose index is variable val and its value is keep increasing with 1 each time cursor comes here.
} ##Closing BLOCK for match here.
END{ ##Starting END BLOCK section for this awk program here.
for(i=1;i<=count;i++){ ##Starting for loop from i=1 to till value of count here.
if(d[b[i]]>1){ ##Checking if value of array d with index b[i] is greater than 1 then go inside block.
print c[b[i]] ##Printing value of array c whose index is b[i].
}
}
}
' Input_file ##Mentioning Input_file name here.
Another in awk:
$ awk -F\| '{ # set delimiter
n=$1 # store number
sub(/^[^|]*/,"",$0) # remove number from string
if($0 in a) { # if $0 in a
if(a[$0]==1) # if $0 seen the second time
print b[$0] $0 # print first instance
print n $0 # also print current
}
a[$0]++ # increase match count for $0
b[$0]=n # number stored to b and only needed once
}' file
Output for the sample data:
2|learning|Unix|Business|Team
4|learning|Unix|Business|Team
3|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
5|learning|Linux|Business|Requirements
6|learning|Unix|Business|Team
Also, would this work:
$ sort -k 2 file | uniq -D -f 1
or -k2,5 or smth. Nope, as the delimiter changed from space to pipe.
Two steps of improvement.
First step:
After
awk -F'|' '{print $3}' Report.txt | sort | uniq -d >dup.txt
# or
cut -d "|" -f3 < Report.txt | sort | uniq -d >dup.txt
you can use
grep -f <(sed 's/.*/^.*|.*|&|.*|/' dup.txt) Report.txt
# or without process substitution
sed 's/.*/^.*|.*|&|.*|/' dup.txt > dup.sed
grep -f dup.sed Report.txt
Second step:
Use awk as given in other, better, answers.
At the moment I have my R function generate an awk script to load, selectively, a subset of a csv into fread.
The resulting awk string looks something like this:
tail -n +2 ../data/faults_main_only_dp_1_shopFlag.csv | parallel -k -q --block 500M --pipe awk -F , ' $5 > \"2013-01-01\" && $5 < \"2015-11-17\" && $2 ~ /^F59PHI$|^GP20ECO$|^GT42CU-ACE$/ && $20 ~ /^Disregard$|^EMD Work Item$|^Pending$|^Pre-Work Item$|^Road Failure$|^Unit Shopped$|^Watch$|^Work Item$|^NA$/ {print $2 \",\" $88 \",\" $17 \",\" $5 \",\" $9 \",\" $22 \",\" $3 \",\" $15 \",\" $14 } '
The thing is: as of recent, my csv is ordered by dates ($5), in descending order, so if the user enters a specific lower-bound date, and awk gets to that line, it make sense for it to stop. (I am not sure how that would work the parallelization I am doing above. Maybe there is a way to select only the part of the csv that is “above” the lower-bound of the date and then pass the resulting csv into the awk script.) Is there a way to do that?
Generate an awk program such as this which explitly exits on a condition (here if field 3 exceeds 4):
$2 > 3 & $2 < 10
$3 > 4 { exit}
Put the above in a file called myprog.awk, say, and assuming default separators run it with this (your awk may be called something else):
gawk -f myprog.awk mydata.dat
or put it on the command line but you will have to be careful regarding quoting depending on the shell you use:
$2 > 3 & $2 < 10; $3 > 4 { exit}
I'm just trying to do some basic calculations on a CSV file.
Data:
31590,Foo,70
28327,Bar,291
25155,Baz,583
24179,Food,694
28670,Spaz,67
22190,bawk,4431
29584,alfred,142
27698,brian,379
24372,peter,22
25064,weinberger,8
Here's my simple awk script:
#!/usr/local/bin/gawk -f
BEGIN { FPAT="([^,]*)|(\"[^\"]+\")"; OFS=","; OFMT="%.2f"; }
NR > 1
END { if ($3>1336) $4=$3*0.03; if ($3<1336) $4=$3*0.05;}1**
Wrong output:
31590,Foo,70
28327,Bar,291
28327,Bar,291
25155,Baz,583
25155,Baz,583
24179,Food,694
24179,Food,694
28670,Spaz,67
28670,Spaz,67
22190,bawk,4431
22190,bawk,4431
29584,alfred,142
29584,alfred,142
27698,brian,379
27698,brian,379
24372,peter,22
24372,peter,22
25064,weinberger,8
25064,weinberger,8
Excepted output:
31590,Foo,70,3.5
28327,Bar,291,14.55
25155,Baz,583,29.15
24179,Food,694,34.7
28670,Spaz,67,3.35
22190,bawk,4431,132.93
29584,alfred,142,7.1
27698,brian,379,18.95
24372,peter,22,1.1
25064,weinberger,8,.04
Simple math is if
field $3 > 1336 = $3*.03 and results in field $4
field $3 < 1336 = $3*.05 and results in field $4
There's no need to force awk to recompile every record (by assigning to $4), just print the current record followed by the result of your calculation:
awk 'BEGIN{FS=OFS=","; OFMT="%.2f"} {print $0, $3*($3>1336?0.03:0.05)}' file
You shouldn't have anything in the END block
BEGIN {
FS = OFS = ","
OFMT="%.2f"
}
{
if ($3 > 1336)
$4 = $3 * 0.03
else
$4 = $3 * 0.05
print
}
This results in
31590,Foo,70,3.5
28327,Bar,291,14.55
25155,Baz,583,29.15
24179,Food,694,34.7
28670,Spaz,67,3.35
22190,bawk,4431,132.93
29584,alfred,142,7.1
27698,brian,379,18.95
24372,peter,22,1.1
25064,weinberger,8,0.4
$ awk -F, -v OFS=, '{if ($3>1336) $4=$3*0.03; else $4=$3*0.05;} 1' data
31590,Foo,70,3.5
28327,Bar,291,14.55
25155,Baz,583,29.15
24179,Food,694,34.7
28670,Spaz,67,3.35
22190,bawk,4431,132.93
29584,alfred,142,7.1
27698,brian,379,18.95
24372,peter,22,1.1
25064,weinberger,8,0.4
Discussion
The END block is not executed at the end of each line but at the end of the whole file. Consequently, it is not helpful here.
The original code has two free standing conditions, NR>1 and 1. The default action for each is to print the line. That is why, in the "wrong output," all lines after the first were doubled in the output.
With awk:
awk -F, -v OFS=, '$3>1336?$4=$3*.03:$4=$3*.05' file
The conditional-expression ? action1 : action2 ; is the much shorter terinary operator in awk.
I am trying a small variation of this, except I telling awk that the delimiter of the file to be split based on the 5th field can either be a colon ":" or a tab \t. I do the awk -F '[:\t]' part alone, it does indeed print the right $5 field.
However, when I try to incorporate this into the bigger command, it returns the following error:
print > f
awk: cmd. line:9: ^ syntax error
This is the code:
awk -F '[:\t]' ' # read the list of numbers in Tile_Number_List
FNR == NR {
num[$1]
next
}
# process each line of the .BAM file
# any lines with an "unknown" $5 will be ignored
$5 in num {
f = "Alignments_" $5 ".sam" print > f
} ' Tile_Number_List.txt little.sam
Why won't it work with the -F option?
The problem isn't with the value of FS it's this line as pointed to by the error:
f = "Alignments_" $5 ".sam" print > f
You have two statements on one line so either separate them with a ; or a newline:
f = "Alignments_" $5 ".sam"; print > f
Or:
f = "Alignments_" $5 ".sam"
print > f
As full one liner:
awk -F '[:\t]' 'FNR==NR{n[$1];next}$5 in n{print > ("Alignments_"$5".sam")}'
Or as a script file i.e script.awk:
BEGIN {
FS="[:\t]"
}
# read the list of numbers in Tile_Number_List
FNR == NR {
num[$1]
next
}
# process each line of the .BAM file
# any lines with an "unknown" $5 will be ignored
$5 in num {
f = "Alignments_" $5 ".sam"
print > f
}
To run in this form awk -f script.awk Tile_Number_List.txt little.sam.
Edit:
The character - is used to represent input from stdin instead of a file with many *nix tools.
command | awk -f script.awk Tile_Number_List.txt -
I am working on a UNIX box, and trying to run an application, which gives some debug logs to the standard output. I have redirected this output to a log file, but now wish to get the lines where the error is being shown.
My problem here is that a simple
cat output.log | grep FAIL
does not help out. As this shows only the lines which have FAIL in them. I want some more information along with this. Like the 2-3 lines above this line with FAIL. Is there any way to do this via a simple shell command? I would like to have a single command line (can have pipes) to do the above.
grep -C 3 FAIL output.log
Note that this also gets rid of the useless use of cat (UUOC).
grep -A $NUM
This will print $NUM lines of trailing context after matches.
-B $NUM prints leading context.
man grep is your best friend.
So in your case:
cat log | grep -A 3 -B 3 FAIL
I have two implementations of what I call sgrep, one in Perl, one using just pre-Perl (pre-GNU) standard Unix commands. If you've got GNU grep, you've no particular need of these. It would be more complex to deal with forwards and backwards context searches, but that might be a useful exercise.
Perl solution:
#!/usr/perl/v5.8.8/bin/perl -w
#
# #(#)$Id: sgrep.pl,v 1.6 2007/09/18 22:55:20 jleffler Exp $
#
# Perl-based SGREP (special grep) command
#
# Print lines around the line that matches (by default, 3 before and 3 after).
# By default, include file names if more than one file to search.
#
# Options:
# -b n1 Print n1 lines before match
# -f n2 Print n2 lines following match
# -n Print line numbers
# -h Do not print file names
# -H Do print file names
use strict;
use constant debug => 0;
use Getopt::Std;
my(%opts);
sub usage
{
print STDERR "Usage: $0 [-hnH] [-b n1] [-f n2] pattern [file ...]\n";
exit 1;
}
usage unless getopts('hnf:b:H', \%opts);
usage unless #ARGV >= 1;
if ($opts{h} && $opts{H})
{
print STDERR "$0: mutually exclusive options -h and -H specified\n";
exit 1;
}
my $op = shift;
print "# regex = $op\n" if debug;
# print file names if -h omitted and more than one argument
$opts{F} = (defined $opts{H} || (!defined $opts{h} and scalar #ARGV > 1)) ? 1 : 0;
$opts{n} = 0 unless defined $opts{n};
my $before = (defined $opts{b}) ? $opts{b} + 0 : 3;
my $after = (defined $opts{f}) ? $opts{f} + 0 : 3;
print "# before = $before; after = $after\n" if debug;
my #lines = (); # Accumulated lines
my $tail = 0; # Line number of last line in list
my $tbp_1 = 0; # First line to be printed
my $tbp_2 = 0; # Last line to be printed
# Print lines from #lines in the range $tbp_1 .. $tbp_2,
# leaving $leave lines in the array for future use.
sub print_leaving
{
my ($leave) = #_;
while (scalar(#lines) > $leave)
{
my $line = shift #lines;
my $curr = $tail - scalar(#lines);
if ($tbp_1 <= $curr && $curr <= $tbp_2)
{
print "$ARGV:" if $opts{F};
print "$curr:" if $opts{n};
print $line;
}
}
}
# General logic:
# Accumulate each line at end of #lines.
# ** If current line matches, record range that needs printing
# ** When the line array contains enough lines, pop line off front and,
# if it needs printing, print it.
# At end of file, empty line array, printing requisite accumulated lines.
while (<>)
{
# Add this line to the accumulated lines
push #lines, $_;
$tail = $.;
printf "# array: N = %d, last = $tail: %s", scalar(#lines), $_ if debug > 1;
if (m/$op/o)
{
# This line matches - set range to be printed
my $lo = $. - $before;
$tbp_1 = $lo if ($lo > $tbp_2);
$tbp_2 = $. + $after;
print "# $. MATCH: print range $tbp_1 .. $tbp_2\n" if debug;
}
# Print out any accumulated lines that need printing
# Leave $before lines in array.
print_leaving($before);
}
continue
{
if (eof)
{
# Print out any accumulated lines that need printing
print_leaving(0);
# Reset for next file
close ARGV;
$tbp_1 = 0;
$tbp_2 = 0;
$tail = 0;
#lines = ();
}
}
Pre-Perl Unix solution (using plain ed, sed, and sort - though it uses getopt which was not necessarily available back then):
#!/bin/ksh
#
# #(#)$Id: old.sgrep.sh,v 1.5 2007/09/15 22:15:43 jleffler Exp $
#
# Special grep
# Finds a pattern and prints lines either side of the pattern
# Line numbers are always produced by ed (substitute for grep),
# which allows us to eliminate duplicate lines cleanly. If the
# user did not ask for numbers, these are then stripped out.
#
# BUG: if the pattern occurs in in the first line or two and
# the number of lines to go back is larger than the line number,
# it fails dismally.
set -- `getopt "f:b:hn" "$#"`
case $# in
0) echo "Usage: $0 [-hn] [-f x] [-b y] pattern [files]" >&2
exit 1;;
esac
# Tab required - at least with sed (perl would be different)
# But then the whole problem would be different if implemented in Perl.
number="'s/^\\([0-9][0-9]*\\) /\\1:/'"
filename="'s%^%%'" # No-op for sed
f=3
b=3
nflag=no
hflag=no
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-f) f=$2; shift 2;;
-b) b=$2; shift 2;;
-n) nflag=yes; shift;;
-h) hflag=yes; shift;;
--) shift; break;;
*) echo "Unknown option $1" >&2
exit 1;;
esac
done
pattern="${1:?'No pattern'}"
shift
case $# in
0) tmp=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/`basename $0`.$$
trap "rm -f $tmp ; exit 1" 0
cat - >$tmp
set -- $tmp
sort="sort -t: -u +0n -1"
;;
*) filename="'s%^%'\$file:%"
sort="sort -t: -u +1n -2"
;;
esac
case $nflag in
yes) num_remove='s/[0-9][0-9]*://';;
no) num_remove='s/^//';;
esac
case $hflag in
yes) fileremove='s%^$file:%%';;
no) fileremove='s/^//';;
esac
for file in $*
do
echo "g/$pattern/.-${b},.+${f}n" |
ed - $file |
eval sed -e "$number" -e "$filename" |
$sort |
eval sed -e "$fileremove" -e "$num_remove"
done
rm -f $tmp
trap 0
exit 0
The shell version of sgrep was written in February 1989, and bug fixed in May 1989. It then remained unchanged except for an administrative change (SCCS to RCS transition) in 1997 until 2007, when I added the -h option. I switched to the Perl version in 2007.
http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/The_Complicator_0x27_s_Gloves.aspx
You can use sed to print specific lines, lets say you want line 20
sed '20 p' -n FILE_YOU_WANT_THE_LINE_FROM
Done.
-n prevents echoing lines from the file. The part in quotes is a sed rule to apply, it specifies that you want the rule to apply to line 20, and you want to print.
With GNU grep on Windows:
$ grep --context 3 FAIL output.log
$ grep --help | grep context
-B, --before-context=NUM print NUM lines of leading context
-A, --after-context=NUM print NUM lines of trailing context
-C, --context=NUM print NUM lines of output context
-NUM same as --context=NUM