In the beginning, I create a new FPSAnimator(drawable,FPS,true);
Is it possible to speed up or slow down (i.e, change the FPS of animating) the animating speed after FPSAnimator started?
FPSAnimator has a method named .setFPS() . It works after the animator has already been started. Here is the link for you.
EDIT:
When Animator starts it is not possible to change FPS again and some methods such as this is not working or my level of coding is not enough to use it.
So here I will give you a small Java example about how to change FPS after you first start the Animator.
Lets assume we have a simple snake game with OpenGL (libjogl) and your main method is;
public static void main(String[] args) {
GLCanvas canvas = new GLCanvas();
Frame frame = new Frame("Snake");
frame.setSize(500, 500);
frame.add(canvas);
frame.setVisible(true);
frame.addWindowListener(new WindowAdapter() {
public void windowClosing(WindowEvent e){
System.exit(0);
}
});
Animator animator = new FPSAnimator(canvas, fps);
SnakeGameScene scene = new SnakeGameScene(animator);
canvas.requestFocus();
canvas.addGLEventListener(scene);
canvas.addKeyListener(scene);
animator.start();
}
Here you have your frame, Canvas WindowListener, Animator, the thing OpenGL animate, in this case it is SnakeGameScene... If we change the main and the class where main method is, to make animator fps changable by some trigger. The code I will show will change it with key presses. Therefore, it is in SnakeGameScene's keyPressed #Overrides.
#Override
public void keyPressed(KeyEvent k) {
int keyCode = k. getKeyCode();
try{
if(this.lockKeyAfterPressed){
switch(keyCode){
case KeyEvent.VK_UP:
this.snake.setDirection(Direction.UP);
lockKeyAfterPressed =false;
break;
case KeyEvent.VK_DOWN:
this.snake.setDirection(Direction.DOWN);
lockKeyAfterPressed =false;
break;
case KeyEvent.VK_LEFT:
this.snake.setDirection(Direction.LEFT);
lockKeyAfterPressed =false;
break;
case KeyEvent.VK_RIGHT:
this.snake.setDirection(Direction.RIGHT);
lockKeyAfterPressed =false;
break;
case KeyEvent.VK_Z: // n1
Application.increaseFPS();
break;
case KeyEvent.VK_X://n2
Application.decreaseFPS();
break;
}
}
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
In this part, relevant cases are the last two cases, n1 and n2. When respective key is pressed it either increase or decrease. But as I said above we need to stop the animator first. So we change the main class as followes;
public class Application {
private static int fps = 1;
private static Animator animator;
private static GLCanvas canvas;
public static void setAnimator(Animator animator){Application.animator = animator;}
public static int getFps() {return fps;}
public static void setFps(int fps) {Application.fps = fps;}
public static void increaseFPS(){
animator.stop();
setFps((getFps()+1));
Application.updateAnimator();
}
public static void decreaseFPS(){
animator.stop();
setFps((getFps()-1));
if(getFps() <1){setFps(1);}
Application.updateAnimator();
}
private static void updateAnimator(){
Application.setAnimator(new FPSAnimator(canvas, fps));
animator.start();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
canvas = new GLCanvas();
Frame frame = new Frame("Snake");
frame.setSize(500, 500);frame.add(canvas);
frame.setVisible(true);
frame.addWindowListener(new WindowAdapter() {
public void windowClosing(WindowEvent e){
System.exit(0);
}
});
animator = new FPSAnimator(canvas, fps);
SnakeGameScene scene = new SnakeGameScene(animator);
canvas.requestFocus();
canvas.addGLEventListener(scene);
canvas.addKeyListener(scene);
animator.start();
}
}
Here, you do not create Canvas, animator and Fps in main method, they must be in the Class. When the respective key is pressed the system will stop the animator,then create a new animator with an updated fps and sets it as animator, the start the animator instance again.
Sorry if I overkill, add irrelevant codes, make description and syntax mistake.
Hope it helps you.
Related
So I'm trying to play indefinitly a song on a background thread, but when the music ends it does not loop as it was supose to.
Tried the offered solution but yet no joy! Here is the code for the main class, hope this helps in the resolution of the issue.
Even tried to loop the thread, but no joy...
Not sure why it's ending after playing the full file once, but not sure how to solve it!
Here is the code I have. Any help is welcome
public class Main extends Application {
Media sugar = new Media(this.getClass().getResource("sounds/t1coSugar.wav").toExternalForm());
/**
* #param args the command line arguments
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
Application.launch(Main.class, args);
}
#Override
public void start(Stage primaryStage)
{
primaryStage.setTitle("pacman");
primaryStage.setWidth(MazeData.calcGridX(MazeData.GRID_SIZE_X + 2)); //stage size x
primaryStage.setHeight(MazeData.calcGridY(MazeData.GRID_SIZE_Y + 5)); //stage size y
//splash screen
//end of splash screen
final Group root = new Group();
final Scene scene = new Scene(root);
root.getChildren().add(new Maze());
primaryStage.setScene(scene);
primaryStage.show();
int playbackgroundmusic = playbackgroundmusic();
}
private int playbackgroundmusic()
{
Runnable task = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
playSugar(); //method of the music
}
};
// Run the task in a background thread
Thread backgroundThread = new Thread(task);
// Terminate the running thread if the application exits
backgroundThread.setDaemon(true);
// Start the thread
backgroundThread.start();
return 0;
}
public void playSugar()
{
MediaPlayer mediaplayer = new MediaPlayer(sugar);
mediaplayer.volumeProperty().setValue(0.4);
mediaplayer.setStartTime(Duration.seconds(0));
mediaplayer.setStopTime(Duration.seconds(67));
mediaplayer.setAutoPlay(true);
mediaplayer.setCycleCount(MediaPlayer.INDEFINITE);
mediaplayer.play();
}
I have a small javafx application using scene builder which on a button click should read a string from COM port at regular intervals and update in a text field.
But now it only shows the last string if I use a for loop, and nothing if i put the code in infinite loop (That's my temporary requirement).
Can anyone help me so that at each read from COM port the new string is updated in the text field.
Here is the code I used for both the cases :
Note : In both cases in controller class, I'm getting perfect output on console.
public class Main extends Application
{
#Override
public void start(Stage primaryStage)
{
try
{
Parent root = FXMLLoader.load(getClass().getResource("test.fxml"));
Scene scene = new Scene(root);
//scene.getStylesheets().add(getClass().getResource("application.css").toExternalForm());
primaryStage.setTitle("test");
primaryStage.setScene(scene);
primaryStage.show();
}
catch(Exception e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
launch(args);
}
}
Here is the Controller class :
// In this case it shows only the last string in the text field.
public class Controller implements Initializable
{
#FXML
private Button sayHelloButton;
#FXML
private TextField helloField;
#Override
public void initialize(URL arg0, ResourceBundle arg1)
{
}
#FXML
public void printHello(ActionEvent event)
{
if(event.getSource() == sayHelloButton)
{
SerialPort serialPort = new SerialPort("COM22");
for(int i=0;i<5;i++)
{
try
{
if(!serialPort.isOpened())
{
serialPort.openPort();
serialPort.setParams(9600, 8, 1, 0);
}
String str = serialPort.readString(10,3000);
System.out.println(str);
helloField.clear();
helloField.setText(str);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
helloField.setText(e.toString());
}
}
}
}
}
Here is the method with infinite loop :
//this shows nothing in the text field
#FXML
public void printHello(ActionEvent event)
{
if(event.getSource() == sayHelloButton)
{
SerialPort serialPort = new SerialPort("COM22");
while(true)
{
try
{
if(!serialPort.isOpened())
{
serialPort.openPort();
serialPort.setParams(9600, 8, 1, 0);
}
String str = serialPort.readString(10,3000);
System.out.println(str);
helloField.clear();
helloField.setText(str);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
helloField.setText(e.toString());
}
}
}
}
There are a couple things happening here. In your first example, you state that the console output is correct but the TextField only shows the last result.
This is expected if the loop executes quickly. The TextField is being updated, but it happens so quickly that you can't see it until the loop ends and the last result is still being displayed. Even if you have a delay built into the loop, this could still block the UI from being updated until the loop is completed.
With your infinite loop, the issue is that the loop is being run on the JavaFX Application Thread (JFXAT). This blocks any updates to the GUI until the loop is finished, which is never is.
You will need to move the infinite loop to a new background thread. From there, you can update the GUI using the Platform.runLater() method.
SerialPort serialPort = new SerialPort("COM22");
new Thread(() -> {
while(true)
{
try
{
if(!serialPort.isOpened())
{
serialPort.openPort();
serialPort.setParams(9600, 8, 1, 0);
}
String str = serialPort.readString(10,3000);
System.out.println(str);
// Update the UI on the JavaFX Application Thread
Platform.runLater(() -> {
helloField.clear();
helloField.setText(str);
});
}
catch(Exception e)
{
Platform.runLater(() -> helloField.setText(e.toString()));
}
}
}).start();
This allows your UI to continually update as the background thread sends it new information.
I've used Scenebuilder to place few shapes in my GUI (simplified version of my project). I would like the shapes to change colours but wait 2 seconds between changing colours. I want these changes to happen in my controller class after a button is pressed.
Circle1.setFill(YELLOW)
Wait(2 seconds)
Circle2.setFill(BLUE)
I'm not sure how to do that. I have read online about threading, but I don't really understand how to implement that from my Main and into my Controller class. Also, I could not really find any examples online. My Main class looks like:
public class Main extends Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
launch(args);
}
#Override
public void start(Stage primaryStage) throws Exception {
BorderPane root = (BorderPane)FXMLLoader.load(getClass().getResource("File.fxml"));
Scene scene = new Scene(root);
scene.getStylesheets().add(getClass().getResource("application.css").toExternalForm());
primaryStage.setScene(scene);
primaryStage.show();
}
}
Please help. Also, if you could provide an example would be helpful for me to understand as I could not really find one online that gives an example of this.
Answering this question is easiest through an example I believe. So I've created a small Traffic Light application, since it allows me to use Circle and a timed sequence similar to your problem, whilst being a familiar concept for all.
I'll be using java.util.Timer alongside java.util.TimerTask for handling the sequence of lights. You may choose to use some animation / time line in JavaFX, but I think that is overkill for this kind of task.
I include the three files used in this project:
FXMLTrafficLight.fxml - which defines my FXML layout
FXMLTrafficLightController.java - my FXML controller
TrafficLightApplication.java - for completeness my subclass of Application, this is just the boiler plate.
FXMLTrafficLight.fxml
Not a fancy layout, just a VBox with three circles redLight, amberLight and greenLight, plus two Button objects startLights and stopLights used to start and stop the timer.
<VBox fx:id="root" id="VBox" xmlns:fx="http://javafx.com/fxml/1" fx:controller="javafxtimer.FXMLTrafficLightController">
<children>
<Circle fx:id="redLight" radius="100"></Circle>
<Circle fx:id="amberLight" radius="100"></Circle>
<Circle fx:id="greenLight" radius="100"></Circle>
<Button fx:id="startLights" text="Start Lights" onAction="#startLights"></Button>
<Button fx:id="stopLights" text="Start Lights" onAction="#stopLights"></Button>
</children>
</VBox>
FXMLTrafficLightController.java
I've included the model/state in the controller for simplicity. Whether a light is red / amber / green is determined by a boolean flag. The initial state is set in the initialize() method, and is updated by calling updateState().
When startLights(ActionEvent) is invoked (the EventHandler for startLights) a new Timer is constructed with a TimerTask implementation that first invokes updateState() on the thread created by the Timer and then invokes updateLights() which changes the color of the lights based on the current state on the JavaFX Application Thread using Platform.runLater(Runnable).
Note: the TimerTask itself will not be run on the JavaFX Application Thread, hence the need to use Platform.runLater(Runnable) for updating the GUI.
When stopLights(ActionEvent) is invoked, it will cancel the Timer.
Note that both startLights(ActionEvent) and stopLights(ActionEvent) toggle which Button objects are enabled on the interface as well.
public class FXMLTrafficLightController implements Initializable {
#FXML
private Circle redLight;
#FXML
private Circle amberLight;
#FXML
private Circle greenLight;
#FXML
private Button startLights;
#FXML
private Button stopLights;
private Timer timer;
private static final int DELAY = 2000; // ms
private boolean red, amber, green;
#Override
public void initialize(URL url, ResourceBundle rb) {
red = true;
amber = false;
green = false;
stopLights.setDisable(true);
updateLights();
}
#FXML
private void startLights(ActionEvent e) {
toggleButtons();
timer = new Timer();
timer.schedule(new TimerTask() {
#Override
public void run() {
// Not run on the JavaFX Application Thread!
updateState();
// Using Platform.runLater(Runnable) to ensure updateLights()
// is run on the JavaFX Application Thread
Platform.runLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
updateLights();
}
});
}
}, 0, DELAY); // no initial delay, trigger again every 2000 ms (DELAY)
}
#FXML
private void stopLights(ActionEvent e) {
toggleButtons();
timer.cancel();
}
private void toggleButtons() {
startLights.setDisable(!startLights.isDisable());
stopLights.setDisable(!stopLights.isDisable());
}
private void updateState() {
if (red && !amber && !green) {
amber = true;
} else if (red && amber && !green) {
red = false;
amber = false;
green = true;
} else if (!red && !amber && green) {
green = false;
amber = true;
} else {
red = true;
amber = false;
green = false;
}
}
private void updateLights() {
redLight.setFill(red ? Color.RED : Color.GREY);
amberLight.setFill(amber ? Color.ORANGE : Color.GREY);
greenLight.setFill(green ? Color.GREEN : Color.GREY);
}
}
TrafficLightApplication.java
For completeness... Just the standard boiler plate with file names changed.
public class TrafficLightApplication extends Application {
#Override
public void start(Stage stage) throws Exception {
Parent root = FXMLLoader.load(getClass().getResource("FXMLTrafficLight.fxml"));
Scene scene = new Scene(root);
stage.setScene(scene);
stage.show();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
launch(args);
}
}
I want to run a task in background updating intermediate results in the view.I am trying to implement MVC JavaFX application. The task is defined in the Model.
I want to send to the main threath partial results in order to show them in the View.
I use updateValue() to do so. Also, I define object property and a listener in the controller.
My problem: The method changed() from the listener, is not being fired each time that updateValue() is executed in the Task. Why? How can I force it to do this?.
I have not found much complex examples.
What I have so far:
Model.cpp
ComplexObject _complexO;
public Task<ComplexObject> getModelTask() {
return new Task<ComplexObject>() {
#Override
protected ComplexObject call() throws Exception {
int numberOfFiles = 0;
boolean filesToRead = true;
while (filesToRead){
// ....
_complexO = new ComplexObject();
try{
//..
if(f.exists()){
_complexO.initialize();
numberOfScans ++;
}
else{
_complexO.initializeToNull();
}
String stringNumber = Converter.toString(numberOfFiles);
updateMessage(stringNumber);
updateValue(_complexO );
} catch(Exception ex){
ex.printStackTrace();
_complexO = null;
return _complexO;
}
filesToRead = areThereFilesToRead();
}
return _complexO;
}
};
}
Controller.cpp
...
Task< ComplexObject> task = _model.getModelTask();
_AJavaFXTextField.textProperty().bind(task.messageProperty());
_AJavaFXTextField.textProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<String>() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue observable, String oldValue, String newValue) {
System.out.println("Success with messageProperty!!" + newValue);
}
});
SimpleObjectProperty<ComplexObject> complexObjectProperty = new SimpleObjectProperty<>();
complexObjectProperty.bind(task.valueProperty());
complexObjectProperty.addListener(new ChangeListener<ComplexObject>(){
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends ComplexObject> observable, ComplexObject oldValue, ComplexObject newValue) {
if(newValue.data == null ) {
System.out.println("value is new!!! " + scansNumber);
}
else if(newValue.isValid()){
System.out.println("I want to plot newValue data here");
}
}
});
Thread th= new Thread(task);
System.out.println("call TASK");
th.start();
}
My questions/conclusions here:
How to force to all times that I execute in the task updateValue() to really execute the listener - so execute the code where I want to plot data.
Why it is more times fire the bind for the messageProperty than the valueProperty? - it should be the same number of times.
Why I find that the code of the listener is fired more times when debug mode than normal execution?
Any recomendation of good sources about this topic (from a complex point of view) would be great.
I am looking from something in JavaFX to replace SwingWorker.
What I really whant at the end: To return a list of complexObjects from the task, and ideally, updateValue() would send the objects one per one (partial results)
I have followed:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/javafx/api/javafx/concurrent/Task.html
Thanks very much for any contribuction
Task only guaranties that a value passes to updateValue or a value passed later will be set to the value property. This is done to increase performance of the application thread by limiting the number of changes the listeners are notified of.
Why it is more times fire the bind for the messageProperty than the valueProperty? - it should be the same number of times.
As described above there simply is no guaranty about the number of updates.
Why I find that the code of the listener is fired more times when debug mode than normal execution?
In general debugging makes your program smaller. The smaller the update frequency from the thread of your Task, the smaller the number of updates between the times the Task class updates the properties and the smaller the number of skipped. (The updates are probably executed every frame or every few frames.) If you even use a break-point/stepper in the task, you probably make the Task extremely slow while the application thread runs at normal speed.
It should be easy enough to implement publish on your own by using a List to buffer the updates
public abstract class JavaFXWorker<S, T> extends Task<S> {
private List<T> chunks = new ArrayList<>();
private final Object lock = new Object();
private boolean chunkUpdating = false;
protected final void publish(T... results) {
synchronized (lock) {
chunks.addAll(Arrays.asList(results));
if (!chunkUpdating) {
chunkUpdating = true;
Platform.runLater(() -> {
List<T> cs;
synchronized (lock) {
cs = chunks;
// create new list to not unnecessary lock worker thread
chunks = new ArrayList<>();
chunkUpdating = false;
}
try {
process(cs);
} catch (RuntimeException ex) {
}
});
}
}
}
protected void process(List<T> chunks) {
}
}
Sample use
#Override
public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
ListView<Integer> lv = new ListView<>();
Button btn = new Button("Run");
btn.setOnAction((ActionEvent event) -> {
JavaFXWorker<Void, Integer> worker = new JavaFXWorker<Void, Integer>() {
#Override
protected Void call() throws Exception {
final int maxCount = 100;
Random random = new Random();
int breakIndex = random.nextInt(maxCount-1)+1;
for (int i = 0; i < breakIndex; i++) {
publish(i);
}
// some break simulating a part long part of the task with no updates
Thread.sleep(3000);
for (int i = breakIndex; i <= maxCount; i++) {
publish(i);
}
return null;
}
#Override
protected void process(List<Integer> chunks) {
lv.getItems().addAll(chunks);
}
};
new Thread(worker).start();
});
Scene scene = new Scene(new VBox(btn, lv));
primaryStage.setScene(scene);
primaryStage.show();
}
Do you know how to wait for the user's input in a for loop? I don't mean the showAndWait() method, because I am not opening a new dialogue stage for the user. So for example, each round of the for loop should be waiting for the user to push a button before going ahead with the next round.
How is it possible? Many thanks!
UPDATE:
Now it came to my mind, that it would work with a while(buttonNotPressed){} but is it a good solution? I mean the while loop is running in this case as crazy until the user won't push the button. Or doest it work somehow similarly with wait methods?
Imagine it as a session:
User starts session with handleStart() You give the user 5 questions, one after one. In every iteration, the user can answer the upcoming question and he can save or submit the answer by handleSaveButton() You process the answer as you want, and go ahead with the next iteration. The point is, that the iteration must stop, until the save button hasn't been pressed.
Don't do it like that. The FX toolkit, like any event-driven GUI toolkit, already implements a loop for the purposes of rendering the scene graph and processing user input each iteration.
Just register a listener with the button, and do whatever you need to do when the button is pressed:
button.setOnAction(event -> {
// your code here...
});
If you want the action to change, just change the state of some variable each time the action is performed:
private int round = 0 ;
// ...
button.setOnAction(event -> {
if (round < 5) {
System.out.println("Round "+round);
System.out.println("User's input: "+textArea.getText());
round++ ;
}
});
I recently ran into a similar problem where I wanted something to be executed with an interval (if that's what you mean), until the user fired an event. I found 3 ways to do this:
UPDATE
You should use the stop/cancel method for the custom runnable and timer or else the thread will still be running when you exit the application. Timeline seems do it by itself.
Using a Timer:
Timer timer = new Timer();
TimerTask task = new TimerTask() {
#Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("Printed every second.");
}
};
timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(task, 0, 1000);
//timer.cancel();
With a TimeLine:
Timeline tl = new Timeline(new KeyFrame(Duration.millis(1000), e -> {
System.out.println("Timeline");
}));
tl.setCycleCount(Timeline.INDEFINITE);
tl.play();
//tl.stop();
Or making your own runnable class:
public class Runner implements Runnable {
private final Thread thread = new Thread(this);
private boolean run;
#Override
public void run() {
while(run) {
try {
System.out.println("Printed from loop");
Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
run = false;
}
}
}
public void start() {
run = true;
thread.start();
}
public void stop() {
if(run) {
thread.interrupt();
System.out.print("Thread has stopped.");
}
}
}
And then when a person clicks fx. a button the event would stop using the example James_D posted:
Button btn = new Button("Button");
btn.setOnAction(e -> {
timer.cancel();
tl.stop();
runner.stop();
});
In my case, for inside for, had to create 2 index in class, use:
//start method
Timer timer = new Timer();
TimerTask task = new TimerTask()
{
public void run()
{
Platform.runLater(()->{
//... code to run after time, calling the same mehtod, with condition to stop
});
}
};
timer.schedule(task, time);
//end method
Had to use recursive method, incrementing the index with conditions, cause the tasks were been schedule all at the same time, without wait time.
I do not know if it is rigth, but was the solution that i found.
Hope it helps.
ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION W/O PAUSING:
I'm creating a game where I want the user to pick the game difficulty before the game starts. Instead of trying to pause the program midway through, I just put the next step of the code in a separate method which you call once a button is clicked:
private static difficulty;
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
Application.launch(args);
} catch (UnsupportedOperationException e) {
}
}
public void start(Stage startStage) {
HBox buttons = new HBox();
Button easyButton = new Button("Easy");
Button mediumButton = new Button("Medium");
Button hardButton = new Button("Hard");
buttons.getChildren().addAll(easyButton, mediumButton, hardButton);
buttons.setAlignment(Pos.CENTER);
hbox.getChildren().addAll(buttons);
Scene startScene = new Scene(buttons, 200, 200);
startStage.setScene(startScene);
startStage.show(); // MENU
EventHandler<ActionEvent> playEasy = new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() {
#Override
public void handle(ActionEvent actionEvent) {
difficulty = 1; // SET DIFFICULTY
startStage.close(); // CLOSE MENU
play(); // RUN GAME ON EASY
}
};
EventHandler<ActionEvent> playMedium = new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() {
#Override
public void handle(ActionEvent actionEvent) {
difficulty = 2; // SET DIFFICULTY
startStage.close(); // CLOSE MENU
play(); // RUN GAME ON MEDIUM
}
};
EventHandler<ActionEvent> playHard = new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() {
#Override
public void handle(ActionEvent actionEvent) {
difficulty = 3; // SET DIFFICULTY
startStage.close(); // CLOSE MENU
play(); // RUN GAME ON HARD
}
};
easyButton.setOnAction(playEasy);
mediumButton.setOnAction(playMedium);
hardButton.setOnAction(playHard);
}
public void play() {
// WRITE GAME CODE HERE
}
To solve your specific problem, you could probably pass the startStage into the play method and then just update the scene there...but regardless I do hope this helps someone whos having trouble on how to use buttons! :)