I have a div that I want to fill the whole height of the body less a set number in pixels. But I can't get height: calc(100% - 50px) to work.
The reason I want to do this is I have elements that have dynamic heights based on some varying criteria, e.g. height of the header changes based on different elements it can contain. A content div then needs to stretch to fill the rest of the available space available.
The div element, however, stays the height of the content - it doesn't seem as if it interprets 100% to be the height of the body element.
body {
background: blue;
height: 100%;
}
header {
background: red;
height: 20px;
width: 100%;
}
h1 {
font-size: 1.2em;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 30px;
font-weight: bold;
background: yellow;
}
#theCalcDiv {
background: green;
height: calc(100% - (20px + 30px));
display: block;
}
<header>Some nav stuff here</header>
<h1>This is the heading</h1>
<div id="theCalcDiv">This blocks needs to have a CSS calc() height of 100% - the height of the other elements.</div>
I would appreciate any help or pointers in the right direction.
You need to ensure the html and body are set to 100% and also be sure to add vendor prefixes for calc, so -moz-calc, -webkit-calc.
Following CSS works:
html,body {
background: blue;
height:100%;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
header {
background: red;
height: 20px;
width:100%
}
h1 {
font-size:1.2em;
margin:0;
padding:0;
height: 30px;
font-weight: bold;
background:yellow
}
#theCalcDiv {
background:green;
height: -moz-calc(100% - (20px + 30px));
height: -webkit-calc(100% - (20px + 30px));
height: calc(100% - (20px + 30px));
display:block
}
I also set your margin/padding to 0 on html and body, otherwise there would be a scrollbar when this is added on.
Here's an updated fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/UF3mb/10/
Browser support is:
IE9+, Firefox 16+ and with vendor prefix Firefox 4+, Chrome 19+, Safari 6+
I was searching why % doesn't seem to work. So, I tested out using 100vh instead of just setting it at 100% it seems that 100vh works really well across almost all browsers/devices.
example: you want to only display the top div to the user before it scrolls, like a hero banner module. But, at the top of the page is a navbar which is 68px in height. The following doesn't work for me at all doing just %
height: calc(100% - 68px);
There's was no change. The page just stayed the same. However, when swapping this to "vh" instead it works great! The div block you assign it too will stay on the viewer's device hight only. Until they decide to scroll down the page.
height: calc(100vh - 68px);
Change the +/- to include how big your header is on the top.
If your navbar is say 120px in height then change 68px to 120px.
Hope this helps anyone who cannot get this working with using normal height: calc();
First off - check with Firebug(or what ever your preference is) whether the css property is being interpreted by the browser. Sometimes the tool used will give you the problem right there, so no more hunting.
Second off - check compatibility: http://caniuse.com/#feat=calc
And third - I ran into some problems a few hours ago and just resolved it. It's the smallest thing but it kept me busy for 30 minutes.
Here's how my CSS looked
#someElement {
height:calc(100%-100px);
height:-moz-calc(100%-100px);
height:-webkit-calc(100%-100px);
}
Looks right doesn't it?
WRONG
Here's how it should look:
#someElement {
height:calc(100% - 100px);
height:-moz-calc(100% - 100px);
height:-webkit-calc(100% - 100px);
}
Looks the same right?
Notice the spaces!!!
Checked android browser, Firefox for android, Chrome for android, Chrome and Firefox for Windows and Internet Explorer 11. All of them ignored the CSS if there were no spaces.
Hope this helps someone.
try setting both html and body to height 100%;
html, body {background: blue; height:100%;}
All the parent elements in the hierarchy should have height 100%. Just give max-height:100% to the element and max-height:calc(100% - 90px) to the immediate parent element.
It worked for me on IE also.
html,
body {
height: 100%
}
parent-element {
max-height: calc(100% - 90px);
}
element {
height:100%;
}
The Rendering in IE fails due to failure of Calc when the window is resized or data loaded in DOM. But this method mentioned above worked for me even in IE.
You don't need to calculate anything, and probably shouldn't:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
body {background: blue; height:100%;}
header {background: red; height: 20px; width:100%}
h1 {font-size:1.2em; margin:0; padding:0;
height: 30px; font-weight: bold; background:yellow}
.theCalcDiv {background-color:green; padding-bottom: 100%}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<header>Some nav stuff here</header>
<h1>This is the heading</h1>
<div class="theCalcDiv">This blocks needs to have a CSS calc() height of 100% - the height of the other elements.
</div>
I stuck it all together for brevity.
If you are styling calc in a GWT project, its parser might not parse calc for you as it did not for me... the solution is to wrap it in a css literal like this:
height: literal("-moz-calc(100% - (20px + 30px))");
height: literal("-webkit-calc(100% - (20px + 30px))");
height: literal("calc(100% - (20px + 30px))");
Related
First, I set the height of the outer most object html to 100%. I then set the min-height of the body to 100%. The page has 2 containers: header and article. The header is 90px in height. The article is calc(100% - 90px).
I added some contents to the article container as it was not displaying without it.
I read an article that talked about adding vendor prefixes for calc, so -moz-calc, -webkit-calc. That did not work. The article is only extending to wrap its contents. If you run the code you will notice that the article container is not extending to the bottom of the page.
I checked caniuse.com and found that most browsers support calc(). I do find that if I specify the height in px, it extends correctly, but since the site supports mobile I do not know the height of each device.
I did notice that changing 100% to 100vh the article now extends to the bottom of the page. I believe that with the height 100%, article is extending to the height of the parent object which in this case is the body tag. Since body is 100%. I’m stumped. I tested this on an iPad and it worked properly. On a Galaxy S5 it did not extend 100%. Maybe the phone does not support vh since it’s a bit older. I did a remote debug with my phone and computer through Chrome and found that the chrome browser likes –webkit-calc(). The weird thing is that with the phone in portrait mode it’s calculation 100vh as half the height of the screen.
Here is my code in as simple a form as I can make it:
html {
height: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
background-color: #acacac;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
header {
height: 90px;
background-color: red;
width: 85%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
article {
min-height: -moz-calc(100vh - 90px) !important;
min-height: -webkit-calc(100vh - 90px) !important;
min-height: calc(100vh - 90px) !important;
background-color: white;
width: 85%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
<header></header>
<article>
<br />
<div style="background-color:green; width:50%; height:200px; margin:0 auto">bbb</div>
<br />
</article>
height 100% only works if there is a parent element with a position and a fixed height.
If you don't have that, you need to use 100vh (viewport height). Keep in mind that 100vh does not represent the full screen on some touch devices (ipad) as some of the toolbars are not respected in the calculation.
height:100% won't give you 100% of the height of the viewport, only of the page content (or parent element). height:100vh (viewport height) seems to be working for most browsers for you, right? So maybe it's figuring out why it's not working correctly on certain devices? This article may help. https://www.lullabot.com/articles/unexpected-power-of-viewport-units-in-css
(Need more info to figure out why it's not behaving as expected with viewport height on your phone.)
I know this question: Height equal to dynamic width (CSS fluid layout)
But I want more!! I want a flexible container which has always the aspect ratio of a square but with max-height and max-width of 100% of the page (the window element) and on the top of it is always vertically and horizontally centered.
Like this:
// Container matches height of the window
// container-height = 100%; container-width = absolute-container-height
-page/browser-window-
- ####### -
- #cont-# -
- #ainer# -
- ####### -
---------------------
// container matches width of the window
// container-width = 100%; container-height = absolute-container-width
--page---
- -
- -
-#######-
-#######-
-#######-
-#######-
- -
- -
---------
Is it possible to achieve this with pure css (and even better cross-browser)?
Edit:
I know there is calc() for css3, but due to the poor mobile browser-support, I don't want to use it.
Edit2:
Seems like, I didn't make myself clear enough. I need height and width of the wrapper to match the height OR the width of the window, depending on which is smaller.The square-container should never exceed the smaller value of the window-height/width.
This is, how it would be done with jQuery:
// container/#main-wrapper has top: 50%, left: 50%, position: absolute via css
$(window).resize(function () {
var $ww = $(window).width();
var $wh = $(window).height();
if ($ww > $wh) {
$('#main-wrapper').css({
height: $wh,
width: $wh,
marginTop : ($wh / 2) * -1,
marginLeft : ($wh / 2) * -1
});
} else {
$('#main-wrapper').css({
height: $ww,
width: $ww,
marginTop : ($ww / 2) * -1,
marginLeft : ($ww / 2) * -1
});
}
});
I finally figured it out. The magic ingredients are the view-port units.
Given this html structure:
.l-table
.l-table-cell
.square
You can use this css (well actuall its scss, but you get the idea) to make it work
html,
body{
height: 100%
}
l-table{
background: orange;
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.l-table-cell{
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
border: 2px solid black;
}
.square{
background: red;
margin: auto;
#media (orientation:landscape) {
width: 70vh;
height: 70vh;
}
#media screen and (orientation:portrait) {
width: 70vw;
height: 70vw;
}
}
http://codepen.io/johannesjo/pen/rvFxJ
For those who need it, there is a polyfill.
EDIT: Since writing the below, I appealed on Twitter and got a response from Brian Johnson. He came up with a solution that isn't 100% perfect semantically, but it's pretty damn good and I'll certainly be using it. He asked that I share it in this discussion. LINK
I'm having the same issue right now and I was just typing out pretty much this exact question, so although I can't answer it, I wanted to share what I've found so far in case it helps anyone come up with the final solution.
To clarify, I need my content to fit into a square which fills 60% of the browser's width if portrait or 60% of the height if landscape.
However, this square must never exceed the width or height of the viewport.
Using the technique found here I've managed to create the fluid square, but it still exceeds the viewport when landscape.
width: 60%;
height:0;
padding-bottom: 60%;
Link to Codepen example
I have tried flipping that technique on it's side for landscape but that doesn't work. (You can see that code in the above example, noted out.)
I can't use a simple max-height property because the height is being worked out by the padding-bottom property.
I've thought about adding an extra div as someone else has suggested (C-Link's post is really interesting) but I can't work out how I'd get it to do what we want it do here.
html
<div id="outer">
<div id="inner">YOUR CONTENTS HERE
</div>
</div>
css
html, body{
height: 100%;
}
#outer{
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
position: relative;
height: 100%;
}
#inner{
position: relative;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -50% auto auto auto;
background: red;
text-align: center;
color: yellow;
}
See this fiddle.
How about if you take the earlier concept a step further with a similar div as a container. The container has an added max-height & width. I tried this and the container does not throw a scrollbar at me. It is quite interesting in behavior I must say myself. Does this work for you?
<div id="container">
<div id="centered">A DIV</div>
</div>
#container {
top:0;
bottom:0;
right:0;
left:0;
margin:auto;
position:absolute;
width:200px;
height:200px;
max-width:100%;
max-height:100%;
background:#00f;
padding:0;
}
#centered {
background: green;
bottom: 0;
height: 80px;
left: 0;
margin: auto;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
width: 80px;
}
updated fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/djwave28/mBBJM/96/
I have 2 divs floated left in a container div. The second div has width: 20px. I need the first div to fill all the available space and remains inline. Set first div width to 100% doesn't work because the second div with fixed width goes down. How can i do?
The code is described here: http://jsfiddle.net/7EW5h/4/
Thanks
You can use calc CSS3 function and set a dynamic width to #inner1 div as follows:
width: calc(100% - 20px);
It will be compatible with Firefox 16 (or later) and Internet Explorer 9 (or later).
You can add vendor prefixes as shown:
width: -moz-calc(100% - 20px);
width: -webkit-calc(100% - 20px);
width: calc(100% - 20px);
To make it compatible with Chrome 19 (or later), Firefox 4 (or later), Internet Explorer 9 (or later) and Safari 6 (or later).
You can check compatible tables here: http://caniuse.com/#search=calc
Regarding to you example, I had to set border: 0 to #inner1 and #inner2 divs.
I have tested and worked out a solution in Chrome, IE9, Firefox and Opera:
Use containers for the two input elements.
Change the order of the elements so that the right one is first.
Do not float the element that is supposed to fill the remaining space, just set the display to block (which is the default for div elements).
Set the margin-right of the larger container to the total width of the right element. Here we also need to account for things like borders, margins and paddings of both elements.
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="inner2">
<input />
</div>
<div id="inner1">
<input />
</div>
</div>
CSS:
#inner2 {
float: right;
}
#inner2 input {
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
border: 1px solid #000;
}
#inner1 {
margin-right: 24px;
}
#inner1 input {
width: 100%;
height: 20px;
border: 1px solid #000;
}
Live example: http://jsfiddle.net/7EW5h/22/.
Also note that i have explicitly set borders on the two input elements.
I can not get it to work without changing the HTML or the order of the two elements without using absolute positioning.
Have you tried using position:absolute; to position the elements as you need?
See fiddle - JSFiddle Example
I think, without complicating things, you can do the following.
Remove the floats from the two inputs.
Absolutely position the second input as shown below.
add padding-right to the first input to avoid content overlap.
also, even if it is not shown in my code below, don't forget the presence of default border, margin and padding.
#container {
overflow: hidden;
background-color: red;
}
#inner1 {
width: 100%;
background-color: blue;
padding-right:45px;
}
#inner2 {
height: 20px;
width: 20px;
background-color: green;
position:absolute;
right:0;
top:0;
}
I am looking to implement the opposite behaviour to the following question: CSS Push Div to bottom of page. I.e., when content overflows to the scrollbars, I would like the footer to be at the bottom of the page, like Stack Overflow.
I have a div with id="footer" and the following CSS:
#footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 30px;
width: 100%;
}
This moves the div to the bottom of the viewport - but the element stays there even when you scroll the page down, so it is no longer at the bottom.
How can I make sure the div stays at the bottom of the page's contents even when the content overflows? I'm not looking for fixed positioning, only for the element to be at the bottom of all content.
Image:
This is precisely what position: fixed was designed for:
#footer {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
Here's the fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/uw8f9/
Unfortunately you can't do this with out adding a little extra HTML and having one piece of CSS rely on another.
HTML
First you need to wrap your header,footer and #body into a #holder div:
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
CSS
Then set height: 100% to html and body (actual body, not your #body div) to ensure you can set minimum height as a percentage on child elements.
Now set min-height: 100% on the #holder div so it fills the content of the screen and use position: absolute to sit the footer at the bottom of the #holder div.
Unfortunately, you have to apply padding-bottom to the #body div that is the same height as the footer to ensure that the footer does not sit above any content:
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#holder{
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
}
#body{
padding-bottom: 100px; /* height of footer */
}
footer{
height: 100px;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
Working example, short body: http://jsfiddle.net/ELUGc/
Working example, long body: http://jsfiddle.net/ELUGc/1/
Just worked out for another solution as above example have bug( somewhere error ) for me. Variation from the selected answer.
html,body {
height: 100%
}
#nonFooter {
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
/* Firefox */
min-height: -moz-calc(100% - 30px);
/* WebKit */
min-height: -webkit-calc(100% - 30px);
/* Opera */
min-height: -o-calc(100% - 30px);
/* Standard */
min-height: calc(100% - 30px);
}
#footer {
height:30px;
margin: 0;
clear: both;
width:100%;
position: relative;
}
for html layout
<body>
<div id="nonFooter">header,middle,left,right,etc</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</body>
Well this way don't support old browser however its acceptable for old browser to scrolldown 30px to view the footer
plunker
I realise it says not to use this for 'responding to other answers' but unfortunately I don't have enough rep to add a comment onto the appropriate answer (!) but ...
If you are having problems in asp.net with the answer from 'My Head Hurts' - you need to add 'height : 100%' to the main generated FORM tag as well as HTML and BODY tags in order for this to work.
You didn't close your ; after position: absolute.
Otherwise your above code would have worked perfectly!
#footer {
position:absolute;
bottom:30px;
width:100%;
}
I would comment if i could , but i have no permissions yet, so i will post a hint as an answer, for unexpected behavior on some android devices:
Position: Fixed only works in Android 2.1 thru 2.3 by using the following meta tag:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, user-scalable=no">.
see http://caniuse.com/#search=position
This is an intuitive solution using the viewport command that just sets the minimum height to the viewport height minus the footer height.
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#nonFooter{
min-height: calc(100vh - 30px)
}
#footer {
height:30px;
margin: 0;
clear: both;
width:100%;
}
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
(if needs element in whole display and left align)
left:0;
width: 100%;
I've solved a similar issue by putting all of my main content within an extra div tag (id="outer"). I've then moved the div tag with id="footer" outside of this last "outer" div tag.
I've used CSS to specify the height of "outer" and specified the width and height of "footer". I've also used CSS to specify the margin-left and margin-right of "footer" as auto. The result is that the footer sits firmly at the bottom of my page and scrolls with the page too (although, it's still appears inside the "outer" div, but happily outside of the main "content" div. which seems strange, but it's where I want it).
I just want to add - most of the other answers worked fine for me; however, it took a long time to get them working!
This is because setting height: 100% only picks up parent div's height!
So if your entire html (inside of the body) looks like the following:
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
Then the following will be fine:
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#holder{
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
}
#body{
padding-bottom: 100px; /* height of footer */
}
footer{
height: 100px;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
...as "holder" will pick up it's height directly from "body".
Kudos to My Head Hurts, whose answer was the one I ended up getting to work!
However. If your html is more nested (because it's only an element of the full page, or it's within a certain column, etc) then you need to make sure every containing element also has height: 100% set on the div. Otherwise, the information on height will be lost between "body" and "holder".
E.g. the following, where I've added the "full height" class to every div to make sure the height gets all the way down to our header/body/footer elements:
<div class="full-height">
<div class="container full-height">
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
</div>
</div>
And remember to set height on full-height class in the css:
#full-height{
height: 100%;
}
That fixed my issues!
if you have a fixed height footer (for example 712px) you can do this with js like so:
var bgTop = 0;
window.addEventListener("resize",theResize);
function theResize(){
bgTop = winHeight - 712;
document.getElementById("bg").style.marginTop = bgTop+"px";
}
I hit my footer with a margin-top: auto and it did the trick! Im commenting this here just in case it could help any future visitors.
With HTML/CSS, how can I make an element that has a width and/or height that is 100% of it's parent element and still has proper padding or margins?
By "proper" I mean that if my parent element is 200px tall and I specify height = 100% with padding = 5px I would expect that I should get a 190px high element with border = 5px on all sides, nicely centered in the parent element.
Now, I know that that's not how the standard box model specifies it should work (although I'd like to know why, exactly...), so the obvious answer doesn't work:
#myDiv {
width: 100%
height: 100%;
padding: 5px;
}
But it would seem to me that there must be SOME way of reliably producing this effect for a parent of arbitrary size. Does anyone know of a way of accomplishing this (seemingly simple) task?
Oh, and for the record I'm not terribly interested in IE compatibility so that should (hopefully) make things a bit easier.
EDIT: Since an example was asked for, here's the simplest one I can think of:
<html style="height: 100%">
<body style="height: 100%">
<div style="background-color: black; height: 100%; padding: 25px"></div>
</body>
</html>
The challenge is then to get the black box to show up with a 25 pixel padding on all edges without the page growing big enough to require scrollbars.
I learned how to do these sort of things reading "PRO HTML and CSS Design Patterns". The display:block is the default display value for the div, but I like to make it explicit. The container has to be the right type; position attribute is fixed, relative, or absolute.
.stretchedToMargin {
display: block;
position:absolute;
height:auto;
bottom:0;
top:0;
left:0;
right:0;
margin-top:20px;
margin-bottom:20px;
margin-right:80px;
margin-left:80px;
background-color: green;
}
<div class="stretchedToMargin">
Hello, world
</div>
Fiddle by Nooshu's comment
There is a new property in CSS3 that you can use to change the way the box model calculates width/height, it's called box-sizing.
By setting this property with the value "border-box" it makes whichever element you apply it to not stretch when you add a padding or border. If you define something with 100px width, and 10px padding, it will still be 100px wide.
box-sizing: border-box;
See here for browser support. It does not work for IE7 and lower, however, I believe that Dean Edward's IE7.js adds support for it. Enjoy :)
The solution is to NOT use height and width at all! Attach the inner box using top, left, right, bottom and then add margin.
.box {margin:8px; position:absolute; top:0; left:0; right:0; bottom:0}
<div class="box" style="background:black">
<div class="box" style="background:green">
<div class="box" style="background:lightblue">
This will show three nested boxes. Try resizing browser to see they remain nested properly.
</div>
</div>
</div>
The better way is with the calc() property. So, your case would look like:
#myDiv {
width: calc(100% - 10px);
height: calc(100% - 10px);
padding: 5px;
}
Simple, clean, no workarounds. Just make sure you don't forget the space between the values and the operator (eg (100%-5px) that will break the syntax. Enjoy!
According the w3c spec height refers to the height of the viewable area e.g. on a 1280x1024 pixel resolution monitor 100% height = 1024 pixels.
min-height refers to the total height of the page including content so on a page where the content is bigger than 1024px min-height:100% will stretch to include all of the content.
The other problem then is that padding and border are added to the height and width in most modern browsers except ie6(ie6 is actually quite logical but does not conform to the spec). This is called the box model. So if you specify
min-height: 100%;
padding: 5px;
It will actually give you 100% + 5px + 5px for the height. To get around this you need a wrapper container.
<style>
.FullHeight {
height: auto !important; /* ie 6 will ignore this */
height: 100%; /* ie 6 will use this instead of min-height */
min-height: 100%; /* ie 6 will ignore this */
}
.Padded {
padding: 5px;
}
</style>
<div class="FullHeight">
<div class="Padded">
Hello i am padded.
</div
</div>
1. Full height with padding
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
min-height: 100vh;
padding: 50px;
box-sizing: border-box;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">Hello world.</div>
2. Full height with margin
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
min-height: calc(100vh - 100px);
margin: 50px;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">Hello world.</div>
3. Full height with border
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
min-height: 100vh;
border: 50px solid pink;
box-sizing: border-box;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">Hello world.</div>
This is one of the outright idiocies of CSS - I have yet to understand the reasoning (if someone knows, pls. explain).
100% means 100% of the container height - to which any margins, borders and padding are added. So it is effectively impossible to get a container which fills it's parent and which has a margin, border, or padding.
Note also, setting height is notoriously inconsistent between browsers, too.
Another thing I've learned since I posted this is that the percentage is relative the container's length, that is, it's width, making a percentage even more worthless for height.
Nowadays, the vh and vw viewport units are more useful, but still not especially useful for anything other than the top-level containers.
Another solution is to use display:table which has a different box model behaviour.
You can set a height and width to the parent and add padding without expanding it. The child has 100% height and width minus the paddings.
JSBIN
Another option would be to use box-sizing propperty. Only problem with both would be they dont work in IE7.
Another solution: You can use percentage units for margins as well as sizes. For example:
.fullWidthPlusMargin {
width: 98%;
margin: 1%;
}
The main issue here is that the margins will increase/decrease slightly with the size of the parent element. Presumably the functionality you would prefer is for the margins to stay constant and the child element to grow/shrink to fill changes in spacing. So, depending on how tight you need your display to be, that could be problematic. (I'd also go for a smaller margin, like 0.3%).
A solution with flexbox (working on IE11): (or view on jsfiddle)
<html>
<style>
html, body {
height: 100%; /* fix for IE11, not needed for chrome/ff */
margin: 0; /* CSS-reset for chrome */
}
</style>
<body style="display: flex;">
<div style="background-color: black; flex: 1; margin: 25px;"></div>
</body>
</html>
(The CSS-reset is not necessarily important for the actual problem.)
The important part is flex: 1 (In combination with display: flex at the parent). Funnily enough, the most plausible explanation I know for how the Flex property works comes from a react-native documentation, so I refer to it anyway:
(...) flex: 1, which tells a component to fill all available space, shared evenly amongst other components with the same parent
To add -webkit and -moz would be more appropriate
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
Frank's example confused me a bit - it didn't work in my case because I didn't understand positioning well enough yet. It's important to note that the parent container element needs to have a non-static position (he mentioned this but I overlooked it, and it wasn't in his example).
Here's an example where the child - given padding and a border - uses absolute positioning to fill the parent 100%. The parent uses relative positioning in order to provide a point of reference for the child's position while remaining in the normal flow - the next element "more-content" is not affected:
#box {
position: relative;
height: 300px;
width: 600px;
}
#box p {
position: absolute;
border-style: dashed;
padding: 1em;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
}
<div id="box">
<p>100% height and width!</p>
</div>
<div id="more-content">
</div>
A useful link for quickly learning CSS positioning
This is the default behavior of display: block The fastest way that you can fix it in 2020 is to set display: 'flex' of parent element and padding e.g. 20px then all its children will have 100% height relative to its height.
Border around div, rather than page body margin
Another solution - I just wanted a simple border around the edge of my page, and I wanted 100% height when the content was smaller than that.
Border-box didn't work, and the fixed positioning seemed wrong for such a simple need.
I ended up adding a border to my container, instead of relying on the margin of the body of the page - it looks like this :
body, html {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
border: 8px solid #564333;
}
<style type="text/css">
.stretchedToMargin {
position:absolute;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
</style>