Here's my problem.
I'm using SOAP to retrieve information from a third-party web service.
Response time is too high, so I was planning on using JSON instead, at least in a couple of methods.
For this I'm using DataContractJsonSerializer, but I seem to be having some trouble.
For example, in SOAP there's a method called getAvailablePublic with returns an object of type getAvailablePublicResponse.
There's an equivalent for this method in JSON, which also returns a an object of type getAvailablePublicResponse.
In order to deserialize the information I needed to create a couple of data contracts, and here are my concerns:
Do I really need to create a DataContract? Why can't I use getAvailablePublicResponse object from asmx?
The problem is that if I create a DataContract, I need to use a different name other than getAvailablePublicResponse, as I would have two objects with the same name (the one created by me, and the one from SOAP), and this would require making several changes in my solution.
Hope this makes sense.
Thanks.
Can you post your client code that is making the call to the web service? I don't know what you are using now, but I'm a fan of RestSharp for making remote calls and serializing JSON to C# classes. Something like this:
RestClient client = new RestClient("http://some.domain.com/someservice?someparam=yes");
var results = client.Execute<MyGreatDTOClass>(new RestRequest(Method.GET));
Related
I have an API with two clients: OldClient and newClient. I currently have this in Startup.cs so my json responses are serialized as PascalCase, i.e. as per all my .net objects which have first letter capitalized.
services.AddControllers().AddJsonOptions(jsonOptions =>
{
// So json output is like 'SomeId' instead of 'someId':
jsonOptions.JsonSerializerOptions.PropertyNamingPolicy = null;
...
}
OldClient loves this format. However, newClient would really prefer camelCase.
Is there a way I can configure my app to respond with camelCase for newClient requests and PascalCase for OldClient requests? newClient can send a header to indicate that it wants camelCase.
You can check out this issue on aspnetcore's github page
The possibility of using specific JSON Serializer Options on a per-controller basis hasn't been implemented yet. It has been moved to ".NET 8 planning", which means it's still a ways-away.
Meanwhile, you could work around this issue by:
For data reception and model-binding, you could create a Custom ModelBinder by implementing IModelBinder interface in a ModelBinderAttribute in order to utilize your specific JSON Serialization options. Then, you could simply add the attribute to the endpoints where you need it.
For data responses, you could simply use:
return new JsonResult([object], [CustomJSONSerializationSettings]);
It's quite annoying to have to modify these per-endpoint, but it seems like it's the only way until the feature is added in .net 8 (if we're lucky).
I have this situation, I am creating a Web Service in C# where I need to consume a SOAP Web Service, which gives me an XML response back, I need to serialize this XML response and save it to a table in the database.
I have tried the to call the XML in Postman and it worked fine with a
200 OK status
, but I need how to serialize this reponse and save it to the database.
And then I have tried to write this:
public void CreateFilter(Student student)
{
var XML = XmlSerialization <Student> (student);
ConnectDataBase db = new ConnectDataBase();
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("sp_Student");
cmd.Parameters.Add("#name", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = student.name;
cmd.Parameters.Add("#surname", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = student.surname;
cmd.Parameters.Add("#subject", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = student.subject;
cmd.Parameters.Add("#student", SqlDbType.Xml).Value = XML;
}
Any thoughts on how to get a response from the Web Service I have to consume, and then serialize the response I'm getting back and then save the serialization on the database?
Thank you in advance
Well, you have a couple of options really. Essentially, if you aren't leveraging an ORM (like Hibernate or some such), you want to:
Grab the XML payload
Get that deserialized into an object instance so you can work with it
Pick out the data you are interested in and persist it
Step 2 is essentially writing a class (or tree of classes) that mimmicks the field structure of the XML, then asking a library nicely to parse the XML state into an instance of that class. This then makes it easy to work with for you.
You can either leverage the the native deserialization as per:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.xml.serialization.xmlserializer.deserialize?view=net-6.0
Or, just for arguments sake alternatively you could use a modern serialization library. There isn't much of a good choice when it comes to XML and C#, so the main one I can think of that will get you from point a to point b is Json.NET:
https://www.newtonsoft.com/json
This library, though predomenantly pushed as an all-in-one object mapper for JSON is also able to translate between XML and Json:
https://www.newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/ConvertingJSONandXML.htm
Depending on how much of a fight the native deserializer puts up (defining the schema can be a bit of a pain, bloody SOAP am I right), it might be easier to use Json.NET to hoover up the XML, convert it to JSON, then deserialize that json as an object.
This gives you a 2-step deserialization process which isn't ideal, but it's not such a bad thing either as you get to work with the "nice" library and not have to fight the old baked in xml serialization stuff.
The choice is yours really. I'd give the first option a good go first then if that puts up too much of a fight you have Json.NET to fall back on :)
I'm using the .NET API of CosmosDB and I'm getting a hard time trying to figure out how to get the raw result of a CosmosDB query prior to it getting deserialized into a class. Browsing the documentation, all examples I find cast the results to an specific class or to a dynamic. That is:
//This returns a Document, wich actually is a dynamic...
client.ReadDocumentAsync(...)
//This returns an object of type MyClass, wich I supose is casted internally by the API
client.ReadDocumentAsync<MyClass>(...)
What I want to do is to get the original raw JSON payload of the result to inspect it without the overhead of deserializing it to anything else.
Does anybody know if it's possible to get the raw result with the .NET api? If so, how?
In other cases, I need to use the result as an ExpandoObject to treat it dynamically, but I find that the "dynamic" results given by the api are not "expandables" so I'm forced to serialize them and then deserialize again in a recursive form into an ExpandoObject. Furthermore, the result is polluted with _rid, Etag, etc. properties that I don't need on my object. It's quite anoying.
I think it's an unnecesary overhead to serialize and then deserialize again, so maybe the optimus way would be to get the raw JSON result and write a method to deserialize directly to Expando.
Or maybe I'm loosing any point and there's an API to get the results as Expandos. Does anybody know it?
Check out this question that I had earlier:
Converting arbitrary json response to list of "things"
Altough I didn't named it, the API in question was actually DocumentDb, so I think you'll be able to use that code.
Seen some bad advice here, but it is built into the SDK natively.
Document doc = cosmosClient.ReadDocumentAsync(yourDocLink);
string json = doc.ToString();
I need to get some Json to the client side from the server and it's somewhat troublesome as almost all tutorials assume an Ajax call to a separate action to get the Json.
This led me to think that there must be some reason why it is done this way. In Asp.Net MVC we can pass a Model along with the view to get the information but we can't seem to easily pass a Json object. Instead you are supposed to make a separate call to get this information.
What if the Json info is known when the page is generated, why not generate it at the same time?
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. While it's nice to hear of ways to get Json to the client, the question is actually whether there is a specific reason the Ajax call method is much more popular, like security or anything like that.
Can you put something like this into your view? (rough pseudo code, assuming using a Razor view)
< script >
var myJSON = { Field: #model.Field, Field2: #model.Field2 };
< /script >
Because you do not need both at the same time... on the first call will be to get html (the view of the data - represented by a view model), and any ajax calls will be to get the possibly updated data (json serialized view model).
No reason why you can't. You could use the javacript serializer to create a JSON string that drop on the page. You could also create an action that return the json string that you called from a script tag.
What you want if you're using KnockOut, would be the Mapping plugin that turns an ordinary JS object, like that generated above, into an observable ready for KnockOut to use. See here from info. http://knockoutjs.com/documentation/plugins-mapping.html
You can use content-negotiation by setting accept header. This is considered a best practice (and according to some RESTful).
This needs to be supported and implemented at server as well. ASP NET MVC does not make it easy to support content-negotiation and you have to implement it yourself by if-else or using ActionFilter and implementing action selector.
I have an existing web application that uses EF and POCO objects. I want to improve the client experience by exposing some of my objects through WCF(JSON). I have this working fine but where I am unsure is how to handle derived objects(not sure if that is the correct term) or IEnumerable anonymous objects if you will.
Let's say I have 3 tables structured like so:
Templates
ID
Template
Groups
ID
Group
Instances
ID
TemplateID
GroupID
This is obviously a one-to-many type relationship. I have my navigation properties setup correctly and getting strongly typed object properties works great. However, how do I send serialized anonymous type object(s) over the wire. Like an object that sends all instances that are equal to groupid=1 and include the names of the template and the object.
Am I missing something or do I have to create another class object for WCF that would look like this:
WCF Object
InstanceID
TemplateID
TemplateName
GroupID
GroupName
I guess I could alter my tables to account for this but that seems wrong too. I know that IEnumerable objects can't be serialized and I know that throw away objects are probably not the way to go either. I want to do this the right way but I am not sure how to go about it.
Your suggestions are appreciated.
Regards
Based on what you're doing, I'd suggest looking at OData with WCF Data Services. You state that you want to be able to send all instances where the groupid=1 - OData is great at this type of filtering.
If you're want to stick with your current approach and not use OData, then my first question is why are you sending back anonymous types at all? You can do what you are seeking (all instances with a groupid=1) without sending back an anonymous type. In your select clause you just create new instances of your concrete objects rather than newing up anonymous types. If your query is really just filtering and not executing any meaningful projection with the selct to anonymous type, then I don't see any reason to send back your anonymous type at all.