Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Currently I am working on multiple projects as a third party (outsourced) where I have no control over the hosting. My application is modular enough to be changed on the fly, all that's required is slight edit in Html / CSS and it'll become a brand new site.
I do not want my proprietary codes to leak on the web without my consent.
Since I'm contracted to only work on a few particular domains, I wish to "lock" them down in the sense there won't be multiple instances of the same application running in the wild.
Domain locking comes to mind, but this will be rather restrictive as my client will no longer be able to change domain in the future.
Any other inexpensive ideas?
You could try having a registration server somewhere that requires various libraries in the system to register infrequently.
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 days ago.
Improve this question
I need to create an internal page where there are links to approx 10 files. These will be HR compliance forms and training manuals. Just a list of links, no frills. I started going down the sharepoint path but it seems too complex for what I need. Is there a way to create a 1 page link that will open in a web browser and just list the files in a specific folder? THe files are already stored on a network drive all users have access to. Thanks!
I tried sharepoint but it involves setting up on a server and seems too complex for my needs. T
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed last month.
Improve this question
I am attempting to create a Minecraft fabric mod (or jarmod) that, when sent a server resource pack, sends back a packet acknowledging that it has loaded the resource pack, while it actually has not. This is intended to be used to bypass the way some servers require the use of a custom texture pack, which has to be loaded every single time. A similar system is used in Minecraft Console Client (code), which doesn't even load textures. Is there a way to do this? I can't understand the Fabric Networking Tutorial, none of the code or advice seems relevant to what I am trying to do. Also, I don't use java. Is there anyone more knowledgeable on the subject who can help?
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I am bulding a learning portal for a client and the client has asked for a feature where the user can record and upload sound directly from the browser (or browser plugin) to a custom made forum on the portal. The client envision having a button like [start recording] on the site. I am probably ending up with recommending against this feature but I would like to hear if any of you have done something similar and what you used.
This specific application is built using dotnet core 2.0 and Angular 5 in the frontend.
Using WebRTC could be an option if you can run your site under an SSL cert.
You may want to take a look to this example here.
Here you have another example using the device camera.
You can store the response on a Blob and send it to your server.
It is an initial aproach but I think it could help you take a decision.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Apologies if this is in the wrong category. I'm currently developing and application in ASP, due to my inexperience with ASP I'm worried about vulnerabilities that a user can exploit.
My application is being coded from scratch, no templates used or defaults from Visual Studio, completely blank projects. The user is greeted with a login page where depending on there user access in active directory depends on which pages the user can access.
The exploit I'm worried about is if the user will be able to commit a directory traversal and access a page in which they're not allowed to access and change critical information.
I'm afraid my inexperience has caught up with me. Could someone explain to me how I could limit the access to the user or, If I'm over thinking the process, correct me? Constructive criticism is accepted.
Microsoft does try to help protect your application through their defaults, so if you're running in IIS, make sure the user the application pool is running under only has write access to the folders it needs to write into.
This is a very open-ended question and depends on many factors such as version of .net, server OS/IIS version, other handlers installed, etc. But a good start is to review the OWASP Top 10:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project#OWASP_Top_10_for_2013
Here's a list of some automated tools you can use for testing your implementation:
https://geekflare.com/online-scan-website-security-vulnerabilities/
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Recently I've got some problems in my live site but the localhost version is fine. But live site contains some updated articles of type page/story and also comments.
So what I want to do is to move node & comment table to localhost. I'm not using comments in any custom modules.
Will moving comments & node can have any issues given some minor db settings may be different between localhost and live site versions?
Just dump the entire database. Unless you're using a module like domain access or sso you should be able to just take the entire database without it causing issues. You might want to clear the cache tables first though.