This should be simple, but I can't figure it out. I have markup like such:
<section id="container">
<article></article>
<article></article>
<article></article>
<article></article>
</section>
How can I get each article to be the full height of the window by using purely CSS, and no JS?
You should make sure that the html, body and #container tags are also at a height of 100%:
html, body, #container {
height: 100%;
}
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/aXPwL/1/
<section id="container" style="height:100%">
<article style="height:100%;"></article>
<article style="height:100%;"></article>
<article style="height:100%;"></article>
<article style="height:100%;"></article>
</section>
All elements starting from html cascading down to the article element need to have 100% height specified, otherwise any child element will always be only as tall as its parent element.
My JSFiddle to show that
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
height: 100%;
}
section {
height: 100%;
}
article {
background: blue;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
Also note, not sure if this is what you want, but since the articles are not stacked on top of each other, the user will have to scroll down to see all 4 articles, making the actual page height 4x the height of the browser window.
Related
I'm building an angular application that frequently uses nested views. Certain views, however, are taller than the other elements on the page and end up extending well beyond the end of the parent view.
I'm using Ryan Fait's Sticky Footer so I have a wrapper around a containing div set to height:100% and I would have expected the page to just adapt and move the footer to the bottom of the nested view however I'm seeing the style elements of the footer border and background-color are remaining at end of the parent div while the content of the footer is being pushed to the end of the nested div.
Including an image as I'm struggling with getting the language exact:
I'm really looking for any solution from fixing the css to something that seems hackier like changing the footer or using ng-if/ng-class on certain pages. I'm imagining I'm misunderstanding something about CSS/UI-Router but I can't really track it.
The code isn't really interesting but here is it?
CODE
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
margin-bottom: -50px;
}
.push {
height: 50px;
}
.footer {
display: block;
height: 50px;
}
.nested {
max-height: 500px;
}
<body>
<div class="wrapper">
<div>
<h1>Some text</h1>
<ui-view class="nested"></ui-view>
</div>
<div class="push"></div>
</div>
<footer class="footer">
<span>some copy</span>
</footer>
</body>
If you use percentage values for height (i.e. a relative height), the parent element heights have to be defined too. In your case you also need height: 100% on body and html, like
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
I have been banging my head against the wall trying to figure out this problem and I have looked high and low for the answer and came up with similar results.
Synopsis
The problem is that I am building a website using the 960 grid and have three columns that I want to stretch at 100% at all times. Here is a fiddle for your reference: http://jsfiddle.net/Uec7h/1/
Essentially the html is like so:
<div class="contentWrapper">
<div class="container_12">
<div class="grid_2 leftSide clearfix">
Left sidebar content.
</div>
<div class="grid_7 content">
Lots of content loaded from the server.
</div>
<div class="grid_3 rightSide">
Right sidebar content.
</div>
</div>
</div>
with the CSS being like
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.content {
height: 100%;
}
.leftSide {
height: 100%;
background-color: #000000;
}
.rightSide {
height: 100%;
background-color: #000000;
}
.contentWrapper {
height: 100%;
}
The fiddle isn't completely accurate to what I am seeing on my local version, but it's close. Seems like the left and right sidebars do not want to expand to 100% no matter what I do.
What I've Tried
Most of the answers I have found on SO have suggested to put height: 100% on the html, body elements and everything should work out fine. Adding this attribute and giving both sidebars height: 100% did work a little bit, but if the content in the middle column gets too big, it stops at a certain point and won't continue to stretch.
I have tried adding the clearfix class that comes with the 960 grid but it didn't seem to help at all.
Question
How do I get the left and right side bars height in the fiddle to be 100% no matter what content is in the middle column?
If you add the following CSS to the sidebar elements it will fill the 100% of the height.
display:block;
height:auto;
position:absolute;
top:0px;
bottom:0px;
If you place the sidebar into a wrapper div with relative positioning, the content section will be again in it's right place...
I would also set padding and margin to 0 for the body.
EDIT:
If you add height: 100% to the .container_12 it will get a real height, and children elements can have a 100% height. Notice that the sidebars will be as height as the window itself, but your content at the middle can be taller than 100%... Fiddle
Dont know the 960 grid, the EDITED solution - using visibility: visible; -
HTML
<div id="box">
<div class="vision"> sdfsdfsd </div>
</div>
CSS
#box {
float: left;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.vision {
width: 300px;
height: 600px;
visibility: visible;
}
I'm aware that similar questions have been asked over and over, but I have yet to come across a solution that actually works for me. Picture the following problem.
Situation:
The body has a non-fixed background image that repeats both vertically and horizontally.
There is supposed to be a second transparent background image laid over the first.
Constraints:
The second background is supposed to stretch across the document, just like the background on the body. Mind: Not just the viewport, the entire document.
Even when the body height is smaller than the document height (i.e. no scrollbar), the second background must stretch to the bottom of the viewport (so any solution working with 100% html and/or body height is out of the question).
The second background's position cannot be fixed, because that would cause some sort of parallax effect when scrolling. The illusion that both images are actually one must be upheld.
It is possible for the body to have margin and/or padding. Both backgrounds should cover the entire document regardless.
Using a second background image on the body ("background-image: url(), url();") is not an option for backward compatibility reasons.
No JavaScript.
No actually merging the two images into one, obviously. :)
I have brooded over this problem for a while now and have gotten to the conclusion that this is impossible using only HTML and CSS2. I'd very much like to be proven wrong.
You should place a background image for two separate which covers each the whole document :
<html>
<head>
<style>
.firstbackground {
position:absolute;
left:0;
top : 0;
width : 100%;
min-height : 100%;
background: url('first.png') repeat;
}
.secondbackground {
width : 100%;
min-height : 100%;
background:url('second.png'); /* may be transparent, but why add a background then ;-) */
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="firstbackground">
<div class="secondbackground">
long content
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
CSS3 allows multiple backgrounds that are separated by commas, for eg:
background: url('topNonFixedBG.png'), #000 url('mainBG.png') no-repeat fixed top center;
http://jsfiddle.net/hs2WT/1/
Just use multiple divs...
CSS:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body { height: 100%;}
.wrapper1 {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: url('http://khill.mhostiuckproductions.com/siteLSSBoilerPlate//images/nav/hixs_pattern_evolution.png');
}
.wrapper2 {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: url('http://khill.mhostiuckproductions.com/siteLSSBoilerPlate//images/nav/yellow1.png');
}
.content { color: #fff; }
HTML:
<div class="wrapper1">
<div class="wrapper2">
<div class="content">
<p>Some Content</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
let the secend background to have the position:absolute;
body{
background:url("http://jsfiddle.net/css/../img/logo.png") #000;
}
#secBg{
background:url("http://placehold.it/350x150") ;
position:absolute;
min-height:500%;
min-width:100%;
}
<html>
<body>
<div id="secBg">
</div>
</body>
</html>
http://jsfiddle.net/5sxWB/
I want to set a background for the content of a page. The div with the background image has class=history. All the divs above "history" and history itself have height set to 100%. However, the "history" div does not get the correct height.
Below is a sample of the code. I may be missing some relevant details but will add them once the solution is found. See also the live page.
The CSS:
html, body {
height: 100%;
background: url(cream_dust.png) repeat 0 0;
}
The HTML:
<html>
<body class="page page-id-41 page-child parent-pageid-8 page-template-default logged-in admin-bar">
<div class="wrapper-for-footer">
<div id="page" class="hfeed site">
<div id="main" class="site-main">
<div id="primary" class="content-
An element that is set to height: 100% will only take up 100% of the vertical space of its parent. If there's an element somewhere between history and body that doesn't have a height, then it won't be as tall as you're expecting.
The majority of the history element is floated content, so it has collapsed to only contain the non-floated content.
Add a clearfix to the history element.
overflow: hidden
or
.history {
zoom: 1; // fix for IE
}
.history:after {
content: ' ';
display: block;
height: 0;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
}
You might need to add position:absolute; to the div you are trying to give 100% height to.
EDIT: you need to add position:absolute; to the history div
So I wanted a sticky footer on a page and got this one to work for me. All is well, but no, not really..
The problem is that I wanted the content above the footer to stretch all the way down to it. Now the box containing the main content end just after the text in the box, and there's a large space between the footer and the content. What I want is the background of the main content to stretch down to the footer!
See my beautiful image!
This is what I have right now in html:
<div id="wrap">
<!-- start header -->
<div id="header">
<div id="header-content">
</div>
</div>
<!-- end header -->
<!-- start main -->
<div id="main">
<div id="main-content">
</div>
</div>
<!-- end main -->
</div>
<!-- start footer -->
<div id="footer">
</div>
And in css:
html {
height: 100%; }
body {
height: 100%;}
/* wrap */
#wrap {
min-height: 100%; }
/* main */
#main {
background-color: #43145c;
overflow: auto;
padding-bottom: 50px; }
#main-content {
width: 720px;
margin: auto;
background-color: #643280;
padding-top: 20px; }
#footer {
position: relative;
margin-top: -50px;
height: 50px;
clear: both;
background: red; }
I tried setting min height of main to 100%, but didn't work. I just want the backgroundcolor of main-content all the way down to footer, since it's different to the body and main box.
Does it make any sense? Can anyone help?
I know this was asked 6 months ago, but I've been searching for the solution to this problem for quite a while now and hope other people can benefit from the solution I employed being archived. You were spot on when you said that somehow the main box needs to get the min-height of the space between the header and footer.
Unfortunately, I don't know how this can be done with pure CSS, it's quite easy with javascript of course but that solution is not always viable, and it's kind of messy in terms of code separation. The good news is that depending on what you need to do, there is a CSS hack you can employ.
What I did was add an absolutely positioned element below body that essentially stretched from below the header to above the footer.This way I could add a background or a gradient on this #divBelowBody that essentially allowed me to pretend this problem is solved (although this solution leaves a bitter taste in my mouth).
In addition, if you wanted to add a border around your content div and were hoping that it extended to the footer even when content was small, you're screwed (although not really, I can probably think of a hack or two to make this workable), so it only works if you were hoping to add a background or gradient etc.
You can see the code in action here:
http://jsfiddle.net/qHAxG/
Expand the result section horizontally to more clearly see what's going on.
Try this:
Replace your HTML and BODY Styles in the Style Sheet with this:
html,body {height: 100%;}
Then replace your "wrapper" with this:
#wrap {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
}
Hope that helps.
Try this
HTML
<body>
<div id="wrap">
<!-- start header -->
<div id="header">
<div id="header-content">
</div>
</div>
<!-- end header -->
<!-- start main -->
<div id="main">
<div id="main-content">
</div>
</div>
<!-- end main -->
<div class="push"></div>
</div>
<!-- start footer -->
<div id="footer">
</div>
</body>
CSS
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
/* wrap */
#wrap {
background: green;
height: auto !important;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#wrap,
#main,
#main-content {
margin-bottom: -50px;
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
/* main */
#main {
background-color: #43145c;
}
#main-content {
width: 720px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: #643280;
}
.push, #footer {
height: 50px;
}
#footer {
position: relative;
background: red;
}
see THIS demo: it might be of use. It seems like you want a div with a background color to stretch to the bottom. But the problem with the sticky footer is that it stays at the bottom also - get's out of your way when the content extends past the view-port. So It needs some distance ( height of the content ) to know how when to do that. If that height isn't designated by actual content... 100% isn't really going to do the trick either. because then the "sticky" footer doesn't really work... it would be off the screen. What is it really 100% of ?
this whole thing has frustrated me for a year... but I always find a way to make it look the way I want even if I can't get it to function the way I want... hopefully that link demo above will maybe lend another piece to the puzzle. Good Luck !