html:
<div id="main">
<div id="foo">foo</div>
</div>
css:
html,body{
height: 100%;
}
#main{
height: 100%;
}
#foo{
height: auto;
/* height: 100%; I cannot use height 100% or fixed height for this element*/
}
#foo:before{
content: "bar";
/*I want to use the height in percentage which won't work but work with px*/
height: 100%;
display: block;/* or inline-block*/
}
demo
I cannot use flexbox css for some reason. And I also tried with transform css technique and various techniques such as table but even couldn't get vertical center.
I cannot change the markup and please if possible without touching the css for #main would be great for me.
You can center an element vertically within it's container using this technique:
#foo{
position: absolute;
top: 50%; // move down 50% of parent
transform: translateY(-50%); // move back up 50% of own height
}
Set position: relative; on the #main container to make #foo relate to it.
Demo
Try this:
#foo {
height: auto;
margin:auto;
position:absolute;
top:50%;
}
I want to create an HTML page which:
Appears centred horizontally
Has a white background the entire height of the window
Contains a fixed header and scrollable content
I am having two issues related to {width: 100%} and {height: 100%}.
My header is 100% of the page width, when I expect it to be 100% of its parent width.
The background appears at 100% of the window height, but it then scrolls up with the content.
I would appreciate any help in understanding how CSS treats the 100% value in these two cases. I am not asking for a workaround: I already have that. I am asking for insights into the way CSS thinks.
Many thanks in advance,
James
Here's a demo of the issue
And here's the barebones HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
<title>Width & Height 100%</title>
<style>
html {
height:100%;
}
body {
background: #666;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
#container {
position: relative;
height:100%;
background: white;
width: 400px;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0 0;
}
#header {
position:fixed;
z-index:100;
background:#ffe;
/* width:760px; */
width:100%;
height:64px;
}
#content {
position: absolute;
left:20px;
width:360px;
height:360px;
margin:64px 0 0 0;
background:#efe;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="header">
Fixed header
</div>
<div id="content">
Scrollable content
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
All of these fixed positions are going to give you headaches.
About the widths: the box model is usually the problem. I start every CSS with body height and width set to 100%, and then reset my box model so it matches across browsers, and applies all of my padding to the inside of a box instead of the outside:
/* Set box models to match across browsers. */
* {
box-sizing:border-box;
-moz-box-sizing:border-box;
webkit-box-sizing:border-box;
max-width:100%;
}
Then set your width on a container using padding, first the mobile width, then the screen width to override:
#container {
padding: 0px 10px;
}
#media only screen
and (min-width : 700px) {
#container {
padding: 0% 30%;
}
}
For a full layout, you can visit my site:
http://instancia.net/fluid-sticky-footer-layout/
I should probably add the mobile bit to that page. :)
Fix header
Change the header position fixed to position absolute
Fix content height
* {
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#container{
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
background:#efe;
}
#content {
padding: 64px 20px 0;
}
Live example with pos fixed
http://jsfiddle.net/qB4sD/1/
I have an image, and I want to set it a specific width and height (in pixels)
But If I set width and height using css (width:150px; height:100px), image will be stretched, and It may be ugly.
How to Fill images to a specific size using CSS, and not stretching it?
Example of fill and stretching image:
Original Image:
Stretched Image:
Filled Image:
Please note that in the Filled image example above: first, image is resized to 150x255 (maintained aspect ratio), and then, it cropped to 150x100.
You can use the css property object-fit. ("sets how the content of a replaced element, such as an <img> or <video>, should be resized to fit its container.")
.cover {
object-fit: cover;
width: 50px;
height: 100px;
}
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" class="cover" width="242" height="363" />
See example here
There's a polyfill for IE: https://github.com/anselmh/object-fit
Related: object-position (specifies the alignment of an element's contents within its box.)
If you want to use the image as a CSS background, there is an elegant solution. Simply use cover or contain in the background-size CSS3 property.
.container {
width: 150px;
height: 100px;
background-image: url("http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg");
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 50% 50%;
}
<div class="container"></div>
While cover will give you a scaled up image, contain will give you a scaled down image. Both will preserve the pixel aspect ratio.
http://jsfiddle.net/uTHqs/ (using cover)
http://jsfiddle.net/HZ2FT/ (using contain)
This approach has the advantage of being friendly to Retina displays as per Thomas Fuchs' quick guide.
It's worth mentioning that browser support for both attributes excludes IE6-8.
Enhancement on the accepted answer by #afonsoduarte.
in case you are using bootstrap
There are three differences:
Providing width:100% on the style. This is helpful if you are using bootstrap and want the image to stretch all the available width.
Specifying the height property is optional, You can remove/keep it as you need
.cover {
object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
/*height: 300px; optional, you can remove it, but in my case it was good */
}
By the way, there is NO need to provide the height and width attributes on the image element because they will be overridden by the style. so it is enough to write something like this.
<img class="cover" src="url to img ..." />
The only real way is to have a container around your image and use overflow:hidden:
HTML
<div class="container"><img src="ckk.jpg" /></div>
CSS
.container {
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
display: block;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
.container img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
}
It's a pain in CSS to do what you want and center the image, there is a quick fix in jquery such as:
var conHeight = $(".container").height();
var imgHeight = $(".container img").height();
var gap = (imgHeight - conHeight) / 2;
$(".container img").css("margin-top", -gap);
http://jsfiddle.net/x86Q7/2/
CSS solution no JS and no background image:
Method 1 "margin auto" ( IE8+ - NOT FF!):
div{
width:150px;
height:100px;
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
}
div img{
position:absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
margin: auto;
width:100%;
}
<p>Original:</p>
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
<p>Wrapped:</p>
<div>
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/
Method 2 "transform" ( IE9+ ):
div{
width:150px;
height:100px;
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
}
div img{
position:absolute;
width:100%;
top: 50%;
-ms-transform: translateY(-50%);
-webkit-transform: translateY(-50%);
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
<p>Original:</p>
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
<p>Wrapped:</p>
<div>
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/1/
Method 2 can be used to center an image in a fixed width / height container. Both can overflow - and if the image is smaller than the container it will still be centered.
http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/3/
Method 3 "double wrapper" ( IE8+ - NOT FF! ):
.outer{
width:150px;
height:100px;
margin: 200px auto; /* just for example */
border: 1px solid red; /* just for example */
/* overflow: hidden; */ /* TURN THIS ON */
position: relative;
}
.inner {
border: 1px solid green; /* just for example */
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin: auto;
display: table;
left: 50%;
}
.inner img {
display: block;
border: 1px solid blue; /* just for example */
position: relative;
right: 50%;
opacity: .5; /* just for example */
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/5/
Method 4 "double wrapper AND double image" ( IE8+ ):
.outer{
width:150px;
height:100px;
margin: 200px auto; /* just for example */
border: 1px solid red; /* just for example */
/* overflow: hidden; */ /* TURN THIS ON */
position: relative;
}
.inner {
border: 1px solid green; /* just for example */
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
bottom: 0;
display: table;
left: 50%;
}
.inner .real_image {
display: block;
border: 1px solid blue; /* just for example */
position: absolute;
bottom: 50%;
right: 50%;
opacity: .5; /* just for example */
}
.inner .placeholder_image{
opacity: 0.1; /* should be 0 */
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">
<img class="real_image" src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
<img class="placeholder_image" src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/5xjr05dt/26/
Method 1 has slightly better support - you have to set the width OR height of image!
With the prefixes method 2 also has decent support ( from ie9 up ) - Method 2 has no support on Opera mini!
Method 3 uses two wrappers - can overflow width AND height.
Method 4 uses a double image ( one as placeholder ) this gives some extra bandwidth overhead, but even better crossbrowser support.
Method 1 and 3 don't seem to work with Firefox
Solution not requiring image as a background and will auto-resize without being cut-off or distorting.
Another solution is to put the image in a container with the desired width and height. Using this method you would not have to set the image as a background image of an element.
Then you can do this with an img tag and just set a max-width and max-height on the element.
CSS:
.imgContainer {
display: block;
width: 150px;
height: 100px;
}
.imgContainer img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
HTML:
<div class='imgContainer'>
<img src='imagesrc.jpg' />
</div>
Now when you change the size of the container the image will automatically grow as large as it can without going outside the bounds or distorting.
If you want to center the image vertically and horizontally you can change the container css to:
.imgContainer {
display: table-cell;
width: 150px;
height: 100px;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
}
Here is a JS Fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/9kUYC/2/
Not using css background
Only 1 div to clip it
Resized to minimum width than keep correct aspect ratio
Crop from center (vertically and horizontally, you can adjust that with the top, lef & transform)
Be careful if you're using a theme or something, they'll often declare img max-width at 100%. You got to make none. Test it out :)
https://jsfiddle.net/o63u8sh4/
<p>Original:</p>
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
<p>Wrapped:</p>
<div>
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg" alt="image"/>
</div>
div{
width:150px;
height:100px;
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
}
div img{
min-width:100%;
min-height:100%;
height:auto;
position:relative;
top:50%;
left:50%;
transform:translateY(-50%) translateX(-50%);
}
Building off of #Dominic Green's answer using jQuery, here is a solution that should work for images that are either wider than they are high or higher than they are wide.
http://jsfiddle.net/grZLR/4/
There is probably a more elegant way of doing the JavaScript, but this does work.
function myTest() {
var imgH = $("#my-img").height();
var imgW = $("#my-img").width();
if(imgW > imgH) {
$(".container img").css("height", "100%");
var conWidth = $(".container").width();
var imgWidth = $(".container img").width();
var gap = (imgWidth - conWidth)/2;
$(".container img").css("margin-left", -gap);
} else {
$(".container img").css("width", "100%");
var conHeight = $(".container").height();
var imgHeight = $(".container img").height();
var gap = (imgHeight - conHeight)/2;
$(".container img").css("margin-top", -gap);
}
}
myTest();
after reading StackOverflow answers the simple solution I got is
.profilePosts div {
background: url("xyz");
background-size: contain;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: x;
height: y;
}
I helped build a jQuery plugin called Fillmore, which handles the background-size: cover in browsers that support it, and has a shim for those that don't. Give it a look!
This will Fill images to a specific size, without stretching it or without cropping it
img{
width:150px; //your requirement size
height:100px; //your requirement size
/*Scale down will take the necessary specified space that is 150px x 100px without stretching the image*/
object-fit:scale-down;
}
Try something like this: http://jsfiddle.net/D7E3E/4/
Using a container with overflow: hidden
EDIT: #Dominic Green beat me.
I think it's quite late for this answer. Anyway hope this will help somebody in the future.
I faced the problem positioning the cards in angular. There are cards displayed for array of events. If image width of the event is big for card, the image should be shown by cropping from two sides and height of 100 %. If image height is long, images' bottom part is cropped and width is 100 %. Here is my pure css solution for this:
HTML:
<span class="block clear img-card b-b b-light text-center" [ngStyle]="{'background-image' : 'url('+event.image+')'}"></span>
CSS
.img-card {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-position: 50% 50%;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
you can do it by 'flex' display. for me!:
.avatar-img {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: stretch;
border-radius: 50%;
border: 1px solid #dee2e6;
height: 5.5rem;
width: 5.5rem;
overflow: hidden;
}
.avatar-img > img {
flex-grow: 1;
object-fit: cover;
}
<div>
<div class="avatar-img">
<img src="https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSqczw3Fb_TYsj0hbPEy0u7Ay2bVq1KurD6hw&usqp=CAU" alt="Test!'s profile photo">
</div>
<div class="avatar-img">
<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/236x/a1/37/09/a137098873af3bf6180dd24cbe388ae9--flower-iphone-wallpaper-wallpapers-flowers.jpg" alt="Test!'s profile photo">
</div>
</div>
To fit image in fullscreen try this:
background-repeat: round;
<div class="container">
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/2OrtT.jpg"/>
</div>
<style>
.container {
width: 150px;
height: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
}
</style>
As far as I know, there is a plugin to make this simple.
jQuery Plugin: Auto transform <img> into background style
<img class="fill" src="image.jpg" alt="Fill Image"></img>
<script>
$("img.fill").img2bg();
</script>
Besides, this way also fulfills the accessibility needs. As this plugin will NOT remove your <img> tag from your codes, the screen reader still tells you the ALT text instead of skipping it.
you have to use background-size : cover in the css
js code
<div>
<div className={styles.banner}>banner</div>
</div>
css code
.banner{
background:
url("./images/home-bg.jpg");
background-size: cover;
height: 53rem;
width: 100%;
}
object fit is not working
background-size: contain is also not working
What's the best way (if any) to make the inside box transparent so the image can be seen with no opacity (clear image) and the rest of the outer box opaque. So far this is what I'm doing:
<style>
#a {
background-color: black;
float: left;
} #b {
opacity : 0.4;
filter: alpha(opacity=40);
} #div {
position: absolute;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
top: 90px;
left: 90px;
border: 1px solid #FFF;
background: transparent;
}
</style>
<div id="a">
<div id="b">
<img src="http://clagnut.com/images/ithaka.jpg" />
</div>
</div>
<div id="div"></div>
Any ideas? thx
The maximum opacity of an element is the opacity of its parent element. So if div#b has an opacity of 40%, if his children have 100% opacity in style they will also be 40% absolute opacity.
To accomplish what you're describing (at least what I think you're describing), one way could be to have both the transparent wrapper and the image children of a parent div with relative positioning. You can absolutely position both of the children inside of that wrapper so that the image shows up on top of the transparent box.
Edit: Here is the code for the effect you are describing. My example has a 480 x 320 image, and a 30-pixel border:
<style>
#back {background-image:url(mypicture.jpg);
width:480px;
height:320px;
position:relative;}
#middle {position:absolute;
width:480px;
height:320px;
background-color:#000;
opacity:0.4;
filter:alpha(opacity=40);
top:0;
left:0;}
#front {position:absolute;
width:420px; /* 30px border on left & right */
height:260px; /* 30px border on top & bottom */
background-image:url(mypicture.jpg);
background-position:-30px -30px; /* compensate for the border */
top:30px;
left:30px;}
</style>
<div id="back">
<div id="middle">
</div>
<div id="front">
</div>
</div>
If I understand you correctly, try using just one div (i.e. get rid of the outer one with ID "a") and setting a colored border around it. Or you could get more flexibility by "faking" a border using 4 divs for the left, right, top, and bottom edges and 4 more for the corners.
It's kind of hard to know what you mean without an example page, or screenshots of what you expect and what you're actually getting.
EDIT: I was about to edit in basically the same thing Rex M wrote. Here's another (although idealistically inferior) way to do it:
<style>
#a {
float: left;
position: relative;
}
div.overlay {
opacity: 0.4;
background-color: black;
position: absolute;
}
#t {
left: 0; top: 0; height: 90px; width: 450px;
}
#b {
left: 0; top: 120px; height: 218px; width: 450px;
}
#l {
left: 0; top: 90px; height: 30px; width: 90px;
}
#r {
left: 120px; top: 90px; height: 30px; width: 330px;
}
</style>
<div id="a">
<div id="t" class="overlay"></div>
<div id="b" class="overlay"></div>
<div id="l" class="overlay"></div>
<div id="r" class="overlay"></div>
<img src="http://clagnut.com/images/ithaka.jpg">
</div>
If you want to be sure that the images have a certain color for a background, you could just as well stick a background to all IMG-elements in your stylesheet:
div#a img { background: #FFF; }
Anyhow, the filter-property in CSS should not be relied upon, as it is not part of the official specifications for CSS 2.1.
I might have misunderstood the question, though. Could you rephrase it or provide pictures of expected results?
To follow on what Rex M said, you'll need to change things so that the non-transparent elements aren't children of the transparent elements.
You can use absolute or relative positioning to line up your "border" with the picture, although this can often have inconsistencies between browsers.
The most painless way off the top of my head is to use javascript to get the top and left pixel locations of the image and set the top/left css properties of the border to match (and set the size of the border to that of the image).
UPDATE:
The asker showed an example of what he is trying to recreate. In the example linked, the shaded areas (the "not selected" area) of the picture is created by 4 divs.
The top and bottom divs are the full width of the image, and are set to have a height that is the difference between the top/bottom of the selection box and the top/bottom of the image respectively.
The side divs have height and width modified so that they fill in the "side areas" of the image.
The sizes are updated via a mousemove event.
How can I center an image horizontally and aligned to the bottom of the container at the same time?
I have been able to center the image horizontally by its self. I have also been able to align the bottom of the container by its self. But I have not been able to do both at the same time.
Here is what I have:
.image_block {
width: 175px;
height: 175px;
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.image_block a img {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="image_block">
<img src="..." border="0">
</div>
That code aligns the image to the bottom of the div. What do I need to add/change to make it also center the image horizontally inside the div? The image size is not known before hand but it will be 175x175 or less.
.image_block {
width: 175px;
height: 175px;
position: relative;
}
.image_block a {
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
}
.image_block img {
/* nothing specific */
}
explanation: an element positioned absolutely will be relative to the closest parent which has a non-static positioning. i'm assuming you're happy with how your .image_block displays, so we can leave the relative positioning there.
as such, the <a> element will be positioned relative to the .image_block, which will give us the bottom alignment. then, we text-align: center the <a> element, and give it a 100% width so that it is the size of .image_block.
the <img> within <a> will then center appropriately.
This also works (taken a hint from this question)
.image_block {
height: 175px;
width:175px;
position:relative;
}
.image_block a img{
margin:auto; /* Required */
position:absolute; /* Required */
bottom:0; /* Aligns at the bottom */
left:0;right:0; /* Aligns horizontal center */
max-height:100%; /* images bigger than 175 px */
max-width:100%; /* will be shrinked to size */
}
wouldn't
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
added to the .image_block a img do the trick?
Note that that won't work in IE6 (maybe 7 not sure)
there you will have to do on .image_block the container Div
text-align:center;
position:relative; could be a problem too.
This is tricky; the reason it's failing is that you can't position via margin or text-align while absolutely positioned.
If the image is alone in the div, then I recommend something like this:
.image_block {
width: 175px;
height: 175px;
line-height: 175px;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
You may need to stick the vertical-align call on the image instead; not really sure without testing it. Using vertical-align and line-height is going to treat you a lot better, though, than trying to mess around with absolute positioning.
Remove the position: relative; line. I'm not sure why exactly but it fixes it for me.
have you tried:
.image_block{
text-align: center;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
#header2
{
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
background-color:Red;
}
<div style="text-align:center; height:300px; width:50%;" id="header2">
<div class="right" id="header-content2">
<p>this is a test</p>
</div>
</div>