I am trying to see if there is a way to get the ComponentPresentations by passing the list of ComponentIDs in one single API instead of passing each one in a loop. In my case all the DCPs are using the same template as well.
When I checked the API I could not find any method which could accept the list of tcmids or something in those lines. The use case I am trying to solve is getting all the DCPs in one single API call vs. looping through 10-15 (in my case) and get each DCP independently which is not effective when the first time we hit the broker db.
I was able to get the same using OData web service, but we not yet ready to use the Odata. Not sure if Odata and broker API are slightly different, but could not find any documentation that explain API vs Odata difference in capabilities from query point.
Any help will be appreciated.
ENV: Tridion 2011 SP1, Java API.
OData and Broker API are very different. If you want information on OData I'd recommend checking here and here.
No, you can't do that operation through the Content Delivery API. With a properly configured cache you will be hitting the database only once per component presentation, so the impact is minimized...
Related
So I've this Microservice architecture where there is an ApiGateway, 2 microservices i.e., Configurations. API and API-1. The Configuration. API is mainly responsible to parse the JSON request and
access the DB and update Status tables, also to fetch required data, it even adds up more values to the JSON request and send it to the API-1. API-1 is responsible to just generate report based on the json passed.
Yes I can merge the configurations. API to the API-1 and make it a single service/container but the requirement is not to merge and create two different components i.e., 1 component purely based on
fetching the data, updating the status while the other just to generate the reports.
So here are some questions:
: Should I use gRPC for the configuration.API or is there a better way to achieve this.
Thank you.
RPC is a synchronous communication so you have to come up with strong reason to use it in service to service communication. it brings the fast and performant communication on the table but also coupling to the services. if you insist use rpc it is better to use MASSTRANSIT to implement the rpc in less coupled way. however in most cases the asynchronous event-base communication is recommended to avoid coupling (in that case look at CAP theory, SAGA, circuit breaker ).
since you said
but the requirement is not to merege and create two different
components
and that is your reason and also base on the fact
also to fetch requried data, it even adds up more values to the JSON
request and send it to the API-1
i think the second one makes scenes more. how ever i cant understand why you change the database position since you said the configuration service is responsible for that.
if your report service needs request huge data to generate report you have to think about the design. there is no more profile on you domain so there cannot be an absolute answer to this. but consider data reduce from insertion or request or some sort of pre-calculation if you could and also caching responses.
End-to-end logging between multiple components using Application Insights (AI) is based on a hierarchical Request-Id header. So each component is responsible to honer a possible incoming Request-Id. To get the full end-to-end hierarchical flow correct in Application Insights the Request-Id header needs to be used as the AI Operation.Id and Operation.ParentId (as described here).
But when making a request with a Request-Id header to a Azure Function using a HttpTrigger binding for example (Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Functions 1.0.24) with integrated Application Insights configured (as described here) a completely new Operation.Id is created and used - causing the whole flow in AI to be lost. Any ideas on how to get around this?
Setting up a separate custom TelemetryClient might be an option. But seems to require a lot of configuration to get the full ExceptionTrackingTelemetryModule and DependencyTrackingTelemetryModule right - especially when using Functions v2 and Core (ref to AI config). Anyone go that successfully working?
This is not yet supported by Functions but should start working sometime early next year.
If you want to hack it through, you can add a reference to ApplicationInsights SDK for AspNetCore (v 2.4.1) and configure RequestTrackingTelemetryModule.
static Function1()
{
requestModule = new RequestTrackingTelemetryModule();
requestModule.Initialize(TelemetryConfiguration.Active);
}
private static RequestTrackingTelemetryModule requestModule;
This is pretty sketchy, not fully tested and has drawbacks. E.g. request collected is no longer augmented with functions details (invocation id, etc). To overcome it you need to get the real TelemetryConfiguration from the Function dependency injection container and use it to initialize the module.
It should be possible, but is blocked by some issue.
But even with the code above, you should get requests that respect incoming headers and other telemetry correlated to the request.
Also, when out-of-the-box support for correlation for http request is rolled out, this may break. So this is a hacky temporary solution, use it only if you absolutely have to.
How to get the governance registry lifecycles using this api https://localhost:9443//governance/restservices in payload of json.I am getting all the field but i am not getting lifecycle value in that api.Can anyone suggest how to get that.I also see this api to get lifecycle state GET https://localhost:9443/ /governance/restservices/44dadw4/states but I dont want to use this api because I have to call for each time this api to get its lifecycle state.I want to use this api https://localhost:9443//governance/restservices and get the rest service lifecycle value in json payload.
Please help i am searching in web for this approach but not getting enough result.
There is no way getting LC details from https://localhost:9443//governance/restservices using vanilla WSO2 G-Reg. This endpoint is used to retrieve rest service artifact metadata.
I don't understand your point, why you can't use https://localhost:9443/ /governance/restservices/44dadw4/states endpoint for this. Documentation.
However, You can achieve this using a custom deployment. If you want to get LC details from this endpoint you have to update the existing API code. Basically you need to update Asset.java and deploy the new governance.war file.
I am already using the standard WebAPI and returning JSON objects to my client. Now I saw an application that returned OData.
Can someone explain if there is any reason for me to use OData if I do not want to query my data from anything other than my own client running in the browser. Are there advantages that I could get through using OData ?
If you are only using your data in your own browser application, there is only few advantages to use OData in your situation:
OData is able to provide metadata about your service interface that can be used to generate client code to access the service. So if you have lots of client classes that you need to create, this could speed up your process. On the other hand, if you can share your classes between the server and an ASP.NET based client or if you only have a few classes, this might not be relevant in your situation.
Another - bigger - advantage in your situation is the support for generic queries against the service data. OData supports IQueryable so that you can decide on the client side on how to filter the data that the service provides. So you do not have to implement various actions or use query parameters to provide filtered data. This also means that if you need a new filter for your client, it is very likely that you do not have to change the server and can just put up the query on the client side. Possible filters include $filter expressions to filter the data, but also operations like $skip and $top that are useful when paging data. For details on OData and queries, see this link.
For a complete overview about OData and Web API see this link.
Here are few advantages of OData.
OData is a open protocol started by Microsoft is based on Rest Services so we can get data base on URL.
It suppport various protocol like http,atom,pub and also support JSON format.
No need to create proxy classes which we used to do it in web service.
You will able to write your own custom methods.
It is very light weight so the interaction between client and server will be fast compared to web service and other technologies.
Very simple to use.
Here are few reference links.
http://sandippatilprogrammer.wordpress.com/2013/12/03/what-is-odata-advantages-and-disadvantages/
http://geekswithblogs.net/venknar/archive/2010/07/08/introduction-odata.aspx
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/why-microsofts-open-data-protocol-matters/12700
I agree with the answers already posted, but as an additional insight...
You mentioned that:
... if I do not want to query my data from anything other than my own
client running in the browser...
You may not wish to run it normally through anything but your own cilent, but using oData you could use other querying tools for debugging. For example LinqPad allows you to use oData endpoints (such as that provided by stackoverflow).
It's probably not a good enough reason to implement oData if you don't have another reason to do so, but it's an added bonus.
I'm working on a web service that uses ASP.NET security model (i.e. with AspNetCompatibilityRequirements set to allowed). Like many others, I got an error saying the Anonymous access is required because the mexHttpBinding requires it and the only way to get around it is to remove the mex endpoint from each service as described here:
WCF - Windows authentication - Security settings require Anonymous
I thought by removing mex endpoint I will no longer able to generate WSDL or add a reference to the service from Visual Studio but to my surprise everything still works. I quickly googled the "mex binding" but most web sites just say it's for "Metadata Exchange" without going into too much detail on what it actually does.
Can anyone tell me what's the side effect of removing the mex binding?
If your WCF service does not expose service metadata, you cannot add a service reference to it, neither from within Visual Studio (Add Service Reference), nor will another client be able to interrogate your service for its methods and the data it needs.
Removing Metadata Exchange (mex) basically renders the service "invisible", almost - a potential caller must find out some other way (e.g. by being supplied with a WSDL file, or by getting a class library assembly with a client he can use) about what the service can do, and how.
This might be okay for high risk environment, but most of the time, being able to interrogate the service and have it describe itself via metadata is something you want to have enabled. That's really one of the main advantages of a SOAP based service - by virtue of metadata, it can describe itself, its operations, all the data structures needed. That feature is used to make it really easy to call that service - you just point to the mex endpoint, and you can find out all you need to know about that service.
Without the metadata exchange, you won't be able to use svcutil.exe to automatically generate the proxy classes.