thanks to take a look here. I am starting get involved in a project and I need to create the tests for the code I've written. I have not too much experience with tests.
I've written this file:
tests/fixtures/visitante_boletin.yml
1:
id_localizacion: 60
email: emailconfirmado#server.net
estado_confirmacion: 1
fecha_creacion: 2013-02-03 12:01:49
fecha_confirmacion: 2013-02-03 12:01:49
fecha_cancelacion:
token: 343fbb5f15709935470ba3b7524068af8544776d924b0bd45c2558a7eb5c8082f0bef31402b773fa
and this test:
tests/libraries/com/arteinformado/service/front/SuscribeServiceTest.php
...
const SINCONFIRMAR = 0;
const CONFIRMADO = 1;
const CANCELADO = 2;
...
public function testShouldGetAllSuscriptionsWithStateCONFIRMADO() {
$suscriptors = $this->_suscribeService->getAllSuscriptionsWithState(self::CONFIRMADO);
$this->assertNotEmpty($suscriptors);
$this->assertEquals(1, count($suscriptors));
}
...
When I run the test I get an error at the assertNotEmpty, so I don't know if fixture data are being loaded or what's going on, since the method it is testing it is quite simple and should be ok.
public function getAllSuscriptionsWithState($estado_confirmacion) {
$suscriptors = array();
$query = $this->db->get_where('visitante_boletin', array('estado_confirmacion' => $estado_confirmacion));
foreach ($query->result() as $row) {
$suscriptor = $this->_dbRowToVisitanteBoletin($row);
array_push($suscriptors, $suscriptor);
}
return $suscriptors;
}
Any help guide will be really appreciate.
Thanks in advance. Cheers,
ยท_-
The PHPUnit-documentation is your friend.
You didn't mention it, but have you:
installed the DbUnit-extension
let your test-classes extend PHPUnit_Extensions_Database_TestCase
provided your test-classes with a getConnection()- and getDataSet()-method
That definitely is working for me.
Related
I have created this project, which is basically an attempted clone of this project but converted from C# to VB using SharpDevelop 4.4 and then built using VS 2015
My issue can be found on GitHub here, but here's the error I'm getting when I run my NodeJS project:
My bit of code in my NodeJS project that isn't working:
var WriteCrapVB = edge.func('vb', function () {
/*
Function(input)
Console.WriteLine("Hello from .NET")
Return Nothing
End Function
*/
});
var hello = WriteCrapVB(null);
hello(null); // prints out "Hello from .NET"
When running this C# it does work:
var WriteCrapCS = edge.func('cs', function () {
/*
async (input) =>
{
return (Func<object,Task<object>>)(async (i) => {
Console.WriteLine("Hello from .NET");
return null;
});
}
*/
});
var hello = WriteCrapCS(null, true);
hello(null, true); // prints out "Hello from .NET"
I have basically tried to use this guide to create this project.
I've tried various things to fix this bug, each as unhelpful as the previous one. I'm hoping someone with greater .NET knowledge than I can point out a glaringly obvious mistake!
Please help this poor soul from going bald from hair tearing!
facepalm
Root namespace must be blank.
I am trying the phpunit in the Zf2 album module by following the online ZF2 tutorial. Below is the debug information.
Album\Model\AlbumTableTest::testFetchAllReturnsAllAlbums
Argument 1 passed to Album\Model\AlbumTable::__construct() must be an instance of Zend\Db\Adapter\Adapter, instance of Mock_TableGateway_fb3537df given, called in D:\www\zend2\tests\module\Album\src\Album\Model\AlbumTableTest.php on line 26 and defined
And the function used is
public function testFetchAllReturnsAllAlbums()
{
$resultSet = new ResultSet();
$mockTableGateway = $this->getMock('Zend\Db\TableGateway\TableGateway',
array('select'), array(), '', false);
$mockTableGateway->expects($this->once())
->method('select')
->with()
->will($this->returnValue($resultSet));
$albumTable = new AlbumTable($mockTableGateway);
$this->assertSame($resultSet, $albumTable->fetchAll());
}
And the 26th line mentioned in the debug information is
$albumTable = new AlbumTable($mockTableGateway);
Which calls to the following functon in Album\Model\AlbumTable::__construct()
public function __construct(Adapter $adapter)
{
$this->adapter = $adapter;
$this->resultSetPrototype = new ResultSet();
$this->resultSetPrototype->setArrayObjectPrototype(new Album());
$this->initialize();
}
Any help to over come this failed test is much appreciated.
Got it solved. I happened to see that the Album module given in the Zend Framework2 tutorial has been changed. I followed it once again to correct the changed codes. Now the mentioned issue has been sorted out.
I feel like I must be doing this wrong. I've got a function that is supposed to construct a query based on an API's description of available fields. Here's what I've got:
var query_fields = getQueryFieldsFor(sobject_name);
// Need query fields for the next statement, which actually does the query
public function getQueryFieldsFor(sObject:String):String{
//helper function to get queryfields for given sobject
var queryFields:String = '';
app.connection.describeSObject(sObject,
new mx.rpc.Responder(
function(result:DescribeSObjectResult):void{
var returnFields:String = '';
for ( var field:Field in result.fields ){
if(field.active){
returnFields.concat(field.name+',')
}
}
returnFields.slice(0, returnFields.length-1); //remove last comma
queryFields = returnFields;
}, function(error):void{
Alert.show('error in getQueryFieldsFor function');
})
);
return queryFields;
}
I know this doesn't work, and I think I understand why. However, I keep running into this type of issue and I believe I'm just thinking about it/designing it wrong. So what's a better pattern here? Would really appreciate any insight on this. Many thanks in advance.
It would be better to externalize your functions and execute your next line of code after the fact:
public function getQueryFieldsFor(sObject:String):String
{
var responder:Responder = new Responder( onResult, onFault);
app.connection.describeSObject(sObject, responder);
}
private function onResult(result:DescribeSObjectResult):void
{
var returnFields:String = '';
for ( var field:Field in result.fields ){
if(field.active){
returnFields.concat(field.name+',')
}
}
returnFields.slice(0, returnFields.length-1); //remove last comma
queryFields = returnFields;
}
Your main problem though is not the code, but a lack of thinking asynchronously. You cannot have a function called "getQueryFields" that will return it instantly. What you want to do is think in the request/response way. You're trying to get some data, a request is made to a service, gets the data back, updates a property which is then binded to a view which gets redrawn. This is the proper way to do any webapp.
It might be beneficial for you to also look at application frameworks like RobotLegs and Parsley since it helps you manage these situations. Parsley also has a task library which lets you perform several asynchronous task one after another.
I am trying to build a test against some legacy method that implement out parameters.
Could you give me an example how to do this?
Just assign the out or ref parameter from the test.
Given this interface:
public interface ILegacy
{
bool Foo(out string bar);
}
You can write a test like this:
[TestMethod]
public void Test13()
{
string bar = "ploeh";
var legacyStub = new Mock<ILegacy>();
legacyStub.Setup(l => l.Foo(out bar))
.Returns(true);
Assert.IsTrue(legacyStub.Object.Foo(out bar));
Assert.AreEqual("ploeh", bar);
}
Anything wrong with the second example at the top of https://github.com/moq/moq4/wiki/Quickstart ? You really should be giving examples of what you're trying to do if you're not going to look for things like this.
Incidentally if you want to use moq (currently) to mock the out parameter too you'll also have to do the following hoop jump. Lets say that you wanted to mock an out parameter that returned another mocked object e.g.
var mockServiceA = new Mock<IMyService>();
var mockServiceOutput = new Mock<IMyServiceOutput>();
// This will not work...
mockServiceA.Setup(svc => svc.DoSomething(out mockServiceOutput.Object));
// To have this work you have to do the following
IMyServiceOutput castOutput = mockServiceOutput.Object;
mockServiceA.Setup(svc => svc.DoSomething(out castOutput));
I have an BLL that does validation on user input then inserts a parent(PorEO) and then inserts children(PorBoxEO). So there are two calls to the same InsertJCDC. One like this=>InsertJCDC(fakePor) and another like this=>InsertJCDC(fakeBox).
When I stub out the parent I want to return fakePor. But when I run the code it returns null instead. Here is the unit test.
[Test]
public void PorBLL_InsertByPorInsertCV_DoingGoodCase()
{
// Startup object mapper
_Bootstrapper.Bootstrap();
// create the mock for generic Crud
IGenericCrud mockGenericCrud = MockRepository.GenerateMock<IGenericCrud>();
PorInsertCV fakePor = new PorInsertCV();
PorBoxInsertCV fakeBox = new PorBoxInsertCV();
// build fake return
PorEO fakePorNewRow = new PorEO();
fakePorNewRow.PorId = 22;
// stub parent and child insert routines.
mockGenericCrud.Stub(c => c.InsertJCDC<PorEO, PorInsertCV>(fakePor)).Return(fakePorNewRow);
mockGenericCrud.Stub(c => c.InsertJCDC<PorBoxEO, PorBoxInsertCV>(fakeBox)).Return(null);
ObjectFactory.Inject(typeof(IGenericCrud), mockGenericCrud);
IPorBLL localWithMock = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<IPorBLL>();
// build user args to csll bll with and use for insert
PorInsertCV userArgs = new PorInsertCV();
userArgs.AccessionNbr = "364-80-0007";
userArgs.NbrBoxes = 11;
userArgs.RegId = 20;
userArgs.TransmitedDt = Convert.ToDateTime("1/30/1980");
// call the bll using the stub
localWithMock.InsertByPorInsertCV(userArgs);
}
Any help is greatly appreciated
I can't really follow your code that well, but I'll give it a shot.
From my skills of deduction, this line here is the one giving you issues:
mockGenericCrud.Stub(c => c.InsertJCDC<PorEO, PorInsertCV>(fakePor)).Return(fakePorNewRow);
Because you're expecting fakePorNewRow to be returned when you call localWithMock.InsertByPorInsertCV(userArgs); - yeah?
If that's your case, what your problem is, is that it will only return fakePorNewRow when it is given fakePor ... not userArgs as you have given it.
Tell me if I'm completely off track.
HTHs,
Charles
Ps. You might want to add the tag of which mocking framework you are using to the question.