How to get equivalent to R ifelse functionality, using logical operators - r

Please can anyone advise how I can turn the following statement into one that will do the same thing but NOT using ifelse please?
<-ifelse(y>=50, 0.2*x+0.8*y, ifelse(y<50 & x>70, y+10, ifelse(y<50 & x<70, y)))
x=80
y=60
So I the final code should give an answer of 64 - selecting the first condition. I will then test it to ensure the other 3 conditions give the correct result for varying values of x and y
Thanks a lot.

This should work:
finalmark <- (x * 0.2 + y * 0.8) * (y >= 50) + (y + 10 * (x > 70)) * (y < 50)

Something like this?
if(y>=50){
0.2*x+0.8*y
}else{
if(y<50 & x>70){
y+10
}else{
if(y<50 & x<70){
y
}else{
"OMG I did not expect this scenario"
}
}
}
try: y=45; x=70 to see why I have the last condition.

If y is a number then, once you've tested for y > = 50 then y must be less than 50 so don't keep testing for that. Similarly, once you've found x > 70 then you don't need the last ifelse. You don't have a return for x = 70. My guess is that you want to test for a <= or >= situation there.
ifelse(y>=50, 0.2*x+0.8*y, ifelse(x>70, y+10, y))
in scalar that's
if(y >= 50){
0.2*x+0.8*y
}else if(x > 70){
y+10
}else y
Given you seem to be having a hard time in general writing the logic I suggest you post a more complete question. It's possible (probable) that you're doing something here that you really don't want to do.

There are several approaches you can take. Below are a few examples of building a function 'f', so that 'f(x,y)' meets your criteria listed in the question using logic other than 'ifelse' statements.
Note: I'm also adding in one amendment to the original post, since 'x=70' would break the logic. I'm adding 'x>=70' to the second criterion.
Option 1: Use a standard 'if / else if / else' logic block. Personally, I like this option, because it's easily readable.
f <- function(x, y){
if (y>= 50){
return(0.2*x+0.8*y)
} else if (y < 50 & x >= 70){
return(y+10)
} else {
return(y)
}
}
Option 2: Combine your two logical tests (there are really only two) into a string, and use a switch. Note that the final and unnamed option is treated as an 'else'.
f <- function(x, y){
return(
switch(paste(x >= 70, y >= 50, sep=""),
TRUEFALSE = y + 10,
FALSEFALSE = y,
0.2*x+0.8*y
)
)
}
Option 3: Order your 'if' statements to reduce logical comparisons. This is the sort of thing to do if you have a large data set or very limited memory. This is slightly harder to troubleshoot, since you have to read the whole block to fully understand it. Option 1 is better if you don't have memory or cycle limitations.
f <- function(x, y){
if (y >= 50){
return(0.2*x+0.8*y)
} else {
if (x >=70){
return(y+10)
} else {
return(y)
}
}
}
There are other options, but these are the simplest that come readily to mind.

Related

What is the best way to add an optional length argument?

First post ever, excuse my ignorance as I'm relatively new to programming. I'm trying to create a function that samples a number given by x and returns "number too small" below 5 and "number too big" if its above 10. I already figured this part out, however my issue is that I want to add an optional len argument that will display the length of x if used and if not will still function as intended. I'm sure its possible if I just do a bunch of if else statements with every possible scenario, but is there a more organized way to achieve my goal. Was thinking that I can make another if/else that returns null if they opt out of the second len argument but unsure on how i would code it as I already have two if or else statements.
vector.maker.num2 <-function(x){
generator <-sample(1:20, x)
if (x < 5) {
print(c(generator, "warning, number too low"))
}
if (x > 10) {
print(c(generator, "warning, number too high"))
}
}
vector.maker.num2(4)
It sounds like what you want is the missing function.
vector.maker.num2 <-function(x, len){
generator <-sample(1:20, x)
if (!missing(len)) {
print(length(x))#Will usually print 1, because x is a vector of length 1.
}
if (x < 5) {
print(c(generator, "warning, number too low"))
}
if (x > 10) {
print(c(generator, "warning, number too high"))
}
}
vector.maker.num2(4)

R: How to use current function output's within this function

I write a R function using if & else if in it. See the code below:
i_ti_12 <- function(x){
if (x <= 44)
{ti = exp(-13.2238 + 0.152568*x)}
else if (x >= 49)
{ti = -0.01245109 + 0.000315605*x}
else (x > 44 & x < 49)
{ti = (x-44)*(i_ti_12(49))/(49-44) + (49-x)*(i_ti_12(44))/(49-44)}
return(ti)
}
I want to use this function's output, i_ti_12(49) within this function, but the above code doesn't work. The output is:
> i_ti_12(49)
Error: C stack usage 7974292 is too close to the limit
The simple solution is just replace i_ti_12(49) by -0.01245109 + 0.000315605*49, but its not a clear way to solve it and might not work in complex cases.
So I really want to know and to learn if there are clear methods to do this? I mean, like above simple example, write a conditional function using one condition's output in this function. Any help is highly appreciate.
Your last else is followed by a condition (x > 44 & x < 49), which actually is not correct. If you have (x > 44 & x < 49) there, that means you will execute that statement, and ti = (x-44)*(i_ti_12(49))/(49-44) + (49-x)*(i_ti_12(44))/(49-44) is something independent with your if-else structure.
In that case, when you call i_ti_12(49), your function does not know when the recursion should be terminated since you did not define that case.
You can try the code below:
i_ti_12 <- function(x){
if (x <= 44)
{ti = exp(-13.2238 + 0.152568*x)}
else if (x >= 49)
{ti = -0.01245109 + 0.000315605*x}
else
{ti = (x-44)*(i_ti_12(49))/(49-44) + (49-x)*(i_ti_12(44))/(49-44)}
return(ti)
}
such that
> i_ti_12(49)
[1] 0.003013555

Error in if (num < 0) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed

y <- as.integer(readline(prompt ="Enter a number: "))
factorial = 1
if (y< 0){
print("Error")
} else if (y== 0)
{
print("1")
} else
{
for(i in 1:y) {
factorial = factorial * i
}
return(factorial)
}
wondering why this is giving:
Error in if (y< 0) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
is it cause the first line has data type NA_integer?
There are three possible ways to pass values to the if statement.
y <- 1
if (y > 0) print("more")
This one works as expected.
y <- 1:3
if (y > 0) print("ignores all but 1st element")
As the warning message will tell you, only the first element was used to evaluate it. You could use any or all to make this right.
y <- NA
if (y > 0) print("your error")
This case actually gives you your error. I would wager a bet that y is somehow NA. You will probably need to provide a reproducible example (with data and the whole shebang) if you'll want more assistance. Note also that it helps visually structure your code to improve readability.

Error message in Bubble sort code in R language

I did some programming work on R language to do the bubble sort. Sometimes it works perfectly without any error message, but sometimes, it shows "Error in if (x[i] > x[i + 1]) { : argument is of length zero". Can any one help me check whats wrong with it? I have attached my code below
example <- function(x) {
n <- length(x)
repeat {
hasChanged <- FALSE
n <- n - 1
for(i in 1:n) {
if ( x[i] > x[i+1] ) {
temp <- x[i]
x[i] <- x[i+1]
x[i+1] <- temp
hasChanged <- TRUE
cat("The current Vector is", x ,"\n")
}
}
if ( !hasChanged ) break;
}
}
x <-sample(1:10,5)
cat("The original Vector is", x ,"\n")
example(x)
The error occurs because you are iteratively decreasing n. Depending on the original vector's order (or lack thereof), n can reach the value of 1 after the last change. In that case, a further reduction of n in the next iteration step addresses the value x[0], which is undefined.
With a minimal correction your code will work properly, without giving error messages. Try to replace the line
if ( !hasChanged ) break;
with
if ( !hasChanged | n==1 ) break
Basically you have two termination criteria: Either nothing has been changed in the previous iteration or n is equal to one. In both cases, a further iteration won't change the vector since it is already ordered.
By the way, in R programming you don't need a semicolon at the end of a command. It is tolerated/ignored by the interpreter, but it clutters the code and is not considered good programming style.
Hope this helps.

How to setup a recursive lapply for specific values ex.w[i] == n[i]?

Background
I'm developing a function that takes in a value for w between 1 and 3 and returns n values from one of 3 distributions.
The problem I am having is when n or w are not of length 1. So I've added 2 parameters nIsList and wIsList to create the functionality I want. The way I want this to work is as follows:
(Works as needed)
If nIsList ex( c(1,2,3) ) return a list equivalent to running consume(w,1), consume(w,2), consume(w,3)
(Works as needed)
If wIsList ex( c(1,2,3) ) return a list equivalent to running consume(1,n), consume(2,n), consume(3,n)
(Doesn't work as needed)
If nIsList ex(1,2,3) and wIsList ex(1,2,3)
return a list equivalent to running consume(1,1), consume(2,2), consume(3,3). Instead, I get a list equivalent to running [consume(1,1), consume(1,2), consume(1,3)], [consume(2,1), consume(2,2), consume(2,3)], [consume(3,1),consume(3,2), consume(3,3)]
I understand why I am getting the results I am getting. I just can't seem to figure out how to get the result I want. (As explained above)
Question
I want the function to provide a list for each element in w and n that is consume(w[i], n[i]) when wIsList & nIsList are True. Is there a way to do that using lapply?
The code:
library("triangle")
consume <- function(w, n=1, nIsList=F, wIsList=F){
if(!nIsList & !wIsList){
if(w==1){
return(rtriangle(n,0.3,0.8))
}else if(w==2){
return(rtriangle(n,0.7,1))
}else if(w==3){
return(rtriangle(n,0.9,2,1.3))
}
}
else if(nIsList & !wIsList){
return(sapply(n, consume, w=w))
}
else if(nIsList & wIsList){
return(lapply(n, consume, w=w, wIsList=T))
}
else if(!nIsList & wIsList){
return(lapply(w, consume, n))
}
}
Note: I am having trouble summarizing this question. If you have any suggestions for renaming it please let me know and I will do so.
Thanks to JPC's comment, using mapply does the trick. The new code is as follows:
consume <- function(w, n=1){
nIsList <- length(n) > 1 # Change based on JPC's second comment
wIsList <- length(w) > 1 # Change based on JPC's second comment
if(!nIsList & !wIsList){
if(w==1){
return(rtriangle(n,0.3,0.8))
}else if(w==2){
return(rtriangle(n,0.7,1))
}else if(w==3){
return(rtriangle(n,0.9,2,1.3))
}
}
else if(nIsList & !wIsList){
return(sapply(n, consume, w=w))
}
else if(nIsList & wIsList){
return(mapply(consume,w,n)) ## Updated portion
}
else if(!nIsList & wIsList){
return(lapply(w, consume, n))
}
}

Resources