Does there exist anything akin "Master Slave Widget" for PloneFormGen? Where the user choices first choice A which would generate the list of choices for choice B (below) to select?
This is a far less than ideal answer, but I've done this several times with JavaScript injected into the header with a PFG override. It's only practical for relatively simple decision trees.
The basic procedure is to on-load hide all the subsidiary controls, then reveal them as click events indicate a controlling choice. Grouping subsidiary controls into fieldsets is also handy: then you may show and hide controls as a group.
Related
I'm really just wondering if anyone has stumbled across this...
In the Widgets API documentation for the Multiselect widget in Google App Maker, the "Styles" section includes a style name for a disabled item:
.app-MultiSelect-Item.disabled Style for the disabled item or items.
I have a case where I'm adding options and values to a multiselect by script based on data pulled from elsewhere. The initial values include the currently selected set of choices, but based on other actions taken by the user, they may not be eligible (via our internal rules and processes) to make that choice anymore.
If there's a way to set a specific item as disabled, I'm envisioning being able to style it with a strike through to communicate that even though that choice is selected now, it's not available as a new choice, and it's going to be removed from the other data source.
So it might be like this:
X Choice A
_ Choice B
X Choice C
_ Choice D
Thoughts?
I have to create a Dynamic menu in ASP.NET. I want to use dynamic LinkButtons (or can be a Menu Control), but should be appended with sequence numbers. Eg: 1,2,3a 3b etc..and these sequcenes could be dynamic. Any idea. I used a repeater with a label and LinkButton in it, but having problems with view state. Any idea how to append sequence to menu??
Essentially, you have two paradigms with web applications, at least from this conversation's standpoint.
Stream out the HTML, creating it as you stream
Create containers that can bind to data and shape the data
Your concept seems to be "only #1 is dynamic", but that is not true. Any time you can change the data and get a different output, you are dealing with something dynamic. My personal feeling is shape the menu data prior to binding. This cannot always be done, but more oft than not, it can. The second method would be to attach to an event like a item binding or row binding event. Controlling the HTML stream and writing out individual items is generally my last resort.
Now to the viewstate issue. Viewstate is a bastard when you start adding things to an item after binding and semi-problematic when you are playing the dynamic game from #1 above. The problem is things added after the initial definition cannot easily be set up with automagic bits. You end up having to rebind each time. This is why shaping data and then binding is superior. Even in cases where you have to rebuild, you can cache the shaped data and quickly rebind. It takes more "up front" work, but is less problematic.
The actual container you are binding with is inconsequential. Unless you can't use the menu control for some reason (other than having to dynamically add, which can be solved by playing with the bound data), I would head this direction. Actually, I would head this direction and use the CSS friendly adapters so you can alter the look and feel more easily. :-)
I'm using Telerik scheduler to display a Timeline view of meetings. The resources derive from the Person class, and they are Advocate, and Legislator.
On the Y axis, I am listing Advocates, and on the X axis, I am listing blocks of time in one hour increments.
When I double click an appointment, the Edit Appointment modal dialog pops up and lists Advocates and Legislators.
Since meetings will have multiple advocates and possibly multiple legislators in attendance, I would like to have a checkbox list inside the resource dropdowns on the edit screen. Is there any way to accomplish this?
I believe this will allow me to solve one problem in that, if Peter Pan and Homer Simpson both are to attend the same meeting, clicking the meeting in the row for either of those two advocates will display 'Peter Pan' in both instances (or sometimes '-', not yet sure where that comes from) rather than 'Homer Simpson' where I open up the meeting from his row.
If it is not possible to introduce checkboxes to the resources list, can you suggest an alternate way around the ultimate issue in the above paragraph? Thanks in advance.
Telerik supports the adding of a listbox to support what you are trying to do. On the Scheduler itself add the code below that mimics your field names that your advocates are pulling from in your DB:
<ResourceTypes>
<telerik:ResourceType DataSourceID="SqlDataSource2" ForeignKeyField="Adv_AdvocateID"
KeyField="Adv_AdvocateID" Name="Advocate" TextField="Adv_FullName" AllowMultipleValues="true" />
</ResourceTypes>
The next step is to populate the resources using a custom provider. See this program here for a great project in which you can see resource population in action. Using the SchedulerDBProvider class you can then adjust their example to more represent your fields and populate the appointments accordingly with your desired ResourceTypes.
In terms of getting that particular drop down to have multiple selections via checkboxes you would most likely have to define your own custom advanced template. This route allows you to take a UserControl and use that as the edit view for your appointments. There's a demo that displays all of this (including source code) right here.
However, having that RadComboBox there might not even be the ideal approach to take. What about just a simple list of checkboxes? This demo shows off how a very simple declaration for the RadScheduler can achieve this functionality. Additionally, there is some code-behind (both in C# and VB.NET) that shows off how you can customize the text on each appointment, which might be helpful in the case that you're referring to.
Looking for some implementation advice:
I have a page that has a 3-tab ajaxToolkit:TabContainer. The purpose of the page is to expose a calculator that has two basic inputs: geo-location and date. The three tabs are labeled "City and State", "Postal Code", and "GPS Coordinates". The layout of each tab container is the same for each tab, with the exception of the location section; the location section changes because each type of location has different inputs. For example, to specify city/state, there will be three fields: city, country, and state (country and state will use cascading drop-down lists). But Postal code requires only one field (which will validate via regular expression for allowed countries).
See the example design mockup:
So, what I WOULD LIKE to do (in order to minimize duplicate code), is to have a common control that contains the layout and structure of the calculator without specifying anything about the location section. Then, I'd like to be able to pull in each of the unique location controls based on what tab is selected. The tab structure exists at the page level, not in a control.
Any advice?
I was looking at templated controls (see MSDN article here), but I'm not convinced that it's the right solution. If I HAVE to create three separate controls with similar layouts and common elements, then that's what I have to do. But REALLY, I'd prefer a more elegant, inheritance-based solution.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
I wound up using jQuery UI for this. It's tab feature is very nice.
I have a very simple webforms app that will allow field techs to order parts from the warehouse.
Essentially it work like so:
User selects a category from a filter dropdown, which then binds items of that category to a gridview control
User finds an item in the gridview and inputs a desired quantity (in a text box in a template field in each row)
User repeats 1 & 2 as needed
User sees a summary of the complete requisition
User confirms items and submits the requisition for processing
My no-brainer UI design so far is the generic dropdown-above-a-gridview where there's a category drop-down list that filters a gridview, like in the eye-catching asp.net ado tutorials:
http://static.asp.net/asp.net/images/dataaccess/15fig01vb.png
Each gridview row (in my app, not in the image above) lists an item's details and can accept a quantity input in the template textbox if the user wants to requisition that item.
Given that a user will want items from different categories during a single usage session, I'm trying to figure out a good, user-friendly way to allow users to input a quantity for an item, have a warm fuzzy feeling that their input has been accepted/stored, then change the category filter (thus binding the gridview to a different set of data) and select other items from the gridview as many times as necessary before summing up their order and submitting it.
I've thought about putting another grid below the first and adding items to it dynamically as the user selects each item. But that seems awkward. Ditto with an unordered list or similar simple structure under the grid.
I've also thought about just storing the user's picks in view state or session state and displaying a summary on another page, kind of like a shopping cart sort of functionality. Maybe do that and use some sort of ajaxy goodness on the main page to display something warm and fuzzy when a quantity is input?
WWYD? What Would You Do?
TIA.
I strongly agree with your first choice: users need to see somewhere what they have chosen or they will probably keep choosing it over again thinking it failed. Waiting to display it on a summary page shouldn't even be an option. I don't see much wrong with binding to another grid, although a repeater is also a decent option. Well, there are many options. Anyway, if there is room to do this off to one side or another - especially the left- I definitely would, rather than at the bottom. Also, bonus points for enabling users to change the quantities (or delete all) of an item they already selected, wherever you choose to display this.
I like the idea of a search, but be careful with auto-complete. Google style is good where it displays results below, but I've seen people develop some that are way too aggressive and love to write over what you're typing: this is awful. Good luck.
Probably because both your choices are fine - it comes down to personal preference. The shopping cart idea is well known. But sometimes it gets old if you have to keep going back and forth between the cart and the item selection.
What's wrong with the separate grid? -That way you keep the selection list separate from the ordered items list?
Why tie the user to selecting the correct category and then selecting the quantity and hitting a button?
Why not use some type of autocomplete search so they can type in the produce name they want? Then a user could type "widg", get a drop town of choices, hit tab to go to a quantity field, enter a number, and then hit enter.
Display a quickie preview with the aucocomplete too, like as single row of your data.
Then throw all these into another grid at the top of the page if its a critical part of the application, maybe at the bottom if you think the actual grid results are important.
The reason I don't like category drop downs is people who are familiar with their jobs or company usually know the names and even skus numebers for what they are trying to do. Having them select a category instead of typing just slows them down. Also I hate running into the "which category is this?" moment. For example, is a chicken a pet, food, livestock, or food producer?