I have some relatively positioned containers (that vary in height) and I want to display them under each other. What's happening is they are displaying on top of each other (see fiddle).
I am using position:relative on the containers because I want the child elements to have position:absolute and display relative to their container. I think there is probably a quick fix with a fixed height for example but that isn't very flexible, my containers (or their children) will vary in height.
Desired result - fiddle
Actual result - fiddle
Code:
<style type="text/css">
.outside
{
position:relative;
border:1px solid red;
}
.inside
{
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
}
</style>
<div class="outside">
<div class="inside"><p>absolute 1</p></div>
</div>
<div class="outside">
<div class="inside"><p>absolute 2</p></div>
</div>
<div class="outside">
<div class="inside"><p>absolute 3</p></div>
</div>
When you position something absolute inside a relative element, this relative element won't take in consideration the width or height of the absolute element, so just add a height:30px; - DEMO -
If you do not wish to have a fixed height, then use at least a min-height. - DEMO -
The problem you are having is that your outside containers have no dimension because the inside divs are absolutely positioned.
Since you say these are variable height containers, I know of no way to fix this.
What's wrong with the 'desired result' fiddle? It seems that you are trying to recreate the default behavior of how boxes are rendered.
Related
I still have problem to well understand how the float property works in CSS. I do apologize because I know this is css basics but I really want to understand that and get a good explanation. I've created an example to show you.
Here is my page :
I just want to resize the second div at the right. When I look at it in the Chrome Developer Tools, I see that this div begins at the top left of the window and not after the red square. I'd like it to begins just after the red square to change the width properly without calculating the size of the square and doing something like
width = square size + width i want
Do you know how this it happens and how to properly resize the width of the second div ?
EDIT: the solution consists in add the float property to the second div too. The explanation is the following : floated elements are removed from the flow, so they don't stack with the non-floated elements.
You need to set float for another div too.
We generally do like below:
html
<div class="float-left">
<p>floated left</p>
</div>
<div class="float-left"><!--- to float next to previous div--->
<p>floated left</p>
</div>
css
.float-left{
float: left;
}
As per your comment:
We do clear the float values because the container contents would never been collapsed.
You need to float the second div.
Heres an example.
<div class="parent-div">
<div class="left">
</div>
<div class="left">
<p>This is the description of the image</p>
</div>
</div>
You need to set
p { display:inline; }
or
div { display:inline; }
since paragraphs and divs are block elements.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#block-boxes
the reason is that floated elements are removed from the flow, so they don't stack with the non-floated elements. - therefore they don't "take up space" like before. This is why your text div starts at the top left of its container.
from MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/float
The float CSS property specifies that an element should be taken from the normal flow and placed along the left or right side of its container, where text and inline elements will wrap around it. A floating element is one where the computed value of float is not none.
You have to set float for both DIVs
Here is the updated code:
HTML:
<div id="main_container">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right">
<p>This is the description of the image <i>Random text</i>
</p>
</div>
<!--Comment below <DIV> to see the result-->
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
CSS
#main_container {
border:5px solid #000;
}
.left, .right {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: red;
float:left;
}
.right {
background: blue;
width: calc(100% - 100px);
}
.clear {
clear:both;
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
Also, just to add one more important fact related to "float" is, make sure you add "clear:both" property after "float".
Why?? Because, a common problem with float-based layouts is that the floats' container doesn't want to stretch up to accomodate the floats. If you want to add, say, a border around all floats (ie. a border around the container) you'll have to command the browsers somehow to stretch up the container all the way.
Here is the Fiddle for the same: http://jsfiddle.net/1867ud9p/7/
Hope this will help!
I have a div element inside a main div, which i wanted to put an image tag into it. The problem is, when i positioned the image to absolute, the image didn't show up and the container div didn't take any space on the main div. But when i remove the position:absolute the image is showing just fine. Any help how to show it without removing the position:absolute?
The code is something like this:
<div id="main">
<div id="image_wrapper">
<img style="width:100%; position:absolute; top:0px; left:0px;" src="image.png" />
</div>
</div>
html
<div id="main">
<div id="image_wrapper">
<img src="image.png" />
</div>
</div>
css
#image_wrapper {
position:relative;
}
#image_wrapper img {
width:100%;
position:absolute;
top:0px; left:0px;
}
try this maybe it help....
When you set an element to be absolute-positioned, it is removed from the flow of the document. In this case, it means the container <div> now has "nothing" inside it and therefore collapses to zero height.
Also note that you should almost always give the containing element position:relative to provide an origin for the absolute element.
The main problem, though, is the lack of height on the container. Fix that and your image should show up.
If it doesn't, then try also specifying the image's height.
I have a problem with footer positioning. It doesn't go to the bottom/last.
So, I have a container div which has 3 divs - float:right , float:left and the center one (which has position:absolute) that comes between the two floated divs.
The center one must have fixed width and height because it's an image.
In that center div I have another div with a lot of content.
The problem is, because the center div has fixed width and height, it doesn't take the childs div height.
So my problem is how to put the footer that it comes last (after the container)?
Note - with JQuery I put the width of the floated divs because they take 100%-980px width.
This is how it looks like.
I tried putting to the center div overflow:auto,overflow:overlay,margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;.
After reading your question again an again i come to conclusion and create the below fiddle using your code and embed a sample image for you desired size.
Please let me know if i am wrong while understanding your question. So i can work around according your needs.
fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/ah3nr/6
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ah3nr/6/embedded/result/
My approach:
I have remove the position:absolute from center div and added new div for image and relate them both using css layer techniques.
Updated css:
.sectionDownContainer {
width: 980px;
/*height:270px;*/
border:1px solid red;
/*position: absolute;*/
position:relative;
top: -32px;
z-index: 1;
}
/*.sectionDownMenu {
margin-left: 50px;
margin-top: 1px;
display: block;
}
*/
#image_container {
position:relative;
width:980px;
height: 270px;
margin-top:-2px;
z-index:2;
}
.sectionDownContent {
width: 640px;
margin-top: -190px;
margin-left: 50px;
position: relative;
z-index:5;
color:#000;
font-weight:bold;
}
Screenshot:
Try this for the parent.
overflow:auto;
Also refer to this stack overflow post: Expanding a parent <div> to the height of its children
You need to set this property of the center-div: height:auto (you could also add a minimum height: min-height:400)
About your second question with the footer, this is much more complicated. You must do this:
<div id="content">
<div id="content_left">
</div>
<div id="content_center">
</div>
<div id="content_right">
</div>
<div id="footer">
</div>
</div>
I'll give you now the full CSS (because it's not so easy):
.content {position:relative; overflow:hidden;} //hidden overflow just a hack for common issues...
.content_left {height:auto; float:left} //set height to auto (very important)
.content_center {height:300; float:left} //a fixed height also works!
.content_right {height:auto; float:right}
.content_footer {width:100%; height:auto; float:right} //for tests you can also set a fixed height
This solution is also according to other threads on Stackoverflow: Align DIV's to bottom or baseline, How to align content of a div to the bottom?
But, if you experience problems with that, you may do this (my preferred solution):
<div id="content">
<div id="content_left">
</div>
<div id="content_center">
</div>
<div id="content_right">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
</div>
And its CSS:
.content {position:relative; overflow:hidden;} //hidden overflow is just a hack
.content_left {height:auto; float:left} //set height to auto (very important)
.content_center {height:300; float:left} //a fixed height also works!
.content_right {height:auto; float:right}
.content_footer {width:100%; height:xxx; float:left} //you can use any height...
Note that all above solutions works only if you set all the "contents" to float, it doesn't work with absolute values! I found this here: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_a_parent_DIV_wrap_around_child_DIVs_which_are_floating_left_or_right
This is due to an issue with divs: It's not possible to "tell" a parent div the size! So childs like "content_center" or "content_right" won't tell the "content" how long they are and how long "content" must be. So it's impossible to tell the footer where to align, if you use absolute values for the childs.
So your second question, although it looks trivial, is a very important question, and not easy to solve.
IMPORTANT UPDATE:
I tried to find a solution with absolute now. The problem is, that absolute and fixed are taken out of the regular (text)flow, so their size can't influence the size/positioning of any other element anymore. But we also have to understand that an absolute element still controls all its childs, so we should rather set the childs as relative than the parent (here: "content")! So I finally found the solution, and it's quite weird, because it's almost the opposite thing I suggested above, but that solution was influenced by the posting of others, while following solution is "my own" one (I added a header for demonstration purpose):
<div id="header">
</div>
<div id="content">
<div id="content_left">
</div>
<div id="content_center">
</div>
<div id="content_right">
</div>
<div id="footer">
</div>
</div>
The CSS (the "header" clearly shows, that "content" inherites all positioning to its childs like "content_left", "content_right", aso.):
.header {position:absolute; left:0; top:0; height:100; width:100%}
.content {position:absolute; left:0; top:100; height:auto; min-width:700} //min-width is only voluntary, but quite useful
.content_left {position:relative; left:0; top:0; width:200; height:auto;} //height:auto is important to adapt the height from containing text!
.content_center {position:relative; left:200; top:0; right:200; width:auto; height:auto;} //in the middle element, also auto-width is important!
.content_right {position:fixed; right:0; top:0; width:200; height:1000;} //we set a fixed position, but that won't influence the footer anymore!
.content_footer {margin:0 0 60 0; position:relative; left:0; bottom:-60; width:100%; height:150;} //a fixed height is also okey...but relative position is needed!
//you still need to add margin:0; border:0; padding:0 or similar values for some elements to get a good layout
The important point here is, that you can decide which child element will be the longest one, and set this element's position:relative, while the other may have absolute or fixed. But if you don't know which element will be the longest, all child's positions need to be set as relative. Anyway, I suggest to set all childs to relative (beside fixed if needed), because their parent "content" will set their absolute height-position already correctly, so there's no need for any absolute at all.
I'm repeating myself: Above I wrote it's not possible to tell a parent div the size...actually it's possible, but not if the values absolute and fixed are used. Only if you use the browser standart value (static) or relative, the parent div will be informed about the size of its childs, an therefore the footer is set correctly at the bottom of the page.
Well, my solution works everywhere...even in IE (tested 6.0 and 8.0!) due to the hack margin:0 0 60 0 where the value 60 should be the positive value of bottom:-60. Now we finally got the non-floating crossbrower-solution. ;)
The problem you're experiencing is that certain CSS properties cause elements to be "removed from the flow" of the document (see the W3C Visual formatting model). Parent elements naturally grow to fit the height of children elements, however, floated and absolutely positioned elements are removed from the document flow. As mentioned in a few comments, setting overflow: auto; or overflow: hidden; on the parent element re-establishes a bounding box around floated elements. This means you can float elements within the parent container, then set overflow: hidden; on the parent element, and the parent element will contain the floats. However, this doesn't work for absolutely positioned elements: the absolutely positioned box is "removed from the normal flow entirely (it has no impact on later siblings)". The only exception is that the entire document will try and grow to display any positioned elements (give an element position: absolute; top: 3000em; and the page scrollbar will grow to allow you to scroll to that element). I don't know of any way to trigger this for elements other than the document.
Back to your intended effect… If you don't need IE7 support, you can use display: table; table-layout: fixed; to achieve a centered column with a fixed width and two columns of variable width on either side.
jsFiddle Demo
In the near future, this will also be possible using the CSS "flexbox" properties. Flexbox will allow for some nifty new features, including horizontal and vertical centering, changing the order of rendered elements, and setting "flex" values for how much of the remaining variable width an element should take. However, the standard is currently going through a period of flux, and the old standard (enjoying moderate support) is being replaced by a new standard (with little to no support). See "Old" Flexbox and "New" Flexbox and the accompanying demo. Considering the glacially slow progress of web standards implementation, I don't expect to see this in use for a few years unless a truly masterful polyfill is produced.
I'm having a little issue with couple of DIVs.
I need two DIVs to be positioned in exactly same place, and toggle them. As one div disappear, another should appear. This I will do using jQuery toggle().
The issue is that both DIVs should be part of the page flow and positioned exactly the same way. How I would achieve that?
So, there is some previous div, that occupies some place, has relative positioning and non-fixed sizes (dependent on window measures)
<div class="header">
... </div>
Then my div
<div id="galleria" style="height:700px;width:920px; margin:0 auto; border:1px solid green; ">
... </div>
and other my DIV
<div id="aboutDiv" >
This is ABOUT
</div>
Two later divs should occupy the same place. What positioning tags I could use?
The design adjusts to the window size due to flexible element -- very first DIV "header", so no absolute positioning is possible.
just put them one after another
<div id="galleria" style="height:700px;width:920px; margin:0 auto; border:1px solid green; "> ... </div>
<div id="aboutDiv" >
This is ABOUT
</div>
both should be positioned relative , when one is hidden then other will move up and they will be in the same place - as long as you are using toggle to always have one hidden and one shown
You either need a relatively positioned parent container with absolutely positioned children, or hide one and show the other when its faded out completely
I currently have a div with width:auto to fill the entire screen width but I want to put a side bar on the right hand side.
When I float the width:auto div left and fixed width div to the right it goes under instead.
I'm basically looking for something similar to what reddit have with there search bar on the right width the content auto adjusting to the page width.
Thanks
You can make it like this:
Say you have those 2 divs inside a parent container, which expands to fit the page:
<div id="container">
<div id="autowidth">text expands her...</div>
<div id="fixed">This is a fixed column</div>
</div>
In your CSS:
#container {
width:100%;
border:1px solid black;
padding-right:200px;
}
#autowidth{
width:100%;
background-color:red;
float:left;
}
#fixed{
width:200px;
background-color:green;
float:right;
margin-right:-200px;
}
Basically, the parent container holds everything together. It has a padding of 200px (the width of the right col), so that its content doesnt goes beyond that point. In turn, the right col has a margin of -200px, so that it forces the boundaries imposed by the parent padding and places itself always at the foremost right. The other div, actually, now has only the spaces provided by the parent container, constrained by its padding, so its 100% would be, in fact, (100% - (parent's padding)). You can see a working result of this here: jsfiddle.
I'm pretty sure there might be more elegant solutions out there, so bear with me.
if you want to give a background, like it were 2 cols, you can go for the classical 'faux columns' background (see example at a list apart )
You don't strictly need a container div. I did css inline for brevity.
<div style="float:right; width:14em; background-color:#CCC;">
<p>This div is fixed-width.</p>
</div>
<div style="background-color:#EEE; margin-right:14.5em;">
<p>This div is auto-width.</p>
</div>
The answer doesn't work for me, I think it's outdated. Now you have to specify box-sizing: border-box for padding to count to width, but thanks for inspiration. This is my solution.
#autowidth {
float:left;
width:100%;
padding-right:200px;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
#fixed {
float:right;
width:200px;
margin-left:-200px;
}