Concatenate rows of a data frame - r

I would like to take a data frame with characters and numbers, and concatenate all of the elements of the each row into a single string, which would be stored as a single element in a vector. As an example, I make a data frame of letters and numbers, and then I would like to concatenate the first row via the paste function, and hopefully return the value "A1"
df <- data.frame(letters = LETTERS[1:5], numbers = 1:5)
df
## letters numbers
## 1 A 1
## 2 B 2
## 3 C 3
## 4 D 4
## 5 E 5
paste(df[1,], sep =".")
## [1] "1" "1"
So paste is converting each element of the row into an integer that corresponds to the 'index of the corresponding level' as if it were a factor, and it keeps it a vector of length two. (I know/believe that factors that are coerced to be characters behave in this way, but as R is not storing df[1,] as a factor at all (tested by is.factor(), I can't verify that it is actually an index for a level)
is.factor(df[1,])
## [1] FALSE
is.vector(df[1,])
## [1] FALSE
So if it is not a vector then it makes sense that it is behaving oddly, but I can't coerce it into a vector
> is.vector(as.vector(df[1,]))
[1] FALSE
Using as.character did not seem to help in my attempts
Can anyone explain this behavior?

While others have focused on why your code isn't working and how to improve it, I'm going to try and focus more on getting the result you want. From your description, it seems you can readily achieve what you want using paste:
df <- data.frame(letters = LETTERS[1:5], numbers = 1:5, stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
paste(df$letters, df$numbers, sep=""))
## [1] "A1" "B2" "C3" "D4" "E5"
You can change df$letters to character using df$letters <- as.character(df$letters) if you don't want to use the stringsAsFactors argument.
But let's assume that's not what you want. Let's assume you have hundreds of columns and you want to paste them all together. We can do that with your minimal example too:
df_args <- c(df, sep="")
do.call(paste, df_args)
## [1] "A1" "B2" "C3" "D4" "E5"
EDIT: Alternative method and explanation:
I realised the problem you're having is a combination of the fact that you're using a factor and that you're using the sep argument instead of collapse (as #adibender picked up). The difference is that sep gives the separator between two separate vectors and collapse gives separators within a vector. When you use df[1,], you supply a single vector to paste and hence you must use the collapse argument. Using your idea of getting every row and concatenating them, the following line of code will do exactly what you want:
apply(df, 1, paste, collapse="")
Ok, now for the explanations:
Why won't as.list work?
as.list converts an object to a list. So it does work. It will convert your dataframe to a list and subsequently ignore the sep="" argument. c combines objects together. Technically, a dataframe is just a list where every column is an element and all elements have to have the same length. So when I combine it with sep="", it just becomes a regular list with the columns of the dataframe as elements.
Why use do.call?
do.call allows you to call a function using a named list as its arguments. You can't just throw the list straight into paste, because it doesn't like dataframes. It's designed for concatenating vectors. So remember that dfargs is a list containing a vector of letters, a vector of numbers and sep which is a length 1 vector containing only "". When I use do.call, the resulting paste function is essentially paste(letters, numbers, sep).
But what if my original dataframe had columns "letters", "numbers", "squigs", "blargs" after which I added the separator like I did before? Then the paste function through do.call would look like:
paste(letters, numbers, squigs, blargs, sep)
So you see it works for any number of columns.

For those using library(tidyverse), you can simply use the unite function.
new.df <- df%>%
unite(together, letters, numbers, sep="")
This will give you a new column called together with A1, B2, etc.

This is indeed a little weird, but this is also what is supposed to happen.
When you create the data.frame as you did, column letters is stored as factor. Naturally factors have no ordering, therefore when as.numeric() is applied to a factor it returns the ordering of of the factor. For example:
> df[, 1]
[1] A B C D E
Levels: A B C D E
> as.numeric(df[, 1])
[1] 1 2 3 4 5
A is the first level of the factor df[, 1] therefore A gets converted to the value 1, when as.numeric is applied. This is what happens when you call paste(df[1, ]). Since columns 1 and 2 are of different class, paste first transforms both elements of row 1 to numeric then to characters.
When you want to concatenate both columns, you first need to transform the first row to character:
df[, 1] <- as.character(df[, 1])
paste(df[1,], collapse = "")
As #sebastian-c pointed out, you can also use stringsAsFactors = FALSE in the creation of the data.frame, then you can omit the as.character() step.

if you want to start with
df <- data.frame(letters = LETTERS[1:5], numbers = 1:5, stringsAsFactors=TRUE)
.. then there is no general rule about how df$letters will be interpreted by any given function. It's a factor for modelling functions, character for some and integer for some others. Even the same function such as paste may interpret it differently, depending on how you use it:
paste(df[1,], collapse="") # "11"
apply(df, 1, paste, collapse="") # "A1" "B2" "C3" "D4" "E5"
No logic in it except that it will probably make sense once you know the internals of every function.
The factors seem to be converted to integers when an argument is converted to vector (as you know, data frames are lists of vectors of equal length, so the first row of a data frame is also a list, and when it is forced to be a vector, something like this happens:)
df[1,]
# letters numbers
# 1 A 1
unlist(df[1,])
# letters numbers
# 1 1
I don't know how apply achieves what it does (i.e., factors are represented by character values) -- if you're interested, look at its source code. It may be useful to know, though, that you can trust (in this specific sense) apply (in this specific occasion). More generally, it is useful to store every piece of data in a sensible format, that includes storing strings as strings, i.e., using stringsAsFactors=FALSE.
Btw, every introductory R book should have this idea in a subtitle. For example, my plan for retirement is to write "A (not so) gentle introduction to the zen of data fishery with R, the stringsAsFactors=FALSE way".

Related

Why does apply(x, 1, paste0(collapse="") leave white space between positive values?

When I apply across columns in this example I get a white space for positive valued numbers but not for negative values? Why is this? Shouldn't paste0 remove whitespace between elements? The context behind this problem is that I am trying to form endpoints for the googlemaps directions api.
library(dplyr)
stop_latlon <- data.frame(lat = paste0("via:", rnorm(10)), lon = rnorm(10))
stop_latlon %>%
apply(1, function(x) paste0(x, collapse = "%7"))
edit: I think that it has something to do with running apply on a dataframe with different data types (lat is a character and lon is a numeric)
Why does the white space show up?
paste0 doesn't add white space - nor does it remove it. You can test this by just calling paste0 on your vector.
apply runs on matrices and arrays, not data frames. When you pass a data frame to apply, it is coerced to a matrix. The main thing about a matrix, of course, is that all elements must be the same type. Since strings or factors can't generally be coerced to numerics, your numeric is coerced to a string or factor to match the first column. If you examine as.matrix.data.frame, you'll see that format is used for this conversion, and ?format shows a default trim = FALSE that says
trim; if FALSE, logical, numeric and complex values are right-justified to a common width: if TRUE the leading blanks for justification are suppressed.
So there's your problem!
What's the solution?
paste and paste0 are vectorized, so there's no reason to apply them one row at a time. You can just paste the columns together directly:
with(stop_latlon, paste0(lat, "%7", lon))
In a more complicated case where apply really would be necessary, the solution would be to handle your own matrix conversion rather than relying on apply to do it with defaults. If you made all the columns strings before passing the data to apply, (or if you used a character matrix instead of a data frame), the conversion would be straightforward (or unnecessary).
Since you are already using dplyr, a dplyr solution is to use
stop_latlon %>% rowwise() %>%
summarise(latlon = paste0(lat, "%7", lon))
# A tibble: 10 x 1
latlon
<chr>
1 via:1.222988975822%7-0.0916195541513781
2 via:0.159343465931011%72.13195314768885
3 via:-1.20468509249113%70.207717129395512
4 via:-0.134019685121819%7-0.912028913867691
5 via:-0.279895116522155%71.93812564387851
6 via:1.34379237820276%70.500525410068601
7 via:0.808272181619927%7-0.942578996972991
8 via:-1.17359899808855%70.126116638988962
9 via:1.1859602145711%7-1.00865269561505
10 via:1.77635906904826%70.685722866041471
Using a tibble instead of a data.frame by default will not convert your vector to a factor, which I think is desirable in this instance.
Additionally, regarding your question about paste0, it does not remove whitespace between words, it just doesn't add them when concatenating. str_trim in the stringr package will trim whitespace for you.
stop_latlon <- data.frame(lat = paste0("via:", rnorm(10)),
lon = rnorm(10), stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
library(stringr)
stop_latlon %>%
apply(1, function(x) paste0(str_trim(x), collapse = "%7"))
Will also provide the desired result.

Subset data frame based on character vector of column names [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Drop data frame columns by name
(25 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
Rookie question - thanks in advance for patience...
I have a dataframe:
vals <- c(1,1,1,1)
testdf <- data.frame("var1"=vals, "var2"=vals, "var3"=vals)
I have a character vector of variable names:
varnames <- c("var1", "var2")
This is a character vector b/c I use it to generate a formula earlier in the script.
I'd like to subset a dataframe such that variables in varnames are excluded, e.g.
newDF <- subset(df, select=-varnames)
This creates an error since subset expects names instead of characters. So, I use lapply to change the characters to names:
varnames <- lapply(varnames, as.name)
The result of this lapply function is a named(?) and nested(?) list.
[[1]]
var1
[[2]]
var2
[[3]]
var3
Here's where I get lost (I feel like Mugatu on crazy pills... is this confusing to anyone else!?). I can see that each value has correctly been changed from character to name, but it's in this weird nested structure - so when I try to subset, I get an error.
I've tried various solutions to unnest and unname, but with no success. This must be something easy I'm missing.
As a bonus - can someone tell me why it is ever useful for lapply to return this nested named list instead of simple vector? It seems very different than, for instance, Python. Thank you.
You can define the names of the columns you want inside [ (see the help file ?Extract or help("[") for the subset operator [).
testdf[ names(testdf)[!names(testdf) %in% varnames] ]
## or
## testdf[, names(testdf)[!names(testdf) %in% varnames] , drop = FALSE]
Or, more concisely (thanks #Frank)
testdf[ setdiff(names(testdf), varnames)]
var3
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 1
where
names(testdf)
# [1] "var1" "var2" "var3"
varnames
# [1] "var1" "var2"
And So
names(testdf) %in% varnames
# [1] TRUE TRUE FALSE
And therefore
names(testdf)[!names(testdf) %in% varnames]
# [1] "var3"
Which is the same as
testdf[, "var3" ]
And drop = FALSE to stop it 'dropping' to a vector if there's only one column returned.
Also, if you look at the help file for lapply(X, FUN, ...)
?lapply
lapply returns a list of the same length as X
This is why you're getting a list.
As a bonus - can someone tell me why it is ever useful for lapply to return this nested named list instead of simple vector? It seems very different than, for instance, Python. Thank you.
When you're working with a list, and you want it to remain as a list.
You can also use match which returns an index
testdf[-match(varnames,names(testdf))]
# var3
#1 1
#2 1
#3 1
#4 1
You can access the elements using varnames[[1]] etc. and convert it into a vector, if it makes it easier for you.
Source: https://www.datacamp.com/community/tutorials/r-tutorial-apply-family
lapply takes a list and applies the function to every element of the list. The list can also have another list as an element. So it takes that into consideration and returns that nested structure.

Assigning automatic class based on various columns in R [duplicate]

I would like to take a data frame with characters and numbers, and concatenate all of the elements of the each row into a single string, which would be stored as a single element in a vector. As an example, I make a data frame of letters and numbers, and then I would like to concatenate the first row via the paste function, and hopefully return the value "A1"
df <- data.frame(letters = LETTERS[1:5], numbers = 1:5)
df
## letters numbers
## 1 A 1
## 2 B 2
## 3 C 3
## 4 D 4
## 5 E 5
paste(df[1,], sep =".")
## [1] "1" "1"
So paste is converting each element of the row into an integer that corresponds to the 'index of the corresponding level' as if it were a factor, and it keeps it a vector of length two. (I know/believe that factors that are coerced to be characters behave in this way, but as R is not storing df[1,] as a factor at all (tested by is.factor(), I can't verify that it is actually an index for a level)
is.factor(df[1,])
## [1] FALSE
is.vector(df[1,])
## [1] FALSE
So if it is not a vector then it makes sense that it is behaving oddly, but I can't coerce it into a vector
> is.vector(as.vector(df[1,]))
[1] FALSE
Using as.character did not seem to help in my attempts
Can anyone explain this behavior?
While others have focused on why your code isn't working and how to improve it, I'm going to try and focus more on getting the result you want. From your description, it seems you can readily achieve what you want using paste:
df <- data.frame(letters = LETTERS[1:5], numbers = 1:5, stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
paste(df$letters, df$numbers, sep=""))
## [1] "A1" "B2" "C3" "D4" "E5"
You can change df$letters to character using df$letters <- as.character(df$letters) if you don't want to use the stringsAsFactors argument.
But let's assume that's not what you want. Let's assume you have hundreds of columns and you want to paste them all together. We can do that with your minimal example too:
df_args <- c(df, sep="")
do.call(paste, df_args)
## [1] "A1" "B2" "C3" "D4" "E5"
EDIT: Alternative method and explanation:
I realised the problem you're having is a combination of the fact that you're using a factor and that you're using the sep argument instead of collapse (as #adibender picked up). The difference is that sep gives the separator between two separate vectors and collapse gives separators within a vector. When you use df[1,], you supply a single vector to paste and hence you must use the collapse argument. Using your idea of getting every row and concatenating them, the following line of code will do exactly what you want:
apply(df, 1, paste, collapse="")
Ok, now for the explanations:
Why won't as.list work?
as.list converts an object to a list. So it does work. It will convert your dataframe to a list and subsequently ignore the sep="" argument. c combines objects together. Technically, a dataframe is just a list where every column is an element and all elements have to have the same length. So when I combine it with sep="", it just becomes a regular list with the columns of the dataframe as elements.
Why use do.call?
do.call allows you to call a function using a named list as its arguments. You can't just throw the list straight into paste, because it doesn't like dataframes. It's designed for concatenating vectors. So remember that dfargs is a list containing a vector of letters, a vector of numbers and sep which is a length 1 vector containing only "". When I use do.call, the resulting paste function is essentially paste(letters, numbers, sep).
But what if my original dataframe had columns "letters", "numbers", "squigs", "blargs" after which I added the separator like I did before? Then the paste function through do.call would look like:
paste(letters, numbers, squigs, blargs, sep)
So you see it works for any number of columns.
For those using library(tidyverse), you can simply use the unite function.
new.df <- df%>%
unite(together, letters, numbers, sep="")
This will give you a new column called together with A1, B2, etc.
This is indeed a little weird, but this is also what is supposed to happen.
When you create the data.frame as you did, column letters is stored as factor. Naturally factors have no ordering, therefore when as.numeric() is applied to a factor it returns the ordering of of the factor. For example:
> df[, 1]
[1] A B C D E
Levels: A B C D E
> as.numeric(df[, 1])
[1] 1 2 3 4 5
A is the first level of the factor df[, 1] therefore A gets converted to the value 1, when as.numeric is applied. This is what happens when you call paste(df[1, ]). Since columns 1 and 2 are of different class, paste first transforms both elements of row 1 to numeric then to characters.
When you want to concatenate both columns, you first need to transform the first row to character:
df[, 1] <- as.character(df[, 1])
paste(df[1,], collapse = "")
As #sebastian-c pointed out, you can also use stringsAsFactors = FALSE in the creation of the data.frame, then you can omit the as.character() step.
if you want to start with
df <- data.frame(letters = LETTERS[1:5], numbers = 1:5, stringsAsFactors=TRUE)
.. then there is no general rule about how df$letters will be interpreted by any given function. It's a factor for modelling functions, character for some and integer for some others. Even the same function such as paste may interpret it differently, depending on how you use it:
paste(df[1,], collapse="") # "11"
apply(df, 1, paste, collapse="") # "A1" "B2" "C3" "D4" "E5"
No logic in it except that it will probably make sense once you know the internals of every function.
The factors seem to be converted to integers when an argument is converted to vector (as you know, data frames are lists of vectors of equal length, so the first row of a data frame is also a list, and when it is forced to be a vector, something like this happens:)
df[1,]
# letters numbers
# 1 A 1
unlist(df[1,])
# letters numbers
# 1 1
I don't know how apply achieves what it does (i.e., factors are represented by character values) -- if you're interested, look at its source code. It may be useful to know, though, that you can trust (in this specific sense) apply (in this specific occasion). More generally, it is useful to store every piece of data in a sensible format, that includes storing strings as strings, i.e., using stringsAsFactors=FALSE.
Btw, every introductory R book should have this idea in a subtitle. For example, my plan for retirement is to write "A (not so) gentle introduction to the zen of data fishery with R, the stringsAsFactors=FALSE way".

Concatenating strings from different rows in R

I have a R data frame which looks like
data.1 data.character
a **str1**,str2,str2,str3,str4,str5,str6
b str3,str4,str5
c **str1**,str6
I am currently using grepl to identify if the column data.character has my search string "<str>" and if so I want all the row values in data.1 to be concatenated into one string with a separator
eg. if I use grepl(str1,data.character) it will return two rows of df$data.1 and I want an output like
a,c ( rows which contain str1 in data.character)
I am currently using two for loops but i know this is not an efficient method. I was wondering if someone could suggest a more elegant and less time consuming method.
You were almost there - (now my long-winded answer)
# Data
df <- read.table(text="data.1 data.character
a **str1**,str2,str2,str3,str4,str5,str6
b str3,str4,str5
c **str1**,str6",header=T,stringsAsFactors=F)
Match string
# In your question you used grepl which produces a logical vector (TRUE if
#string is present)
grepl("str1" , df$data.character)
#[1] TRUE FALSE TRUE
# In my comment I used grep which produces an positional index of the vector if
# string is present (this was due to me not reading your grepl properly rather
# than because of any property)
grep("str1" , df$data.character)
# [1] 1 3
Then subset the vector that you want at these positions resulting from grep (or grepl)
(s <- df$data.1[grepl("str1" , df$data.character)])
# [1] "a" "c" first and third elements are selected
Paste these together into the required format (collapse argument is used to define the separator between the elements)
paste(s,collapse=",")
# [1] "a,c"
So more succinctly
paste(df$data.1[grep("str1" , df$data.character)],collapse=",")

Losing Class information when I use apply in R

When I pass a row of a data frame to a function using apply, I lose the class information of the elements of that row. They all turn into 'character'. The following is a simple example. I want to add a couple of years to the 3 stooges ages. When I try to add 2 a value that had been numeric R says "non-numeric argument to binary operator." How do I avoid this?
age = c(20, 30, 50)
who = c("Larry", "Curly", "Mo")
df = data.frame(who, age)
colnames(df) <- c( '_who_', '_age_')
dfunc <- function (er) {
print(er['_age_'])
print(er[2])
print(is.numeric(er[2]))
print(class(er[2]))
return (er[2] + 2)
}
a <- apply(df,1, dfunc)
Output follows:
_age_
"20"
_age_
"20"
[1] FALSE
[1] "character"
Error in er[2] + 2 : non-numeric argument to binary operator
apply only really works on matrices (which have the same type for all elements). When you run it on a data.frame, it simply calls as.matrix first.
The easiest way around this is to work on the numeric columns only:
# skips the first column
a <- apply(df[, -1, drop=FALSE],1, dfunc)
# Or in two steps:
m <- as.matrix(df[, -1, drop=FALSE])
a <- apply(m,1, dfunc)
The drop=FALSE is needed to avoid getting a single column vector.
-1 means all-but-the first column, you could instead explicitly specify the columns you want, for example df[, c('foo', 'bar')]
UPDATE
If you want your function to access one full data.frame row at a time, there are (at least) two options:
# "loop" over the index and extract a row at a time
sapply(seq_len(nrow(df)), function(i) dfunc(df[i,]))
# Use split to produce a list where each element is a row
sapply(split(df, seq_len(nrow(df))), dfunc)
The first option is probably better for large data frames since it doesn't have to create a huge list structure upfront.

Resources